1
|
Xie X, Fan L, Chen X, Luo Y, Chen H. The resting-state brain activity and connectivity mediates the effect of overt narcissism on negative physical self. Behav Brain Res 2025; 485:115546. [PMID: 40120946 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2024] [Revised: 03/17/2025] [Accepted: 03/17/2025] [Indexed: 03/25/2025]
Abstract
Overt narcissism is a stable personality trait in which individuals maintain a relatively positive self-image through self-improvement. Previous studies have suggested that examining the neurobiological processes behind personality could help to understand the mechanism by which the personality acts as a risk or protective factor. However, there is a lack of research investigating the neural mechanisms underlying the influence of overt narcissism on negative physical self (NPS). This study evaluated the resting state brain activity (fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations, fALFF) and connectivity (functional connectivity, FC) of 1647 college students. Whole brain correlation analysis showed that overt narcissism was positively correlated with fALFF in the left insula, left precentral gyrus (PreCG) and bilateral superior temporal gyrus (STG). Moreover, overt narcissism exhibited a significant positive correlation with the right STG-PreCG connectivity, and also was significantly positively correlated with FC between the left STG and posterior cingulate gyrus, the left orbitofrontal cortex, the right inferior frontal gyrus and the right thalamus. The results of mediating analysis showed that fALFF in the left PreCG and the right STG-PreCG connectivity partially mediated the effects of overt narcissism on general and facial appearance of NPS, respectively. This study constructed a model (i.e., overt narcissism→brain regions/FC→NPS), providing neurobiological evidence for the relationship between overt narcissism and NPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaowei Xie
- Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
| | - Linlin Fan
- Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
| | - Ximei Chen
- Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
| | - Yijun Luo
- Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
| | - Hong Chen
- Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China; Research Center of Psychology and Social Development, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xu X, Nikolin S, Moffa AH, Xu M, Cao TV, Loo CK, Martin DM. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive training for improving response inhibition: A proof-of-concept, single-blind randomised controlled study. Behav Brain Res 2025; 480:115372. [PMID: 39643046 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2024] [Revised: 11/18/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 12/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Impaired response inhibition is a common characteristic of various psychiatric disorders. Cognitive training (CT) can improve cognitive function, but the benefits may be limited. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising tool to enhance neuroplasticity, and thereby augment the effects of CT. We aimed to investigate the augmentation effects of rTMS on CT for response inhibition in healthy participants. METHODS Sixty healthy participants were randomly assigned to two experimental groups: one with prolonged intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) + CT and the other with sham iTBS + CT over four experimental sessions. Prolonged iTBS (1800 pulses) was used to stimulate the right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC) and pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) in a counterbalanced order. Participants completed a Stop Signal training task following iTBS over one brain region, followed by the Go/No-Go training task after iTBS over the other brain region. The Stroop task with concomitant electroencephalography was conducted before and immediately after the intervention. RESULTS There were no significant differences between groups in behavioural outcomes on the Stop Signal task, Go/No-Go task, Stroop task or Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning for Adults. Similarly, analysis of event-related potentials (ERPs) from the Stroop task (N200 and N400) and exploratory cluster-based permutation analysis did not reveal any significant differences between groups. Subgroup analyses revealed that individuals with higher baseline impulsivity exhibited better learning effects in the active group. CONCLUSIONS This first proof of concept study did not find evidence that four sessions of active rTMS + CT could induce cognitive or neurophysiological effects on response inhibition in healthy participants. However, subgroup analyses suggests that rTMS combined with CT could be useful in improving response inhibition in individuals with high impulsivity. It is recommended that future proof of concept studies examine its potential in this clinical population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaomin Xu
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faulty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Stevan Nikolin
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faulty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Adriano H Moffa
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faulty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Mei Xu
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faulty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Thanh Vinh Cao
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faulty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Colleen K Loo
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faulty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Donel M Martin
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faulty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Steardo L, D'Angelo M, Monaco F, Di Stefano V, Steardo L. Decoding neural circuit dysregulation in bipolar disorder: Toward an advanced paradigm for multidimensional cognitive, emotional, and psychomotor treatment. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2025; 169:106030. [PMID: 39894420 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2024] [Revised: 01/09/2025] [Accepted: 01/25/2025] [Indexed: 02/04/2025]
Abstract
