1
|
Gonsalves D, Ocanto A, Meilan E, Gomez A, Dominguez J, Torres L, Pascual CF, Teja M, Linde MM, Guijarro M, Rivas D, Begara J, González JA, Andreescu J, Holgado E, Alcaraz D, López E, Dzhugashvli M, Lopez-Campos F, Alongi F, Couñago F. Feasibility and Acute Toxicity of Hypo-Fractionated Radiotherapy on 0.35T MR-LINAC: The First Prospective Study in Spain. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1685. [PMID: 38730637 PMCID: PMC11083553 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
This observational, descriptive, longitudinal, and prospective basket-type study (Registry #5289) prospectively evaluated the feasibility and acute toxicity of hypo-fractionated radiotherapy on the first 0.35T MR-LINAC in Spain. A total of 37 patients were included between August and December 2023, primarily with prostate tumors (59.46%), followed by pancreatic tumors (32.44%). Treatment regimens typically involved extreme hypo-fractionated radiotherapy, with precise dose delivery verified through quality assurance measures. Acute toxicity assessment at treatment completion revealed manageable cystitis, with one case persisting at the three-month follow-up. Gastrointestinal toxicity was minimal. For pancreatic tumors, daily adaptation of organ-at-risk (OAR) and gross tumor volume (GTV) was practiced, with median doses to OAR within acceptable limits. Three patients experienced gastrointestinal toxicity, mainly nausea. Overall, the study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of extreme hypo-fractionated radiotherapy on a 0.35T MR-LINAC, especially for challenging anatomical sites like prostate and pancreatic tumors. These findings support the feasibility of MR-LINAC-based radiotherapy in delivering precise treatments with minimal toxicity, highlighting its potential for optimizing cancer treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Gonsalves
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (A.O.); (L.T.); (C.F.P.); (M.T.); (M.M.L.); (M.G.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
- Facultad de Medicina Salud y Deporte, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
| | - Abrahams Ocanto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (A.O.); (L.T.); (C.F.P.); (M.T.); (M.M.L.); (M.G.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Eduardo Meilan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Alberto Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Jesus Dominguez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Lisselott Torres
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (A.O.); (L.T.); (C.F.P.); (M.T.); (M.M.L.); (M.G.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Castalia Fernández Pascual
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (A.O.); (L.T.); (C.F.P.); (M.T.); (M.M.L.); (M.G.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Macarena Teja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (A.O.); (L.T.); (C.F.P.); (M.T.); (M.M.L.); (M.G.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Miguel Montijano Linde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (A.O.); (L.T.); (C.F.P.); (M.T.); (M.M.L.); (M.G.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Marcos Guijarro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (A.O.); (L.T.); (C.F.P.); (M.T.); (M.M.L.); (M.G.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Daniel Rivas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Málaga, 29018 Madrid, Spain; (D.R.); (J.B.); (E.L.)
| | - Jose Begara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Málaga, 29018 Madrid, Spain; (D.R.); (J.B.); (E.L.)
| | | | - Jon Andreescu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Cordoba, 14012 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Esther Holgado
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (E.H.); (D.A.)
| | - Diego Alcaraz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (E.H.); (D.A.)
| | - Escarlata López
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Málaga, 29018 Madrid, Spain; (D.R.); (J.B.); (E.L.)
| | - Maia Dzhugashvli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Fernando Lopez-Campos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Care Center, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, 37024 Verona, Italy;
- Radiation Oncology School, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (A.O.); (L.T.); (C.F.P.); (M.T.); (M.M.L.); (M.G.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
- Facultad de Medicina Salud y Deporte, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Westley RL, Valle LF, Tree AC, Kishan AU. MRI-Guided Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Seeing is Believing. Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:45-55. [PMID: 38105093 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
The advent of MRI guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) offers enormous promise in the treatment of prostate cancer. The MR-linac offers men the opportunity to receive daily MR imaging to guide and influence their radiotherapy treatment. This review focuses on the advantages that MRIgRT potentially offers as well as any potential disadvantages to MRIgRT that may have been recognized thus far. Ongoing clinical trials evaluating this novel treatment platform for the treatment of prostate cancer are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalyne L Westley
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, England, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, England, UK.
