Somatostatin and Somatostatin Receptors: From Signaling to Clinical Applications in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

"Cold" Somatostatin Analogs in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Decoding Mechanisms, Overcoming Resistance, and Shaping the Future of Therapy

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) represent a heterogeneous group of tumors that pose significant therapeutic challenges due to their potential for progression, metastasis, and hormonal syndromes. Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) have emerged as a cornerstone in NEN treatment, offering both antisecretory and antiproliferative effects by targeting somatostatin receptors (SSTRs). Despite their proven efficacy, intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms, including receptor downregulation, tumor heterogeneity, and microenvironmental influences, limit their long-term effectiveness. Recent advances, including high-dose SSA regimens and novel formulations, have aimed to optimize their therapeutic utility and address these limitations. Body of the review. This review explores the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the antitumor effects of SSAs, including receptor-mediated signaling pathways, cell cycle arrest, apoptosis induction, and antiangiogenesis. The role of SSAs in combination therapies with mTOR inhibitors and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is analyzed, emphasizing their synergistic potential. Key clinical trials, such as RADIANT-2, EVERLAR, and NETTER-1, support the efficacy of these approaches, demonstrating improved outcomes when SSAs are combined with targeted agents or radiolabeled therapies. Emerging strategies include high-dose SSA regimens, particularly in progressive cases with low Ki67 indices. Finally, novel formulations, including oral octreotide, paltusotine, and subcutaneous depot formulations like CAM2029, offer improved pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and patient adherence. Ongoing clinical trials, including SORENTO, further evaluate their efficacy and safety profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of SSAs. SSAs remain integral to the management of NENs, providing effective tumor stabilization and symptom control. However, resistance mechanisms and tumor heterogeneity necessitate innovative approaches, including high-dose regimens, combination strategies, and next-generation formulations. Future research should focus on refining these strategies to optimize patient outcomes, enhance long-term efficacy, and expand the therapeutic landscape for NENs.

Treatment of advanced BP-NETS with lanreotide autogel/depot vs placebo: the phase III SPINET study

Prospective data are lacking on early somatostatin analog (SSA) therapy in bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumors (BP-NETs; typical carcinoids and atypical carcinoids (TCs and ACs)). SPINET (EudraCT: 2015-004992-62; NCT02683941) was a phase III, double-blind study of lanreotide autogel/depot (LAN; 120 mg every 28 days) plus best supportive care (BSC) vs placebo plus BSC, with an optional open-label treatment phase (LAN plus BSC). Patients had metastatic/unresectable, somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive TCs or ACs. Recruitment was stopped early owing to slow accrual; eligible patients from the double-blind phase transitioned to open-label LAN. The adapted primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) during either phase for patients receiving LAN. Seventy-seven patients were randomized (LAN, n = 51 (TCs, n = 29; ACs, n = 22); placebo, n = 26 (TCs, n = 16; ACs, n = 10)). Median (95% CI) PFS during double-blind and open-label phases in patients receiving LAN was 16.6 (11.3; 21.9) months overall (primary endpoint), 21.9 (12.8, not calculable (NC)) months in TCs, and 13.8 (5.4; 16.6) months in ACs. During double-blind treatment, median (95% CI) PFS was 16.6 (11.3; 21.9) months for LAN vs 13.6 (8.3; NC) months for placebo (not significant); corresponding values were 21.9 (13.8; NC) and 13.9 (13.4; NC) months, respectively, in TCs and 13.8 (5.4; 16.6) and 11.0 (2.8; 16.9) months, respectively, in ACs. Patients' quality of life did not deteriorate and LAN was well tolerated. Although recruitment stopped early and the predefined sample size was not met, SPINET is the largest prospective study to date of SSA therapy in SSTR-positive TCs and ACs and suggests clinical benefit in TCs.

Surgical Management and Long-Term Evaluation of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) arise from neuroendocrine cells and are a rare class of heterogenous tumors with increasing incidence. The diagnosis, staging, treatment, and prognosis of PNETs depend heavily on identifying the histologic features and biological mechanisms. Here, the authors provide an overview of the diagnostic workup (biomarkers and imaging), grade, and staging of PNETs. The authors also explore associated genetic mutations and molecular pathways and describe updated guidelines on surgical and systemic treatment modalities.

