Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Solid Tumors in the Adjuvant Setting: Current Progress, Future Directions, and Role in Transplant Oncology

Evolving Transplant Oncology: Evolving Criteria for Better Decision-Making

Transplant oncology integrates a wide variety of fields, such as surgery, oncology, and transplant medicine, intending to increase the range of studies and treatments for hepatobiliary cancers and other liver-related malignant lesions. Liver transplantation (LT) has proven to be an effective treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. While the Milan criteria are still the gold standard, several new, more inclusive criteria have been proposed, and hepatocellular carcinoma has become a major indication for liver transplantation. The continuous evolution of diagnostic technologies supported this with higher image quality and more accurate staging. This review describes the current applications of transplant oncology in hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors, and liver metastatic disease from colorectal cancer and discusses the path that led to the development of transplant oncology as an organized approach to managing gastrointestinal malignancies through transplantation. More importantly, the significance of a multidisciplinary approach and criteria in the selection of suitable candidates are discussed. In addition, newer aspects of transplant oncology, such as immunotherapy, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), novel surgical techniques, and the utilization of artificial intelligence, are presented. Finally, the opportunities and challenges involved in the field's future, as well as the evolution of the criteria used over the years and insightful thoughts for the future of the criteria, are discussed.

Assessing the clinical, humanistic, and economic impact of early cancer diagnosis: a systematic literature review

Introduction

There is a clear consensus among healthcare providers on the advantages of early cancer detection and treatment. However, no in-depth review has yet fully presented the clinical, humanistic, and economic benefits of early cancer diagnosis compared to late detection across a broad range of tumor types.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted to determine the clinical, humanistic, and economic benefits of early cancer diagnosis, as opposed to late diagnosis, as reported in non-interventional studies conducted worldwide. Searches were conducted using electronic databases (MEDLINE and Embase), conference repositories and grey literature. Observational studies in adults diagnosed with bladder cancer, gastric cancer, head and neck cancer (HNC), melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal-cell carcinoma (RCC), and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) were eligible for inclusion if they reported survival, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), healthcare resource utilization and/or costs, according to stage at diagnosis. Identified records were screened and extracted by two independent reviewers, and discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. The quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Larg and Moss adapted checklist.

Results

Of the 3,159 records identified, 103 studies were included in this review. The general trend showed worse clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes when patients were diagnosed at a later stage compared to an earlier stage. Patients diagnosed at an earlier stage, had on average, substantially higher survival rates and lower mortality rates across all cancer types and incurred lower resource utilization and costs (with available evidence for patients with NSCLC, TNBC, and HNC), compared to those diagnosed at a more advanced/later stage. Limited evidence on the humanistic burden suggested that with a more advanced stage at diagnosis, patients with bladder cancer experienced reduced HRQoL.

Conclusion

Early cancer diagnosis (i.e., cancer diagnosed at earlier stages or with lower grades) was associated with longer survival, improved quality of life and lower healthcare costs and resource utilization compared to diagnosis of cancer at later stages or higher grades, as reported by overall survival (OS) and HRQoL outcomes. These findings emphasize the importance of screening and early detection of cancer to improve outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer.

Tumor-immune partitioning and clustering algorithm for identifying tumor-immune cell spatial interaction signatures within the tumor microenvironment

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence supports the importance of characterizing the organizational patterns of various cellular constituents in the tumor microenvironment in precision oncology. Most existing data on immune cell infiltrates in tumors, which are based on immune cell counts or nearest neighbor-type analyses, have failed to fully capture the cellular organization and heterogeneity.

METHODS

We introduce a computational algorithm, termed Tumor-Immune Partitioning and Clustering (TIPC), that jointly measures immune cell partitioning between tumor epithelial and stromal areas and immune cell clustering versus dispersion. As proof-of-principle, we applied TIPC to a prospective cohort incident tumor biobank containing 931 colorectal carcinoma cases. TIPC identified tumor subtypes with unique spatial patterns between tumor cells and T lymphocytes linked to certain molecular pathologic and prognostic features. T lymphocyte identification and phenotyping were achieved using multiplexed (multispectral) immunofluorescence. In a separate hepatocellular carcinoma cohort, we replaced the stromal component with specific immune cell types-CXCR3+CD68+ or CD8+-to profile their spatial relationships with CXCL9+CD68+ cells.