| | - Luca F Valle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Alison C Tree
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, England, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, England, UK
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Prunaretty J, Güngör G, Gevaert T, Azria D, Valdenaire S, Balermpas P, Boldrini L, Chuong MD, De Ridder M, Hardy L, Kandiban S, Maingon P, Mittauer KE, Ozyar E, Roque T, Colombo L, Paragios N, Pennell R, Placidi L, Shreshtha K, Speiser MP, Tanadini-Lang S, Valentini V, Fenoglietto P. A multi-centric evaluation of self-learning GAN based pseudo-CT generation software for low field pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1245054. [PMID: 38023165 PMCID: PMC10667706 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1245054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose/objectives An artificial intelligence-based pseudo-CT from low-field MR images is proposed and clinically evaluated to unlock the full potential of MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy for pelvic cancer care. Materials and method In collaboration with TheraPanacea (TheraPanacea, Paris, France) a pseudo-CT AI-model was generated using end-to-end ensembled self-supervised GANs endowed with cycle consistency using data from 350 pairs of weakly aligned data of pelvis planning CTs and TrueFisp-(0.35T)MRIs. The image accuracy of the generated pCT were evaluated using a retrospective cohort involving 20 test cases coming from eight different institutions (US: 2, EU: 5, AS: 1) and different CT vendors. Reconstruction performance was assessed using the organs at risk used for treatment. Concerning the dosimetric evaluation, twenty-nine prostate cancer patients treated on the low field MR-Linac (ViewRay) at Montpellier Cancer Institute were selected. Planning CTs were non-rigidly registered to the MRIs for each patient. Treatment plans were optimized on the planning CT with a clinical TPS fulfilling all clinical criteria and recalculated on the warped CT (wCT) and the pCT. Three different algorithms were used: AAA, AcurosXB and MonteCarlo. Dose distributions were compared using the global gamma passing rates and dose metrics. Results The observed average scaled (between maximum and minimum HU values of the CT) difference between the pCT and the planning CT was 33.20 with significant discrepancies across organs. Femoral heads were the most reliably reconstructed (4.51 and 4.77) while anal canal and rectum were the less precise ones (63.08 and 53.13). Mean gamma passing rates for 1%1mm, 2%/2mm, and 3%/3mm tolerance criteria and 10% threshold were greater than 96%, 99% and 99%, respectively, regardless the algorithm used. Dose metrics analysis showed a good agreement between the pCT and the wCT. The mean relative difference were within 1% for the target volumes (CTV and PTV) and 2% for the OARs. Conclusion This study demonstrated the feasibility of generating clinically acceptable an artificial intelligence-based pseudo CT for low field MR in pelvis with consistent image accuracy and dosimetric results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Prunaretty
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Department of Radiation Oncology, Montpellier, France
| | - Gorkem Güngör
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maslak Hospital, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar (MAA) University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Thierry Gevaert
- Radiotherapy Department, Universitair Ziekenhuis (UZ) Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David Azria
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Department of Radiation Oncology, Montpellier, France
| | - Simon Valdenaire
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Department of Radiation Oncology, Montpellier, France
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Michael David Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Mark De Ridder
- Radiotherapy Department, Universitair Ziekenhuis (UZ) Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Philippe Maingon
- Assistance publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Sorbonne Universite, Charles-Foix Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Kathryn Elizabeth Mittauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Enis Ozyar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maslak Hospital, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar (MAA) University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | | | | | | | - Ryan Pennell
- Radiation Oncology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Lorenzo Placidi
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - M. P. Speiser
- Radiation Oncology Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Pascal Fenoglietto
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Department of Radiation Oncology, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baty M, Pasquier D, Gnep K, Castelli J, Delaby N, Lacornerie T, de Crevoisier R. Achievable Dosimetric Constraints in Stereotactic Reirradiation for Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol 2023; 13:e515-e529. [PMID: 37295723 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiation therapy has been proposed as a salvage treatment for recurrent prostate cancer after irradiation. One crucial issue is choosing appropriate dose-volume constraints (DVCs) during planning. The objectives of this study were to (1) quantify the proportion of patients respecting the DVCs according to the Urogenital Tumor Study Group GETUG-31 trial, testing 36 Gy in six fractions, (2) explain geometrically why the DVCs could not be respected, and (3) propose the most suitable DVCs. METHODS AND MATERIALS This retrospective dosimetric analysis included 141 patients treated for recurrent prostate cancer with Cyberknife (Accuray), according to GETUG-31 DVCs: V95% ≥ 95% for the planning target volume (PTV), V12Gy < 20% and V27Gy < 2 cc for the rectum, and V12Gy < 15% and V27Gy < 5 cc for the bladder. The percentage of patients not respecting the DVCs was quantified. Correlations between the DVCs and anatomic structures were examined. New DVCs were proposed. RESULTS Only 19% of patients respected all DVCs, with a mean PTV of 18.5 cc (range, 3-48 cc), although the mean PTV was 40.5 cc (range, 3-174 cc) in the whole series. A total of 98% of the patients with a clinical target volume (CTV)/prostate ratio >0.5 could not respect the DVCs in the organs at risk. The target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing decreased significantly with increase in the values of PTV, CTV, CTV/prostate ratio, the overlapping volume between the PTV and bladder wall and between the PTV and rectal wall. Threshold values of PTV, >20 cc and 40 cc, allowed for the PTV and bladder DVCs, respectively. To improve DVC respect in case of large target volume, we proposed the following new DVCs: V12Gy < 25% and 25% and V27Gy < 2 cc and 5 cc for the rectum and bladder, respectively. CONCLUSIONS GETUG-31 DVCs are achievable only for small target volumes (CTV more than half of the prostate). For a larger target volume, new DVCs have been proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon Baty
- Department of Radiotherapy, Center Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.
