De-Escalating the Management of In Situ and Invasive Breast Cancer

Physical Health Decline After Chemotherapy or Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer Survivors

Importance

Women with a history of breast cancer (BC) experience greater physical health decline compared with age-matched women without cancer. However, whether this decline differs in patients who received chemotherapy and endocrine therapy is not well understood.

Objective

To investigate physical health decline in BC survivors who received chemotherapy or endocrine therapy compared with age-matched women without cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective cohort study was conducted as part of the Cancer Prevention Study-3, a prospective US cohort study that enrolled participants in 35 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico between 2006 and 2013. Follow-up for this analysis was through April 1, 2020. Statistical analyses were conducted between May 2023 and December 2024. Female participants diagnosed with nonmetastatic BC who returned a survey at least 90 days after their diagnosis were matched on age and year of survey return with up to 5 women without cancer.

Exposure

Cancer status and treatment information.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Outcomes of interest were measures of physical health, assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health Scale instrument. Linear regression was used to estimate associations (β) and 95% CIs of treatment with physical health.

Results

This analysis included 2566 individuals diagnosed with BC and 12 826 age-matched women without cancer. Median (IQR) age at diagnosis was 56.3 (49.9-61.9) years. Of women with BC, 1223 (47.7%) received endocrine therapy, 276 (10.8%) received chemotherapy, and 634 (24.7%) received both. Compared with women without cancer, there was a greater physical health decline within 2 years of diagnosis for BC survivors receiving endocrine therapy (β = -1.12; 95% CI, -1.64 to -0.60), chemotherapy (β = -3.13; 95% CI, -4.19 to -2.07), or both (β = -3.26; 95% CI, -3.97 to -2.55). The decline among endocrine therapy users was restricted to women receiving aromatase inhibitors. More than 2 years after diagnosis, the decline was only observed in women who received chemotherapy.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of 15 392 BC survivors and age-matched women without cancer, BC survivors who received chemotherapy had a long-lasting physical health decline, unlike survivors who received endocrine therapy without chemotherapy. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and to better understand the health consequences of these treatments.

Targeting PGK1: A New Frontier in Breast Cancer Therapy Under Hypoxic Conditions

Breast cancer represents one of the most prevalent malignant neoplasms affecting women, and its pathogenesis has garnered significant scholarly interest. Research indicates that the progression of breast cancer is intricately regulated by glucose metabolism. Under hypoxic conditions within the tumor microenvironment, breast cancer cells generate ATP and essential biosynthetic precursors for growth via the glycolytic pathway. Notably, phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1) is intimately associated with the regulation of hypoxia-inducible factors in breast cancer and plays a crucial role in modulating glycolytic processes. Further investigation into the role of PGK1 in breast cancer pathogenesis is anticipated to identify novel therapeutic targets and strategies. This review consolidates current research on the regulation of glucose metabolism and the function of PGK1 in breast cancer within hypoxic conditions. It aims to offer a significant theoretical foundation for elucidating the mechanisms underlying breast cancer progression and metastasis, thereby facilitating the development of innovative treatment approaches.

Stage IC grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the ovary: assessment of post-operative chemotherapy de-escalation

OBJECTIVE

Given limited real-world practice data evaluating the National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines for possible post-operative chemotherapy omission as a treatment option for patients with stage IC grade 1 endometrioid ovarian carcinoma, this population-based study examined the association between post-operative chemotherapy and overall survival in this tumor group.

METHODS

The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program was retrospectively queried. The study population was 1207 patients with stage IC grade 1-3 endometrioid ovarian carcinoma who received primary cancer-directed surgery from 2007 to 2020. Overall survival was assessed with multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model.

