Population Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib in Patients with BRAF-Mutated Metastatic Melanoma

Drug-drug conjugates of MEK and Akt inhibitors for RAS-mutant cancers

Controlling RAS mutant cancer progression remains a significant challenge in developing anticancer drugs. Whereas Ras G12C-covalent binders have received clinical approval, the emergence of further mutations, along with the activation of Ras-related proteins and signals, has led to resistance to Ras binders. To discover novel compounds to overcome this bottleneck, we focused on the concurrent and sustained blocking of two major signaling pathways downstream of Ras. To this end, we synthesized 25 drug-drug conjugates (DDCs) by combining the MEK inhibitor trametinib with Akt inhibitors using seven types of linkers with structural diversity. The DDCs were evaluated for their cell permeability/accumulation and ability to inhibit proliferation in RAS-mutant cell lines. A representative DDC was further evaluated for its effects on signaling proteins, induction of apoptosis-related proteins, and the stability of hepatic metabolic enzymes. These in vitro studies identified a series of DDCs, especially those containing a furan-based linker, with promising properties as agents for treating RAS-mutant cancers. Additionally, in vivo experiments in mice using the two selected DDCs revealed prolonged half-lives and anticancer efficacies comparable to those of trametinib. The PK profiles of trametinib and the Akt inhibitor were unified through the DDC formation. The DDCs developed in this study have potential as drug candidates for the broad inhibition of RAS-mutant cancers.

Clinical Relevance of High Plasma Trough Levels of the Kinase Inhibitors Crizotinib, Alectinib, Osimertinib, Dabrafenib, and Trametinib in NSCLC Patients

BACKGROUND

the study aims to evaluate whether high plasma trough levels of the kinase inhibitors (K.I.s) crizotinib, alectinib, osimertinib, dabrafenib, and trametinib were associated with a higher risk of toxicity in non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with the selected K.I.s were included if at least one plasma trough level at steady state (C min,ss ) was available. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and laboratory databases. The high group for each K.I. was defined as 10% of patients with the highest first C min,ss . The remaining patients were placed in the non-high group. The frequency of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), defined as adverse events leading to dose reduction, dose interruption, or permanent discontinuation, was compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 542 patients were included in the different K.I. groups. A high C min,ss of crizotinib (n = 96), alectinib (n = 105), osimertinib (n = 227), dabrafenib (n = 52), and trametinib (n = 62) correlated with a C min,ss ≥490, ≥870, ≥405, ≥150, and ≥25 ng/mL, respectively. DLTs were more common in the alectinib high group than in the alectinib non-high group (64% vs. 29%, P = 0.036). Liver toxicity was observed in 4 (36%) patients in the high group and 5 (5%) patients in the non-high group ( P = 0.007). For other K.I.s, no significant differences were observed in the frequency of DLTs between the high and non-high groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For alectinib, high C min,ss was correlated with a higher risk of DLT. No differences in the frequency of DLTs were observed between the high and non-high groups for crizotinib, osimertinib, dabrafenib, and trametinib.

The Relationship Between Efficacy and Safety of Osimertinib Blood Concentration in Patients With EGFR Mutation-positive Lung Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND/AIM

Osimertinib blood levels and their impact on treatment continuation in patients with EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer is not known. This study investigated the drug blood levels and risk factors affecting treatment continuation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-six patients with recurrent and inoperable epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer who received Osimertinib (80 mg once daily, daily dose) between October 1, 2016, and August 31, 2021, were included. Patients were classified into two groups using a cutoff blood level of 155 ng/ml. The primary endpoint was the relationship between Osimertinib exposure and efficacy, and secondary endpoints were the relationship between Osimertinib exposure and side effects, and the effect of covariates on efficacy and blood levels.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival (PFS) for evaluable patients in the steady-state trough concentration (Cmin ss) ≥155 ng/ml and Cmin ss <155 ng/ml groups was 18.7 months and 31.2 months. Serum albumin (Alb) levels were 3.73±0.40 g/dl and 3.93±0.28 g/dl (p=0.030), respectively, and in multivariate analysis, Alb <3.7 g/dl was associated with a hazard ratio of 5.304 (95%CI=1.431-19.66; p=0.013), indicating that Alb <3.7 g/dl significantly shortened PFS.

CONCLUSION

Free blood concentration of Osimertinib may have been increased by a combination of factors, including decreased hepatic metabolic function and decreased albumin production caused by systemic inflammation in patients with cancer. However, there was no effect of Osimertinib Cmin ss on PFS.

Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Dabrafenib and Trametinib for Redifferentiation and Treatment of Radioactive Iodine-Resistant Mutated Advanced Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Background: BRAF and MEK inhibitors are cornerstones of the redifferentiation strategy in metastatic radioactive iodine (RAI)-resistant mutant thyroid cancers. We explored the exposure-toxicity relationship for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) onset in patients treated with dabrafenib and/or trametinib and investigated whether plasma exposure was associated with RAI reuptake. Methods: We conducted a retrospective monocentric study in which we reviewed the electronic medical records of patients treated in our institution with a tumor redifferentiation strategy, for whom plasma concentration of dabrafenib, its active metabolite hydroxy-dabrafenib, and trametinib was measured. Trough concentrations (Cminpred) and total plasma drug exposure (area under the curve, AUC) of dabrafenib (AUCDAB), hydroxy-dabrafenib (AUCOHD), and trametinib (AUCTRA) were estimated. Results: Of the 22 patients treated in a redifferentiation strategy between March 2014 and December 2021, 15 were included in this study. A dabrafenib- or trametinib-related DLT was experienced by 8 (62%) and 9 (64%) patients, respectively. Patients who experienced a trametinib-related DLT exhibited a significantly higher last AUCTRA than the average AUCTRA of patients who had no DLT (390, IQR: 67 vs. 215, IQR: 91 ng/mL·h-1, respectively; p = 0.008). Patients who experienced a dabrafenib-related DLT had a higher AUCDAB than observed in other patients (9265 ng/mL·h-1 vs. 6953 ng/mL·h-1, respectively; p = 0.09). No clinical and demographical characteristic was associated with the DLT onset. Overall, 9 of 15 (60%) patients demonstrated tumor redifferentiation. Patients in whom RAI reuptake was achieved had significant lower AUCDAB (6990 ng/mL·h-1 vs. 9764 ng/mL·h-1, p = 0.014; respectively) compared with patients who did not. Moreover, the relative exposure ratio of AUCOHD/DAB was significantly higher in patients who achieved RAI reuptake (1.11 vs. 0.71, respectively; p = 0.0047). Conclusions: Our data suggest a relationship between DLT onset and trametinib plasma exposure, as well as an association between achievement of RAI reuptake and dabrafenib plasma exposure (AUC and ratio of AUCOHD/DAB). These data imply that the use of plasma drug monitoring could be helpful in guiding clinical practice in redifferentiation treatment.

[Unusual association of BRAF and MEK inhibitors: Clinical response of metastatic melanoma treated with dabrafenib-cobimetinib]

Despite the efficacy of targeted therapies in melanoma, the management of adverse events with BRAFi and MEKi (inhibitors) is one of the limits of these treatments. Close monitoring is required to ensure efficacy and patient safety. In this case study, we report a patient treated for metastatic melanoma with an unusual and innovative combination of dabrafenib (BRAFi) and cobimetinib (MEKi), to manage pyrexia, and lead to complete remission for 19 months. This is the first case ever reported of metastatic melanoma treated with this off-label combination and characterized by the use of therapeutic drug monitoring.

The concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used by patients with cancer, although they could reduce the absorption of oral anticancer targeted therapies. The US Food and Drug Administration states that the effect of PPIs on the efficacy of dabrafenib use by patients with metastatic melanoma is unknown. As a precautionary measure, the European Society for Medical Oncology recommends avoiding PPIs for patients receiving dabrafenib.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of the concomitant use of PPIs and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in patients with metastatic melanoma.

METHODS

Patients with advanced melanoma receiving BRAF/MEK inhibitors as first-line treatments between 2015 and 2017 in France were selected using the French National Health Insurance database. We compared time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) according to concomitant PPI exposure. We balanced the baseline characteristics of patients exposed and nonexposed to PPIs using an overlap weighting method based on a propensity score.

RESULTS

The metastatic melanoma cohort comprised 1028 patients receiving BRAF/MEK inhibitors, including 361 (35.1%) patients using PPIs. PPI users had more comorbidities and a more severe metastatic disease. After having equally distributed metastatic sites and comorbidities across patients exposed and nonexposed to PPIs, concomitant PPI use was not associated with shorter TTD [weighted hazard ratio (wHR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-1.24] or OS (wHR 1.11, 95% CI 0.88-1.39). Consistent results were observed when restricting the population to patients receiving dabrafenib, or when narrowing exposure to PPIs with stronger inhibition of cytochromes.

CONCLUSIONS

In a population-based cohort of patients with advanced melanoma, the concomitant use of PPIs and BRAF/MEK inhibitors was not associated with worse outcome.