| | - David Pasquier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center Oscar Lambret, Lille University, France
| | - Khemara Gnep
- Department of Radiotherapy, Center Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Joel Castelli
- Department of Radiotherapy, Center Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France; Laboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image, Rennes, France
| | - Nolwenn Delaby
- Department of Medical Physics, Center Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Thomas Lacornerie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Renaud de Crevoisier
- Department of Radiotherapy, Center Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France; Laboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image, Rennes, France; Laboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image, University of Rennes, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gruen A, Tegel K, Kluge A, Budach V, Zips D, Boehmer D. PSMA PET-based stereotactic body radiotherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive first-line therapy. Prostate 2023; 83:1298-1305. [PMID: 37394721 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET-computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allow the detection and localization of exclusively local prostate-cancer-recurrences after definitive first-line therapy. PSMA-based early detection of circumscribed local recurrences followed by hypofractionated high-precision stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) might yield long-term disease control at moderate rates of adverse effects. METHODS Retrospective analysis of 35 patients treated for locally recurrent prostate cancer between November 2012 and December 2021 with PSMA PET- and MRI-based robotic SBRT. RESULTS Thirty-five patients treated with local prostate cancer recurrence post surgery, post surgery, and adjuvant/salvage radiotherapy (RT) and after definitive RT. All but one patients had fractionated SBRT in 3-5 fractions. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 52.2 months for all patients and 52.2 months in the radical prostatectomy (RPE) group, 31.2 months in the RPE + RT group and not reached in the RT group. The most common event was increased urinary frequency grade 1-2. 54.3% of all patients had no acute and 79.4% no late toxicity during follow-up. DISCUSSION Our PFS of 52.2 months (RPE), 31.2 months (RPE + RT) and not reached (RT) compares favorably with published data. This method constitutes a valid alternative to morbidity-prone invasive approaches or palliative systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne Gruen
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Campus Virchow-Klinik, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katharina Tegel
- Department for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau Krankenhausbetriebs gGmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Kluge
- MVZ Leipzig Strahlentherapie, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Zips
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Boehmer
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rasing MJA, Peters M, van Son M, Moerland MA, Eppinga W, van de Pol SMG, Noteboom J, Lagendijk J, van der Voort van Zyp JRN. Recurrence characteristics after focal salvage HDR brachytherapy in prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2023; 180:109495. [PMID: 36708924 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Radiorecurrent prostate cancer is often confined to the prostate, predominantly near the index lesion. The purpose of this study was to look at recurrence characteristics in patients treated with focal salvage high dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients treated with MRI-guided HDR brachytherapy, with a single fraction of 19 Gy from July 2013 to October 2021 as focal salvage treatment, were prospectively included in the current study. Imaging data were collected regarding the occurrence of local, regional and distant recurrences, including location of local recurrences (LR) in relation to the HDR radiotherapy field. RESULTS One hundred seventy-five patients were included after focal salvage HDR brachytherapy (median follow-up 36 months (IQR 23-50)). Three-years biochemical recurrence-free survival, LR-free survival, in-field LR-free survival, out-of-field LR-free survival, any-recurrence-free survival and ADT-free survival were 43% (95%CI 34%-52%), 51% (41%-61%), 70% (61%-80%), 92% (88%-97%), 42% (32%-52%) and 86% (80%-92%), respectively. Larger GTV-size and shorter PSA doubling time were associated with in-field LR in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION After focal salvage HDR brachytherapy with a dose of 1x19 Gy for local prostate cancer recurrence, subsequent recurrences are mostly local and in-field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marnix J A Rasing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Max Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke van Son
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marinus A Moerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wietse Eppinga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandrine M G van de Pol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Juus Noteboom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Lagendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gao LR, Tian Y, Wang MS, Xia WL, Qin SR, Song YW, Wang SL, Tang Y, Fang H, Tang Y, Qi SN, Yan LL, Liu YP, Jing H, Chen B, Xing NZ, Li YX, Lu NN. Assessment of delivered dose in prostate cancer patients treated with ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy on 1.5-Tesla MR-Linac. