1
|
Poon DMC, Cheung WSK, Chiu PKF, Chung DHS, Kung JBT, Lam DCM, Leung AKC, Ng ACF, O’Sullivan JM, Teoh JYC, Wu PY, Wu SKK, Kwong PWK. Treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: review of current evidence and synthesis of expert opinions on radioligand therapy. Front Oncol 2025; 15:1530580. [PMID: 40071082 PMCID: PMC11893367 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1530580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/28/2025] [Indexed: 03/14/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the boom in the development of cancer management in the last decade, most patients with metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) eventually progress to metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC) and often require multiple lines of treatment. The treatment landscape of mCRPC has evolved rapidly in recent years, introducing various types of systemic therapies, including taxane-based chemotherapy, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, bone-targeted radionuclides (e.g., radium-223), immune checkpoint inhibitors, poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, and radioligand therapies (RLTs) [e.g., a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand labelled with 177Lu]. Methods To help clinicians navigate the increasingly complex treatment landscape of mCRPC, this article reviews the evidence on different therapeutic regimens from pivotal trials. In addition, it reports on the results of a questionnaire developed and distributed by the Hong Kong Society of Uro-Oncology (HKSUO), with the aim of collecting the perspectives of specialists experienced in the treatment of advanced PCa in Hong Kong with regard to the clinical application of RLT, primarily [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617/analogue therapy. Results A total of 43 questionnaire respondents (including clinical oncologists, urologists, nuclear medicine specialists, and medical oncologists) voted on 27 consensus questions divided into eight sections. Consensus or strong consensus (correspondingly ≥75% or ≥90% acceptance for an answer option) was reached for 10 questions. Subsequently, a panel of 13 local and overseas experts coordinated by the HKSUO discussed the voting results and provided further insights into certain questions. Conclusion The literature review, the voting results of the questionnaire, and the expert opinions are expected to facilitate better understanding of recent therapeutic advancements and the role of novel RLTs in the treatment of mCRPC among clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren M. C. Poon
- Department of Clinical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK
Pao Centre for Cancer, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong
Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital,
Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - William S. K. Cheung
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Hong Kong Sanatorium and
Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Peter K. F. Chiu
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong
Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Daniel H. S. Chung
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital,
Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - John B. T. Kung
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Queen
Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Daisy C. M. Lam
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales
Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | | | - Anthony C. F. Ng
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong
Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Joe M. O’Sullivan
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen’s University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Jeremy Y. C. Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong
Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Philip Y. Wu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Sam K. K. Wu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Hong Kong Sanatorium and
Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gillessen S, Turco F, Davis ID, Efstathiou JA, Fizazi K, James ND, Shore N, Small E, Smith M, Sweeney CJ, Tombal B, Zilli T, Agarwal N, Antonarakis ES, Aparicio A, Armstrong AJ, Bastos DA, Attard G, Axcrona K, Ayadi M, Beltran H, Bjartell A, Blanchard P, Bourlon MT, Briganti A, Bulbul M, Buttigliero C, Caffo O, Castellano D, Castro E, Cheng HH, Chi KN, Clarke CS, Clarke N, de Bono JS, De Santis M, Duran I, Efstathiou E, Ekeke ON, El Nahas TIH, Emmett L, Fanti S, Fatiregun OA, Feng FY, Fong PCC, Fonteyne V, Fossati N, George DJ, Gleave ME, Gravis G, Halabi S, Heinrich D, Herrmann K, Hofman MS, Hope TA, Horvath LG, Hussain MHA, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones RJ, Joshua AM, Kanesvaran R, Keizman D, Khauli RB, Kramer G, Loeb S, Mahal BA, Maluf FC, Mateo J, Matheson D, Matikainen MP, McDermott R, McKay RR, Mehra N, Merseburger AS, Morgans AK, Morris MJ, Mrabti H, Mukherji D, Murphy DG, Murthy V, Mutambirwa SBA, Nguyen PL, Oh WK, Ost P, O'Sullivan JM, Padhani AR, Parker C, Poon DMC, Pritchard CC, Rabah DM, Rathkopf D, Reiter RE, Renard-Penna R, Ryan CJ, Saad F, Sade JP, Sandhu S, Sartor OA, Schaeffer E, Scher HI, et alGillessen S, Turco F, Davis ID, Efstathiou JA, Fizazi K, James ND, Shore N, Small E, Smith M, Sweeney CJ, Tombal B, Zilli T, Agarwal N, Antonarakis ES, Aparicio A, Armstrong AJ, Bastos DA, Attard G, Axcrona K, Ayadi M, Beltran H, Bjartell A, Blanchard P, Bourlon MT, Briganti A, Bulbul M, Buttigliero C, Caffo O, Castellano D, Castro E, Cheng HH, Chi KN, Clarke CS, Clarke N, de Bono JS, De Santis M, Duran I, Efstathiou E, Ekeke ON, El Nahas TIH, Emmett L, Fanti S, Fatiregun OA, Feng FY, Fong PCC, Fonteyne V, Fossati N, George DJ, Gleave ME, Gravis G, Halabi S, Heinrich D, Herrmann K, Hofman MS, Hope TA, Horvath LG, Hussain MHA, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones RJ, Joshua AM, Kanesvaran R, Keizman D, Khauli RB, Kramer G, Loeb S, Mahal BA, Maluf FC, Mateo J, Matheson D, Matikainen MP, McDermott R, McKay RR, Mehra N, Merseburger AS, Morgans AK, Morris MJ, Mrabti H, Mukherji D, Murphy DG, Murthy V, Mutambirwa SBA, Nguyen PL, Oh WK, Ost P, O'Sullivan JM, Padhani AR, Parker C, Poon DMC, Pritchard CC, Rabah DM, Rathkopf D, Reiter RE, Renard-Penna R, Ryan CJ, Saad F, Sade JP, Sandhu S, Sartor OA, Schaeffer E, Scher HI, Sharifi N, Skoneczna IA, Soule HR, Spratt DE, Srinivas S, Sternberg CN, Suzuki H, Taplin ME, Thellenberg-Karlsson C, Tilki D, Türkeri LN, Uemura H, Ürün Y, Vale CL, Vapiwala N, Walz J, Yamoah K, Ye D, Yu EY, Zapatero A, Omlin A. Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer. Report from the 2024 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC). Eur Urol 2025; 87:157-216. [PMID: 39394013 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.09.017] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2024] [Revised: 09/03/2024] [Accepted: 09/13/2024] [Indexed: 10/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Innovations have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer (PC). Nonetheless, we continue to lack high-level evidence on a variety of topics that greatly impact daily practice. The 2024 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) surveyed experts on key questions in clinical management in order to supplement evidence-based guidelines. Here we present voting results for questions from APCCC 2024. METHODS Before the conference, a panel of 120 international PC experts used a modified Delphi process to develop 183 multiple-choice consensus questions on eight different topics. Before the conference, these questions were administered via a web-based survey to the voting panel members ("panellists"). KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Consensus was a priori defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement. The voting results show varying degrees of consensus, as discussed in this article and detailed in the Supplementary material. These findings do not include a formal literature review or meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The voting results can help physicians and patients navigate controversial areas of clinical management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting. The findings can also help funders and policymakers in prioritising areas for future research. Diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised on the basis of patient and cancer characteristics, and should incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence, guidelines, and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is always strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2024 once again identified important gaps (areas of nonconsensus) that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biosciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
| | - Fabio Turco
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Ian D Davis
- Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Karim Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Eric Small
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher J Sweeney
- South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Bertrand Tombal
- Division of Urology, Clinique Universitaire St. Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biosciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Ana Aparicio
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Armstrong
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancer, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Karol Axcrona
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Urology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Mouna Ayadi
- Salah Azaiz Institute, Medical School of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncostat U1018 INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Maria T Bourlon
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Muhammad Bulbul
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Consuelo Buttigliero
- Department of Oncology, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Medical Oncology Department, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS, Trento, Italy
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Castro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Heather H Cheng
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Kim N Chi
- BC Cancer and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Caroline S Clarke
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Noel Clarke
