Cachexia Index as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study

The Prevalence and Prognostic Impact of Cancer Cachexia on Overall Survival in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome characterized by progressive weight loss, predominantly due to the depletion of skeletal muscle mass and adipose tissue. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of cancer cachexia on overall survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Two independent investigators conducted a systematic literature search across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Eligible studies included cohort studies and post hoc analyses of clinical trials that examined the association between cancer cachexia and overall survival in gastrointestinal cancer patients. A total of 22 studies involving 10,480 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled prevalence of cachexia among gastrointestinal cancer patients was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI] 41-59). Meta-analysis demonstrated that cancer cachexia was significantly associated with reduced overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.50; 95% CI 1.35-1.68). Subgroup analyses further confirmed that cancer cachexia remained a robust predictor of poorer survival, irrespective of study design, gastrointestinal cancer subtype, patients' age, country of origin, tumor stage, cachexia definition, or follow-up duration. These findings indicate that cancer cachexia is highly prevalent among gastrointestinal cancer patients and serves as a significant independent predictor of shortened overall survival.

A higher preoperative cachexia index can result in the sufficient administration of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy and lead to a good prognosis for elderly patients with stage II/III gastric cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to clarify the significance of the relative dose intensity (RDI) of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after gastrectomy in elderly patients with stage II/III gastric cancer (GC) and to determine whether the cachexia index (CXI) correlates with RDI.

METHODS

We enrolled 76 patients with stage II/III GC, aged > 70 years. The overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) of participants in the surgery alone, S-1 ACT completion (RDI ≥ 58%), and S-1 ACT non-completion (RDI < 58%) groups were compared. In addition, the clinicopathological determinants of RDI were examined.

RESULTS

The S-1 ACT completion group had better OS and DSS, while the prognoses of patients in the surgery alone and S-1 ACT non-completion groups did not differ significantly. S-1 ACT non-completion or surgery alone was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor for OS and DSS. Furthermore, a multivariate analysis revealed that a high preoperative CXI (≥ 75.5 for males and ≥ 79.4 for females) was an independent predictor of success in achieving an RDI ≥ 58%.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher preoperative CXI can result in a higher RDI and improve the prognosis of elderly patients with stage II/III GC who underwent S-1 ACT.

Prognostic significance of the cachexia index (CXI) in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The Cachexia Index (CXI) was a useful indicator of malnutrition and inflammatory pressure in patients with cancer and was associated with a poor prognosis. However, the available studies differ in terms of study population, design, and the used cut-offs. Therefore, we aimed to systematically analyze the association between CXI and survival in cancer patients.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We conducted a systematic literature search across Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies published up to 24 September 2024. This protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (Registration Number: CRD42024594228). We performed a meta-analysis and analyzed the results of these studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies with a total of 5401 patients were identified. Lower CXI levels were significantly associated with shorter overall survival (OS) (Hazard Ratio (HR): 2.03, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 1.83-2.24, p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR:1.86 95%CI: 1.67-2.08, p < 0.001). This association was similar among tumor types (gastrointestinal (GI), hepatobiliary/pancreas, and other tumors) and tumor stage (localized vs metastatic).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, we showed a relationship between lower CXI levels and survival in patients with cancer. Our findings suggest that CXI may be a valuable prognostic marker in patients with cancer and help clinicians define high-risk patients.

Skeletal Muscle Index-Based Cachexia Index as a Predictor of Prognosis in Patients With Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Cachexia is associated with poor survival rates. In the clinical setting, the diagnosis of cancer cachexia is challenging. The cachexia index (CXI), a new index for predicting survival time, is a promising tool for diagnosing cancer cachexia; however, its efficacy in predicting patient survival has not been validated.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis and systematic review aimed to explore the CXI's prognostic value in patients with cancer.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies to determine the association between CXI findings and prognosis.

DATA EXTRACTION

The outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-, disease-, and recurrence-free survival (PFS/DFS/RFS) rates, and the rate of complete response.

DATA ANALYSIS

The QUality In Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included trials. This meta-analysis comprised 14 studies involving 2777 patients. A low CXI was associated with decreased OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.01-2.72; P < .001), PFS/DFS/RFS (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.68-2.22; P < .001), and complete response (odds ratio [OR] 0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.66; P < .001). Patients with a low CXI had a lower body mass index (mean difference [MD] -0.75, 95% CI -1.00 to 0.50; P < .001), skeletal muscle index (standardized MD -0.80, 95% CI -0.98 to -0.61; P < .001), and serum albumin level (MD -0.23, 95% CI -0.26 to -0.20; P < .001); and a higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (MD 1.88, 95% CI 1.29-2.47; P < .001) and more advanced disease stages (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71-0.91; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

A low CXI was found to be associated with poor survival in patients with cancer. While the CXI is a promising marker for predicting cancer cachexia, further studies are required to verify its usefulness.