RESULTS

Six unsupervised TIPC subtypes based on T lymphocyte distribution patterns were identified, comprising two cold and four hot subtypes. Three of the four hot subtypes were associated with significantly longer colorectal cancer (CRC)-specific survival compared to a reference cold subtype. Our analysis showed that variations in T-cell densities among the TIPC subtypes did not strictly correlate with prognostic benefits, underscoring the prognostic significance of immune cell spatial patterns. Additionally, TIPC revealed two spatially distinct and cell density-specific subtypes among microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancers, indicating its potential to upgrade tumor subtyping. TIPC was also applied to additional immune cell types, eosinophils and neutrophils, identified using morphology and supervised machine learning; here two tumor subtypes with similarly low densities, namely 'cold, tumor-rich' and 'cold, stroma-rich', exhibited differential prognostic associations. Lastly, we validated our methods and results using The Cancer Genome Atlas colon and rectal adenocarcinoma data (n = 570). Moreover, applying TIPC to hepatocellular carcinoma cases (n = 27) highlighted critical cell interactions like CXCL9-CXCR3 and CXCL9-CD8.

CONCLUSIONS

Unsupervised discoveries of microgeometric tissue organizational patterns and novel tumor subtypes using the TIPC algorithm can deepen our understanding of the tumor immune microenvironment and likely inform precision cancer immunotherapy.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Pre-Transplant Hepatocellular Carcinoma Setting: A Glimpse Beyond the Liver

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Liver transplantation (LT) is the best therapy for most patients with non-metastatic HCC. In recent years, the management of patients with HCC has considerably changed, thanks to the improvement of molecular biology knowledge and the introduction of immunotherapy. To date, systemic therapy is authorized in the Western world only in patients with advanced HCC. However, this therapy could not only stabilize the tumour disease or improve survival but could display excellent response and lead to downstaging of the tumour that finally permits LT. There are increasing reports of patients that have performed LT after pretreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, due to the intrinsic mechanism of ICIs, graft rejection might be favoured. In addition, chronic adverse effects affecting other organs may also appear after the end of therapy. This review aims to evaluate the readiness and outcomes of LT in patients with advanced HCC who have previously undergone treatment with ICIs. It seeks to identify the challenges, risks, and benefits associated with this conversion therapy. The integration of ICIs into the treatment paradigm for advanced HCC necessitates a nuanced approach to LT. While early evidence supports the feasibility of LT following ICIs therapy, there is an urgent need for standardized guidelines and more extensive longitudinal studies to optimize patient selection, timing, and post-transplant management.

Focal Update on Immunotherapy and Liver Transplantation in the Era of Transplant Oncology

Transplant oncology is an expanding area of cancer therapy that specifically emphasizes the use of liver transplantation (LT) as the preferred treatment for patients with manageable, but unresectable, tumors. The management and optimization of overall survival strategies, accompanied by an arguably decent quality of life, have been at the forefront of liver oncology treatment, as a plurality of all primary liver cancers are identified as either hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), which are classified as highly aggressive malignancies and frequently remain asymptomatic until they progress to advanced stages, rendering curative procedures, such as resection, impractical. This has led to an increase in utilization of neoadjuvant interventions conducted prior to surgery, which has yielded favorable outcomes. Though this treatment modality has prompted further investigations into the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) as standalone treatments and in combination with locoregional treatments (LRTs) to bridge more patients into curative eligibility. This multidisciplinary methodology and treatment planning has seen multiple successful trials of immunotherapy regimes and combinate treatments, setting the groundwork for increasing eligibility through downstaging and "bridging" previously ineligible patients within stringent LT criteria. Surveillance after LT is a crucial component of transplant oncology. The emergence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has provided a novel approach to identifying the recurrence of cancer in its early stages. Recent research has focused on liquid biopsy, a technique that effectively identifies the dynamics of cancer. This is another innovation to demonstrate the rate at which transplant oncology is rapidly advancing, making the focus of care feel disorienting. Modalities of care are constantly evolving, but when a field is changing as rapidly as this one, it is imperative to reorient to the data and the needs of the patients. In this commentary, we reflect on the update's utilization of ICPIs in neoadjuvant settings as well as the updates on the utilization of liquid biopsy in post-LT follow-up surveillance.

The Recent Trends of Systemic Treatments and Locoregional Therapies for Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a hepatic malignancy that has a rapidly increasing incidence. CCA is anatomically classified into intrahepatic (iCCA) and extrahepatic (eCCA), which is further divided into perihilar (pCCA) and distal (dCCA) subtypes, with higher incidence rates in Asia. Despite its rarity, CCA has a low 5-year survival rate and remains the leading cause of primary liver tumor-related death over the past 10-20 years. The systemic therapy section discusses gemcitabine-based regimens as primary treatments, along with oxaliplatin-based options. Second-line therapy is limited but may include short-term infusional fluorouracil (FU) plus leucovorin (LV) and oxaliplatin. The adjuvant therapy section discusses approaches to improve overall survival (OS) post-surgery. However, only a minority of CCA patients qualify for surgical resection. In comparison to adjuvant therapies, neoadjuvant therapy for unresectable cases shows promise. Gemcitabine and cisplatin indicate potential benefits for patients awaiting liver transplantation. The addition of immunotherapies to chemotherapy in combination is discussed. Nivolumab and innovative approaches like CAR-T cells, TRBAs, and oncolytic viruses are explored. We aim in this review to provide a comprehensive report on the systemic and locoregional therapies for CCA.

