1
|
Rodriguez A, Ahluwalia MS, Bettegowda C, Brem H, Carter BS, Chang S, Das S, Eberhart C, Garzon-Muvdi T, Hadjipanayis CG, Hawkins C, Jacques TS, Khalessi AA, McDermott MW, Mikkelsen T, Orr BA, Phillips JJ, Rosenblum M, Shelton WJ, Solomon DA, von Deimling A, Woodworth GF, Rutka JT. Toward standardized brain tumor tissue processing protocols in neuro-oncology: a perspective for gliomas and beyond. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1471257. [PMID: 39376983 PMCID: PMC11456923 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1471257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 10/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Implementation of standardized protocols in neurooncology during the surgical resection of brain tumors is needed to advance the clinical treatment paradigms that use tissue for diagnosis, prognosis, bio-banking, and treatment. Currently recommendations on intraoperative tissue procurement only exist for diffuse gliomas but management of other brain tumor subtypes can also benefit from these protocols. Fresh tissue from surgical resection can now be used for intraoperative diagnostics and functional precision medicine assays. A multidisciplinary neuro-oncology perspective is critical to develop the best avenues for practical standardization. This perspective from the multidisciplinary Oncology Tissue Advisory Board (OTAB) discusses current advances, future directions, and the imperative of adopting standardized protocols for diverse brain tumor entities. There is a growing need for consistent operating room practices to enhance patient care, streamline research efforts, and optimize outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Analiz Rodriguez
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Manmeet S. Ahluwalia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Chetan Bettegowda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Henry Brem
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Bob S. Carter
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Susan Chang
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Sunit Das
- Division of Neurosurgery, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Charles Eberhart
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Tomas Garzon-Muvdi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Costas G. Hadjipanayis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Cynthia Hawkins
- Division of Pathology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thomas S. Jacques
- Developmental Biology and Cancer Programme, UCL GOS Institute of Child Health and Department of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander A. Khalessi
- Department of Radiology and Neurosciences, Don and Karen Cohn Chancellor’s Endowed Chair of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Michael W. McDermott
- Division of Neurosurgery, Miami Neuroscience Institute, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Tom Mikkelsen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Brent A. Orr
- Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States
| | - Joanna J. Phillips
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Neuropathology Division, Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Mark Rosenblum
- Department of Neurosurgery, Omics Laboratory, Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - William J. Shelton
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - David A. Solomon
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Andreas von Deimling
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Graeme F. Woodworth
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - James T. Rutka
- Division of Neurosurgery, Chair Emeritus, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Suero Molina E, Bruneau M, Reuter G, Shahein M, Cavallo LM, Daniel RT, Kasper EM, Froelich S, Jouanneau E, Manet R, Messerer M, Mazzatenta D, Meling TR, Roche PH, Schroeder HWS, Tatagiba M, Visocchi M, Prevedello DM, Stummer W, Cornelius JF, EANS Skull Base Section. Fluorescence guidance in skull base surgery: Applications and limitations - A systematic review. BRAIN & SPINE 2024; 4:103328. [PMID: 39309550 PMCID: PMC11416557 DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.103328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Revised: 08/18/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Intraoperative fluorescence guidance is a well-established surgical adjunct in high-grade glioma surgery. In contrast, the clinical use of such dyes and technology has been scarcely reported in skull base surgery. Research question We aimed to systematically review the clinical applications of different fluorophores in both open and endonasal skull base surgery. Material and methods We performed a systematic review and discussed the current literature on fluorescence guidance in skull base surgery. Results After a comprehensive literature search, 77 articles on skull base fluorescence guidance were evaluated. A qualitative analysis of the articles is presented, discussing clinical indications and current controversies. The use of intrathecal fluorescein was the most frequently reported in the literature. Beyond that, 5-ALA and ICG were two other fluorescent dyes most extensively discussed, with some experimental fluorophore applications in skull base surgery. Discussion and conclusion Intraoperative fluorescence imaging can serve as an adjunct technology in skull base surgery. The scope of initial indications of these fluorophores has expanded beyond malignant glioma resection alone. We discuss current use and controversies and present an extensive overview of additional indications for fluorescence imaging in skull base pathologies. Further quantitative studies will be needed in the future, focusing on tissue selectivity and time-dependency of the different fluorophores currently commercially available, as well as the development of new compounds to expand applications and facilitate skull base surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Suero Molina
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
- Macquarie Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael Bruneau
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gilles Reuter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | | | - Luigi M. Cavallo