- The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester, UK
| | - Johann S de Bono
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | | | - Onyeanunam N Ekeke
- Urology Division, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
| | | | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS AOU Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Felix Y Feng
- University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Peter C C Fong
- Auckland City Hospital and University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Nicola Fossati
- Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Università della Svizzera Italiana Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Daniel J George
- Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Martin E Gleave
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel Heinrich
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lisa G Horvath
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Maha H A Hussain
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Robert J Jones
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Anthony M Joshua
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Daniel Keizman
- Genitourinary Unit, Division of Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Raja B Khauli
- Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon; Division of Urology, Carle-Illinois College of Medicine, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Gero Kramer
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stacy Loeb
- Department of Urology and Population Health, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA; Department of Surgery/Urology, Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brandon A Mahal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Fernando C Maluf
- Beneficiência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Departamento de Oncologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Joaquin Mateo
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Matheson
- Faculty of Education Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Walsall, UK
| | - Mika P Matikainen
- Department of Urology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ray McDermott
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Rana R McKay
- University of California-San Diego, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Niven Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Axel S Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Alicia K Morgans
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael J Morris
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hind Mrabti
- Institut National d'Oncologie, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Deborah Mukherji
- Clemenceau Medical Center, Dubai, United Arab Emirates; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Vedang Murthy
- Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Shingai B A Mutambirwa
- Department of Urology, Sefako Makgatho Health Science University, Dr. George Mukhari Academic Hospital, Medunsa, South Africa
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William K Oh
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Chris Parker
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Darren M C Poon
- Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Danny M Rabah
- Cancer Research Chair and Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dana Rathkopf
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Raphaele Renard-Penna
- Department of Imagery, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Charles J Ryan
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre Hospitalier de Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Oliver A Sartor
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Edward Schaeffer
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Howard I Scher
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nima Sharifi
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Iwona A Skoneczna
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sandy Srinivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Cora N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Meyer Cancer Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hiroyoshi Suzuki
- Department of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center and Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Levent N Türkeri
- Department of Urology, M.A. Aydınlar Acıbadem University, Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hiroji Uemura
- Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yüksel Ürün
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Claire L Vale
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jochen Walz
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- University Hospital La Princesa, Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Aurelius Omlin
- Onkozentrum Zurich, University of Zurich and Tumorzentrum Hirslanden Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zaid NRR, Bastiaannet R, Hobbs R, Sgouros G. Mathematic Modeling of Tumor Growth During [ 177Lu]Lu-PSMA Therapy: Insights into Treatment Optimization. J Nucl Med 2025; 66:84-90. [PMID: 39753362 PMCID: PMC11705791 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2024] [Accepted: 11/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2025] Open
Abstract
The treatment regimen for [177Lu]Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) 617 therapy follows that of chemotherapy: 6 administrations of a fixed activity, each separated by 6 wk. Mathematic modeling can be used to test the hypothesis that the current treatment regimen for a radiopharmaceutical modality is suboptimal. Methods: A mathematic model was developed to describe tumor growth during [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy. The model examined alternative treatment schedules to maximize tumor mass reduction while still maintaining an acceptable biologically effective dose to kidneys. Median patients' pharmacokinetics from literature reports were used to obtain the dose rate over time. The model incorporates the Gompertz tumor growth and linear quadratic models to describe the effect of radiation-induced cell kill on tumor growth. For a fixed total activity of 44.4 GBq of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and a 6-wk interval between cycles, the efficacy of the standard fractionation (6-cycle) treatment schedule was compared with different treatment regimens for a distribution of published tumor masses. A treatment schedule whereby 7.4 GBq are administered in the first cycle, and the remaining activity (37 GBq) in the second cycle (1-2-cycle treatment), was examined. Results: When tumor mass nadir was used as the optimization metric, a lower tumor burden (e.g., <4 g) was insensitive to the number of cycles; the 6-cycle treatment was equivalent to the 1-2-cycle treatment. For larger masses, fewer cycles yielded better results. For a 7-g tumor, the 5-cycle, 4-cycle, 3-cycle and 1-2-cycle schedules were 24%, 50%, 76%, and 84% more efficacious, respectively, than the 6-cycle schedule. The absorbed doses to kidneys, parotid glands, lacrimal glands, and red marrow were 23, 16, 70, and 1 Gy, respectively. In all fractionated schedules, the biologically effective dose to kidneys was within tolerance (<40 Gy). Conclusion: On the basis of model-derived simulations, treatment delivered in a 1-2-cycle schedule is recommended to achieve better outcomes for patients undergoing [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nouran R R Zaid
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and
| | - Remco Bastiaannet
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and
- Department of Radiology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Rob Hobbs
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and
| | - George Sgouros
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jadvar H, Iravani A, Bodei L, Calais J. Challenges with 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Clinical Practice. J Nucl Med 2024:jnumed.124.268023. [PMID: 39299786 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/21/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hossein Jadvar
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California;
| | - Amir Iravani
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Lisa Bodei
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Książek I, Ligęza A, Drzymała F, Borek A, Miszczyk M, Francuz MR, Matsukawa A, Yanagisawa T, Fazekas T, Zapała Ł, Rajwa P. Role of Lutetium Radioligand Therapy in Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2433. [PMID: 39001495 PMCID: PMC11240688 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Theranostics utilize ligands that chelate radionuclides and selectively bind with cancer-specific membrane antigens. In the case of prostate cancer (PCa), the state-of-the-art lutetium-177-PSMA combines the radioactive β-emitter 177Lu with Vipivotide Tetraxetan, a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-binding ligand. Several studies have been conducted, and the therapy is not without adverse effects (e.g., xerostomia, nausea, and fatigue); however, few events are reported as severe. The available evidence supports the use of 177Lu-PSMA in selected metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients, and the treatment is considered a standard of care in several clinical scenarios. Emerging research shows promising results in the setting of hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; however, evidence from high-quality controlled trials is still missing. In this review, we discuss the available evidence for the application of 177Lu-PSMA in the management of PCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ignacy Książek
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland; (I.K.); (A.B.)
| | - Artur Ligęza
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland; (I.K.); (A.B.)
| | - Franciszek Drzymała
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland; (I.K.); (A.B.)
| | - Adam Borek
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland; (I.K.); (A.B.)
| | - Marcin Miszczyk
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Collegium Medicum—Faculty of Medicine, WSB University, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
| | | | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
| | - Tamás Fazekas
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Łukasz Zapała
- Clinic of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paweł Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland; (I.K.); (A.B.)