Radiation Safety Assessment of 177Lu-DOTATATE Intra-arterial Peptide Receptor Therapy (PRRT)

Objective

177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor therapy (PRRT) is an established treatment for patients suffering from neuroendocrine tumors. In the last few years, intra-arterial PRRT is being considered for patients having liver metastatic disease predominantly. The aim of our study is to measure the radiation doses received by the treating intervention radiologists involved in intra-arterial PRRT treatment using 177Lu-DOTATATE.

Materials and Methods

Radiation safety-related data of 31 patients who underwent 177Lu-DOTATATE intra-arterial PRRT treatment were used for this study. The exposure rate was measured at the hand and eye and chest level of treating intervention radiologists continuously from the beginning to the end of the administration. Exposure from the patient at the body surface (at the level of liver, thigh, and extremities) and 1 m from the body surface was measured just after the administration. The mean radiation exposure from the patient at the body surface and 1 m from the body was also calculated.

Results

The mean administered activity was found to be 194 (±17) mCi. The mean radiation exposure at the surface at the level of the liver, thigh, and feet and at 1 m from the surface was found to be 100 (±25.11), 9 (±1.27), 5.6 (±0.52), and 5.3± (0.50) μSv/hr, respectively. The mean administration time was found to be 23 ± 5.6 min. The mean radiation dose to the hands, and eyes, of the treating intervention radiologist per procedure, was found to be 6.425 ± 2.75 μSv, 5.43 ± 1.76 μSv and 1-m exposure from the patient was found to be 5.3 ± 0.246 μSv, respectively.

Conclusion

Our result shows that the radiation exposure from the patient postadministration is below the permissible limit of discharge. The radiation exposure to the intervention radiologist is also suggestive of a safe procedure to be performed by maintaining the radiation dose well within the permissible limit for radiation professionals.

CXCR4: From Signaling to Clinical Applications in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

There are several well-described molecular mechanisms that influence cell growth and are related to the development of cancer. Chemokines constitute a fundamental element that is not only involved in local growth but also affects angiogenesis, tumor spread, and metastatic disease. Among them, the C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12) and its specific receptor the chemokine C-X-C motif receptor 4 (CXCR4) have been widely studied. The overexpression in cell membranes of CXCR4 has been shown to be associated with the development of different kinds of histological malignancies, such as adenocarcinomas, epidermoid carcinomas, mesenchymal tumors, or neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The molecular synapsis between CXCL12 and CXCR4 leads to the interaction of G proteins and the activation of different intracellular signaling pathways in both gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) and bronchopulmonary (BP) NENs, conferring greater capacity for locoregional aggressiveness, the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and the appearance of metastases. Therefore, it has been hypothesized as to how to design tools that target this receptor. The aim of this review is to focus on current knowledge of the relationship between CXCR4 and NENs, with a special emphasis on diagnostic and therapeutic molecular targets.

Carrier systems of radiopharmaceuticals and the application in cancer therapy

Radiopharmaceuticals play a vital role in cancer therapy. The carrier of radiopharmaceuticals can precisely locate and guide radionuclides to the target, where radionuclides kill surrounding tumor cells. Effective application of radiopharmaceuticals depends on the selection of an appropriate carrier. Herein, different types of carriers of radiopharmaceuticals and the characteristics are briefly described. Subsequently, we review radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and their derivatives, and novel strategies of radiolabeled mAbs and their derivatives in the treatment of lymphoma and colorectal cancer. Furthermore, this review outlines radiolabeled peptides, and novel strategies of radiolabeled peptides in the treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms, prostate cancer, and gliomas. The emphasis is given to heterodimers, bicyclic peptides, and peptide-modified nanoparticles. Last, the latest developments and applications of radiolabeled nucleic acids and small molecules in cancer therapy are discussed. Thus, this review will contribute to a better understanding of the carrier of radiopharmaceuticals and the application in cancer therapy.

Immunohistochemical somatostatin receptor expression in insulinomas

Insulinomas are rare pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Most patients can be cured with surgery, but patients with a metastatic disease show impaired survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate somatostatin receptor (SSTR) 1-5 expression in insulinomas and to correlate the expression profile with clinicopathological variables and with patient outcome. This retrospective study involved 52 insulinoma patients. After histological re-evaluation, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples were processed into tissue microarrays and stained immunohistochemically with monoclonal SSTR1-5 antibodies. All the 52 tumours (49 non-metastatic, 3 metastatic) expressed at least one SSTR subtype. SSTR2 was expressed most frequently (71%), followed by SSTR3 (33%), SSTR1 (27%), SSTR5 (6%) and SSTR4 (0%). SSTR3 expression was associated with a larger tumour size (median diameter 19 mm vs. 13 mm, p = 0.043), and SSTR3 and SSTR5 expression were associated with impaired overall survival [HR 3.532 (95% CI 1.106-11,277), p = 0.033, and HR 6.805 (95% CI 1.364-33.955), p = 0.019 respectively]. Most insulinomas express SSTR2, which may be utilized in diagnostic imaging, and in planning individualized treatment strategies for insulinoma patients. Further studies are needed to clarify the association between SSTR profile and overall survival.