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Dental Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Federico II University of Naples, Policlinico Federico II University Hospital, Italy
| | - Roy T. Daniel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University Hospital Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ekkehard M. Kasper
- Department of Neurosurgery, Boston University Medical School, MA and Steward Medical Group, Brighton, MA/USA McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Sebastien Froelich
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - Emanuel Jouanneau
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon, France
| | - Romain Manet
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon, France
| | - Mahmoud Messerer
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Dental Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Federico II University of Naples, Policlinico Federico II University Hospital, Italy
| | - Diego Mazzatenta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Sciences Institut IRCCS, Bologna, Italy
| | - Torstein R. Meling
- Department of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Pierre-Hugues Roche
- Department of Neurosurgery, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
| | | | - Marcos Tatagiba
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Massimiliano Visocchi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Neurosurgery Catholic University of Rome, Italy
| | - Daniel M. Prevedello
- Deparmtent of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Walter Stummer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Jan F. Cornelius
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - EANS Skull Base Section
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
- Macquarie Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mansoura University, Egypt
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Dental Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Federico II University of Naples, Policlinico Federico II University Hospital, Italy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University Hospital Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, Boston University Medical School, MA and Steward Medical Group, Brighton, MA/USA McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon, France
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Sciences Institut IRCCS, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Neurosurgery, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Neurosurgery Catholic University of Rome, Italy
- Deparmtent of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ramapriyan R, Clark VE, Martinez-Lage M, Hsueh B, Nahed BV, Curry WT, Choi BD, Carter BS. Fluorescence and immune-cell infiltration of nonneoplastic, postbrachytherapy brain tissue in 5-ALA-guided resection of recurrent anaplastic meningioma: illustrative case. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY. CASE LESSONS 2024; 7:CASE23550. [PMID: 38408351 PMCID: PMC10901117 DOI: 10.3171/case23550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescence-guided surgery is a well-established technique for resecting high-grade gliomas. However, its application in meningiomas, especially those previously treated with radiation therapy, remains under investigation. OBSERVATIONS A 48-year-old female with recurrent anaplastic meningioma, World Health Organization grade 3, underwent a right-sided craniotomy using off-label 5-ALA as a surgical adjunct. The patient had previously undergone brachytherapy seed implantation (20 × cesium 131) for tumor management. During the surgery, a large fluorescent tumor mass adjacent to the brachytherapy-treated area was resected, and the prior brachytherapy seeds were removed. Interestingly, the surrounding brain tissue in the irradiated area showed robust 5-ALA fluorescence. Pathological examination confirmed that the fluorescent brain tissue was nonneoplastic and associated with lymphocyte and macrophage infiltration. LESSONS This case report presents unique 5-ALA fluorescence in nonneoplastic tissue following brachytherapy, which was found during the resection of recurrent anaplastic meningioma. This phenomenon may reflect an intricate interplay among radiation therapy, immune cells, the tumor microenvironment, and 5-ALA metabolism. Given that false-positive findings in fluorescence-guided surgery can lead to unnecessary tissue resection and increased surgical morbidity, further research is warranted to elucidate the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon and its implications for meningioma surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishab Ramapriyan
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and
| | | | - Maria Martinez-Lage
- 2Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - William T Curry
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
De Mauro D, Salber J, Stimolo D, Florian E, Citak M. Use of intra-operative fluorescence imaging in periprosthetic joint infection: State of the art and future perspectives. Technol Health Care 2024; 32:3635-3641. [PMID: 38759036 DOI: 10.3233/thc-240479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), the surgeon's role becomes pivotal in addressing the infection locally, necessitating the surgical removal of infected and necrotic tissue. Opportunity to enhance the visualization of infected tissue during surgery could represent a game-changing innovation. OBJECTIVE The aim of this narrative review is to delineate the application of intraoperative fluorescence imaging for targeting infected tissues in PJIs. METHODS A systematic review, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, was carried out. The search included multiple online database; MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. For data extraction the following were evaluated: (i) diagnosis of musculoskeletal infection; (ii) use of intraoperative fluorescence imaging; (iii) infected or necrotic tissues as target. RESULTS Initially, 116 studies were identified through online database searches and reference investigations. The search was narrowed down to a final list of 5 papers for in-depth analysis at the full-text level. Subsequently, 2 studies were included in the review. The study included a total of 13 patients, focusing on cases of fracture-related infections of the lower limbs. CONCLUSION The primary and crucial role for orthopedic surgeons in PJIs is the surgical debridement and precise removal of necrotic and infected tissue. Technologies that enable clear and accurate visualization of the tissue to be removed can enhance the eradication of infections, thereby promoting healing. A promising avenue for the future involves the potential application of intraoperative fluorescence imaging in pursuit of this objective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico De Mauro