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nindra U, Lin P, Becker T, Roberts TL, Chua W. Current state of theranostics in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 68:412-420. [PMID: 38632711 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in the world. There have been significant advances in chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and targeted therapy options for patients with castrate-resistant disease. However, these systemic treatments are often associated with unwanted toxicities. Targeted therapy with radiopharmaceuticals has become of key interest to limit systemic toxicity and provides a more precision oncology approach to treatment. Strontium-89, Samarium-153 EDTMP and Radium-223 have been trialled with mixed results. Strontium-89 and Samarium-153 EDTMP have shown benefits in palliating metastatic bone pain but with no impact on survival outcomes. Early therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals targeting PSMA that were developed were beta-emitting agents, but recently alpha-emitting agents are being investigated as potentially superior options. Radium-223 is the first alpha-particle emitter therapeutic agent approved by the FDA, with phase III trial evidence showing benefits in overall survival and delay in symptomatic skeletal events for patients. Recently, 177-Lutetium-PSMA-617 has demonstrated significant survival advantages in pre-treated metastatic castrate-resistant cancer patients in a number of phase II and III studies. Furthermore, 225-Actinium-PSMA-617 also showed promise even in patients pre-treated with 177-Lutetium-PSMA-617. Hence, there has been an explosion of radiopharmaceutical treatment options for patients with prostate cancer. This review explores past and current theranostic capacities in the radiopharmaceutical treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Udit Nindra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter Lin
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Therese Becker
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tara L Roberts
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wei Chua
- Department of Medical Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Piranfar A, Soltani M, Kashkooli FM, Uribe CF, Rahmim A. Spatiotemporal modeling of radiopharmaceutical transport in solid tumors: Application to 177Lu-PSMA therapy of prostate cancer. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE 2024; 245:108004. [PMID: 38215660 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.108004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE 177Lu-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) represents a pivotal advancement in addressing prostate cancer. However, existing therapies, while promising, remain incompletely understood and optimized. Computational models offer potential insights into RPTs, aiding in clinical drug delivery enhancement. In this study, we investigate the impact of various physiological parameters on the delivery of 177Lu-PSMA-617 RPT using the convection-diffusion-reaction (CDR) model. METHODS Our investigation encompasses tumor geometry and surrounding tissue, characterized by well-defined boundaries and initial conditions. Utilizing the finite element method, we solve governing equations across a range of parameters: dissociation constant KD (1, 0.1, 0.01 [nM]), internalization rate (0.01-0.0001 [min-1]), diverse tumor shapes, and variable necrotic zone sizes. This model can provide an accurate analysis of radiopharmaceutical delivery from the injection site to the tumor cell, including drug transport in the vascular, interstitial, and intracellular spaces, and considering important parameters (e.g., drug extravasation from microvessels or to lymphatic vessels, the extracellular matrix, receptors, and intracellular space). RESULTS Our findings reveal significant enhancements in tumor-absorbed doses as KD decreases. This outcome can be attributed to the higher affinity of radiopharmaceuticals for PSMA receptors as KD diminishes, facilitating a more efficient binding and retention of the therapeutic agent within the tumor microenvironment. Additionally, tumor-absorbed doses for KD ∼ 1 [nM] show an upward trend with higher internalization rates. This observation can be rationalized by considering that a greater internalization rate would result in a higher proportion of radiopharmaceuticals being taken up by tumor cells after binding to receptors on the cell surface. Notably, tumor shape and necrotic zone size exhibit limited influence on tumor absorbed dose. CONCLUSIONS The present study employs the CDR model to explore the role of physiological parameters in shaping 177Lu-PSMA-617 RPT delivery. These findings provide insights for improving prostate cancer therapy by understanding radiopharmaceutical transport dynamics. This computational approach contributes to advancing our understanding of radiopharmaceutical delivery mechanisms and has implications for enhancing treatment efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anahita Piranfar
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
| | - M Soltani
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, ON, Canada; Centre for Biotechnology and Bioengineering (CBB), University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada; Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Farshad M Kashkooli
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
| | - Carlos F Uribe
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Functional Imaging, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Arman Rahmim
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Functional Imaging, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Heesch A, Florea A, Maurer J, Habib P, Werth LS, Hansen T, Stickeler E, Sahnoun SEM, Mottaghy FM, Morgenroth A. The prostate-specific membrane antigen holds potential as a vascular target for endogenous radiotherapy with [ 177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T for triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2024; 26:30. [PMID: 38378689 PMCID: PMC10877802 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-024-01787-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Overexpression of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) on the vasculature of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) presents a promising avenue for targeted endogenous radiotherapy with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T. This study aimed to assess and compare the therapeutic efficacy of a single dose with a fractionated dose of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T in an orthotopic model of TNBC. METHODS Rj:NMRI-Foxn1nu/nu mice were used as recipients of MDA-MB-231 xenografts. The single dose group was treated with 1 × 60 ± 5 MBq dose of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T, while the fractionated dose group received 4 × a 15 ± 2 MBq dose of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T at 7 day intervals. The control group received 0.9% NaCl. Tumor progression was monitored using [18F]FDG-PET/CT. Ex vivo analysis encompassed immunostaining, TUNEL staining, H&E staining, microautoradiography, and autoradiography. RESULTS Tumor volumes were significantly smaller in the single dose (p < 0.001) and fractionated dose (p < 0.001) groups. Tumor growth inhibition rates were 38% (single dose) and 30% (fractionated dose). Median survival was notably prolonged in the treated groups compared to the control groups (31d, 28d and 19d for single dose, fractionated dose and control, respectively). [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T decreased the size of viable tumor areas. We further demonstrated, that [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T binds specifically to the tumor-associated vasculature. CONCLUSION This study highlights the potential of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T for endogenous radiotherapy of TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelie Heesch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
| | - Alexandru Florea
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6202, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School for Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6202, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jochen Maurer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074, Aachen, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf (ABCD), Germany
| | - Pardes Habib
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
| | - Laura S Werth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Thomas Hansen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074, Aachen, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf (ABCD), Germany
| | - Sabri E M Sahnoun
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Felix M Mottaghy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6202, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf (ABCD), Germany
| | - Agnieszka Morgenroth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Herrmann K, Rahbar K, Eiber M, Sparks R, Baca N, Krause BJ, Lassmann M, Jentzen W, Tang J, Chicco D, Klein P, Blumenstein L, Basque JR, Kurth J. Renal and Multiorgan Safety of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in the VISION Dosimetry Substudy. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:71-78. [PMID: 38050121 PMCID: PMC10755516 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In the VISION trial, [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) plus protocol-permitted standard of care significantly improved overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival compared with standard of care alone in patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. This VISION dosimetry substudy quantified absorbed doses of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in the kidneys and other organs. Methods: Participants were a separate cohort of 30 nonrandomized patients receiving standard of care plus 177Lu-PSMA-617 at 7.4 GBq per cycle for up to 6 cycles. Blood samples, whole-body conjugate planar image scintigraphy, and abdominal SPECT/CT images were collected. SPECT/CT images were collected at 2, 24, 48, and 168 h after administration in cycle 1 and at a single time point 48 h after administration in cycles 2-6. Outcomes were absorbed dose per unit activity per cycle and cumulative absorbed dose over all cycles. Cumulative absorbed doses were predicted by extrapolation from cycle 1, and calculation of observed values was based on measurements of cycle 1 and cycles 2-6. Safety was also assessed. Results: Mean (±SD) absorbed doses per cycle in the kidneys were 0.43 ± 0.16 Gy/GBq in cycle 1 and 0.44 ± 0.21 Gy/GBq in cycles 2-6. The observed and predicted 6-cycle cumulative absorbed doses in the kidneys were 15 ± 6 and 19 ± 7 Gy, respectively. Observed and predicted cumulative absorbed doses were similar in other at-risk organs. Safety findings were consistent with those in the VISION study; no patients experienced renal treatment-emergent adverse events of a grade higher than 3. Conclusion: The renal cumulative absorbed 177Lu-PSMA-617 dose was below the established limit. 177Lu-PSMA-617 had a good overall safety profile, and low renal radiotoxicity was not a safety concern. Cumulative absorbed doses in at-risk organs over multiple cycles can be predicted by extrapolation from cycle 1 data in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving 177Lu-PSMA-617.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
| | - Kambiz Rahbar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Bernd J Krause
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Michael Lassmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Walter Jentzen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jun Tang
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey
| | - Daniela Chicco
- Advanced Accelerator Applications, a Novartis Company, Turin, Italy
| | - Patrick Klein
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, East Hanover, New Jersey
| | - Lars Blumenstein
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland; and