Clinical significance of cachexia index determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis in patients with gastrointestinal cancer

Cancer cachexia is a complex disorder characterized by skeletal muscle loss, which may influence the prognosis of patients with cancer. The cachexia index (CXI) is a new index for cachexia. The present study aimed to assess whether the CXI determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is valuable for predicting survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. A total of 54 patients with gastrointestinal cancer undergoing BIA at the time of diagnosis at Fukuchiyama City Hospital (Kyoto, Japan) were retrospectively recruited. CXI values were calculated as follows: CXI=skeletal muscle index (SMI) × serum albumin concentration/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. The SMI was measured using BIA values. The patients were classified into low- and high-CXI groups. The median patient age was 72 years and 63.0% of patients were male. A total of 20 patients with colorectal cancer were enrolled, 12 with pancreatic cancer, 11 with gastric cancer, 6 with esophageal cancer, 4 with biliary tract cancer and 1 with liver cancer. The cumulative one-year overall survival (OS) rate was significantly worse in the low-CXI group compared with that in the high-CXI group (58.3 vs. 88.5%; P=0.012). By contrast, the SMI had no significant effect on OS. Thus, CXI values using BIA may predict survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Developing and validating a Modified Cachexia Index to predict the outcomes for colorectal cancer after radical surgery

BACKGROUND

It was reported that the cachexia index (CXI:ALB * SMI NLR ) was an essential index for predicting the prognosis of tumor patients. However, since for SMI needs to be measured by CT imaging methods and its calculation was inconvenient. Thus, we developed a modified cachexia index (mCXI:ALB NLR * UCR ). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between mCXI and prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer.

METHODS

An analysis of 215 patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer was carried out retrospectively. An optimal cut-off value of mCXI was established by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for predicting prognosis. Prognostic implications of mCXI were investigated using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. A comparative assessment of the predictive capacity between mCXI and the CXI was performed using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

Patients were classified into two groups based on the cut-off value of mCXI: the LOW mCXI group (n = 60) and the HIGH mCXI group (n = 155). The 3-year Overall survival (OS) (76.6% vs 96.7%, p < 0.01) and 3-year Recurrence-free survival (RFS) (68.3% vs 94.1%, p < 0.01) were significantly worse in the LOW mCXI group in contrast to that in the HIGH mCXI group. In Cox multivariate regression analysis, mCXI was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 8.951, 95%CI: 3.105-25.807, <0.01). Moreover, compared with CXI (AUC = 0.723), mCXI (AUC = 0.801) has better predictive efficacy, indicating that mCXI is more suitable for prognostic assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

The mCXI significantly correlated with survival outcomes for colorectal cancer patients after radical surgery.

Cachexia Index in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The cachexia index is a novel biomarker of cancer cachexia. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of cachexia index on prognosis after surgery for gastrointestinal cancer.

METHODS

In August 2023, we systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Ovid for relevant studies on the oncological outcome after gastrointestinal cancer surgery and analyzed the findings from these studies for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Our systematic and meta-analysis review identified eight studies involving 1876 patients. The number of patients with low cachexia index accounted for 813 patients (43.3%). We found that low cachexia index was associated with worse overall survival (pooled HR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.85-2.87; z = 7.49; P < 0.001) and disease/relapse/progression-free survival (pooled HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.45-2.18; z = 5.50; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis showed that cachexia index was associated with oncological outcome after gastrointestinal cancer surgery. However, the limitations of this meta-analysis should be taken into consideration when interpreting the results.