RESULTS

The median age was 52, 54, and 55 years for grade 1, 2, and 3 groups, respectively (p=0.02). Grade 1 and 2 tumors were more common than grade 3 tumors (n=508 (42.1%), n=493 (40.8%), and n=206 (17.1%), respectively). Chemotherapy use rate for grade 1 tumors was lower compared with grade 2-3 tumors (67.9%, 76.5%, and 78.6%, respectively, p<0.001). When nodal evaluation was performed for grade 1 tumors, among patients who did not receive post-operative chemotherapy and among those who did, 5-year overall survival rate exceeded 90% (93.3% and 96.0%, respectively), with statistically non-significant hazard estimates (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.54, 95% CI 0.63 to 3.73). In contrast, post-operative chemotherapy omission for patients who did not undergo nodal evaluation was associated with decreased overall survival (5-year rates 82.3% vs 96.0%, aHR 5.41, 95% CI 1.95 to 15.06). Results were similar for node-evaluated grade 2 tumors (5-year overall survival rates, 94.6% and 94.4% for node-evaluated post-operative chemotherapy omission and administration, respectively), but not in grade 3 tumors.

CONCLUSION

The results of this population-based study may partially support the current clinical practice guidelines for post-operative chemotherapy omission as a possible option for patients with stage IC grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the ovary for those who had lymph node evaluation. Observed data were also supportive for node-evaluated grade 2 tumors, warranting further evaluation.

Cryotherapy in the Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies, affecting millions of people worldwide annually. The treatment paradigm for early-stage breast cancer is in flux. The focus is now on opportunities to de-escalation treatment to minimize morbidity and maximize patients' quality of life. Recently, percutaneous minimally invasive ablative techniques have been explored. Early trials in small population of patients demonstrated cryoablation to be effective, safe, and well-tolerated in an outpatient setting. Subsequent surgical resection was performed and the ablation success rate was the highest if the tumor was less than 1.5 cm and with < 25% ductal carcinoma in situ component. ACOSOG Alliance Z1072, a phase II trial with curative intent, demonstrated 100% ablation in all tumors smaller than 1 cm and 92% success in lesions without multifocal disease and less than 2 cm in size. There are ongoing prospective clinical trials to investigate the efficacy of cryoablation without surgical excision for treatment of early-stage breast cancer. FROST (Freezing Instead of Removal Of Small Tumors) started in 2016 is ongoing, ICE3 (Cryoablation of Low Risk Small Breast Cancer) started in 2014 just released 5 years results, and COOL-IT: Cryoablation vs Lumpectomy in T1 Breast Cancers is also ongoing. These prospective trials will expand our knowledge on the safety and value of cryoablation. It is crucial to understand the indications, technical nuances, and distinctive imaging findings for cryoablation as it has potential to revolutionize standard surgical practice.

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided cryoablation for early-stage primary breast cancer: a follow-up study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) for early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) can be performed under local anesthesia in an outpatient clinic. This study continues a pilot stage to examine local control, safety, patient quality of life (QoL), satisfaction and cosmetic outcomes of cryoablation for ESBC.

METHODS

PCA was performed under local anesthesia for patients with primary ESBC, followed by radiation and endocrine therapies. Oncologic outcomes were examined by imaging (mammography, ultrasound, MRI) at baseline and 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months post-cryoablation. EQ-VAS, EQ-5D-5L, subjective satisfaction and Moiré topography were used to measure health-related QoL outcomes.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients, mean aged 59.0 ± 9.0 years, mean tumor size 9.8 ± 2.3 mm, ER + , PR + (17/18), HER2-, Ki67 < 20% (15/18), underwent PCA and were followed for a mean of 44.3 months. No serious adverse events were reported, and no patients had local recurrence or distant metastasis in the 5-year follow-up. Cosmetic outcomes, satisfaction level, and QoL all improved post-cryoablation. Five-year average reduction rates of the cryolesion long, short, and depth diameters, on US, were 61.3%, 42.3%, and 22.8%, respectively, compared to the 86.2% volume reduction rate on MRI. The correlation coefficient between MRI and US measurement criteria was highest for the long diameter. During follow-up, calcification of the treated area was observed in 13/18 cases.