| | | | - Jens Kurth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Higuchi T, Hartrampf PE, Buck AK, Pomper MG, Rowe SP, Serfling SE, Werner RA. Role of Functional SPECT and PET in Renal Emergencies. Semin Nucl Med 2023; 53:786-796. [PMID: 37236903 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Renal scintigraphy is a centerpiece of nuclear medicine and is also commonly applied for (peri-)acute care. In this regard, referrals by the treating physician include: I.) acute obstructions caused by gradual and infiltrative tumor growth or renal off-target effects under anti-tumor treatment, II.) functional issues in infants, for example, structural abnormalities such as duplex kidneys or uroliths in adults, which can also trigger III.) Infections of renal parenchyma. Renal radionuclide imaging is also requested due to IV.) acute trauma to the abdomen, for example, to assess renal scarring or upon further follow-up after reconstructive surgery. We will discuss clinical applications of (peri-)acute renal scintigraphy, along with future prospects on the use of more advanced nuclear imaging techniques such as renal positron emission tomography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Higuchi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
| | - Philipp E Hartrampf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Andreas K Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Martin G Pomper
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Steven P Rowe
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Rudolf A Werner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mahdi RA, Aggarwal P, Kumar S, Sood A, Paul D, Mittal BR. Excellent Response to Full-Dose 177 Lu-PSMA-617 RLT in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With Transplant Kidney : A Step Ahead. Clin Nucl Med 2023; 48:e470-e471. [PMID: 37566811 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/13/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT 177 Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT) has shown very encouraging results in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with acceptable adverse events. The adverse events of RLT are mainly limited to salivary glands and kidneys. However, there is dearth of available data of RLT in transplanted kidney patients with mCRPC. Here is a case of 68-year-old mCRPC patient with history of renal transplant who underwent 4 cycles of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 RLT (~7.4 GBq/cycle). Posttherapy serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate remained stable along with excellent response and symptomatic improvement, thus demonstrating the safety of full dose of 177 Lu-PSMA in renal transplant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raza Abbas Mahdi
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
| | - Piyush Aggarwal
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
| | - Suraj Kumar
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
| | - Ashwani Sood
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
| | - Davinder Paul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fortis Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Bhagwant Rai Mittal
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang JH, Kiess AP. PSMA-targeted therapy for non-prostate cancers. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1220586. [PMID: 37645427 PMCID: PMC10461313 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1220586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Radioligand therapy (RLT) agents are demonstrating a crucial role in the clinical approach to aggressive malignancies such as metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (m-CRPC). With the recent FDA approval of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted RLT for m-CRPC, the field has broadened its gaze to explore other cancers that express PSMA in the tumor parenchyma or tumor neovasculature. In this review article, we discuss current progress in the clinical use of PSMA RLTs in non-prostate cancers such salivary gland cancers, renal cell carcinoma, high grade glioma, and soft tissue sarcoma. We highlight early reports in small case series and clinical trials indicating promise for PSMA-targeted RLT and highlighting the importance of identifying patient cohorts who may most benefit from these interventions. Further study is indicated in non-prostate cancers investigating PSMA RLT dosimetry, PSMA PET/CT imaging as a biomarker, and assessing PSMA RLT safety and efficacy in these cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarey H. Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Ana P. Kiess
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kratochwil C, Fendler WP, Eiber M, Hofman MS, Emmett L, Calais J, Osborne JR, Iravani A, Koo P, Lindenberg L, Baum RP, Bozkurt MF, Delgado Bolton RC, Ezziddin S, Forrer F, Hicks RJ, Hope TA, Kabasakal L, Konijnenberg M, Kopka K, Lassmann M, Mottaghy FM, Oyen WJG, Rahbar K, Schoder H, Virgolini I, Bodei L, Fanti S, Haberkorn U, Hermann K. Joint EANM/SNMMI procedure guideline for the use of 177Lu-labeled PSMA-targeted radioligand-therapy ( 177Lu-PSMA-RLT). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:2830-2845. [PMID: 37246997 PMCID: PMC10317889 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06255-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is expressed by the majority of clinically significant prostate adenocarcinomas, and patients with target-positive disease can easily be identified by PSMA PET imaging. Promising results with PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy have already been obtained in early-phase studies using various combinations of targeting molecules and radiolabels. Definitive evidence of the safety and efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in combination with standard-of-care has been demonstrated in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, whose disease had progressed after or during at least one taxane regimen and at least one novel androgen-axis drug. Preliminary data suggest that 177Lu-PSMA-radioligand therapy (RLT) also has high potential in additional clinical situations. Hence, the radiopharmaceuticals [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T are currently being evaluated in ongoing phase 3 trials. The purpose of this guideline is to assist nuclear medicine personnel, to select patients with highest potential to benefit from 177Lu-PSMA-RLT, to perform the procedure in accordance with current best practice, and to prepare for possible side effects and their clinical management. We also provide expert advice, to identify those clinical situations which may justify the off-label use of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 or other emerging ligands on an individual patient basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clemens Kratochwil
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Oncology, Sir Peter MacCallum, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, Australia
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joseph R Osborne
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Amir Iravani
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Phillip Koo
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ, USA
| | - Liza Lindenberg
- Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- F. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Richard P Baum
- Curanosticum Wiesbaden-Frankfurt, Center for Advanced Radiomolecular Precision Oncology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Murat Fani Bozkurt
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Roberto C Delgado Bolton
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging (Radiology) and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital San Pedro and Centre for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (CIBIR), Logroño (La Rioja), Spain
| | - Samer Ezziddin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany
| | - Flavio Forrer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Rodney J Hicks
- The University of Melbourne Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging / Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Levent Kabasakal
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University- Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mark Konijnenberg
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine Department, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Klaus Kopka
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
- Technical University Dresden, School of Science, Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Lassmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Felix M Mottaghy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Medical Faculty, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Wim J G Oyen
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, and Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kambiz Rahbar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Heiko Schoder
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Irene Virgolini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Lisa Bodei
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Uwe Haberkorn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ken Hermann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, 45147, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sutherland DEK, Kashyap R, Jackson P, Buteau JP, Murphy DG, Kelly B, Spain L, Sandhu S, Azad AA, Medhurst E, Kong G, Hofman MS. Safety of Lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen-617 (PSMA-617) radioligand therapy in the setting of severe renal impairment: a case report and literature review. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231177018. [PMID: 37323189 PMCID: PMC10262655 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231177018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Reported here is a case of rapidly progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in the setting of severe renal impairment and impending ureteric obstruction. PSMA is expressed on renal tubular cells, raising the possibility of radiation-induced nephrotoxicity, and this level of renal impairment would typically exclude the patient from [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 therapy. Multidisciplinary input, individualized dosimetry, and patient-specific dose reduction were used to ensure the cumulative dose to the kidneys remained within acceptable limits. He was initially planned for treatment with six cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. However, he had an excellent response to therapy following four cycles of treatment and the last two cycles were omitted. He has been followed for 1-year posttherapy without evidence of disease recurrence. No acute or chronic nephrotoxicity was observed. This case report highlights the utility of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 therapy in severe renal impairment and provides evidence of relative safety in patients who would otherwise not be considered candidates for therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duncan E. K. Sutherland
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Raghava Kashyap
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Price Jackson
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - James P. Buteau
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Declan G. Murphy
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Brian Kelly
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lavinia Spain
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Arun A. Azad
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Medhurst
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Grace Kong
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael S. Hofman
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 300 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC 3185, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Orozco Scott P, Deshpande P, Abramson M. Genitourinary Cancer: Updates on Treatments and Their Impact on the Kidney. Semin Nephrol 2023; 42:151344. [PMID: 37172546 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2023.151344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Genitourinary cancers are diverse in their presentation, prevalence, and mortality risk. Although there have been significant advancements in medical (eg, immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors) and surgical treatments of genitourinary cancers, patients are still at risk for chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and electrolyte derangements in the short and long term. In addition, pre-existing kidney disease may increase the risk of developing some genitourinary cancers. This review focuses on the kidney-related effects of treatments for renal cell carcinoma and bladder and prostate cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paloma Orozco Scott
- Department of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Medical School, New York, NY.