Bipolar disorder (BD) is characterized by a complex constellation of emotional, cognitive, and psychomotor disturbances, each deeply intertwined with underlying dysfunctions in large-scale brain networks and neurotransmitter systems. This manuscript integrates recent advances in neuroimaging, neuromodulation, and pharmacological research to provide a comprehensive view of BD's pathophysiology, emphasizing the role of network-specific dysfunctions and their clinical manifestations. We explore how dysregulation within the fronto-limbic network, particularly involving the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and amygdala, underpins the emotional instability that defines both manic and depressive episodes. Additionally, impairments in the central executive network (CEN) and default mode network (DMN) are linked to cognitive deficits, with hyperactivity in the DMN driving rumination and cognitive inflexibility, while CEN underactivity contributes to attentional lapses and impaired executive function. Psychomotor symptoms, which oscillate between hyperactivity in mania and retardation in depression, are closely associated with imbalances in neurotransmitter systems, particularly dopamine and serotonin, within the basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical motor pathway. Recent studies indicate that these psychomotor disturbances are further exacerbated by disruptions in network connectivity, leading to impairments in both motor control and emotional regulation. Emerging therapeutic strategies are discussed, with a focus on neuromodulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS), which show promise in restoring balance within these critical networks. Furthermore, pharmacological interventions that modulate synaptic functioning and neuronal plasticity offer potential for addressing both the emotional and motor symptoms of BD. This manuscript underscores the need for an integrative treatment approach that simultaneously targets neural circuits and neurotransmitter systems to address the full spectrum of symptoms in BD. Drawing on recent advancements in neurobiological models and therapeutic frameworks, this proposal outlines a pathway for the development of precision-tailored interventions. These approaches are designed to optimize cognitive, emotional, and psychomotor outcomes, ultimately striving to elevate the quality of life for individuals living with bipolar disorder (BD), while remaining firmly grounded in the latest empirical evidence and theoretical insights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Steardo
- Psychiatry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro Magna Graecia, Catanzaro 88100, Italy
| | - Martina D'Angelo
- Psychiatry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro Magna Graecia, Catanzaro 88100, Italy.
| | - Francesco Monaco
- Department of Mental Health, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Salerno, Salerno, Italy; European Biomedical Research Institute of Salerno (EBRIS), Salerno, Italy.
| | - Valeria Di Stefano
- Psychiatry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro Magna Graecia, Catanzaro 88100, Italy.
| | - Luca Steardo
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology "Vittorio Erspamer", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00185, Italy; Department of Clinical Psychology, University Giustino Fortunato, Benevento 82100, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Trapp NT, Purgianto A, Taylor JJ, Singh MK, Oberman LM, Mickey BJ, Youssef NA, Solzbacher D, Zebley B, Cabrera LY, Conroy S, Cristancho M, Richards JR, Flood MJ, Barbour T, Blumberger DM, Taylor SF, Feifel D, Reti IM, McClintock SM, Lisanby SH, Husain MM. Consensus review and considerations on TMS to treat depression: A comprehensive update endorsed by the National Network of Depression Centers, the Clinical TMS Society, and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Clin Neurophysiol 2025; 170:206-233. [PMID: 39756350 PMCID: PMC11825283 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2024] [Revised: 11/13/2024] [Accepted: 12/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/07/2025]
Abstract
This article updates the prior 2018 consensus statement by the National Network of Depression Centers (NNDC) on the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the treatment of depression, incorporating recent research and clinical developments. Publications on TMS and depression between September 2016 and April 2024 were identified using methods informed by PRISMA guidelines. The NNDC Neuromodulation Work Group met monthly between October 2022 and April 2024 to define important clinical topics and review pertinent literature. A modified Delphi method was used to achieve consensus. 2,396 abstracts and manuscripts met inclusion criteria for review. The work group generated consensus statements which include an updated narrative review of TMS safety, efficacy, and clinical features of use for depression. Considerations related to training, roles/responsibilities of providers, and documentation are also discussed. TMS continues to demonstrate broad evidence for safety and efficacy in treating depression. Newer forms of TMS are faster and potentially more effective than conventional repetitive TMS. Further exploration of targeting methods, use in special populations, and accelerated protocols is encouraged. This article provides an updated overview of topics relevant to the administration of TMS for depression and summarizes expert, consensus opinion on the practice of TMS in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas T Trapp
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA; Iowa Neuroscience Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - Anthony Purgianto
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Joseph J Taylor
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Manpreet K Singh
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Lindsay M Oberman
- Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Brian J Mickey
- Department of Psychiatry, Huntsman Mental Health Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Nagy A Youssef
- Pine Rest Christian Mental Health Services, Grand Rapids, MI, USA; Division of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Daniela Solzbacher
- Department of Psychiatry, Huntsman Mental Health Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Benjamin Zebley
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laura Y Cabrera
- Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Center for Neural Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Susan Conroy
- Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Mario Cristancho
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jackson R Richards
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | - Tracy Barbour
- Division of Neuropsychiatry and Neuromodulation, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel M Blumberger
- Department of Psychiatry, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stephan F Taylor
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - David Feifel
- Kadima Neuropsychiatry Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA; University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Irving M Reti
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shawn M McClintock
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas,TX, USA
| | - Sarah H Lisanby
- Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Division of Translational Research, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Mustafa M Husain
