A Comparative Analysis of Tumors and Plasma Circulating Tumor DNA in 145 Advanced Cancer Patients Annotated by 3 Core Cellular Processes

Pitfalls and Rewards of Setting Up a Liquid Biopsy Approach for the Detection of Driver Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNAs: Our Institutional Experience

We describe our institutional experience of developing a liquid biopsy approach using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis for personalized medicine in cancer patients, focusing on the hurdles encountered during the multistep process in order to benefit other investigators wishing to set up this type of study in their institution. Blood samples were collected at the time of cancer surgery from 209 patients with one of nine different cancer types. Extracted tumor DNA and circulating cell-free DNA were sequenced using cancer-specific panels and the Illumina MiSeq machine. Almost half of the pairs investigated were uninformative, mostly because there was no trackable pathogenic mutation detected in the original tumor. The pairs with interpretable data corresponded to 107 patients. Analysis of 48 gene sequences common to both panels was performed and revealed that about 40% of these pairs contained at least one driver mutation detected in the DNA extracted from plasma. Here, we describe the choice of our overall approach, the selection of the cancer panels, and the difficulties encountered during the multistep process, including the use of several tumor types and in the data analysis. We also describe some case reports using longitudinal samples, illustrating the potential advantages and rewards in performing ctDNA sequencing to monitor tumor burden or guide treatment for cancer patients.

The current state of molecular profiling in gastrointestinal malignancies

This is a review of the current state of molecular profiling in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers and what to expect from this evolving field in the future. Individualized medicine is moving from broad panel testing of numerous genes or gene products in tumor biopsy samples, identifying biomarkers of prognosis and treatment response, to relatively noninvasive liquid biopsy assays, building on what we have learned in our tumor analysis and growing into its own evolving predictive and prognostic subspecialty. Hence, the field of GI precision oncology is exploding, and this review endeavors to summarize where we are now in preparation for the journey ahead.

TP53 Mutations as a Driver of Metastasis Signaling in Advanced Cancer Patients

Molecular profiling with next generation sequencing (NGS) delivers key information on mutant gene sequences, copy number alterations, gene-fusions, and with immunohistochemistry (IHC), is a valuable tool in clinical decision making for patients entering investigational agent trials. Our objective was to elucidate mutational profiles from primary versus metastatic sites from advanced cancer patients to guide rational therapy. All phase I patients (n = 203) with advanced cancer were profiled by commercially available NGS platforms. The samples were annotated by histology, primary and metastatic site, biopsy site, gene mutations, mutation count/gene, and mutant TP53. A molecular profile of each patient was categorized into common and unique mutations, signaling pathways for each profile and TP53 mutations mapped to 3D-structure of p53 bound to DNA and pre/post therapy molecular response. Of the 171 patients analyzed, 145 had genetic alterations from primary and metastatic sites. The predominant histology was adenocarcinoma followed by squamous cell carcinoma, carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUPS), and melanoma. Of 790 unique mutations, TP53 is the most common followed by APC, KRAS, PIK3CA, ATM, PTEN, NOTCH1, BRCA2, BRAF, KMT2D, LRP1B, and CDKN2A. TP53 was found in most metastatic sites and appears to be a key driver of acquired drug resistance. We highlight examples of acquired mutational profiles pre-/post- targeted therapy in multiple tumor types with a menu of potential targeted agents. Conclusion: The mutational profiling of primary and metastatic lesions in cancer patients provides an opportunity to identify TP53 driver 'pathways' that may predict for drug sensitivity/resistance and guide rational drug combinations in clinical trials.

Clinical complexity of utilizing FGFR inhibitors in cancer therapeutics

INTRODUCTION

Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR 1-4) are a highly conserved family of receptor tyrosine kinases, involved in several physiological processes. Genetic aberrations of FGFRs and their ligands, fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are involved in several pathological processes including cancer. The FGF-FGFR axis has emerged as a treatment target in oncology. Because these aberrations drive cancer progression, the development of FGFR targeted therapies have been accelerated.

AREAS COVERED

In this comprehensive review, we evaluate molecular pathology and targeted therapies to FGFRs. We reviewed the evidence for safety and efficacy from preclinical and clinical studies (phase I-III) of FGFR targeted therapies. We also discuss potential challenges in bringing these targeted therapies from bench to bedside and the potential opportunities.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the challenges of the clinical development of FGFR targeted therapies, two FGFR small-molecule inhibitors, namely Erdafitinib and Pemigatinib, are FDA approved for urothelial cancer and cholangiocarcinoma, respectively. Understanding and detection of FGFR genomic aberrations, protein overexpression and the development of isoform-specific inhibitors are factors in the clinical success of these therapies. An enhanced understanding of patient selection based on a gene signatures or biomarkers is key to success of FGFR targeted therapies.

Rare Tumor-Normal Matched Whole Exome Sequencing Identifies Novel Genomic Pathogenic Germline and Somatic Aberrations

Whole exome sequencing (WES) of matched tumor-normal pairs in rare tumors has the potential to identify genome-wide mutations and copy number alterations (CNAs). We evaluated 27 rare cancer patients with tumor-normal matching by WES and tumor-only next generation sequencing (NGS) as a comparator. Our goal was to: 1) identify known and novel variants and CNAs in rare cancers with comparison to common cancers; 2) examine differences between germline and somatic variants and how that functionally impacts rare tumors; 3) detect and characterize alleles in biologically relevant genes-pathways that may be of clinical importance but not represented in classical cancer genes. We identified 3343 germline single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small indel variants-1670 in oncogenes and 1673 in tumor suppressor genes-generating an average of 124 germline variants/case. The number of somatic SNVs and small indels detected in all cases was 523:306 in oncogenes and 217 in tumor suppressor genes. Of the germline variants, six were identified to be pathogenic or likely pathogenic. In the 27 analyzed rare cancer cases, CNAs are variable depending on tumor type, germline pathogenic variants are more common. Cell fate pathway mutations (e.g., Hippo, Notch, Wnt) dominate pathogenesis and double hit (mutation + CNV) represent ~18% cases.