True Prevalence of Unforeseen N2 Disease in NSCLC: A Systematic Review + Meta-Analysis

The Impact of Preoperative Invasive Nodal Staging on Unexpected Mediastinal Upstaging in Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Preoperative invasive nodal staging is standard of care for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Complications and delays in care are not negligible and diagnostic accuracy varies. In our system, invasive nodal staging is performed for clear radiographic indications (node > 1.0 cm short axis or standardized uptake value > 3.0, tumor > 4.0 cm). This study assessed whether unexpected mediastinal upstaging was less common in patients receiving preoperative invasive nodal staging.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated nodal upstaging, defined as pathological N2 or IIIA+ disease, based on receipt or non-receipt of invasive nodal staging. Clinical stage I-II NSCLC patients who underwent resection (2009-2019) were identified from our cancer registry. Stage and preoperative nodal staging information were confirmed through chart review. Associations between patient characteristics, invasive nodal staging receipt, and clinical to pathological stage changes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 2576 patients, 18.7% (n = 481) underwent invasive nodal staging. After resection, 6.2% of all patients had nodal upstaging and 24.9% had TNM upstaging. Only 0.3% (n = 9) were upstaged to N2 and 0.5% (n = 13) were upstaged to IIIA+. Lack of preoperative nodal sampling was not associated with N2 or IIIA+ upstaging. Findings were consistent in subanalyses of patients with surgical specimens meeting Commission on Cancer nodal sampling criteria and with clinical IB+ disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most patients did not undergo invasive nodal staging, <1% had unexpected N2 on surgical pathology. There was no association between lack of preoperative invasive nodal sampling and N2 nodal upstaging. Preoperative invasive nodal staging did not increase pathologic N2 nodal upstaging in early-stage NSCLC patients in our integrated health system.

Real-World Analysis of Survival and Treatment Efficacy in Stage IIIA-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) poses a significant clinical challenge, with low survival rates despite advances in therapy. The lack of a standardised treatment approach complicates patient management. This study utilises real-world data from Guy's Thoracic Cancer Database to analyse patient outcomes, identify key predictors of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and address the limitations of randomised controlled trials.

METHODS

This observational, single-centre, non-randomised study analysed 142 patients diagnosed with clinical and pathological T1/2 N2 NSCLC who received curative treatment from 2015 to 2021. Patients were categorised into three groups: Group A (30 patients) underwent surgery for clinical N2 disease, Group B (54 patients) had unsuspected N2 disease discovered during surgery, and Group C (58 patients) received radical chemoradiation or radiotherapy alone (CRT/RT) for clinical N2 disease. Data on demographics, treatment types, recurrence, and survival rates were analysed.

RESULTS

The median OS for the cohort was 31 months, with 2-year and 5-year OS rates of 60% and 30%, respectively. Group A had a median OS of 32 months, Group B 36 months, and Group C 25 months. The median DFS was 18 months overall, with Group A at 16 months, Group B at 22 months, and Group C at 17 months. Significant predictors of OS included ECOG performance status, lymphovascular invasion, and histology. No significant differences in OS were found between treatment groups (p = 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the complexity and diversity of Stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC, with no single superior treatment strategy identified. The findings underscore the necessity for personalised treatment approaches and multidisciplinary decision-making. Future research should focus on integrating newer therapeutic modalities and conducting multi-centre trials to refine treatment strategies. Collaboration and ongoing data collection are crucial for improving personalised treatment plans and survival outcomes for Stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients.

Saving Lives in Thoracic Surgery: Balancing Oncological Radicality and Functional Preservation, Transitioning from Standard Pneumonectomy to Targeted Sublobar Resection

This review chronicles the evolution of thoracic surgical interventions, from the standardized pneumonectomy to the precise approach of sublobar resections. It discusses the emergence and acceptance of minimally invasive and robot-assisted surgical techniques, highlighting their impact on improving outcomes beyond cancer and their influence on the surgical management of early-stage lung cancer. Evaluating historical developments alongside present methodologies, this review underscores the critical need for meticulous surgical planning and execution to optimize both oncological radicality and functional preservation. This evolution portrayed not only technical advancements but also a shift in the clinical approach towards tailored, organ-preserving methodologies, culminating in a contemporary framework promoting sublobar resections as the standard for specific patient profiles, signifying a new era of precision in thoracic surgery.

Systematic mediastinal staging in non-small cell lung cancer: Filling in the guideline evidence gap

See related article