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas,TX, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Göke K, McClintock SM, Mah L, Rajji TK, Lee HH, Nestor SM, Downar J, Noda Y, Daskalakis ZJ, Mulsant BH, Blumberger DM. Cognitive Outcomes After Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Late-Life Depression: Résultats cognitifs après la stimulation magnétique transcrânienne pour le traitement de la dépression chez les personnes âgées. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2025:7067437251315515. [PMID: 39881587 PMCID: PMC11783421 DOI: 10.1177/07067437251315515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Late-life depression (LLD) is often accompanied by cognitive impairment, which may persist despite antidepressant treatment. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an efficacious treatment for depression, with potential benefits on cognitive functioning. However, research on cognitive effects is inconclusive, relatively sparse in LLD, and predominantly focused on group-level cognitive changes. This study aimed to explore individual-level cognitive changes following rTMS treatment in patients with LLD. METHOD Data were analyzed from 153 patients with LLD from the FOUR-D study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02998580) who received bilateral standard rTMS or theta burst stimulation (TBS) targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Cognitive function was assessed pre- and post-treatment using measures of executive function, information processing speed, and learning and memory. Reliable change indices, adjusted for practice effects and test-retest reliability, were employed to evaluate individual-level cognitive changes. Chi-square tests examined if proportions of cognitive improvers differed from expected proportions. RESULTS Cognitive performance from baseline to end of treatment remained stable for most patients. Reliably improved performance was observed in 0.0% to 20.0% of participants across cognitive measures, while worsened performance was observed in 0.0% to 2.7%. A small but significant proportion (20.0%) of participants showed improvement in verbal learning. CONCLUSIONS Bilateral standard rTMS or TBS of the DLPFC in LLD yielded no substantial cognitive enhancing effects, although a small proportion showed improved verbal learning after treatment. Importantly, both interventions were cognitively safe with relatively stable performance across time. Future research is needed to explore approaches to enhance the cognitive benefits of standard rTMS and TBS in patients with LLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Göke
- Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention and Campbell Family Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shawn M. McClintock
- Division of Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Linda Mah
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tarek K. Rajji
- Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention and Campbell Family Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Toronto Dementia Research Alliance, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hyewon H. Lee
- Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention and Campbell Family Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sean M. Nestor
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jonathan Downar
- Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention and Campbell Family Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yoshihiro Noda
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Benoit H. Mulsant
- Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention and Campbell Family Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel M. Blumberger
- Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention and Campbell Family Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Saccenti D, Lauro LJR, Crespi SA, Moro AS, Vergallito A, Grgič RG, Pretti N, Lamanna J, Ferro M. Boosting Psychotherapy With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation: The Whys and Wherefores of Modulating Neural Plasticity to Promote Therapeutic Change. Neural Plast 2024; 2024:7853199. [PMID: 39723244 PMCID: PMC11669434 DOI: 10.1155/np/7853199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 12/04/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The phenomenon of neural plasticity pertains to the intrinsic capacity of neurons to undergo structural and functional reconfiguration through learning and experiential interaction with the environment. These changes could manifest themselves not only as a consequence of various life experiences but also following therapeutic interventions, including the application of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) and psychotherapy. As standalone therapies, both NIBS and psychotherapy have demonstrated their efficacy in the amelioration of psychiatric disorders' symptoms, with a certain variability in terms of effect sizes and duration. Consequently, scholars suggested the convenience of integrating the two interventions into a multimodal treatment to boost and prolong the therapeutic outcomes. Such an approach is still in its infancy, and the physiological underpinnings substantiating the effectiveness and utility of combined interventions are still to be clarified. Therefore, this opinion paper aims to provide a theoretical framework consisting of compelling arguments as to why adding NIBS to psychotherapy can promote therapeutic change. Namely, we will discuss the physiological effects of the two interventions, thus providing a rationale to explain the potential advantages of a combined approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Saccenti
- Department of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonor J. Romero Lauro
- Department of Psychology and NeuroMi, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Cognitive Studies, Cognitive Psychotherapy School and Research Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Sofia A. Crespi
- Cognitive Studies, Cognitive Psychotherapy School and Research Center, Milan, Italy
- Faculty of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea S. Moro
- Department of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, Milan, Italy
- Center for Behavioral Neuroscience and Communication (BNC), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Novella Pretti
- Cognitive Studies, Cognitive Psychotherapy School and Research Center, Milan, Italy
- Clinical Psychology Center, Division of Neurology, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Jacopo Lamanna
- Faculty of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Center for Behavioral Neuroscience and Communication (BNC), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Ferro
- Department of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, Milan, Italy