Monitoring of Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Serum and Self-Sampled Capillary Blood in Patients with BRAFV600-Mutant Melanoma

Patients treated with dabrafenib and trametinib for BRAFV600-mutant melanoma often experience dose reductions and treatment discontinuations. Current knowledge about the associations between patient characteristics, adverse events (AE), and exposure is inconclusive. Our study included 27 patients (including 18 patients for micro-sampling). Dabrafenib and trametinib exposure was prospectively analyzed, and the relevant patient characteristics and AE were reported. Their association with the observed concentrations and Bayesian estimates of the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of (hydroxy-)dabrafenib and trametinib were investigated. Further, the feasibility of at-home sampling of capillary blood was assessed. A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model-informed conversion model was developed to derive serum PK parameters from self-sampled capillary blood. Results showed that (hydroxy-)dabrafenib or trametinib exposure was not associated with age, sex, body mass index, or toxicity. Co-medication with P-glycoprotein inducers was associated with significantly lower trough concentrations of trametinib (p = 0.027) but not (hydroxy-)dabrafenib. Self-sampling of capillary blood was feasible for use in routine care. Our conversion model was adequate for estimating serum PK parameters from micro-samples. Findings do not support a general recommendation for monitoring dabrafenib and trametinib but suggest that monitoring can facilitate making decisions about dosage adjustments. To this end, micro-sampling and the newly developed conversion model may be useful for estimating precise PK parameters.

Exposure-Response Analysis of Osimertinib in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

High interindividual variability (IIV) of the clinical response to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors such as osimertinib in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might be related to the IIV in plasma exposure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the exposure−response relationship for toxicity and efficacy of osimertinib in unselected patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. This retrospective analysis included 87 patients treated with osimertinib. Exposure−toxicity analysis was performed in the entire cohort and survival analysis only in second-line patients (n = 45). No significant relationship between occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity and plasma exposure was observed in the entire cohort (p = 0.23, n = 86). The median overall survival (OS) was approximately two-fold shorter in the 4th quartile (Q4) of osimertinib trough plasma concentration (>235 ng/mL) than in the Q1−Q3 group (12.2 months [CI95% = 8.0−not reached (NR)] vs. 22.7 months [CI95% = 17.1−34.1]), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). To refine this result, the exposure−survival relationship was explored in a cohort of 41 NSCLC patients treated with erlotinib. The Q4 erlotinib exposure group (>1728 ng/mL) exhibited a six-fold shorter median OS than the Q1−Q3 group (4.8 months [CI95% = 3.3-NR] vs. 22.8 months (CI95% = 10.6−37.4), p = 0.00011). These results suggest that high exposure to EGFR inhibitors might be related to worse survival in NSCLC patients.

Evaluating the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring in the clinical use of small molecule kinase inhibitors: a review of the literature

Introduction: Orally administered small molecule kinase inhibitors (KI) are a key class of targeted anti-cancer medicines that have contributed substantially to improved survival outcomes in patients with advanced disease. Since the introduction of KIs in 2001, there has been a building body of evidence that the benefit derived from these drugs may be further enhanced by individualizing dosing on the basis of concentration.Areas covered: This review considers the rationale for individualized KI dosing and the requirements for robust therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Current evidence supporting TDM-guided KI dosing is presented and critically evaluated, and finally potential approaches to address translational challenges for TDM-guided KI dosing and alternate approaches to support individualization of KI dosing are discussed.Expert opinion: Intuitively, the individualization of KI dosing through an approach such as TDM-guided dosing has great potential to enhance the effectiveness and tolerability of these drugs. However, based on current literature evidence it is unrealistic to propose that TDM-guided KI dosing should be routinely implemented into clinical practice.

Monitoring of plasma concentrations of dabrafenib and trametinib in advanced BRAFV600mut melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

Dabrafenib (D) and trametinib (T) improved survival in patients with BRAFV600^mut melanoma. High plasma concentration of D (PCD) is weakly associated with adverse events (AE). We investigated the relationship between PCD/T and tumour control or AE.

METHODS

We analysed PCD/T in patients treated with D+T for metastatic melanoma. We collected data of tumour response (RECIST 1.1) and AE (CTCAE 4.0) blinded to PCD/T results.

