Kinetics of Renal Function during Induction in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Results of Two Prospective Studies by the German Myeloma Study Group DSMM

Management of multiple myeloma-related renal impairment: recommendations from the International Myeloma Working Group

Here, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) updates its clinical practice recommendations for the management of multiple myeloma-related renal impairment on the basis of data published until Dec 31, 2022. All patients with multiple myeloma and renal impairment should have serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and free light chains (FLCs) measurements together with 24-h urine total protein, electrophoresis, and immunofixation. If non-selective proteinuria (mainly albuminuria) or involved serum FLCs value less than 500 mg/L is detected, then a renal biopsy is needed. The IMWG criteria for the definition of renal response should be used. Supportive care and high-dose dexamethasone are required for all patients with myeloma-induced renal impairment. Mechanical approaches do not increase overall survival. Bortezomib-based regimens are the cornerstone of the management of patients with multiple myeloma and renal impairment at diagnosis. New quadruplet and triplet combinations, including proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, improve renal and survival outcomes in both newly diagnosed patients and those with relapsed or refractory disease. Conjugated antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, and T-cell engagers are well tolerated and effective in patients with moderate renal impairment.

An objective assessment in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma to avoid treatment complications and strengthen therapy adherence

In heterogeneous multiple myeloma (MM) patients treatment decisions are challenging. The hypothesis was that adaptation of treatment intensity (dose reduction [DR] vs. none) according to an objective risk score (revised-myeloma comorbidity index [R-MCI]) rather than physician judgement alone may improve therapy efficacy and avoid toxicities. We performed this study in 250 consecutive MM patients who underwent a prospective fitness assessment at our center, after having received induction protocols based on physicians' judgement. DR, serious adverse events (SAE), response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared in fitness (fit, intermediate-fit, frail), age (<60, ≥70 years [y]) and therapy intensity subgroups at baseline and follow-up. Fit and <60 y patients were mostly treated with full intensity, whereas frail and ≥70 y patients usually received DR. Hematological and non-hematological SAE were more frequently seen in frail versus ≥70 y patients. Dose adaptations were mainly necessary in frail patients. OS and PFS were similar in fit and intermediate-fit but significantly worse in frail patients (P=0.0245/P<0.0001), whereas in age-based subgroups, OS and PFS differences did not reach significance (P=0.1362/P=0.0569). Non-hematological SAE were another negative predictor for impaired OS and PFS (P=0.0054/P=0.0021). In the follow-up performed at a median of 11 months after the first fitness assessment, the R-MCI improved or remained stable in 90% versus deteriorated in only 10% of patients. In conclusion, separation by R-MCI/frailty-defined subgroups was superior to age-based subgroups and can be used to improve tailored treatment. Fitter patients benefit from intensive therapies, whereas frail patients bear a need for initial DR.

Response and Dynamics of Renal Function in Transplantation-Eligible Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with a Novel Agent: The CAREMM-2201 Study

Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) frequently results in renal impairment (RI), and its natural course has not been fully elucidated in the era of novel agents. We aimed to identify the dynamics of renal function after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) following induction treatment using a novel agent in transplantation-eligible NDMM patients with RI (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≤50 mL/min/1.73 m²) at diagnosis. The factors associated with achieving a renal response based on the term renal benefit regardless of baseline eGFR were investigated as well. In a multicenter registry database including 1795 patients with plasma cell disorder, 140 transplantation-eligible NDMM patients who developed RI at the time of initiation of treatment for NDMM were identified. They received protocol-based treatment (PBT) consisting of induction treatment using proteasome inhibitors and/or immunomodulatory drugs followed by ASCT. MM and renal responses were evaluated using the International Myeloma Working Group response criteria. To evaluate the standardized improvement of renal function irrespective of baseline eGFR, renal benefit was defined as a sustained (for at least 3 months) increase in eGFR >15 mL/min/1.73 m². The mean patient age was 54.7 ± 7.4 years. With a mean baseline eGFR of 24.8 ± 13.9, the renal complete response (renalCR) and renal benefit rates were 49.3% and 67.9%, respectively. In a multivariable analysis, the 3 factors significantly associated with reduced likelihood of achieving both renalCR and renal benefit were age ≥55 years, light chain type NDMM, and failure to improve eGFR by 5 mL/min/1.73 m² with supportive care when measured 3 days prior to induction therapy and at the initiation of chemotherapy. Hypertension and advanced eGFR also were associated with poor renalCR achievement. The mean eGFR improved until the time of ASCT and then decreased gradually over time. The mean eGFR improved significantly until 4 months post-PBT compared with each eGFR at previous time points, but this significant improvement disappeared by 5 months post-PBT. In a subgroup of patients who developed RI after undergoing ASCT (n = 55), the eGFR increased temporarily at 1 month post-ASCT; however, this improvement reverted to baseline at 2 months post-ASCT. Among another subgroup of 27 patients who were dialysis-dependent at the time of initial treatment, 18 (66.7%) were no longer dialysis-dependent after a median of 60 days. The best renal response was acquired early during the PBT period, and ASCT did not have a robust impact on the renal outcome. Patients who failed to achieve a renal benefit should be provided with the best supportive care for chronic kidney disease, and this simplified criterion for evaluating the renal response needs to be validated in larger studies before it can be recommended. © 2022 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Assessing Pretransplant and Posttransplant Therapy Response in Multiple Myeloma Patients

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematologic cancer defined by an abnormal development of clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow, releasing vast quantities of immunoglobulins and different proteins. In the majority of patients, MM remains incurable despite decades of medical improvement and a number of treatment breakthroughs. Frontline standard-of-care has little long-term success, with the majority of patients eventually relapsing, although the overall progression-free survival (PFS) has improved significantly in the last ten years. Patients who are eligible for a transplant have the highest PFS rate at 5 years, depending on medication response and other various factors that are yet to be discovered. Therefore, the current study aimed to evaluate the response to VCD (bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone) and VTD (bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone) used as pretransplant regimens, as well as to compare responses between thalidomide and lenalidomide used as maintenance therapy posttransplant. This retrospective study was performed on a group of 105 hospitalized patients in the Hematology Department of the Timisoara Municipal Emergency Clinical Hospital between January 2016 and December 2021. Data was collected from the paper records of patients with MM who were under-followed. The treatment regimens used as induction therapy were either VCD or VTD if cyclophosphamide was contraindicated. Of the 105 patients, 27 became eligible for bone marrow transplantation. Furthermore, they received maintenance therapy which was based on either lenalidomide with dexamethasone or thalidomide with dexamethasone. Of the 62 patients treated with VTD, 17.7% were in complete remission before stem cell transplantation. Of the 43 patients treated with VCD, 37.2% were in complete remission. The 5-year mean progression-free survival (PFS) in the entire cohort was better in the group treated with the VTD regimen (31.6 vs. 27.2 months). However, in the 27 patients undergoing maintenance after ASCT, the PFS with thalidomide was 35.5 months (95% CI = 27-42), while the PFS rate in those receiving maintenance treatment with lenalidomide was 46.1 months (95% CI = 20-73). VCD proved to be superior to VTD in inducing complete pretransplant responses. Regarding maintenance therapy, patients from the lenalidomide group had superior responses compared with those under thalidomide.