Who Knows? Information Received, and Knowledge about, Cancer, Treatment and Late Effects in a National Cohort of Long-Term Childhood, Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors

Awareness about the risk of hearing loss after ototoxic treatments in Swiss childhood cancer survivors

OBJECTIVES

The International Guideline Harmonization Group recommends childhood cancer survivors (CCS) exposed to ototoxic treatments be aware of the risk of hearing loss. We assessed awareness among adult CCS.

METHODS

We identified adults diagnosed with cancer < 20 years who received ototoxic treatments through the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry (ChCR) and invited them to the HEAR-study. Participants completed a questionnaire and underwent pure-tone audiometry. Cancer and treatment data were obtained from the ChCR. We used logistic regression to explore factors influencing awareness.

RESULTS

Of 424 invited, 105 CCS participated (25 %). Fifty-seven percent did not remember receiving information on hearing loss prior to the study. CCS who remembered being informed were more likely diagnosed after 1995 (OR: 4.5, 95 % CI: 1.3-15.4), reported hearing problems (10.9, 2.6-45.1) and other late effects (4.1, 1.3-13.2), and treated with platinum chemotherapy only (10.8, 2.2-53.2) versus cranial radiotherapy only. 44 % of participants presented clinically relevant hearing loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Over half of CCS exposed to ototoxic treatments were unaware of their risk of hearing loss.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Educating CCS about potential late effects of ototoxic treatments is important to allow early diagnosis and treatment, especially for those who had cancer longer ago and those exposed to cranial radiation.

Maladaptive coping styles moderate the relationship between information on cancer treatment and psychosocial symptoms: an Italian multicenter study

Objectives

Disclosing information on diagnosis, prognosis and treatment is a delicate process in oncology, although awareness levels have over time increased in people with cancer. However, individual characteristics should be considered when communicating difficult information. We conducted a multicentric study to explore the moderating role of coping styles on the relationship between information about cancer, quality of life and psychological distress.

Methods

In the period between October 2015 and February 2016, 288 patients with a diagnosis of a solid tumor were recruited from seven Italian oncology units. All participants were administered the Distress Thermometer (DT), the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer (Mini-MAC), the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), and the EORTC QLQ 25-item information module (INFO25). We explored the moderating effect of coping style with quality of life (QoL) and distress (DT) as dependent variables and information on cancer treatment as independent variable.

Results

Low levels of anxious preoccupation significantly moderated the relationship between information on treatment and QoL (R2 6%, p < 0.001), while low and medium levels of hopelessness significantly moderated the relationship between information on treatment and DT (R2 = 14%, p = 0.033). Adaptive coping strategies, such as fighting spirit and fatalism, and borderline strategies such as avoidance, did not play a role in this relationship.

Conclusion

Taking into account and evaluating coping mechanisms in cancer care is a priority when disclosing information on treatments, in order to tailor communication style to individual features.

Unveiling perspectives on the psychosocial impacts of childhood cancer survival on young adult survivors' reassimilation journey: A qualitative exploration

Background

Approximately 82% of children with childhood cancer survive more than five years after diagnosis. Living as a cancer survivor elicits a new reality that can include psychosocial impacts. These psychosocial impacts interact collectively, especially regarding reassimilation, and are rarely explored.

Objective

To explore the psychosocial impacts of surviving childhood cancer and reassimilation back into society in young adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Methodology

Individual in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with childhood cancer survivors and explored psychosocial aspects associated with returning to work, school, and social environments after remission. Interpretive phenomenological analysis was conducted once interviews were manually transcribed. A group interview with survivors was held to discuss the study's findings and interpretation.

Results

Individual interviews and the group interview revealed three major themes: outlook on reassimilating, outlook on coping, and outlook on cancer.

Conclusions

This work is a first step to understanding how survivors' personal outlook on coping and healthcare system barriers play influential roles in reassimilation following cancer treatment. Survivors expressed the need for reliable survivorship information and improved communication with healthcare providers regarding what to expect, so they could feel prepared for life post-cancer. These aspects need to be explored more deeply through other qualitative studies.

Regards sur les séquelles psychosociales des cancers pédiatriques sur le parcours de réintégration des jeunes survivants devenus adultes: étude qualitative exploratoire

Contexte

Environ 82 % des personnes atteintes d’un cancer pendant l’enfance survivent plus de 5 ans après le diagnostic. La survivance transforme leur quotidien et entraîne parfois des difficultés psychosociales. Les séquelles psychosociales – rarement étudiées – sont interreliées, surtout en ce qui concerne la réinsertion aux activités normales.

Objectif

Examiner les effets psychosociaux de la survie au cancer pédiatrique et la réinsertion sociale des jeunes adultes.

