1
|
Omer DM, Shah F, Luthra A, Chen CT, Lee CI, Williams H, Walch H, Verheij FS, Rosen R, Alvarez J, Firat C, Karagkounis G, Weiser MR, Widmar M, Wei IH, Pappou EP, Nash GM, Smith JJ, Chatila WK, Romesser PB, Shia J, Paty PB, Garcia-Aguilar J, Sanchez-Vega F. Clinical and Genomic Characterization of Secondary Rectal Cancer After Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2025; 8:e251039. [PMID: 40100215 PMCID: PMC11920846 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2025] Open
Abstract
Importance Patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PC) have increased risk of secondary rectal cancer (SRC) and more limited treatment options. Objective To assess the tumor molecular profile, clinical characteristics, and oncologic outcomes of SRC after PC and compare them with those of primary rectal cancer (PRC). Design, Setting, and Participants This case-control study included patients with SRC diagnosed 5 or more years after RT for PC and patients with PRC who were treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York between February 1, 1994, and September 31, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures Clinical information and DNA sequencing data were analyzed. Oncologic outcomes were compared between patients with SRC and clinically matched patients with PRC using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Numerical and categorical variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher exact test, respectively. Results The analysis included 604 male patients with PRC (71.6%; median age, 55 [IQR, 46-66] years) and 64 male patients with SRC (median age, 78 [IQR, 72-82] years). Patients with SRC had more distal rectum (37 of 63 [58.7%] vs 131 of 581 [22.5%]; P < .001) and anterior rectal wall (20 of 57 [35.1%] vs 67 of 496 [13.5%]; P < .001) tumors, were less likely to receive neoadjuvant treatment (33 of 64 [51.6%] vs 570 of 604 [94.4%]), and had shorter 5-year overall survival (45.7% vs 64.9%; P = .01) and disease-free survival (40.3% vs 71.2%; P = .006) compared with clinically matched patients with PRC. Targeted DNA sequencing data from 31 SRC tumors identified lower mutational burden (median, 4.4 [IQR, 3.2-6.7] per megabase [Mb] vs 5.8 [IQR, 4.4-7.0] per Mb; P = .047), lower frequency of APC alterations (15 [48.4%] vs 432 [79.9%]; P < .001), and higher rates of SMAD4 inactivation (8 [25.8%] vs 54 [10.0%]; P = .01) compared with 541 PRC tumors. Whole-exome sequencing data from 17 SRC tumors identified a higher rate of frameshift deletions compared with 28 PRC tumors (median, 5.0 [IQR, 4.0-9.0] vs 2.5 [IQR, 1.0-4.2] variants; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance In this case-control study, patients with SRC after RT for PC had worse survival and different molecular profiles than patients with PRC. These findings may help improve the clinical management of SRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana M Omer
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Farheen Shah
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anisha Luthra
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chin-Tung Chen
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Christina I Lee
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hannah Williams
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Henry Walch
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Floris S Verheij
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Roni Rosen
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Janet Alvarez
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Canan Firat
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Georgios Karagkounis
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Martin R Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Maria Widmar
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Iris H Wei
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Emmanouil P Pappou
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Garrett M Nash
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Walid K Chatila
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Paul B Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Philip B Paty
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Francisco Sanchez-Vega
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lyu YH, Liu JQ, Wang FH, Yan WJ, Ming AH, Li GS, Ge JL, Jing R, Liu SJ, Hong-Yang, He YY, Jia-Li. Risk and survival outcomes of secondary pelvic neoplasm after radiotherapy in female patients with genital neoplasms: A large Population-Based cohort study. Radiother Oncol 2025; 202:110595. [PMID: 39521276 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 10/18/2024] [Accepted: 10/18/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To investigate the impact of radiotherapy (RT) on the risk of secondary pelvic neoplasms (SPN) and the survival outcomes of patients following a diagnosis of female patients with genital neoplasm(FGN). MATERIALS AND METHODS Utilizing SEER databases, this study involved 102,895 patients from nine oncology centers, spanning 1990 to 2015. We employed the Fine-Gray competing risks regression methodology to chart the trajectory of SPN development and used the Kaplan-Meier method to calculate the 10-year overall survival rates. RESULTS This study included 25,774 patients in the RT group and 77,121 in the non-radiotherapy (NRT) group. The cumulative incidence rate of SPN was 5.10 % in the RT group and 3.42 % in the NRT group. The RT group showed a significantly higher incidence of bladder cancer (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.75; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.43-2.14; P < 0.05), colon cancer (adjusted HR: 1.32; 95 % CI: 1.16-1.49; P < 0.05), and rectal cancer (adjusted HR: 1.34; 95 % CI: 1.10-1.65; P < 0.05) compared to the NRT group. After propensity score matching, patients in the RT group who developed bladder cancer had significantly reduced 10-year survival rates compared to patients with primary pelvic tumors (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION RT is identified as an independent risk factor for the development of SPN in patients with FGN. Patients with FGN who undergo RT demonstrate a significant increase in the risk of developing secondary neoplasms, specifically bladder cancers, and experience a reduction in 10-year survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan-Hong Lyu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Jia-Qi Liu
- Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Fa-Han Wang
- School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China
| | - Wen-Jingchi Yan
- School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China
| | - An-Hong Ming
- School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China
| | - Geng-Sheng Li
- School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China
| | - Jun-Li Ge
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Ru Jing
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Shu-Juan Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Hong-Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Yuan-Yuan He
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China.
