1
|
Ticha P, Sukop A. Patient-reported outcomes in bilateral prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction: A narrative review. Breast 2024; 73:103602. [PMID: 37995427 PMCID: PMC10709055 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.103602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
In women at high risk of developing breast cancer, bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM) 1 significantly reduces the risk; simultaneously, breast reconstruction preserves body integrity. Given the complex and personal nature of such surgical procedures, patient assessment of satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) 2 is essential in evaluation of surgical outcomes. With this review, we aim to organize the current knowledge on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) 3 in bilateral prophylactic surgery. Literature search was conducted using the databases Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science to address the following questions, which can help clinicians and women undergoing the procedures navigate their healthcare decision-making process: How does BPM with reconstruction influence cancer-related distress? How does the surgery impact patient satisfaction and HRQoL? How do preoperative PROs differ from postoperative outcomes? Does the type of BPM and the type of reconstruction impact patient satisfaction and HRQoL? Furthermore, we summarize available patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) 4 that can be administered to women undergoing BPM with reconstruction. In addition, we discuss possible future directions for PRO research in prophylactic breast surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavla Ticha
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 50, 10034, Praha 10, Czech Republic.
| | - Andrej Sukop
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 50, 10034, Praha 10, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maita KC, Torres-Guzman RA, Avila FR, Garcia JP, Rinker BD, Ho OA, Forte AJ. Technical consideration for breast reconstruction in patients requiring neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiotherapy: a narrative review. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2023; 11:417. [PMID: 38213815 PMCID: PMC10777226 DOI: 10.21037/atm-23-1052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objective Surgical considerations for breast reconstruction (BR) in patients requiring neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NART) or adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) cannot be understated. The management of irradiated tissue leads surgeons to face several challenges. Therefore, it is essential to comprehensively understand the proper patient selection and preoperative planning to ensure the best outcomes and minimize the risk of complications. This narrative review aims to provide an update and summary of the most important technical considerations every breast surgeon must contemplate reconstructing the irradiated breast. Methods The search strategy was performed on January 10th, 2023. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were queried to capture all publications regarding surgical considerations in BR of patients undergoing NART and ART. Key Content and Findings This review shows that the effects of radiotherapy (RT) on BR are still being studied. RT represents an essential factor for overall patient survival, and its use is increasing. However, the range of RT treatments across different cancer centers complicates the creation of a single treatment protocol. BR improves women's quality of life, so finding the proper integration of BR and RT is essential. When deciding on the reconstructive method, there are several factors to consider, such as the patient's body characteristics, tumor stage, RT protocol, and chemotherapy. To achieve the best surgical results and the most satisfied patient, using less aggressive and safer RT methods in the treatment sequence is recommended. Conclusions The timing of the radiation will influence the selection of the best reconstructive methods to be employed in the breast cancer patient. However, there is clear evidence of preference for immediate autologous-based BR in cases due to the low rate of complications in the long term. But patient individualization is the key. Therefore, the benefits and risks of immediate versus delayed and autologous versus implant-based reconstruction must be weighed in every single case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karla C Maita
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | | | - John P Garcia
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Brian D Rinker
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Olivia A Ho
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Antonio J Forte
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Frasson AL, Falcone AB, Barbosa F, Anton de Souza AB, Malhone C, Miranda I, Vollbrecht B, Rodriguez Martinez Frasson MA, Kobe L, Lichtenfels M. Low rate of complications in nipple-sparing mastectomy for patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation. Per Med 2023; 20:493-501. [PMID: 37909344 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2023-0084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
Background: To describe the indications and outcomes of BRCA mutation carriers undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). Methods: In this retrospective study, 76 BRCA mutation carriers with no cancer who opted to undergo risk reduction NSM or diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) who opted to undergo therapeutic NSM were included. Results: Indications for NSM: cancer treatment (n = 33), bilateral risk reduction (n = 39) and contralateral prophylactic NSM (n = 4). In a mean follow-up of 45 months (median: 30 months), one patient (2.5%) undergoing risk-reducing NSM developed a new BC. One (3%) local, one (3%) ipsilateral axillary and one (3%) distant recurrence were observed in BC patients. No partial or total nipple necrosis occurred. Conclusion: NSM is safe for reducing the risk of BC development in BRCA mutation carriers and for treating cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antônio Luiz Frasson