Méthodologie

Des entrevues individuelles semi-structurées détaillées ont été réalisées auprès de personnes ayant survécu à un cancer pédiatrique afin d’étudier les aspects psychologiques du retour au travail, à l’école et en société après la rémission. Après la transcription manuelle des entrevues, on a procédé à une analyse phénoménologique interprétative. Un groupe de discussion a été organisé pour permettre aux survivants de discuter des résultats de l’étude et de l’interprétation des données.

Résultats

Les entrevues individuelles et le groupe de discussion ont fait ressortir trois grands thèmes: le regard porté sur la réinsertion, le regard porté sur l’adaptation et le regard porté sur le cancer.

Conclusions

La présente recherche amorce une démarche visant à comprendre en quoi le regard que portent les survivants sur l’adaptation et les obstacles liés au système de santé influence la réintégration après le cancer. Les survivants ont exprimé le besoin d’obtenir des renseignements fiables sur la survivance au cancer et d’être mieux informés par leurs professionnels de la santé afin de se préparer à la vie après le cancer. Ces aspects devront faire l’objet d’autres études qualitatives détaillées.

Food Insecurity and Nutritional Challenges in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors in the U.S.A.: A Narrative Review and Call to Action

Advancements in cancer treatments over the past several decades have led to improved cancer survival in adolescents and young adults (AYAs, ages 15–39 years). However, AYA cancer survivors are at an increased risk for “late effects”, including cardiovascular, pulmonary and bone diseases as well as fatigue, infertility and secondary cancers. The treatments for cancer may also alter taste, lead to nutritional deficiencies and increase financial burdens that, when taken together, may increase the risk of food and nutrition security in AYA cancer survivors. Furthermore, although AYAs are often merged together in cancer survivorship studies, adolescents and young adults have distinct developmental, psychosocial and pathophysiological differences that may modify their risk of nutritional challenges. In this narrative review and “Call to Action”, rationale is provided for why there is a need to better understand nutritional challenges and food insecurity in AYA cancer survivors as a special population. Then, recommendations for next steps to advance knowledge and policy in this field are provided. In particular, integrating screening for food and nutrition insecurity and enhancing awareness of existing resources (e.g., the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, SNAP) might help AYA cancer survivors combat nutritional deficiencies and reduce late effects while improving their overall survival and quality of life.

A Historical Misconception in Clinical Trials of Drugs for Cancer-Age Grouping

In clinical trials of cancer drugs, grouping by age is a very common grouping method, as it can allow for a visual comparison of the different pharmaceutical responses in patients at different age stages. Under the guidance of this thinking, many researchers use age grouping when studying clinical cancer drugs. However, even people at the same age may be at different stages in their lives, such as individuals who are going through puberty, menopause/andropause, or intermediate transition, as well as childhood and old age, affected by factors such as hormone levels, immune responses, ethnic groups, and regions. Every individual has different cancer symptoms and responses to drugs; therefore, the experimental effect of life stage grouping will be more obvious and clearer. Not only does this conclusion apply to cancer drugs, but it also applies to clinical trials for other diseases. In addition, this does not mean that age grouping should be completely abandoned. Life stage is a more general interval that can be further divided into life stage groups according to the age of the patients. Based on the principal law of lifespan (PLOSP), age trends in life stages also need to be updated from time to time. To date, life stage grouping has not been discussed systematically and has not been used as a grouping method for cancer patients. In this paper, life stage grouping is discussed as one of the important grouping categories in cancer clinical trials.

The gap between expectations and reality: A qualitative study of psychosocial challenges of young childhood cancer survivors from the PACCS study

OBJECTIVE

In this sub-study from the 'PACCS' study, we explored the psychosocial experiences of children and adolescents in everyday life post-cancer treatment and the possible factors that can moderate these experiences.

METHODS

This is a qualitative explorative study using semi-structured interviews with 43 childhood cancer survivors between the ages of nine and 18 from Norway and Denmark. We conducted a secondary thematic analysis using Malterud's systematic text condensation.

RESULTS

Two main themes were identified: 'The post-treatment gap between expectations and reality' comprised two subthemes: (1) lack of mastery and feeling different and (2) lack of understanding and acceptance. The second main theme, 'Managing the gap', comprised three subthemes: (1) information and knowledge, (2) adjustments and adaptions and (3) social support and openness. The findings reveal that the psychosocial challenges resulted from the remaining ability gap(s). Measures such as tailored information, school adjustments and social support were potential dynamic factors affecting the gap(s) positively or negatively. Psychosocial challenges post-treatment are experiences of lack of acceptance and understanding from others.

CONCLUSION

To safeguard a positive transition back to everyday life, health care providers should support the survivors' psychosocial care, including getting back to school and re-entering social interactions.