Somatostatin plus Ulinastatin in the Treatment of Severe Acute Pancreatitis and Its Effect on Serum Cytokine Levels

Objective

To investigate the effect of somatostatin combined with ulinastatin in the treatment of patients with severe acute pancreatitis and its effect on serum cytokine levels.

Methods

This study is a retrospective trial. One hundred patients with severe acute pancreatitis in our hospital between March 2020 and May 2021 were recruited and assigned into the control group (ulinastatin alone) and experimental group (somatostatin plus ulinastatin) according to different treatment methods, 50 cases each. The clinical efficacy and serum cytokine levels of the two groups were compared.

Results

Somatostatin plus ulinastatin was associated with a higher total effective rate versus ulinastatin alone (p < 0.05). After treatment, the experimental group observed significantly better interleukin-10 (IL-10), interleukin-18 (IL-18), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) when compared with those in the control group (p < 0.05); somatostatin plus ulinastatin resulted in better serum amylase, blood calcium, blood urea nitrogen, blood sugar, and white blood cell count versus ulinastatin alone (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Somatostatin plus ulinastatin is a viable alternative in the treatment of patients with severe acute pancreatitis, with a remarkable efficacy profile. It is worthy of clinical application.

Somatostatin receptor ligands suppressed proliferation and lipogenesis in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes

Somatostatin and its analogues, known as somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs), have been reported to attenuate weight gain in some clinical settings. However, their direct effects on preadipocytes are barely investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the influence of SRLs on preadipocytes and to further explore the potential mechanisms. Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, Oil Red O staining, triglyceride contents measurements, qPCR, and western blot were used to investigate the effects of SRLs on preadipocytes. We found that three SRLs (octreotide, TT232, and pasireotide) inhibited cell viability after 8-48 h but not 4 h. Further western blot results showed that they significantly suppressed activation of PI3K/Akt pathway. Besides, lipid accumulation was also significantly inhibited by these SRLs. Moreover, mRNA levels of some critical adipogenic markers, including Pparg, Cebpa, Fasn, Fabp4, Acaca, and Lpl, were downregulated by the treatments of all these SRLs. Consistently, the protein expression of PPARγ, C/EBPα, and FAS were also suppressed by SRLs. SRLs inhibit the proliferation and lipogenesis in preadipocytes. Their inhibitory effects on cell proliferation may be mediated by the downregulated PI3K/Akt pathway, and the suppressive actions on lipogenesis may be related to the decreased PPARγ and C/EBPα expression.

The New Radiolabeled Peptide 99mTcEDDA/HYNIC-TOC: Is It a Feasible Choice for Diagnosing Gastroenteropancreatic NETs?

(1) Background: The aim of our study is to reveal the advantages and limitations of the use of 99mTcEDDA/HYNIC-TOC (Tektrotyd®, Polatom) in the diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and to compare our results with the values obtained for 111In-pentetreotide and 68Ga-DOTA-peptides, routinely used in medical practice. (2) Methods: This retrospective monocentric study included 173 patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors who underwent 99mTcEDDA/HYNIC-TOC scans as part of their clinical management. The examination protocol included a whole-body scan acquired 2 h after the radiotracer's administration, with the SPECT/CT performed 4 h post-injection. Physiological and abnormal uptake were established by two experienced physicians and, based on the obtained results, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. (3) Results: Our method presented a sensitivity of 90.5%, a specificity of 71.9%, and an accuracy of 84.3%, with a positive predictive value of 86.7% and a negative predictive value of 78.8%. (4) Conclusions: 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC, a receptor-based radiopharmaceutical, could represent a competitor for 68Ga-labeled peptides in the diagnosis and management of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Our results show a lower sensitivity (90.5%) than 68Ga-DOTA-peptides, but with great specificity, accuracy, positive, and negative predictive values.