1
|
Deyell RJ, Soroka HP, Sharp D, Ruus C, Bone JN, Gervais MK, Roux A, Feng X, Logie N, Prudhomme N, Holloway C, Gupta AA, Tsang DS. Whole Abdominal Radiotherapy Is Tolerable and Effective in Children and Young Adults With Intra-Abdominal Sarcoma: A Canadian Sarcoma Research and Clinical Collaboration (CanSaRCC) Study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2025:e31768. [PMID: 40361282 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.31768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2025] [Revised: 03/10/2025] [Accepted: 04/12/2025] [Indexed: 05/15/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whole abdominal radiotherapy (WART) is utilized in children, adolescents, and young adults with intra-abdominal sarcoma, but efficacy and toxicity are uncertain. METHODS Sarcoma patients diagnosed at ≤39 years of age between 1998 and 2023 who received WART were identified from a national registry. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment, response, and survival outcomes were assessed. RESULTS Twenty patients with desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) (n = 7), rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) (n = 6), Ewing sarcoma, rhabdoid tumor, endometrial stromal tumor (each n = 1), and sarcoma not-otherwise-specified (NOS) (n = 4) were included. Among 17 patients who received WART as part of upfront therapy, 16 had abdominal metastatic disease (94.1%) (peritoneal deposits n = 9, malignant ascites n = 8 [including two with both peritoneal deposits and malignant ascites] and liver metastases n = 1), while one was initially localized. Median WART dose was 22.5 Gy (range: 10.5-30); median kidney and liver doses were 14.9 Gy (range: 7.7-20.7) and 21.0 Gy (range: 13.1-27.7), respectively. Three patients developed Grade 3 acute toxicity; diarrhea (n = 2) or elevated creatinine (n = 1); two RMS patients developed second malignancies. Two-year overall and progression-free survival estimates were 100% and 80% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51.6%-100%) in RMS; 62.5% (95% CI: 32%-100%) and 50% (95% CI: 22.5%-100%) in DSRCT. Five-year cumulative incidence of abdominal recurrence was 33.3% (95% CI: 11.4%-57.3%) with WART failure in DSRCT (n = 2) and sarcoma NOS (n = 1). Three patients received WART following relapse; all recurred; two within the WART field. CONCLUSIONS WART is well tolerated among young sarcoma patients and provides meaningful local disease control when utilized in front-line adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Deyell
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/BMT, B.C. Children's Hospital and Research Institute, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Hagit Peretz Soroka
- Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Delaney Sharp
- Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Caroline Ruus
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/BMT, B.C. Children's Hospital and Research Institute, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jeffrey N Bone
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/BMT, B.C. Children's Hospital and Research Institute, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mai-Kim Gervais
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Hôpital Maisonneuve Rosemont, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Audrey Roux
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Xiaolan Feng
- Division of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Natalie Logie
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nicolas Prudhomme
- Division of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Caroline Holloway
- Division of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer, University of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Abha A Gupta
- Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Derek S Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Manoğlu B, Sökmen S, Egeli T, Derici ZS, Ağalar C, Aksoy SÖ. Prognostic Value of Immune Scoring System for Colorectal Cancer Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:2070. [PMID: 39768948 PMCID: PMC11678378 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60122070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2024] [Revised: 11/21/2024] [Accepted: 12/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: There is no reliable immune scoring system that can help us predict the postoperative outcomes of colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastases after cytoreductive surgery. In this cohort, the aims were (1) to evaluate the postoperative morbidity, mortality and surgical oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis; (2) to compare oncological and postoperative outcomes of colon cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis and rectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis; and (3) to assess the prognostic value of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and the CRP-albumin ratio (CAR). Materials and Methods: A prospectively maintained database of 258 patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin between 2007 and 2024 was analyzed. According to the anatomical location of the primary tumor, two different groups were created: rectum cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis (Group A) and colon cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis (Group B). All standard clinico-pathological characteristics, operative findings, morbi-mortality results, and final oncologic outcomes were compared between Groups A and B. We evaluated whether CAR and mGPS could predict postoperative morbi-mortality and overall survival in the two groups or not. Results: No significant difference was detected between Groups A and B in terms of clinical-demographic characteristics. In both groups, the preoperative mGPS and CAR values were statistically significantly higher in those who developed postoperative high-grade complications (C-D grade III/IV) (p < 0.001) and those who died perioperatively (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002). Conclusions: In multivariate Cox analysis, the CAR was found to be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in this cohort. CAR and mGPS predicted high-grade complications and postoperative mortality in both groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berke Manoğlu