- Breast Cancer Group, Albert Einstein Hospital, Albert Einstein Avenue 627, 05652-900, São Paulo, Brazil
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Ipiranga 6690, 90610-000, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Ana Beatriz Falcone
- Breast Cancer Group, Albert Einstein Hospital, Albert Einstein Avenue 627, 05652-900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fernanda Barbosa
- Breast Cancer Group, Albert Einstein Hospital, Albert Einstein Avenue 627, 05652-900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alessandra Borba Anton de Souza
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Ipiranga 6690, 90610-000, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Carolina Malhone
- Breast Cancer Group, Albert Einstein Hospital, Albert Einstein Avenue 627, 05652-900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Isabela Miranda
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Ipiranga 6690, 90610-000, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Betina Vollbrecht
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Ipiranga 6690, 90610-000, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Monica Adriana Rodriguez Martinez Frasson
- Breast Cancer Group, Albert Einstein Hospital, Albert Einstein Avenue 627, 05652-900, São Paulo, Brazil
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Ipiranga 6690, 90610-000, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Luiza Kobe
- Breast Cancer Group, Albert Einstein Hospital, Albert Einstein Avenue 627, 05652-900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Martina Lichtenfels
- Breast Cancer Group, Albert Einstein Hospital, Albert Einstein Avenue 627, 05652-900, São Paulo, Brazil
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Ipiranga 6690, 90610-000, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bertozzi S, Londero AP, Xholli A, Azioni G, Di Vora R, Paudice M, Bucimazza I, Cedolini C, Cagnacci A. Risk-Reducing Breast and Gynecological Surgery for BRCA Mutation Carriers: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041422. [PMID: 36835955 PMCID: PMC9967164 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
This narrative review aims to clarify the role of breast and gynecological risk-reduction surgery in BRCA mutation carriers. We examine the indications, contraindications, complications, technical aspects, timing, economic impact, ethical issues, and prognostic benefits of the most common prophylactic surgical options from the perspectives of a breast surgeon and a gynecologist. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and EMBASE databases. The databases were explored from their inceptions to August 2022. Three independent reviewers screened the items and selected those most relevant to this review's scope. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers are significantly more likely to develop breast, ovarian, and serous endometrial cancer. Because of the Angelina effect, there has been a significant increase in bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM) since 2013. BRRM and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) significantly reduce the risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer. RRSO has significant side effects, including an impact on fertility and early menopause (i.e., vasomotor symptoms, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, cognitive impairment, and sexual dysfunction). Hormonal therapy can help with these symptoms. Because of the lower risk of developing breast cancer in the residual mammary gland tissue after BRRM, estrogen-only treatments have an advantage over an estrogen/progesterone combined treatment. Risk-reducing hysterectomy allows for estrogen-only treatments and lowers the risk of endometrial cancer. Although prophylactic surgery reduces the cancer risk, it has disadvantages associated with early menopause. A multidisciplinary team must carefully inform the woman who chooses this path of the broad spectrum of implications, from cancer risk reduction to hormonal therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Bertozzi
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, UD, Italy
- Ennergi Research (Non-Profit Organisation), 33050 Lestizza, UD, Italy
| | - Ambrogio P. Londero
- Ennergi Research (Non-Profit Organisation), 33050 Lestizza, UD, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Infant Health, University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, GE, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Anjeza Xholli
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale San Martino, 16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Azioni
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale San Martino, 16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Roberta Di Vora
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, UD, Italy
| | - Michele Paudice
- Anatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
- Anatomic Pathology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale San Martino, 16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Ines Bucimazza
- Department of Surgery, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa
| | - Carla Cedolini
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, UD, Italy
- Ennergi Research (Non-Profit Organisation), 33050 Lestizza, UD, Italy
| | - Angelo Cagnacci
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Infant Health, University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, GE, Italy
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale San Martino, 16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
| |
Collapse
|