Cachexia Index as a Predictor of Reduced Survival in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The cachexia index is a novel indicator of cachexia, but its prognostic implications for survival outcomes have not been systematically assessed in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the association between the cachexia index and survival outcomes in gastrointestinal cancer patients. Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify studies that evaluated the prognostic significance of the cachexia index in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The prognostic value of the cachexia index was determined by combining the adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Thirteen studies were identified, including a total of 4207 patients. Meta-analysis indicated that a lower cachexia index was associated with shorter overall survival (HR 2.18; 95% CI 1.78-2.66) and disease-free survival (HR 1.72; 95% CI 1.50-1.97) in gastrointestinal cancer patients. Further stratified analysis confirmed the significant association between a lower cachexia index and shorter overall survival in different study designs, regions, patients' age, sample sizes, gastrointestinal cancer subtypes, tumor stages, and follow-up duration subgroups. The cachexia index could be utilized as a predictor of overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. However, future prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

Effect of Preoperative Body Mass Index on Postoperative and Long-Term Outcomes in an East Indian Gastric Cancer Cohort

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is a global health concern with varying clinical outcomes. This study aims to investigate the influence of preoperative Body Mass Index (BMI) on survival in patients who underwent curative resection for gastric cancer in Eastern India.

METHODS

Data from a prospectively maintained Surgical Oncology database were analysed for patients who underwent curative resection for primary gastric adenocarcinoma between May 2016 and March 2022. Patients with incomplete data were excluded. Preoperative BMI was categorised into three groups: Underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2), Normal (18.5-22.9 kg/m2), and Overweight/Obese (=23 kg/m2). Clinicopathological details, short-term outcomes, and long-term oncological outcomes were assessed. Statistical analysis included survival estimates, Cox proportional hazard models, and subgroup analysis.

RESULT

Of 162 patients, 145 met the inclusion criteria. Patients were predominantly male (68%) with middle or lower socioeconomic status. No significant differences amongst BMI groups were observed in performance score, tumour grade, clinical stage, or short-term outcomes. Postoperative complications and 30-day mortality were similar. However, underweight patients had poorer 4-year disease-free survival (DFS) compared to overweight/obese patients (14.3% vs. 39.7%, p = 0.03). Overweight/obese patients showed significantly better 4-year overall survival (OS) than underweight patients (47.8% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In Eastern Indian gastric cancer patients undergoing curative resection, preoperative higher BMI (overweight/obese) was associated with better long-term survival. Understanding these findings could guide tailored interventions to improve outcomes in this population.

CT-determined low skeletal muscle index predicts poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia is highly prevalent among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Computed tomography (CT)-based assessment of low skeletal muscle index (SMI) is widely used for diagnosing sarcopenia. However, there are conflicting findings on the association between low SMI and overall survival (OS) in CRC patients. The objective of this study was to investigate whether CT-determined low SMI can serve as a valuable prognostic factor in CRC.

METHODS

We collected data from patients with CRC who underwent radical surgery at our institution between June 2020 and November 2021. The SMI at the third lumbar vertebra was calculated using CT scans, and the cutoff values for defining low SMI were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the associations between clinical characteristics and postoperative major complications.

RESULTS

A total of 464 patients were included in the study, 229 patients (46.7%) were classified as having low SMI. Patients with low SMI were older and had a lower body mass index (BMI), a higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and higher nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS2002) scores compared to those with normal SMI. Furthermore, patients with sarcopenia had a higher rate of major complications (10.9% vs. 1.3%; p < 0.001) and longer length of stay (9.09 ± 4.86 days vs. 8.25 ± 3.12 days; p = 0.03). Low SMI and coronary heart disease were identified as independent risk factors for postoperative major complications. Moreover, CRC patients with low SMI had significantly worse OS. Furthermore, the combination of low SMI with older age or TNM stage II + III resulted in the worst OS in each subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-determined low SMI is associated with poor prognosis in patients with CRC, especially when combined with older age or advanced TNM stage.

Cachexia index for prognostication in surgical patients with locally advanced oesophageal or gastric cancer: multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Features of cancer cachexia adversely influence patient outcomes, yet few currently inform clinical decision-making. This study assessed the value of the cachexia index (CXI), a novel prognostic marker, in patients for whom neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for oesophagogastric cancer is planned.

METHODS

Consecutive patients newly diagnosed with locally advanced (T3-4 or at least N1) oesophagogastric cancer between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2015 were identified through the West of Scotland and South-East Scotland Cancer Networks. CXI was calculated as (L3 skeletal muscle index) × (serum albumin)/(neutrophil lymphocyte ratio). Sex-stratified cut-off values were determined based on the area under the curve (AUC), and patients were divided into groups with low or normal CXI. Primary outcomes were disease progression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and overall survival (at least 5 years of follow-up).