| | - Priya Deshpande
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Matthew Abramson
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Burgard C, Rosar F, Marlowe RJ, Bartholomä M, Dewes S, Schaefer-Schuler A, Linxweiler J, Khreish F, Ezziddin S. Tumor Sink Effect with Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Theranostics in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Intra-Individual Evaluations. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092592. [PMID: 37174058 PMCID: PMC10177482 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
"Tumor sink effects", decreased physiological uptake of radiopharmaceuticals due to sequestration by a tumor, may impact radioligand therapy (RLT) toxicity and dosing. We investigated these effects with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radiopharmaceuticals in the healthy organs-at-risk (the parotid glands, kidneys, liver, and spleen) of 33 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We retrospectively performed three intra-individual comparisons. First, we correlated changes from baseline to post-RLT (after two 177-lutetium (177Lu)-PSMA-617 cycles) in total lesional PSMA (∆TLP) and organ mean standardized uptake values (∆SUVmean). Second, in 25 RLT responders, we compared the organ SUVmean post-RLT versus that at baseline. Lastly, we correlated the baseline TLP and organ SUVmean. Data were acquired via 68-gallium-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography before the first and after the second 177Lu-PSMA-617 cycle. In the parotid glands and spleen, ∆TLP and ∆SUVmean showed a significant inverse correlation (r = -0.40, p = 0.023 and r = -0.36, p = 0.042, respectively). Additionally, in those tissues, the median organ SUVmean rose significantly from baseline after the response to RLT (p ≤ 0.022), and the baseline TLP and SUVmean were significantly negatively correlated (r = -0.44, p = 0.01 and r = -0.42, p = 0.016, respectively). These observations suggest tumor sink effects with PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals in the salivary glands and spleen of patients with mCRPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Burgard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University-Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | - Florian Rosar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University-Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | | | - Mark Bartholomä
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University-Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Dewes
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University-Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | | | - Johannes Linxweiler
- Department of Urology, Saarland University-Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | - Fadi Khreish
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University-Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | - Samer Ezziddin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University-Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ladrière T, Faudemer J, Levigoureux E, Peyronnet D, Desmonts C, Vigne J. Safety and Therapeutic Optimization of Lutetium-177 Based Radiopharmaceuticals. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:pharmaceutics15041240. [PMID: 37111725 PMCID: PMC10145759 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using Lutetium-177 (177Lu) based radiopharmaceuticals has emerged as a therapeutic area in the field of nuclear medicine and oncology, allowing for personalized medicine. Since the first market authorization in 2018 of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera®) targeting somatostatin receptor type 2 in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, intensive research has led to transfer innovative 177Lu containing pharmaceuticals to the clinic. Recently, a second market authorization in the field was obtained for [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (Pluvicto®) in the treatment of prostate cancer. The efficacy of 177Lu radiopharmaceuticals are now quite well-reported and data on the safety and management of patients are needed. This review will focus on several clinically tested and reported tailored approaches to enhance the risk-benefit trade-off of radioligand therapy. The aim is to help clinicians and nuclear medicine staff set up safe and optimized procedures using the approved 177Lu based radiopharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Typhanie Ladrière
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU de Caen Normandie, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
- Department of Pharmacy, CHU de Caen Normandie, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Julie Faudemer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU de Caen Normandie, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Elise Levigoureux
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Est, 69677 Bron, France
- Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS UMR5292, INSERM U1028, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69677 Bron, France
| | - Damien Peyronnet
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU de Caen Normandie, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
- Department of Pharmacy, CHU de Caen Normandie, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Cédric Desmonts
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU de Caen Normandie, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
- INSERM U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandy University, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Jonathan Vigne
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU de Caen Normandie, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
- Department of Pharmacy, CHU de Caen Normandie, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
- PhIND, Centre Cyceron, Institut Blood and Brain @ Caen-Normandie, INSERM U1237, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Al Musaimi O, Al Shaer D, Albericio F, de la Torre BG. 2022 FDA TIDES (Peptides and Oligonucleotides) Harvest. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:ph16030336. [PMID: 36986436 PMCID: PMC10056021 DOI: 10.3390/ph16030336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
A total of 37 new drug entities were approved in 2022; although that year registered the lowest number of drug approvals since 2016, the TIDES class consolidated its presence with a total of five authorizations (four peptides and one oligonucleotide). Interestingly, 23 out of 37 drugs were first-in-class and thus received fast-track designation by the FDA in categories such as breakthrough therapy, priority review voucher, orphan drug, accelerated approval, and so on. Here, we analyze the TIDES approved in 2022 on the basis of their chemical structure, medical target, mode of action, administration route, and common adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Othman Al Musaimi
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
- Correspondence: (O.A.M.); (B.G.d.l.T.); Tel.: +44-7398-561-752 (O.A.M.); +27-614047528 (B.G.d.l.T.)
| | - Danah Al Shaer
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Evotec (UK) Ltd., Abingdon OX14 4R, UK
| | - Fernando Albericio
- School of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa
- CIBER-BBN, Networking Centre on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine, Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Beatriz G. de la Torre
- KRISP, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa
- Correspondence: (O.A.M.); (B.G.d.l.T.); Tel.: +44-7398-561-752 (O.A.M.); +27-614047528 (B.G.d.l.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Extended therapy with [ 177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in responding patients with high-volume metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:1811-1821. [PMID: 36702927 PMCID: PMC10119067 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06119-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The currently used scheme for radioligand therapy (RLT) of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) consists of 4-6 cycles of 6.0-7.4 GBq [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 each. This standard treatment scheme has proved safe and effective resulting in objective response in most patients with no significant toxicity. Many patients, however, show high-volume residual tumor burden after the sixth cycle and may benefit from treatment continuation. Extended treatment with additional cycles has been withheld due to concerns on potential increased toxicity. METHODS Twenty-six patients with high-volume residual tumor burden (according to CHAARTED) after standard RLT with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and no alternative treatment option received additional RLT cycles reaching a median of 10 (range 7-16) cycles with a mean activity of 7.4 ± 0.9 GBq per cycle. Response assessment with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was done every 2-3 cycles or if disease progression was clinically suspected or based on change in PSA value (according to the PCWG3 criteria). Toxicity was measured using routine blood work up including blood counts, liver and renal function, and was graded according to CTCAE v5.0 criteria. Survival outcome was calculated based on the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Further PSA decline of 33 ± 28% during the extended treatment was observed in 21/26 (81%) patients, whereas 5/26 (19%) patients showed a PSA increase; correspondingly in 11/21 patients with an initial response (PR or SD) to extended cycles, treatment was discontinued due to progressive disease, whereas six (23%) patients achieved low-volume residual disease. Two (8%) patients died without showing progression, and two (8%) patients are still under therapy. The median progression-free survival was 19 (95% CI: 15-23) months, and the overall survival was 29 (95% CI: 18-40) months. Grade ≥ 3 hematological toxicities occurred in 4/26 (15%) patients during treatment extension, and nephrotoxicity (grade ≥ 3) was observed in 1/26 (4%) patient during the follow-up. CONCLUSION Extended radioligand therapy is a feasible treatment option in patients with high-volume residual tumor after the completion of standard treatment with six cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. Improved survival and the acceptable safety profile warrant further investigation of the concept of additional cycles in selected patients.