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Department of Surgery, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, 35340 Balcova, Turkey; (S.S.); (T.E.); (Z.S.D.); (C.A.); (S.Ö.A.)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Karimi M, Shirsalimi N, Sedighi E. Challenges following CRS and HIPEC surgery in cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis: a comprehensive review of clinical outcomes. Front Surg 2024; 11:1498529. [PMID: 39687325 PMCID: PMC11647005 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1498529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2024] [Accepted: 11/18/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) are a pair of relatively modern therapeutic surgical methods in advanced cancerous patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM). The goal of CRS + HIPEC is treatment or to improve survival outcomes, which are linked to high morbidity side effects and complications, even with their possible advantages. Surgical-related, chemotherapy-related, anesthetic-related, gastrointestinal, organs and systemic complications are the categories into which complications are separated according to frequency, risk factors, and effect on patient outcomes. In this narrative review of the literature, the side effects and complications of HIPEC + CRS in cancer patients with PM are examined. The present knowledge on the incidence, frequency, kinds, and risk factors of acute complications following CRS + HIPEC is summarized in this study. This review emphasizes the need for careful patient selection criteria, precise surgical technique, and thorough intraoperative care to reduce or manage these risks. Moreover, it highlights the need for interdisciplinary collaboration in treating these patients. This study aims to know these complications, improve clinical practice, and guide future studies to increase the safety and efficacy of CRS + HIPEC in treating metastatic colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Karimi
- Faculty of Medicine, Bogomolets National Medical University (NMU), Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Niyousha Shirsalimi
- Faculty of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Science (UMSHA), Hamadan, Iran
| | - Eshagh Sedighi
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Islamic Azad University Branch of Urmia, Urmia, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cashin PH, Asplund D, Bexe Lindskog E, Ghanipour L, Syk I, Graf W, Nilsson PJ, Jansson Palmer G. Secondary cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent colorectal peritoneal metastases. Surg Open Sci 2024; 20:45-50. [PMID: 38911055 PMCID: PMC11190744 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Secondary treatment of recurrent colorectal peritoneal metastases after previous cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is poorly investigated. Objectives To evaluate the overall survival outcome of secondary (repeat) CRS + HIPEC compared to palliative treatment in recurrent peritoneal disease. Methods Patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases treated with an index CRS + HIPEC and subsequently having recurrent peritoneal disease were identified from the prospective Swedish national HIPEC registry. Patients were divided into interventional group (secondary CRS + HIPEC) or palliative group. Multivariable logistic regression, propensity-score matching, and survival outcomes were calculated. Results Among 575 patients who underwent complete CRS between 2010 and 2021, 208 (36 %) were diagnosed with a subsequent recurrent peritoneal disease. Forty-two patients (20 %) were offered secondary CRS + HIPEC. Propensity-score matching of secondary interventional cases with palliative cases succeeded in 88 % (n = 37) in which female sex, lower peritoneal cancer index at index surgery, longer disease-free interval, and absence of extra-peritoneal metastases were identified as the most relevant matching covariates. Median OS from date of recurrence was 38 months (95%CI 30-58) in the interventional group and 19 months (95%CI: 15-24) in the palliative group (HR 0.35 95%CI: 0.20-0.63, p = 0.0004). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the results. As reference, the median OS from index CRS + HIPEC in the whole colorectal registry (n = 575) was 41 months (95%CI: 38-45). Conclusion After matching for relevant factors, the hazard ratio for death was significantly reduced in patients who were offered a secondary CRS + HIPEC procedure for recurrent peritoneal disease. Selection bias is inherent, but survival outcomes were comparable to those achieved after the initial procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dan Asplund
- Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Dept of Surgery, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Elinor Bexe Lindskog
- Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Dept of Surgery, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Ingvar Syk
- Skåne's University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Per J. Nilsson