RESULTS

Overall, 385 patients (72% men, median age 66 years) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for oesophageal (274) or gastric (111) cancer across the study interval. Although patients with a low CXI (men: CXI below 52 (AUC 0.707); women: CXI below 41 (AUC 0.759)) were older with more co-morbidity, disease characteristics were comparable to those in patients with a normal CXI. Rates of disease progression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, leading to inoperability, were higher in patients with a low CXI (28 versus 12%; adjusted OR 3.07, 95% c.i. 1.67 to 5.64; P < 0.001). Low CXI was associated with worsened postoperative mortality (P = 0.019) and decreased overall survival (median 14.9 versus 56.9 months; adjusted HR 1.85, 1.42 to 2.42; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CXI is associated with disease progression, worse postoperative mortality, and overall survival, and could improve prognostication and decision-making in patients with locally advanced oesophagogastric cancer.

The Utility of the Cachexia Index and the Modified Glasgow Score in Young Patients With Breast Cancer

Background Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Body composition and inflammatory markers are increasingly important for predicting cancer prognosis. The Cancer Cachexia Index (CXI) and the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) are two new markers evaluating prognosis in cancer. In this study, we evaluated the utility of the CXI and the modified GPS in young patients with breast cancer. Methods Eighty patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2023 were included in the study. The following information was recorded: patient features, pathological subtype, estrogen receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) status, disease stage, therapies, disease recurrence, and last control or death date. The CXI and the modified GPS were calculated using clinical data, including skeletal muscle index, albumin, C-reactive protein, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Results There were no differences in overall survival with respect to the CXI in the study population (p=0.96). Only stage 4 patients showed statistically significant survival differences according to the CXI (p=0.046). Although the median survival time was not reached for the modified GPS groups, there was a statistical overall survival difference favoring the negative group (p=0.017). No significant differences were observed in disease-free survival due to the CXI (p=0.128). In multivariate analysis, no factors, including the modified GPS and the CXI, influenced overall survival. There was a significant effect of the modified GPS and body mass index on recurrence (p=0.037; p=0.034). The CXI had a non-significant marginal p-value (p=0.074). Conclusion Our study showed that the modified GPS may be related to disease-free survival and overall survival, whereas the CXI has a more prominent prognostic effect on overall survival in advanced-stage breast cancers. In early-stage and young patients, optimization of risk scores is lacking.

Breaking Down Cachexia: A Narrative Review on the Prevalence of Cachexia in Cancer Patients and Its Associated Risk Factors

Cachexia is an irreversible condition that involves a significant loss of body weight, muscle mass, and adipose tissue. It is a complex condition that involves a variety of metabolic, hormonal, and immune-related factors, with the precise mechanisms not yet fully understood. In this review, the prevalence of cachexia in different types of cancer as well as the potential risk factors was evaluated from literature retrieved from databases such as ScienceDirect, PubMed and Scopus. Potential risk factors evaluated here include tumor-related factors such as location, and stage of the cancer, as well as patient-related factors such as age, gender, and comorbidities. Several findings were observed where cachexia is more prevalent in male cancer patients than females, with higher incidences of weight loss and poorer outcomes. This may be due to the different muscle compositions between gender. Additionally, cachexia is more prevalent at the later stages, which may be brought about by the late-stage diagnosis of certain cancers. The anatomical location of certain cancers such as the pancreas and stomach may play a significant factor in their high prevalence of cachexia. These are sites of the synthesis of digestive enzymes and hormones regulating appetite. Cachexia is an issue faced by cancer patients which could affect their recovery. However, it is poorly understood, which limit therapeutic options. Hence, understanding this disease from different perspectives (clinical and pre-clinical), and bridging those findings could further improve our comprehension and consequently improve therapeutic options.

Prognostic Significance of the Cachexia Index in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases after Stereotactic Radiotherapy

Background

The cachexia index (CXI) has been proposed as a novel biomarker of cancer cachexia. We aimed to investigate the association between CXI and survival outcomes after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases.

Methods

Data from 145 patients with NSCLC, who underwent SRT for brain metastases between April 2016 and August 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. Cachexia index was calculated as skeletal muscle index (SMI) × serum albumin level/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, whereas SMI was calculated from computed tomography images captured at the L1 level. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The prognostic values of CXI and other cachexia biomarkers were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

Lower pretreatment CXI (<30.8) was significantly associated with older age (P = .039), lower Karnofsky performance score (P = .009), and a high likelihood of extracranial metastases (P = .001). Patients with a lower pretreatment CXI had a significantly shorter PFS and OS than those with a higher CXI (P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that pretreatment CXI was an independent risk factor for both PFS, hazard ratio (HR) = 2.375; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.610-3.504; P < .001, and OS, HR = 2.340; 95% CI = 1.562-3.505; P < .001. Compared with other biomarkers, pretreatment CXI had the highest area under the ROC curve value for prognostic assessment, reaching 0.734. Moreover, the loss of CXI was a strong risk factor for survival independent of pretreatment CXI (P = .011).

