Birds of a Feather Flock Together: Disadvantageous Decision Making in Augmented Restless Legs Syndrome Patients with and without Impulse Control Disorders

Effect of Dopaminergic Therapy on Impulse Control Disorders in Patients With a Prolactinoma

BACKGROUND

Studies have reported an increase in the incidence of impulse control disorders (ICDs) in patient groups treated with dopamine agonists (DAAs), especially in Parkinson disease (PD). However, very few studies have reported on ICDs in individuals with a prolactinoma who were treated with DAAs.

OBJECTIVE

To see whether a DAA by itself causes ICDs in individuals with a prolactinoma by controlling the susceptibility to impulsivity by excluding individuals with other risk factors for ICDs.

METHOD

We compared the performance of 31 individuals with a prolactinoma receiving DAA therapy (DAA+) on various behavioral scales and the Iowa gambling task (IGT), a neuropsychological instrument that measures risky decision-making, with the performance of 20 individuals with a prolactinoma who were not on DAA therapy (DAA-) and 30 healthy controls (HC).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference among the groups concerning performance on the Zuckerman Sensation Seeking Scale-V, Minnesota Impulse Disorders Interview, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11, or IGT. No correlation was found between the scores on these scales and the duration or dose of DAA in the DAA+ group. The incidence of ICDs was 25.8% in the DAA+ group, 15% in the DAA- group, and 16.7% in the HC. The differences among the groups did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Individuals who are under treatment with low-dose, D 2 -selective DAAs for a prolactinoma do not face an increased risk for ICDs, especially when they are carefully screened for any psychiatric comorbidity that may also display impulsivity.

Restless legs syndrome: Over 50 years of European contribution

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a sensorimotor neurological disorder characterised by an urge to move the limbs with a circadian pattern (occurring in the evening/at night), more prominent at rest, and relieved with movements. RLS is one of the most prevalent sleep disorders, occurring in 5%-10% of the European population. Thomas Willis first described RLS clinical cases already in the 17th century, and Karl-Axel Ekbom described the disease as a modern clinical entity in the 20th century. Despite variable severity, RLS can markedly affect sleep (partly through the presence of periodic leg movements) and quality of life, with a relevant socio-economic impact. Thus, its recognition and treatment are essential. However, screening methods present limitations and should be improved. Moreover, available RLS treatment options albeit providing sustained relief to many patients are limited in number. Additionally, the development of augmentation with dopamine agonists represents a major treatment problem. A better understanding of RLS pathomechanisms can bring to light novel treatment possibilities. With emerging new avenues of research in pharmacology, imaging, genetics, and animal models of RLS, this is an interesting and constantly growing field of research. This review will update the reader on the current state of RLS clinical practice and research, with a special focus on the contribution of European researchers.

Objective Measures of Cognitive Performance in Sleep Disorder Research

Neurocognitive tests offer objective and reliable assessment of patients' status and progress. However, there is no consensus on how to use neurocognitive assessment in sleep disorder research. An effective use of neurocognitive assessment must be based on standardized practices and have a firm theoretic basis. The aim of this review is to offer an overview of how different tests have been used in the field, mapping each test onto a corresponding cognitive domain and propose how to move forward with a suggested cognitive battery of tests covering all major cognitive domains.

Cognitive profile in Restless Legs Syndrome: A signal-to-noise ratio account

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common neurological disorder characterized by a sensorimotor condition, where patients feel an uncontrollable urge to move the lower limbs in the evening and/or during the night. RLS does not only have a profound impact on quality of life due to the disturbed night-time sleep, but there is growing evidence that untreated or insufficiently managed RLS might also cause cognitive changes in patients affected by this syndrome. It has been proposed that RLS is caused by alterations in the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and in dopamine (DA) neurotransmission in the nervous system. Based on this evidence, we propose the “SNR-DA hypothesis” as an explanation of how RLS could affect cognitive performance. According to this hypothesis, variations/reductions in the SNR underlie RLS-associated cognitive deficits, which follow an inverted U-shaped function: In unmedicated patients, low dopamine levels worsen the SNR, which eventually impairs cognition. Pharmacological treatment enhances DA levels in medicated patients, which likely improves/normalizes the SNR in case of optimal doses, thus restoring cognition to a normal level. However, overmedication might push patients past the optimal point on the inverted U-shaped curve, where an exaggerated SNR potentially impairs cognitive performance relying on cortical noise such as cognitive flexibility. Based on these assumptions of SNR alterations, we propose to directly measure neural noise via “1/f noise” and related metrics to use transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), a noninvasive brain stimulation method which manipulates the SNR, as a research tool and potential treatment option for RLS.

•

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common neurological disorder.

•

RLS is caused by alterations in the SNR ratio and in DA neurotransmission.

•

The SNR- DA hypothesis how RLS affects cognitive performance is presented.