- Karolinska University Hospital & Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ho YK, Woo JY, Loke KM, Deng LW, Too HP. Enhanced anti-tumor efficacy with multi-transgene armed mesenchymal stem cells for treating peritoneal carcinomatosis. J Transl Med 2024; 22:463. [PMID: 38750559 PMCID: PMC11097589 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05278-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have garnered significant interest for their tumor-tropic property, making them potential therapeutic delivery vehicles for cancer treatment. We have previously shown the significant anti-tumour activity in mice preclinical models and companion animals with naturally occurring cancers using non-virally engineered MSCs with a therapeutic transgene encoding cytosine deaminase and uracil phosphoribosyl transferase (CDUPRT) and green fluorescent protein (GFP). Clinical studies have shown improved response rate with combinatorial treatment of 5-fluorouracil and Interferon-beta (IFNb) in peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). However, high systemic toxicities have limited the clinical use of such a regime. METHODS In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of intraperitoneal administration of non-virally engineered MSCs to co-deliver CDUPRT/5-Flucytosine prodrug system and IFNb to potentially enhance the cGAS-STING signalling axis. Here, MSCs were engineered to express CDUPRT or CDUPRT-IFNb. Expression of CDUPRT and IFNb was confirmed by flow cytometry and ELISA, respectively. The anti-cancer efficacy of the engineered MSCs was evaluated in both in vitro and in vivo model. ES2, HT-29 and Colo-205 were cocultured with engineered MSCs at various ratio. The cell viability with or without 5-flucytosine was measured with MTS assay. To further compare the anti-cancer efficacy of the engineered MSCs, peritoneal carcinomatosis mouse model was established by intraperitoneal injection of luciferase expressing ES2 stable cells. The tumour burden was measured through bioluminescence tracking. RESULTS Firstly, there was no changes in phenotypes of MSCs despite high expression of the transgene encoding CDUPRT and IFNb (CDUPRT-IFNb). Transwell migration assays and in-vivo tracking suggested the co-expression of multiple transgenes did not impact migratory capability of the MSCs. The superiority of CDUPRT-IFNb over CDUPRT expressing MSCs was demonstrated in ES2, HT-29 and Colo-205 in-vitro. Similar observations were observed in an intraperitoneal ES2 ovarian cancer xenograft model. The growth of tumor mass was inhibited by ~ 90% and 46% in the mice treated with MSCs expressing CDUPRT-IFNb or CDUPRT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Taken together, these results established the effectiveness of MSCs co-expressing CDUPRT and IFNb in controlling and targeting PC growth. This study lay the foundation for the development of clinical trial using multigene-armed MSCs for PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoon Khei Ho
- Department of Biochemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117596, Singapore.
- NUS Centre for Cancer Research (N2CR), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- AGeM Bio, Singapore, 119276, Singapore.
- Singapore Innovate, Singapore, 059911, Singapore.
| | - Jun Yung Woo
- Department of Biochemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117596, Singapore
- NUS Centre for Cancer Research (N2CR), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kin Man Loke
- Department of Biochemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117596, Singapore
- NUS Centre for Cancer Research (N2CR), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lih-Wen Deng
- Department of Biochemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117596, Singapore
- NUS Centre for Cancer Research (N2CR), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Heng-Phon Too
- Department of Biochemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117596, Singapore
- NUS Centre for Cancer Research (N2CR), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sarofim M, Wijayawardana R, Ahmadi N, Morris DL. Repeat cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases: a systematic review. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:99. [PMID: 38627808 PMCID: PMC11022433 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03386-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) are present in 10-20% of patients at the time of their initial cancer diagnosis, and affects over 20% of those who develop colorectal cancer recurrence. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with HIPEC is firmly established as the optimal surgical treatment, but there is very little known about the benefit of repeat or iterative CRS. The aim of this review is to provide a systematic evaluation of the perioperative complications, survival outcomes and quality of life in patients undergoing repeat CRS with HIPEC for CRPM. METHODS A systematic review of PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane databases was performed to identify all studies that reported outcomes for repeat CRS with or without HIPEC for CRPM. RESULTS Four hundred and ninety-three manuscripts were screened, and 15 retrospective studies were suitable for inclusion. Sample sizes ranged from 2 to 30 participants and comprised a total of 229 patients. HIPEC was used in all studies, but exact rates were not consistently stated. Perioperative morbidity was reported in four studies, between 16.7% and 37.5%. Nine studies reported mortality rate which was consistently 0%. The median overall survival after repeat CRS ranged from 20 to 62.6 months. No studies provided quality of life metrics. CONCLUSION Repeat CRS for CRPM has perioperative morbidity and mortality rates comparable to initial CRS, and offers a potential survival benefit in selected patients. There is however limited high-quality data in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Sarofim
- Liver and Peritonectomy Unit, St George Hospital, Gray St, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia.