Conclusions

Cachexia index may serve as a clinically useful tool for predicting survival outcomes of patients with NSCLC and brain metastases who undergo SRT.

Comparison of the cachexia index based on hand-grip strength (H-CXI) with the original CXI for the prediction of cancer cachexia and prognosis in patients who underwent radical colectomy for colorectal cancer

Background and aims

The cachexia index (CXI) is a novel biomarker for estimating cancer cachexia. The cachexia index based on hand-grip strength (H-CXI) has been recently developed as a simple proxy for CXI. The present study aims to compare both the H-CXI and CXI for the prediction of cancer cachexia and postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent radical colectomy for colorectal cancer.

Methods

Patients who underwent radical operations for colorectal cancer were included in this study. Cancer cachexia was diagnosed according to the international consensus outlined by Fearon et al. The cachexia index (CXI) was calculated as [skeletal muscle index (SMI) × serum albumin/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)]. The H-CXI was calculated as [hand-grip strength (HGS)/height2 × serum albumin/NLR]. The SMI was measured based on the preoperative CT images at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) level. HGS was measured before surgery.

Results

From July 2014 to May 2021, a total of 1,411 patients were included in the present study, of whom 361 (25.6%) were identified as having cancer cachexia. Patients with cachexia had a lower CXI (p < 0.001) and lower H-CXI (p < 0.001) than those without cachexia. A low CXI but not low H-CXI independently predicted cancer cachexia in the multivariate analysis (OR 1.448, p = 0.024). Both a low CXI (HR 1.476, p < 0.001 for OS; HR 1.611, p < 0.001 for DFS) and low H-CXI (HR 1.369, p = 0.007 for OS; HR 1.642, p < 0.001 for DFS) were independent predictors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) after adjusting for the same covariates. A low H-CXI but not low CXI was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications (OR 1.337, p = 0.044). No significant association was found between cancer cachexia and postoperative complications.

Conclusion

The CXI and H-CXI exhibited better prognostic value than cancer cachexia for the prediction of postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent radical colectomy for colorectal cancer. The H-CXI was a superior index over the CXI in predicting short-term clinical outcomes, whereas the CXI demonstrated a closer correlation with Fearon's criteria for cancer cachexia. Ideal tools for the assessment of cancer cachexia should incorporate not only weight loss but also muscle mass, physical function, and inflammatory state.

Nutritional risk index predicts the prognosis of gastric cancer patients with pyloric stenosis who received preoperative parenteral nutrition

Patients with gastric cancer with pyloric stenosis frequently have poor nutritional status and preoperative parenteral nutrition has been a common treatment strategy. The present study aimed to explore the predictive ability of the nutritional risk index (NRI) regarding the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer and pyloric stenosis who received preoperative parenteral nutrition. A total of 194 patients with gastric cancer with pyloric stenosis who received preoperative parenteral nutrition at Tthe Second People's Hospital of Neijiang (Neijiang, China) between January 2016 and December 2021 were included. At the same time, 221 patients with gastric cancer without pyloric stenosis who received surgery during the same period were also collected and the clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were compared. The optimal cut-off value of the NRI was determined from the receiver operating characteristic curve and prognostic factors were identified by survival analysis. Finally, a nomogram was constructed to predict the survival probability of patients with gastric cancer. The results indicated that patients with pyloric stenosis exhibited a wide range of unfavorable pathological characteristics and blood parameters. In addition, their overall survival (OS) was significantly worse (P<0.001). Among the patients with pyloric stenosis, there were 120 patients (61.9%) with an NRI <93.42 and 74 patients (38.1%) with NRI ≥93.42. Furthermore, patients with an NRI <93.42 had poorer OS (34.37 months vs. not reached, P=0.004). Of note, age, tumor size, radical resection, NRI and TNM stage were determined to be independent prognostic factors for OS. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.760 (95%CI: 0.688-0.832). In conclusion, the NRI was indicated to be an accurate score reflecting the nutritional status of patients, which was able to predict the clinical outcomes of patients with gastric cancer with pyloric stricture who received preoperative parenteral nutrition. Patients with a low NRI had shorter survival times.