- Center for Behavioral Neuroscience and Communication (BNC), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Martin DM, Su Y, Chan HF, Dielenberg V, Chow E, Xu M, Wang A, Nikolin S, Moffa AH, Loo CK. Individualised Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Targeting of the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex for Enhancing Cognition: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Brain Sci 2024; 14:299. [PMID: 38671951 PMCID: PMC11048387 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14040299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been demonstrated to produce cognitive enhancing effects across different neuropsychiatric disorders; however, so far, these effects have been limited. This trial investigated the efficacy of using a novel individualised approach to target the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC) for enhancing cognitive flexibility based on performance on a cognitive task. First, forty healthy participants had their single target site at the L-DLPFC determined based on each individual's performance on a random letter generation task. Participants then received, in a cross-over single-blinded experimental design, a single session of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) to their individualised DLPFC target site, an active control site and sham iTBS. Following each treatment condition, participants completed the Task Switching task and Colour-Word Stroop test. There was no significant main effect of treatment condition on the primary outcome measure of switch reaction times from the Task Switching task [F = 1.16 (2, 21.6), p = 0.33] or for any of the secondary cognitive outcome measures. The current results do not support the use of our novel individualised targeting methodology for enhancing cognitive flexibility in healthy participants. Research into alternative methodological targeting approaches is required to further improve rTMS's cognitive enhancing effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donel M. Martin
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
- Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Yon Su
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Ho Fung Chan
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Victoria Dielenberg
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Esther Chow
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Mei Xu
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
- Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Ashley Wang
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Stevan Nikolin
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
- Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Adriano H. Moffa
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
- Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Colleen K. Loo
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
- Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Konrad K, Gerloff C, Kohl SH, Mehler DMA, Mehlem L, Volbert EL, Komorek M, Henn AT, Boecker M, Weiss E, Reindl V. Interpersonal neural synchrony and mental disorders: unlocking potential pathways for clinical interventions. Front Neurosci 2024; 18:1286130. [PMID: 38529267 PMCID: PMC10962391 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1286130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Interpersonal synchronization involves the alignment of behavioral, affective, physiological, and brain states during social interactions. It facilitates empathy, emotion regulation, and prosocial commitment. Mental disorders characterized by social interaction dysfunction, such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD), and Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD), often exhibit atypical synchronization with others across multiple levels. With the introduction of the "second-person" neuroscience perspective, our understanding of interpersonal neural synchronization (INS) has improved, however, so far, it has hardly impacted the development of novel therapeutic interventions. Methods To evaluate the potential of INS-based treatments for mental disorders, we performed two systematic literature searches identifying studies that directly target INS through neurofeedback (12 publications; 9 independent studies) or brain stimulation techniques (7 studies), following PRISMA guidelines. In addition, we narratively review indirect INS manipulations through behavioral, biofeedback, or hormonal interventions. We discuss the potential of such treatments for ASD, RAD, and SAD and using a systematic database search assess the acceptability of neurofeedback (4 studies) and neurostimulation (4 studies) in patients with social dysfunction. Results Although behavioral approaches, such as engaging in eye contact or cooperative actions, have been shown to be associated with increased INS, little is known about potential long-term consequences of such interventions. Few proof-of-concept studies have utilized brain stimulation techniques, like transcranial direct current stimulation or INS-based neurofeedback, showing feasibility and preliminary evidence that such interventions can boost behavioral synchrony and social connectedness. Yet, optimal brain stimulation protocols and neurofeedback parameters are still undefined. For ASD, RAD, or SAD, so far no randomized controlled trial has proven the efficacy of direct INS-based intervention techniques, although in general brain stimulation and neurofeedback methods seem to be well accepted in these patient groups. Discussion Significant work remains to translate INS-based manipulations into effective treatments for social interaction disorders. Future research should focus on mechanistic insights into INS, technological advancements, and rigorous design standards. Furthermore, it will be key to compare interventions directly targeting INS to those targeting other modalities of synchrony as well as to define optimal target dyads and target synchrony states in clinical interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin Konrad
- Child Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany
- JARA Brain Institute II, Molecular Neuroscience and Neuroimaging (INM-11), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany
| | - Christian Gerloff
- Child Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany
- JARA Brain Institute II, Molecular Neuroscience and Neuroimaging (INM-11), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Cambridge Centre for Data-Driven Discovery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Simon H. Kohl
- Child Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany
- JARA Brain Institute II, Molecular Neuroscience and Neuroimaging (INM-11), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany
| | - David M. A. Mehler
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical School, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
- Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Center (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Lena Mehlem
- Child Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany
| | - Emily L. Volbert
- Child Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany
| | - Maike Komorek
- Child Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany
| | - Alina T. Henn
- Child Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany
| | - Maren Boecker
- Child Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany
| | - Eileen Weiss
- Child Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany
| | - Vanessa Reindl
- Child Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|