Collapse
|
20
|
van der Gaag S, Bartelink IH, Vis AN, Burchell GL, Oprea-Lager DE, Hendrikse H. Pharmacological Optimization of PSMA-Based Radioligand Therapy. Biomedicines 2022; 10:3020. [PMID: 36551776 PMCID: PMC9775864 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men of middle and older age. The standard treatment strategy for PCa ranges from active surveillance in low-grade, localized PCa to radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, hormonal treatment and chemotherapy. Recently, the use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) for metastatic castration-resistant PCa has been approved. PSMA is predominantly, but not exclusively, expressed on PCa cells. Because of its high expression in PCa, PSMA is a promising target for diagnostics and therapy. To understand the currently used RLT, knowledge about pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of the PSMA ligand and the PSMA protein itself is crucial. PK and PD properties of the ligand and its target determine the duration and extent of the effect. Knowledge on the concentration-time profile, the target affinity and target abundance may help to predict the effect of RLT. Increased specific binding of radioligands to PSMA on PCa cells may be associated with better treatment response, where nonspecific binding may increase the risk of toxicity in healthy organs. Optimization of the radioligand, as well as synergistic effects of concomitant agents and an improved dosing strategy, may lead to more individualized treatment and better overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne van der Gaag
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Imke H. Bartelink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N. Vis
- Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - George L. Burchell
- Medical Library, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E. Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harry Hendrikse
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chhabra A, Thakur ML. Theragnostic Radionuclide Pairs for Prostate Cancer Management: 64Cu/ 67Cu, Can Be a Budding Hot Duo. Biomedicines 2022; 10:2787. [PMID: 36359312 PMCID: PMC9687163 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10112787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the preeminent causes of mortality in men worldwide. Theragnostic, a combination of therapy and diagnostic, using radionuclide pairs to diagnose and treat disease, has been shown to be a promising approach for combating PCa. In PCa patients, bone is one of the most common sites of metastases, and about 90% of patients develop bone metastases. This review focuses on (i) clinically translated theragnostic radionuclide pairs for the management of PCa, (ii) radionuclide therapy of bone metastases in PCa, and (iii) a special emphasis on emerging theragnostic radionuclide pair, Copper-64/Copper-67 (64Cu/67Cu) for managing the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anupriya Chhabra
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Mathew L. Thakur
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Shah H, Ravi P, Sonpavde G, Jacene H. Lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2022; 22:1163-1175. [PMID: 36305305 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2022.2139679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION 177Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan is a radiopharmaceutical that selectively targets prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and delivers beta-radiations to kill prostate cancer cells. AREAS COVERED Extensive experience outside the United States as well as randomized phase II and phase III data demonstrate that 177Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan is a safe, generally well tolerated, and effective therapy for men with mCRPC. 177Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan was approved by the FDA in March 2022 for the treatment of PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after androgen receptor pathway inhibition and taxane-based chemotherapy based on the results of the VISION trial. EXPERT OPINION This review discusses the development and studies leading to the approval of 177Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan. In all, 177Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan is an exciting new tool in the arsenal for men with mCRPC after novel androgen pathway inhibitors and at least one taxane chemotherapy. Optimal selection of patients, sequencing of 177Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan with the other agents available to treat mCRPC, and the use of dosimetry are current areas of interest with great potential and opportunities for further individual patient optimization using the tools of theranostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hina Shah
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Praful Ravi
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,The Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Guru Sonpavde
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,The Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Heather Jacene
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sadaghiani MS, Sheikhbahaei S, Werner RA, Pienta KJ, Pomper MG, Gorin MA, Solnes LB, Rowe SP. 177 Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy effectiveness in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate 2022; 82:826-835. [PMID: 35286735 PMCID: PMC9311733 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies to evaluate the effectiveness of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted endoradiotherapy/radioligand therapy (PRLT) in castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). METHODS A systematic search was performed in July 2020 using PubMed/Medline database to update our prior systematic review. The search was limited to papers published from 2019 to June 2020. A total of 472 papers were reviewed. The studied parameters included pooled proportion of patients showing any or ≥50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline after PRLT. Survival effects of PRLT were assessed based on pooled hazard ratios (HRs) of the overall survival (OS) according to any PSA as well as ≥50% PSA decline after PRLT. Response to therapy based on ≥50% PSA decrease after PRLT versus controls was evaluated using Mantel-Haenszel random effect meta-analysis. All p values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. RESULTS A total of 45 publications were added to the prior 24 studies. 69 papers with total of 4157 patients were included for meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of the two recent randomized controlled trials showed that patients treated with 177 Lu-PSMA 617 had a significantly higher response to therapy compared to controls based on ≥50% PSA decrease. Meta-analysis of the HRs of OS according to any PSA decline and ≥50% PSA decline showed survival prolongation after PRLT. CONCLUSIONS PRLT results in higher proportion of patients responding to therapy based on ≥50% PSA decline compared to controls. Any PSA decline and ≥50% PSA decline showed survival prolongation after PRLT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This is the first meta-analysis to aggregate the recent randomized controlled trials of PRLT which shows CRPC patients had a higher response to therapy after PRLT compared to controls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad S. Sadaghiani
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological ScienceJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Sara Sheikhbahaei
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological ScienceJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Rudolf A. Werner
- Department of Nuclear MedicineUniversity Hospital WürzburgWürzburgGermany
| | - Kenneth J. Pienta
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological InstituteJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Martin G. Pomper
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological ScienceJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological InstituteJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Michael A. Gorin