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Ruwanthi Wijayawardana
- Liver and Peritonectomy Unit, St George Hospital, Gray St, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nima Ahmadi
- Liver and Peritonectomy Unit, St George Hospital, Gray St, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David L Morris
- Liver and Peritonectomy Unit, St George Hospital, Gray St, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tsili AC, Alexiou G, Tzoumpa M, Siempis T, Argyropoulou MI. Imaging of Peritoneal Metastases in Ovarian Cancer Using MDCT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1467. [PMID: 38672549 PMCID: PMC11048266 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
This review aims to compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector CT (MDCT), MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging, and FDG PET/CT in the detection of peritoneal metastases (PMs) in ovarian cancer (OC). A comprehensive search was performed for articles published from 2000 to February 2023. The inclusion criteria were the following: diagnosis/suspicion of PMs in patients with ovarian/fallopian/primary peritoneal cancer; initial staging or suspicion of recurrence; MDCT, MRI and/or FDG PET/CT performed for the detection of PMs; population of at least 10 patients; surgical results, histopathologic analysis, and/or radiologic follow-up, used as reference standard; and per-patient and per-region data and data for calculating sensitivity and specificity reported. In total, 33 studies were assessed, including 487 women with OC and PMs. On a per-patient basis, MRI (p = 0.03) and FDG PET/CT (p < 0.01) had higher sensitivity compared to MDCT. MRI and PET/CT had comparable sensitivities (p = 0.84). On a per-lesion analysis, no differences in sensitivity estimates were noted between MDCT and MRI (p = 0.25), MDCT and FDG PET/CT (p = 0.68), and MRI and FDG PET/CT (p = 0.35). Based on our results, FDG PET/CT and MRI are the preferred imaging modalities for the detection of PMs in OC. However, the value of FDG PET/CT and MRI compared to MDCT needs to be determined. Future research to address the limitations of the existing studies and the need for standardization and to explore the cost-effectiveness of the three imaging modalities is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athina C. Tsili
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, University Campus, 45110 Ioannina, Greece; (M.T.); (M.I.A.)
| | - George Alexiou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, University Campus, 45110 Ioannina, Greece;
| | - Martha Tzoumpa
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, University Campus, 45110 Ioannina, Greece; (M.T.); (M.I.A.)
| | - Timoleon Siempis
- ENT Department, Ulster Hospital, Upper Newtownards Rd., Dundonald, Belfast BT16 1RH, UK;
| | - Maria I. Argyropoulou
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, University Campus, 45110 Ioannina, Greece; (M.T.); (M.I.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bhutiani N, Grotz TE, Concors SJ, White MG, Helmink BA, Raghav KP, Taggart MW, Beaty KA, Royal RE, Overman MJ, Matamoros A, Scally CP, Rafeeq S, Mansfield PF, Fournier KF. Repeat Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Recurrent Mucinous Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma: A Viable Treatment Strategy with Demonstrable Benefit. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:614-621. [PMID: 37872456 PMCID: PMC10695875 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14422-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many patients with mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma experience peritoneal recurrence despite complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Prior work has demonstrated that repeat CRS/HIPEC can prolong survival in select patients. We sought to validate these findings using outcomes from a high-volume center. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma who underwent CRS/HIPEC at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2004 and 2021 were stratified by whether they underwent CRS/HIPEC for recurrent disease or as part of initial treatment. Only patients who underwent complete CRS/HIPEC were included. Initial and recurrent groups were compared. RESULTS Of 437 CRS/HIPECs performed for mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma, 50 (11.4%) were for recurrent disease. Patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC for recurrent disease were more often treated with an oxaliplatin or cisplatin perfusion (35%/44% recurrent vs. 4%/1% initial, p < 0.001), had a longer operative time (median 629 min recurrent vs. 511 min initial, p = 0.002), and had a lower median length of stay (10 days repeat vs. 13 days initial, p < 0.001). Thirty-day complication and 90-day mortality rates did not differ between groups. Both cohorts enjoyed comparable recurrence free survival (p = 0.82). Compared with patients with recurrence treated with systemic chemotherapy alone, this select cohort of patients undergoing repeat CRS/HIPEC enjoyed better overall survival (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In appropriately selected patients with recurrent appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma, CRS/HIPEC can provide survival benefit equivalent to primary CRS/HIPEC and that may be superior to that conferred by systemic therapy alone in select patients. These patients should receive care at a high-volume center in the context of a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal Bhutiani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Travis E Grotz
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Seth J Concors
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael G White
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Beth A Helmink
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kanwal P Raghav
- Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Melissa W Taggart
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Karen A Beaty
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard E Royal
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA
| | - Michael J Overman
- Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aurelio Matamoros
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher P Scally
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Safia Rafeeq
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul F Mansfield
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Keith F Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|