Advances in Immunotherapy for Transplant Oncology

The increasing incidence of global cancer rates has created an entirely new demand for curative treatment modalities to improve patient outcomes [...].

Cholangiocarcinoma: The Current Status of Surgical Options including Liver Transplantation

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) poses a substantial threat as it ranks as the second most prevalent primary liver tumor. The documented annual rise in intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) incidence in the United States is concerning, indicating its growing impact. Moreover, the five-year survival rate after tumor resection is only 25%, given that tumor recurrence is the leading cause of death in 53-79% of patients. Pre-operative assessments for iCCA focus on pinpointing tumor location, biliary tract involvement, vascular encasements, and metastasis detection. Numerous studies have revealed that portal vein embolization (PVE) is linked to enhanced survival rates, improved liver synthetic functions, and decreased overall mortality. The challenge in achieving clear resection margins contributes to the notable recurrence rate of iCCA, affecting approximately two-thirds of cases within one year, and results in a median survival of less than 12 months for recurrent cases. Nearly 50% of patients initially considered eligible for surgical resection in iCCA cases are ultimately deemed ineligible during surgical exploration. Therefore, staging laparoscopy has been proposed to reduce unnecessary laparotomy. Eligibility for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) requires certain criteria to be granted. OLT offers survival advantages for early-detected unresectable iCCA; it can be combined with other treatments, such as radiofrequency ablation and transarterial chemoembolization, in specific cases. We aim to comprehensively describe the surgical strategies available for treating CCA, including the preoperative measures and interventions, alongside the current options regarding liver resection and OLT.

Efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Annual melanoma incidence in the US is escalating.

OBJECTIVE

Comprehensive evaluation of nivolumab alone or with ipilimumab for advanced melanoma treatment.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases, extending until August 2023. A range of outcomes were evaluated, encompassing overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), adverse events (both any and serious), complete response rate, mortality rate, and recurrence rate in patients with advanced melanoma.

RESULTS

This analysis was conducted on seven relevant studies, involving 2,885 patients. The baseline characteristics of both groups were found to be comparable across all outcomes, with the exception of tumor size. The pooled analysis did not reveal any significant disparities, except for PFS, where the nivolumab-ipilimumab treatment group demonstrated a significantly longer PFS compared to the nivolumab group. However, there was a notable discrepancy in any adverse events (Odds Ratio (OR): 2.69; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.96, 3.69; p < 0.00001) and serious adverse events (OR: 3.59; 95% CI: 2.88, 4.49, p < 0.00001) between the two groups, suggesting that the safety profile of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab was inferior.

CONCLUSIONS

Given diversity and potential biases, oncologists should base immunotherapy decisions on professional expertise and patient characteristics.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023453484.

Transplant Oncology: An Emerging Discipline of Cancer Treatment

Transplant oncology is an emerging concept of cancer treatment with a promising prospective outcome. The applications of oncology, transplant medicine, and surgery are the core of transplant oncology to improve patients' survival and quality of life. The main concept of transplant oncology is to radically cure cancer by removing the diseased organ and replacing it with a healthy one, aiming to improve the survival outcomes and quality of life of cancer patients. Subsequently, it seeks to expand the treatment options and research for hepatobiliary malignancies, which have seen significantly improved survival outcomes after the implementation of liver transplantation (LT). In the case of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the transplant setting, where the liver is the most common site of metastasis of patients who are considered to have unresectable disease, initial studies have shown improved survival for LT treatment compared to palliative therapy interventions. The indications of LT for hepatobiliary malignancies have been slowly expanded over the years beyond Milan criteria in a stepwise manner. However, the outcome improvements and overall patient survival are limited to the specifics of the setting and systematic intervention options. This review aims to illustrate the representative concepts and history of transplant oncology as an emerging discipline for the management of hepatobiliary malignancies, in addition to other emerging concepts, such as the uses of immunotherapy in a peri-transplant setting as well as the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for surveillance post-transplantation.

Tackling the immunotherapy conundrum: advances and challenges for operable non-small-cell lung cancer treatment

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents the majority of lung cancer cases, and its standard treatment is primarily surgery. Nonetheless, this type of cancer exhibits an important rate of tumor recurrence. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated significant survival benefits in many cancers, especially in early-stage NSCLC. This review considers the latest CheckMate816, IMpower010 and KEYNOTE-091 trials that led to US FDA approvals. The new wave of resectable NSCLC trial results are also summarized. Finally, the latest challenges for these treatment modalities, such as the choice between neoadjuvant and adjuvant use, the accurate identification of biomarkers and the presence of driver mutations such as EGFR, are discussed.