- Urology Associates and UPMC Western MarylandCumberlandMarylandUSA
- Department of UrologyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Lilja B. Solnes
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological ScienceJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Steven P. Rowe
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological ScienceJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological InstituteJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nautiyal A, Jha AK, Mithun S, Rangarajan V. Dosimetry in Lu-177-PSMA-617 prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted radioligand therapy: a systematic review. Nucl Med Commun 2022; 43:369-377. [PMID: 35045551 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 177Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) gained popularity as a choice of agent in the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer or metastatic castration-resistant stage of prostate carcinoma (mCRPC) diseases. However, this treatment may cause fatal effects, probably due to unintended irradiation of normal organs. We performed an extensive systematic review to assess the organs at risk and the absorbed dose received by tumor lesions in 177Lu-PSMA therapy. DESIGN In this review, published peer-reviewed articles that cover clinical dosimetry in patients following peptide radionuclide ligand therapy using 177Lu-PSMA have been included. Two senior researchers independently checked the articles for inclusion. A systematic search in the database was made using PubMed, Publons and DOAJ. All selected articles were categorized into three groups: (1) clinical studies with the technical description of dosimetry in 177Lu-PSMA therapy (2) organ dosimetry in 177Lu-PSMA therapy or (3) tumor dosimetry in 177Lu-PSMA therapy. RESULT In total, 182 citations were identified on PSMA therapy and 17 original articles on 177Lu-PSMA dosimetry were recognized as eligible for review. The median absorbed dose per unit of administered activity for kidneys, salivary, liver, spleen, lacrimal and bone marrow was 0.55, 0.81, 0.1, 0.1, 2.26 and 0.03 Gy/GBq, respectively. The median absorbed dose per unit of activity for tumor lesions was found in a range of 2.71-10.94 Gy/GBq. CONCLUSION 177Lu-PSMA systemic radiation therapy (SRT) is a well-tolerated and reliable treatment option against the management of the mCRPC stage of prostate carcinoma. Lacrimal glands and salivary glands are the major critical organs in 177Lu-PSMA SRT. Besides, tumors receive 3-6 times higher absorbed doses compared to organs at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Nautiyal
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
| | - Ashish K Jha
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sneha Mithun
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Venkatesh Rangarajan
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Design, synthesis, and preclinical evaluation of a novel bifunctional macrocyclic chelator for theranostics of cancers. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:2618-2633. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05750-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
26
|
Hartrampf PE, Weinzierl FX, Serfling SE, Pomper MG, Rowe SP, Higuchi T, Seitz AK, Kübler H, Buck AK, Werner RA. Hematotoxicity and Nephrotoxicity in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radioligand Therapy with [ 177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030647. [PMID: 35158913 PMCID: PMC8833540 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radioligand therapy (RLT) with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed agents has shown remarkable results in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Our objective was to provide data on the side effect profile of PSMA-directed RLT using the therapeutic radiotracer [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T. We evaluated patients with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer treated with at least three cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T. A substantial fraction of the patients already had impaired renal function and/or reduced white blood cell counts at baseline, but the degree of nephrotoxicity or hematotoxicity under RLT was low. No severe toxicities occurred under RLT. Abstract (1) Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed radioligand therapy (RLT) has shown remarkable results in patients with advanced prostate cancer. We aimed to evaluate the toxicity profile of the PSMA ligand [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T. (2) Methods: 49 patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with at least three cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T were evaluated. Prior to and after RLT, we compared leukocytes, hemoglobin, platelet counts, and renal functional parameters (creatinine, eGFR, n = 49; [99mTc]-MAG3-derived tubular extraction rate (TER), n = 42). Adverse events were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 and KDIGO Society. To identify predictive factors, we used Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. (3) Results: A substantial fraction of the patients already showed impaired renal function and reduced leukocyte counts at baseline. Under RLT, 11/49 (22%) patients presented with nephrotoxicity CTCAE I or II according to creatinine, but 33/49 (67%) according to eGFR. Only 5/42 (13%) showed reduced TER, defined as <70% of the age-adjusted mean normal values. Of all renal functional parameters, absolute changes of only 2% were recorded. CTCAE-based re-categorization was infrequent, with creatinine worsening from I to II in 2/49 (4.1%; GFR, 1/49 (2%)). Similar results were recorded for KDIGO (G2 to G3a, 1/49 (2%); G3a to G3b, 2/49 (4.1%)). After three cycles, follow-up eGFR correlated negatively with age (r = −0.40, p = 0.005) and the eGFR change with Gleason score (r = −0.35, p < 0.05) at baseline. Leukocytopenia CTCAE II occurred only in 1/49 (2%) (CTCAE I, 20/49 (41%)) and CTCAE I thrombocytopenia in 7/49 (14%), with an absolute decrease of 15.2% and 16.6% for leukocyte and platelet counts. Anemia CTCAE II occurred in 10/49 (20%) (CTCAE I, 36/49 (73%)) with a decrease in hemoglobin of 4.7%. (4) Conclusions: After PSMA-targeted therapy using [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T, no severe (CTCAE III/IV) toxicities occurred, thereby demonstrating that serious adverse renal or hematological events are unlikely to be a frequent phenomenon with this agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp E. Hartrampf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Oberdürrbacherstraße 6, 97080 Wurzburg, Germany; (F.-X.W.); (S.E.S.); (T.H.); (A.K.B.); (R.A.W.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-931-201-35001
| | - Franz-Xaver Weinzierl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Oberdürrbacherstraße 6, 97080 Wurzburg, Germany; (F.-X.W.); (S.E.S.); (T.H.); (A.K.B.); (R.A.W.)
| | - Sebastian E. Serfling
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Oberdürrbacherstraße 6, 97080 Wurzburg, Germany; (F.-X.W.); (S.E.S.); (T.H.); (A.K.B.); (R.A.W.)
| | - Martin G. Pomper
- The Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline Str., Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; (M.G.P.); (S.P.R.)
| | - Steven P. Rowe
- The Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline Str., Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; (M.G.P.); (S.P.R.)
| | - Takahiro Higuchi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Oberdürrbacherstraße 6, 97080 Wurzburg, Germany; (F.-X.W.); (S.E.S.); (T.H.); (A.K.B.); (R.A.W.)
- Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan
| | - Anna Katharina Seitz
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Oberdürrbacherstraße 6, 97080 Wurzburg, Germany; (A.K.S.); (H.K.)
| | - Hubert Kübler
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Oberdürrbacherstraße 6, 97080 Wurzburg, Germany; (A.K.S.); (H.K.)
| | - Andreas K. Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Oberdürrbacherstraße 6, 97080 Wurzburg, Germany; (F.-X.W.); (S.E.S.); (T.H.); (A.K.B.); (R.A.W.)