CONCLUSION

Cryoablation for ESBC is an effective and safe procedure with excellent cosmetic outcomes and improved QoL. This study contributes to the growing evidence supporting cryoablation as a potential standard treatment for ESBC, given compliance to pre-defined patient selection criteria.

Tools to Guide Radiation Oncologists in the Management of DCIS

Similar to invasive breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ is also going through a phase of changes not only from a technical but also a conceptual standpoint. From prescribing radiotherapy to everyone to personalized approaches, including radiotherapy omission, there is still a lack of a comprehensive framework to guide radiation oncologists in decision making. Many pieces of the puzzle are finding their place as high-quality data mature and are disseminated, but very often, the interpretation of risk factors and the perception of risk remain very highly subjective. Sharing the therapeutic choice with patients requires effective communication for an understanding of risks and benefits, facilitating an informed decision that does not increase anxiety and concerns about prognosis. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize the current state of knowledge to highlight the tools available to radiation oncologists for managing DCIS, with an outlook on future developments.

Active surveillance versus treatment in low-risk DCIS: Women's preferences in the LORD-trial

BACKGROUND

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) can progress to invasive breast cancer (IBC), but most DCIS lesions remain indolent. However, guidelines recommend surgery, often supplemented by radiotherapy. This implies overtreatment of indolent DCIS. The non-randomised patient preference LORD-trial tests whether active surveillance (AS) for low-risk DCIS is safe, by giving women with low-risk DCIS a choice between AS and conventional treatment (CT). Here, we aim to describe how participants are distributed among both trial arms, identify their motives for their preference, and assess factors associated with their choice.

METHODS

Data were extracted from baseline questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the distribution and characteristics of participants; thematic analyses to extract self-reported reasons for the choice of trial arm, and multivariable logistic regression analyses to investigate associations between patient characteristics and chosen trial arm.

RESULTS

Of 377 women included, 76% chose AS and 24% CT. Most frequently cited reasons for AS were "treatment is not (yet) necessary" (59%) and trust in the AS-plan (39%). Reasons for CT were cancer worry (51%) and perceived certainty (29%). Women opting for AS more often had lower educational levels (OR 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.93) and more often reported experiencing shared decision making (OR 2.71; 95% CI, 1.37-5.37) than women choosing CT.

CONCLUSION

The LORD-trial is the first to offer women with low-risk DCIS a choice between CT and AS. Most women opted for AS and reported high levels of trust in the safety of AS. Their preferences highlight the necessity to establish the safety of AS for low-risk DCIS.

AI-Enhanced PET and MR Imaging for Patients with Breast Cancer

New challenges are currently faced by clinical and surgical oncologists in the management of patients with breast cancer, mainly related to the need for molecular and prognostic data. Recent technological advances in diagnostic imaging and informatics have led to the introduction of functional imaging modalities, such as hybrid PET/MR imaging, and artificial intelligence (AI) software, aimed at the extraction of quantitative radiomics data, which may reflect tumor biology and behavior. In this article, the most recent applications of radiomics and AI to PET/MR imaging are described to address the new needs of clinical and surgical oncology.

The Evolving Approach to Breast Cancer: Moving toward De-Escalating Treatment and Personalized Medicine

In recent years, more attention has been directed to personalized medicine in the management and treatment of breast cancer (BC) [...].

Everybody needs good neighbours: the progressive DCIS microenvironment

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a pre-invasive form of breast cancer where neoplastic luminal cells are confined to the ductal tree. While as many as 70% of DCIS cases will remain indolent, most women are treated with surgery, often combined with endocrine and radiotherapies. Overtreatment is therefore a major issue, demanding new methods to stratify patients. Somewhat paradoxically, the neoplastic cells in DCIS are genetically comparable to those in invasive disease, suggesting the tumour microenvironment is the driving force for progression. Clinical and mechanistic studies highlight the complex DCIS microenvironment, with multiple cell types competing to regulate progression. Here, we examine recent studies detailing distinct aspects of the DCIS microenvironment and discuss how these may inform more effective care.