| | - Jia-Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McDaniel GH, Clark T, Sferra J. Malignant Small Bowel Obstruction from Hernia Mesh Invasion by Jejunal Adenocarcinoma: A Report of a Rare Case. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CASE REPORTS 2024; 25:e945619. [PMID: 39580617 PMCID: PMC11604089 DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.945619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2024] [Revised: 10/14/2024] [Accepted: 09/12/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Small bowel obstructions (SBO) are common and can be caused by various pathologies including intra-abdominal adhesions and hernias. Less frequently, these obstructions are caused by malignancy. The following article will review the etiology and treatment of SBOs, discuss complications of hernia repair with mesh, and examine if there is an association between mesh and cancer. CASE REPORT We present the case of a man who was over 89 years old who presented with an SBO that failed non-operative management. He previously had bilateral inguinal hernia repairs with mesh and pelvic radiation for prostate cancer. Imaging obtained during the workup was concerning for malignancy. Exploratory laparotomy revealed an ascending colon adenocarcinoma and small bowel obstruction secondary to jejunal adenocarcinoma. The jejunal adenocarcinoma was adhered to and invaded into the mesh from a previous hernia repair. He underwent successful resection and anastomosis, had an uneventful postoperative course, and was discharged. Given his advanced age, he refused further workup or treatment. CONCLUSIONS The etiology and management of small bowel obstructions is multifactorial. Small bowel obstructions affect a large portion of the population worldwide and the subsequent management accounts for significant health care spending. This case shows an exceedingly rare and possibly novel case of jejunal adenocarcinoma that invaded into the hernia mesh, leading to a malignant small bowel obstruction. While there is not a clear explanation behind this patients' pathology, we hypothesize that his prior hernia surgery led to an intra-abdominal adhesion, and subsequent pelvic radiation may have facilitated the malignancy invading the mesh and causing a high-grade small bowel obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grant H. McDaniel
- College of Medicine, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Trisha Clark
- Department of Surgery, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Joseph Sferra
- Department of Surgery, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA
- ProMedica Health System, Toledo, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tang W, Zhou LJ, Zhang WQ, Jia YJ, Ge MW, Hu FH, Chen HL. Association of radiotherapy for prostate cancer and second primary colorectal cancer: a US population-based analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2023; 28:14. [PMID: 38095784 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02883-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy (RT) is a common treatment for prostate cancer, yet the risk of second primary colorectal cancer (SPCRC) in patients with prostate cancer undergoing RT has not been adequately studied. METHODS This study employed a population-based cohort design using the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify individuals diagnosed between January 1975 and December 2015. The cumulative incidence of SPCRC was estimated using Fine-Gray competing risk regression. Poisson regression analysis was used to estimate the risk associated with RT. Survival outcomes of patients with SPCRC were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS A total of 287,607 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer were identified. The cumulative incidences were higher in patients who did not receive RT (2.00%) compared to those who underwent RT (2.47%) after 25 years. After adjustment for multiple variables, RT was associated with an increased risk of developing combined SPCRC (adjusted HR 1.590). Additionally, the overall survival was significantly lower in patients who developed colorectal cancer after receiving RT as compared to those who did not receive RT. CONCLUSION These findings underscore the need for diligent long-term monitoring and effective management strategies to detect SPCRC in patients treated with RT for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Tang
- Medical School, Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - L-J Zhou
- Nursing Department, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - W-Q Zhang
- Medical School, Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Y-J Jia
- Medical School, Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - M-W Ge
- Medical School, Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - F-H Hu
- Medical School, Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - H-L Chen
- School of Public Health, Nantong University, 9#Seyuan Road, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|