| | - Rudolf A. Werner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Oberdürrbacherstraße 6, 97080 Wurzburg, Germany; (F.-X.W.); (S.E.S.); (T.H.); (A.K.B.); (R.A.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jackson P, Hofman M, McIntosh L, Buteau JP, Ravi Kumar A. Radiation Dosimetry in 177Lu-PSMA-617 Therapy. Semin Nucl Med 2021; 52:243-254. [PMID: 34893320 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Radionuclide therapy using the small molecule PSMA bound to the beta-emitting radionuclide, Lutetium-177 (177Lu-PSMA) has demonstrated efficacy and survival benefit castrate resistant metastatic disease and represents a novel new line of therapy. Whilst dosimetry was critical for early development, it was not incorporated into either the TheraP or VISION randomized studies, highlighting the difficulty of adopting dosimetry in routine clinical practice. Accumulated clinical experience has also shown that the common (and generally low grade) toxicities such as nausea, xerostomia, and cytopenias are not readily predicted on the basis of dosimetry estimates. The majority of dosimetry and clinical literature deals with the radiopharmaceutical 177Lu-PSMA-617 which displays relatively consistent patterns of retention among normal tissues and high specificity for metastatic prostate cancer phenotypes. Population dosimetry incorporating estimates to the kidneys, salivary glands, and bone marrow have been widely reported the typical range of doses is becoming well established. There is growing interest on tumor dosimetry in 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy as an overall modest side-effect profile from primary organ retention has been observed. A focus away from normal organ dosimetry to whole body tumor dosimetry may enable early prediction of treatment failure. Given the safety of 177Lu-PSMA there is also potential to escalate administered radioactivity to further improve outcomes. Importantly, the variability of uptake between individuals, both to tumor and normal organs, has also been highlighted which provides some rationale for the utility of personalized radiation analysis to optimize treatment based on potential toxicity thresholds or tumor control. Methods to perform dosimetry using serial post treatment imaging may incorporate planar, 3D SPECT, or hybrid datasets. Reliable measurements may be obtained through either method, however, continued developments in computational analysis are better suited to fully 3D imaging; particularly in conjunction with volumetric CT to assist with alignment and contouring. Dose analysis over sequential treatment cycles is vital to understand the radiobiology of these treatments which is unique compared to external beam therapy due to dose rate, fractionation scheme, and potential for intratumoral nonuniformity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Price Jackson
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Dept of Cancer Imaging, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Dept of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Michael Hofman
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Dept of Cancer Imaging, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Dept of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lachlan McIntosh
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Dept of Cancer Imaging, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - James Patrick Buteau
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Dept of Cancer Imaging, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Aravind Ravi Kumar
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Dept of Cancer Imaging, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Dept of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Wollenweber T, Zisser L, Kretschmer-Chott E, Weber M, Grubmüller B, Kramer G, Shariat SF, Mitterhauser M, Schmitl S, Vraka C, Haug AR, Hacker M, Hartenbach M, Rasul S. Renal and Salivary Gland Functions after Three Cycles of PSMA-617 Therapy Every Four Weeks in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:3692-3704. [PMID: 34590608 PMCID: PMC8482282 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28050315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy (PSMA-RLT) could affect kidney and salivary gland functions in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed clinical, renal, and salivary scintigraphy data and salivary [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 ligand PET scan measures such as metabolic volume and SUVmax values of 27 mCRPC men (mean age 71 ± 7 years) before and 4 weeks after receiving three cycles of PSMA-RLT every 4 weeks. Twenty-two patients additionally obtained renal and salivary scintigraphy prior to each cycle. A one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Scheffé test and Cochran's Q test were applied to assess organ toxicity. RESULTS In total, 54 PSMA PET scans, 98 kidney, and 98 salivary scintigraphy results were evaluated. There were no significant differences for the ejection fraction, peak time, and residual activity after 5 min for both parotid and submandibular glands prior to each cycle and 4 weeks after the last cycle. Similarly, no significant differences in serum creatinine and renal scintigraphy parameters were observed prior to each cycle and 4 weeks after the last treatment. Despite there being no changes in the metabolic volume of both submandibular glands, SUVmax values dropped significantly (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Results evidenced no alterations in renal function and only minimal impairment of salivary function of mCRPC patients who acquired an intense PSMA-RLT regimen every 4 weeks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Wollenweber
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (T.W.); (L.Z.); (E.K.-C.); (M.M.); (S.S.); (C.V.); (A.R.H.); (M.H.); (M.H.)
| | - Lucia Zisser
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (T.W.); (L.Z.); (E.K.-C.); (M.M.); (S.S.); (C.V.); (A.R.H.); (M.H.); (M.H.)
| | - Elisabeth Kretschmer-Chott
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (T.W.); (L.Z.); (E.K.-C.); (M.M.); (S.S.); (C.V.); (A.R.H.); (M.H.); (M.H.)
| | - Michael Weber
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of General Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Bernhard Grubmüller
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (B.G.); (G.K.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Gero Kramer
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (B.G.); (G.K.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (B.G.); (G.K.); (S.F.S.)
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 15006 Prague, Czech Republic
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Markus Mitterhauser
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (T.W.); (L.Z.); (E.K.-C.); (M.M.); (S.S.); (C.V.); (A.R.H.); (M.H.); (M.H.)
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Applied Diagnostics, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefan Schmitl
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (T.W.); (L.Z.); (E.K.-C.); (M.M.); (S.S.); (C.V.); (A.R.H.); (M.H.); (M.H.)
| | - Chrysoula Vraka
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (T.W.); (L.Z.); (E.K.-C.); (M.M.); (S.S.); (C.V.); (A.R.H.); (M.H.); (M.H.)
| | - Alexander R. Haug
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (T.W.); (L.Z.); (E.K.-C.); (M.M.); (S.S.); (C.V.); (A.R.H.); (M.H.); (M.H.)
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for Applied Metabolomics (CDL AM), Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Marcus Hacker
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (T.W.); (L.Z.); (E.K.-C.); (M.M.); (S.S.); (C.V.); (A.R.H.); (M.H.); (M.H.)
| | - Markus Hartenbach
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (T.W.); (L.Z.); (E.K.-C.); (M.M.); (S.S.); (C.V.); (A.R.H.); (M.H.); (M.H.)
| | - Sazan Rasul
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (T.W.); (L.Z.); (E.K.-C.); (M.M.); (S.S.); (C.V.); (A.R.H.); (M.H.); (M.H.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +43-1-40400-58742; Fax: +43-1-40400-55520
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Outcome of 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy in Chemo-Refractory Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Early-Onset Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13164193. [PMID: 34439347 PMCID: PMC8392017 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The risk of prostate cancer development, the second most commonly occurring cancer in men overall, increases strongly with age. About 10% of patients, however, are diagnosed with early-onset prostate cancer (age at diagnosis: ≤55 years). This is considered to be a distinct clinical and pathological phenotype with a poor prognosis. Generally, prostate cancer cells express high quantities of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) on their surface. Radioligand therapy is a type of treatment, which, among other available agents, uses the beta-emitting radionuclide 177Lutetium (177Lu) and a PSMA-targeting ligand termed PSMA-617 for internal irradiation of metastatic prostate cancer cells. The aim of our retrospective study was to assess the efficacy and safety of radioligand therapy with 177Lu-PSMA-617 in early-onset metastasized castration-resistant prostate cancer patients refractory to chemotherapy. Special emphasis was placed on the patients’ response to the treatment and survival. The study provides support for the expected shorter survival compared to heterogenous patient groups. Abstract The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the outcome of patients with metastasized castration-resistant early-onset prostate cancer refractory to chemotherapy receiving radioligand therapy with 177Lutetium-PSMA-617 (LuPSMA-RLT). Twenty-five patients of ≤55 years of age at prostate cancer diagnosis, treated with a median of four (IQR 2–6) cycles (mean of 7.7 ± 1.4 GBq per cycle) every 6–8 weeks, were analyzed. Survival outcome was calculated based on the Kaplan–Meier method. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.8 months (95% CI 2.3–5.3), and overall survival (OS) was 8.5 months (95% CI 6.2–10.8). An initial PSA reduction (≥ 50%) was observed in 9/25 (36%) of patients without being significantly associated with OS (p = 0.601). PSA response (PSA decline ≥50% at 12 weeks) was observed in 12/25 (48%) of patients and significantly associated with longer OS (16.0 months, 95% CI 7.4–24.6 vs. 4.0 months, 95% CI 1.1–6.9, p = 0.002). Imaging-based response using 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT after two to three cycles was seen in 11/25 (44%). Additionally, responders had a significantly longer median PFS (8.7 months, 95% CI 1.3–16.1 vs. 1.9 months, 95% CI 1.7–2.2, p < 0.001) and OS (16.0 months, 95% CI 7.6–24.4 vs. 4.0 months, 95% CI 0.9–7.1; p = 0.002). Intra- or post-therapeutic toxicity was graded according to the CTCAE v5.0 criteria. Newly developing grade ≥ 3 anemia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in three (12%), one (4%), and three (12%) patients, respectively. One patient showed renal toxicity (grade ≥ 3) during follow-up. Pain palliation (>2 level VAS decline) was achieved in 9/14 (64%) and performance status improvement (ECOG level decline ≥ 1) in 8/17 (47%) of patients. Compared to previous reports, radioligand therapy with 177Lu-PSMA-617 in metastasized castration-resistant early-onset prostate cancer patients refractory to chemotherapy yields similar response rates with a comparable safety profile, but is associated with shorter survival.
Collapse
|