- Helios ENDO-Klinik, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Orthopedics and Geriatric Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
- Department of Public Health, Orthopedic Unit, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy
| | - Jochen Salber
- Department of Experimental Surgery, Center for Clinical Research, Ruhr-Universität, Bochum, Germany
| | - Davide Stimolo
- Helios ENDO-Klinik, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Orthopedics, Musculoskeletal Oncology Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Özdemir Z, Suero Molina E, Hellwig SJ, Stepp H, Stummer W. Second-Generation Wide-Field Visualization Devices for 5-ALA-Induced Fluorescence and Concepts for Validation in Neurosurgery-A Systematic Review. NEUROSURGERY PRACTICE 2023; 4:e00059. [PMID: 39959385 PMCID: PMC11809958 DOI: 10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Fluorescence-guided resection (FGR) of malignant gliomas with five-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is an established method using surgical microscopes equipped with filter systems for observing fluorescence. Over the past decade, new technologies have been introduced for the same purpose, with available publications evaluating their clinical efficacy based on varying criteria. This study aims to review technologies and concepts of validation in the context of 5-ALA-mediated FGR. METHODS A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was performed to identify devices capable of detecting 5-ALA-induced fluorescence. Articles found eligible for this review were analyzed, focusing on the methods of validation used for novel devices. A qualitative analysis is presented. RESULTS Using predefined eligibility criteria, 22 studies were analyzed. Publications on the following visualization devices were reviewed: FL400 (Leica Microsystems), Aeos (Aesculap), BLUE400 and BLUE400 AR Filter System (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG), Endoscope with D-Light C (Karl Storz), Fiberscope N-4L (Machida), ORBEYE 4K 3D Digital Video Microscope (Olympus), and several customized surgical loupe systems. In many cases, validation seemed unstandardized, with inherent biases and limited reproducibility. CONCLUSION This review illustrates the significance of device validation within the framework of FGR. It emphasizes the criticality of validating devices in accordance with established standard, i.e. the BLUE400 filter system, which was employed in the approval studies of 5-ALA. Furthermore, standardized concepts of validation are required to assess whether new devices are, in fact, a reliable or superior alternative in the field of FGR. Published guidelines should be considered when performing future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeynep Özdemir
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Eric Suero Molina
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Sönke J. Hellwig
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Herbert Stepp
- Laser-Forschungslabor, LIFE Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Walter Stummer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gousias K, Trakolis L, Simon M. Meningiomas with CNS invasion. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1189606. [PMID: 37456997 PMCID: PMC10339387 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1189606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
CNS invasion has been included as an independent criterion for the diagnosis of a high-grade (WHO and CNS grade 2 and 3) meningioma in the 2016 and more recently in the 2021 WHO classification. However, the prognostic role of brain invasion has recently been questioned. Also, surgical treatment for brain invasive meningiomas may pose specific challenges. We conducted a systematic review of the 2016-2022 literature on brain invasive meningiomas in Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. The prognostic relevance of brain invasion as a stand-alone criterion is still unclear. Additional and larger studies using robust definitions of histological brain invasion and addressing the issue of sampling errors are clearly warranted. Although the necessity of molecular profiling in meningioma grading, prognostication and decision making in the future is obvious, specific markers for brain invasion are lacking for the time being. Advanced neuroimaging may predict CNS invasion preoperatively. The extent of resection (e.g., the Simpson grading) is an important predictor of tumor recurrence especially in higher grade meningiomas, but also - although likely to a lesser degree - in benign tumors, and therefore also in brain invasive meningiomas with and without other histological features of atypia or malignancy. Hence, surgery for brain invasive meningiomas should follow the principles of maximal but safe resections. There are some data to suggest that safety and functional outcomes in such cases may benefit from the armamentarium of surgical adjuncts commonly used for surgery of eloquent gliomas such as intraoperative monitoring, awake craniotomy, DTI tractography and further advanced intraoperative brain tumor visualization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Gousias
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Marien Academic Hospital Lünen, KLW St. Paulus Corporation, Luenen, Germany
- Medical School, Westfaelische Wilhelms University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
- Medical School, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Leonidas Trakolis
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Marien Academic Hospital Lünen, KLW St. Paulus Corporation, Luenen, Germany
| | - Matthias Simon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bethel Clinic, Medical School, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|