The Performance of Different Machine Learning Algorithm and Regression Models in Predicting High-Grade Intracranial Meningioma

Performance of Radiomics-based machine learning and deep learning-based methods in the prediction of tumor grade in meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) grade of meningiomas is determined based on the biopsy results. Therefore, accurate non-invasive preoperative grading could significantly improve treatment planning and patient outcomes. Considering recent advances in machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of these models in predicting the WHO meningioma grade using imaging data. A systematic search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to April 1, 2024, and reporting the performance metrics of the ML models in predicting of WHO meningioma grade using imaging studies. Pooled area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), specificity, and sensitivity were estimated. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed based on a number of potential influencing variables. A total of 32 studies with 15,365 patients were included in the present study. The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC of ML methods for prediction of tumor grade in meningioma were 85% (95% CI, 79-89%), 87% (95% CI, 81-91%), and 93% (95% CI, 90-95%), respectively. Both the type of validation and study cohort (training or test) were significantly associated with model performance. However, no significant association was found between the sample size or the type of ML method and model performance. The ML predictive models show a high overall performance in predicting the WHO meningioma grade using imaging data. Further studies on the performance of DL algorithms in larger datasets using external validation are needed.

Exploring machine learning applications in Meningioma Research (2004-2023)

Objective

This study aims to examine the trends in machine learning application to meningiomas between 2004 and 2023.

Methods

Publication data were extracted from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) within the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC). Using CiteSpace 6.2.R6, a comprehensive analysis of publications, authors, cited authors, countries, institutions, cited journals, references, and keywords was conducted on December 1, 2023.

Results

The analysis included a total of 342 articles. Prior to 2007, no publications existed in this field, and the number remained modest until 2017. A significant increase occurred in publications from 2018 onwards. The majority of the top 10 authors hailed from Germany and China, with the USA also exerting substantial international influence, particularly in academic institutions. Journals from the IEEE series contributed significantly to the publications. "Deep learning," "brain tumor," and "classification" emerged as the primary keywords of focus among researchers. The developmental pattern in this field primarily involved a combination of interdisciplinary integration and the refinement of major disciplinary branches.

Conclusion

Machine learning has demonstrated significant value in predicting early meningiomas and tailoring treatment plans. Key research focuses involve optimizing detection indicators and selecting superior machine learning algorithms. Future efforts should aim to develop high-performance algorithms to drive further innovation in this field.

Machine Learning in Neurosurgery: Toward Complex Inputs, Actionable Predictions, and Generalizable Translations

Machine learning can predict neurosurgical diagnosis and outcomes, power imaging analysis, and perform robotic navigation and tumor labeling. State-of-the-art models can reconstruct and generate images, predict surgical events from video, and assist in intraoperative decision-making. In this review, we will detail the neurosurgical applications of machine learning, ranging from simple to advanced models, and their potential to transform patient care. As machine learning techniques, outputs, and methods become increasingly complex, their performance is often more impactful yet increasingly difficult to evaluate. We aim to introduce these advancements to the neurosurgical audience while suggesting major potential roadblocks to their safe and effective translation. Unlike the previous generation of machine learning in neurosurgery, the safe translation of recent advancements will be contingent on neurosurgeons' involvement in model development and validation.