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1039901. [PMID: 36741014 PMCID: PMC9893501 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1039901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To quantitatively characterize the dosimetric effects of long on-couch time in prostate cancer patients treated with adaptive ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy (UHF-RT) on 1.5-Tesla magnetic resonance (MR)-linac. Materials and methods Seventeen patients consecutively treated with UHF-RT on a 1.5-T MR-linac were recruited. A 36.25 Gy dose in five fractions was delivered every other day with a boost of 40 Gy to the whole prostate. We collected data for the following stages: pre-MR, position verification-MR (PV-MR) in the Adapt-To-Shape (ATS) workflow, and 3D-MR during the beam-on phase (Bn-MR) and at the end of RT (post-MR). The target and organ-at-risk contours in the PV-MR, Bn-MR, and post-MR stages were projected from the pre-MR data by deformable image registration and manually adapted by the physician, followed by dose recalculation for the ATS plan. Results Overall, 290 MR scans were collected (85 pre-MR, 85 PV-MR, 49 Bn-MR and 71 post-MR scans). With a median on-couch time of 49 minutes, the mean planning target volume (PTV)-V95% of all scans was 97.83 ± 0.13%. The corresponding mean clinical target volume (CTV)-V100% was 99.93 ± 0.30%, 99.32 ± 1.20%, 98.59 ± 1.84%, and 98.69 ± 1.85%. With excellent prostate-V100% dose coverage, the main reason for lower CTV-V100% was slight underdosing of seminal vesicles (SVs). The median V29 Gy change in the rectal wall was -1% (-20%-17%). The V29 Gy of the rectal wall increased by >15% was observed in one scan. A slight increase in the high dose of bladder wall was noted due to gradual bladder growth during the workflow. Conclusions This 3D-MR-based dosimetry analysis demonstrated clinically acceptable estimated dose coverage of target volumes during the beam-on period with adaptive ATS workflow on 1.5-T MR-linac, albeit with a relatively long on-couch time. The 3-mm CTV-PTV margin was adequate for prostate irradiation but occasionally insufficient for SVs. More attention should be paid to restricting high-dose RT to the rectal wall when optimizing the ATS plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin-Rui Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ming-Shuai Wang
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wen-Long Xia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shi-Rui Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yong-Wen Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shu-Lian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Tang
- GCP Center/Clinical Research Center, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shu-Nan Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ling-Ling Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yue-Ping Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Jing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Nian-Zeng Xing
- Department of Urology and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China,*Correspondence: Ning-Ning Lu, ; Ye-Xiong Li, ; Nian-Zeng Xing,
| | - Ye-Xiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China,*Correspondence: Ning-Ning Lu, ; Ye-Xiong Li, ; Nian-Zeng Xing,
| | - Ning-Ning Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China,*Correspondence: Ning-Ning Lu, ; Ye-Xiong Li, ; Nian-Zeng Xing,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Michalet M, Riou O, Azria D, Decoene C, Crop F. News in magnetic resonance imaging use for radiation oncology. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:784-788. [PMID: 36031496 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.06.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to give a summary of the progress of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiotherapy. MRI is an important imaging modality for treatment planning in radiotherapy. However, the registration step with the simulation scanner can be a source of errors, motivating the implementation of all-MRI simulation methods and new accelerators coupled with on-board MRI. First, practical MRI imaging for radiotherapy is detailed, but also the importance of a coherent imaging workflow incorporating all imaging modalities. Second, future evolutions and research domains such as quantitative imaging biomarkers, MRI-only pseudo computed tomography and radiomics are discussed. Finally, the application of MRI during radiotherapy treatment is reviewed: the use of MR-linear accelerators. MRI is increasingly integrated into radiotherapy. Advances in diagnostic imaging can thus benefit radiotherapy, but specific radiotherapy constraints lead to additional challenges and require close collaboration between radiologists, radiation oncologists, technologists and physicists. The integration of quantitative imaging biomarkers in the radiotherapy process will result in mutual benefit for diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy. MRI-guided radiotherapy has already been used for several years in clinical routine. Abdominopelvic neoplasias (pancreas, liver, prostate) are the preferred locations for treatment because of their favourable contrast in MRI, their movement during irradiation and their proximity to organs at risk of radiation exposure, making the tracking and daily adaptation of the plan essential. MRI has emerged as an increasingly necessary imaging modality for radiotherapy planning. Inclusion of patients in clinical trials evaluating new MRI-guided radiotherapy techniques and associated quantitative imaging biomarkers will be necessary to assess the benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Michalet
- Institut du cancer de Montpellier, Fédération universitaire d'oncologie-radiothérapie d'Occitanie Méditerranée (Forom), Inserm U1194 IRCM, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier, France.
| | - O Riou
- Institut du cancer de Montpellier, Fédération universitaire d'oncologie-radiothérapie d'Occitanie Méditerranée (Forom), Inserm U1194 IRCM, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - D Azria
- Institut du cancer de Montpellier, Fédération universitaire d'oncologie-radiothérapie d'Occitanie Méditerranée (Forom), Inserm U1194 IRCM, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - C Decoene
- Medical physics, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, 59000 Lille, France
| | - F Crop
- Medical physics, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, 59000 Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|