RESULTS

We analysed 71 D and 58T assays from 34 patients. High inter-individual variability of PCD (median: 65.0ng/mL; interquartile range (IQR) [4-945]) and of PCT (median: 8.6ng/mL; IQR [5-39]) was observed. We found a weak relationship between PCD and progression-free survival, taking follow-up time into account (hazard ratio 0.991; 95%CI, 0.981 to 1.000; P=0.06). However, no difference was observed between mean PCD/T of progressing patients (n=21; 125±183ng/mL and 9.3±3.6ng/mL, respectively) and responders (complete, partial or stable response) (n=13; 159±225ng/mL, P=0.58 and 10.6±24.4ng/mL, P=0.29, respectively). No significant relationship was found between PCD/T and most common AEs (fever, lymphopenia, CPK increase, and hepatic cytolysis), body mass index, or age. Mean CPT (n=16) was significantly higher for female subjects (n=18; 11.5±4.8ng/mL) than for male subjects (8.8ng/mL±2.9, P=0.01), but no difference was observed between sex and CPD (P=0.32).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a weak relationship between PCD and progression-free survival, but no relationship between PCD/T and AE was found. Monitoring PCD and PCT alone is unlikely to be useful in assessing response to treatment.

Dabrafenib and trametinib exposure-efficacy and tolerance in metastatic melanoma patients: a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic real-life study

PURPOSE

Dabrafenib plus trametinib combination has greatly improved survival in BRAFV600^mut metastatic melanoma patients. However, data regarding the influence of pharmacokinetic markers in real-life patients are lacking. In this study, we aimed to explore dabrafenib and trametinib pharmacokinetic impact on progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR) or all grades treatment-related adverse events (ARAE) occurrence in routine care patients.

METHODS

BRAFV600^mut metastatic melanoma patients initiating standard doses of dabrafenib 150 mg BID plus trametinib 2 mg QD were included. Clinical data were collected via the French biobank MelBase, prospectively enrolling unresectable stage III or IV melanoma. Clinical response evaluation, ARAE reporting and dabrafenib and trametinib plasma quantification were performed. Association of individual Bayesian-estimated pharmacokinetic markers (AUC_0-τ and C_trough) and baseline clinical variables with DOR, PFS, clinical response, and ARAE was then assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (comprising 4 AJCC stage IIIc and 46 stage IV) were included. Median PFS reached 11.4 months, and overall response rate 70%. Fifty percent of patients experienced ARAE (G3 n = 10, G4 n = 0). In univariate analysis, median dabrafenib C_trough within intermediate range was associated with a significantly higher PFS (HR [95% CI] = 0.41 [0.18; 0.91], p = 0.029) and DOR (HR [95% CI] = 0.39 [0.16; 0.94], p = 0.024), and association with DOR remained significant in multivariate analysis (HR [95% CI] = 0.34 [0.12; 0.95], p = 0.040). Trametinib pharmacokinetic markers were significantly higher in patients experiencing ARAE compared to patients without ARAE.

CONCLUSION

In this study, exposure-efficacy and tolerance analysis highlighted the interest of therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize therapeutic management in BRAFV600^mut metastatic melanoma patients based on trough concentrations of dabrafenib and trametinib.

Simultaneous quantification of dabrafenib, hydroxy-dabrafenib and trametinib in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

A new liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the simultaneous quantification of dabrafenib (DAB), its main metabolite hydroxy-dabrafenib (OHD) and trametinib (TRA) in human plasma has been developed and validated. After addition of internal standard (dabrafenib-d9), extraction was achieved after protein precipitation with acetonitrile containing 1 % (v/v) formic acid. Chromatographic separation was performed on an Accucore® C18 (2.1 × 50 mm; 2.6 μm) column using a gradient elution of water acidified with 0.1 % (v/v) formic acid (A) and acetonitrile containing 0.1 % (v/v) formic acid (B) at a flow rate of 500 μL/min. The calibration ranged from 10 to 2000 ng/mL for DAB and OHD and from 5 to 50 ng/mL for TRA. This method was validated with satisfactory results including good precision (intra- and inter-assay coefficient of variation from 2.0 %-14.9 %) and good accuracy (inter- and intra-day bias between -1.2 % and 10.9 %), as well as long term stability in unprocessed plasma at -20 °C. This newly proposed method is useful for clinical research purposes as well as therapeutic drug monitoring for patients with a Rapidly Accelerated Fibrosarcoma kinase B (BRAF)-mutated cancer.

Targeted Therapies for Melanoma

The incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma is increasing worldwide. Despite available modern therapeutical options, long-term survival of patients in advanced stages of the disease remains rather limited until now. Detailed insights into etiopathogenesis and mechanisms of tumour progression enable physicians to manipulate distinct molecular structures and pathways therapeutically and so treat the tumour. Unfortunately, the acquisition of therapeutic resistance frequently terminates these therapeutical interventions. The presented special issue is focusing on the research and therapeutic experience of leading scientists, and it summarises the state of the art of targeted therapy of melanoma and suggests the new perspectives of the treatment of disease.