Psychosexual Care of Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Cancer Survivors

Exploring how attachment insecurities mediate the link between sexual and partnership satisfaction in adolescents and young adults with cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Comprehensive data on factors affecting partnership satisfaction among adolescents and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors are limited. Our study examines partnership satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and attachment insecurities, exploring how attachment-related anxiety and avoidance influence the relationship between sexual and partnership satisfaction across major tumor entities in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We utilized data from two measurement time points (t1 and t6) of the AYA-LE study, a prospective longitudinal investigation examining the temporal course and associated factors of life satisfaction and psychological distress among AYA cancer survivors. We examined the mediating effect of attachment insecurities (ECR-RD) on the relationship between sexual satisfaction (FLZ-Sex) and partnership satisfaction (PFB), while controlling for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, in a sample of N = 275 participants.

RESULTS

Higher sexual satisfaction was correlated with lower attachment-related anxiety (r = -0.51, p < 0.001) and lower attachment-related avoidance (r = -0.49, p < 0.001). Both lower attachment-related anxiety and attachment-related avoidance were correlated with higher partnership satisfaction (r = -0.64, p < 0.001 and r = -0.72, p < 0.001, respectively). Sexual satisfaction partially predicted partnership satisfaction of AYA cancer survivors through attachment-related anxiety and attachment-related avoidance while the mediating effect accounted for 75% of the total effect.

INTERPRETATION

The associations between sexual satisfaction, partnership satisfaction, and attachment highlight the need to address emotional and relational aspects in supportive care for AYA cancer survivors. There is a clear need for more targeted studies on attachment patterns, sexual satisfaction, and partnership satisfaction in this specific population to further refine and validate these approaches.

Sexual health in adult survivors of childhood cancer: A Project REACH study

BACKGROUND

Sexual dysfunction is a significant complication of treatment for many adult-onset cancers. However, comparatively less is known about sexual dysfunction in adult childhood cancer survivors (CCSs). Research has been limited by the exclusion of specific cancers (e.g., central nervous system [CNS] tumors) and the lack of validated measures, which makes it difficult to understand the nature and prevalence of sexual dysfunction in CCSs.

METHODS

A total of 249 adult CCSs (aged 18-65 years) enrolled in Project REACH, a prospective cohort study, and completed measures of physical and mental health, including sexual dysfunction. Participants scoring ≤19 on the Female Sexual Function Index 6 or ≤21 on the International Index of Erectile Function 5 were classified as experiencing sexual dysfunction. Analyses examined the relationships between sexual dysfunction and demographic, disease, treatment, and health variables.

RESULTS

A total of 78 participants (32%) experienced clinically significant sexual dysfunction. In univariate analysis, sexual dysfunction was significantly associated with CNS tumor diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 2.56) and surgery (OR, 1.96) as well as with health variables such as fatigue (OR, 3.00), poor sleep (OR, 2.84), pain (OR, 2.04), depression (OR, 2.64), poor physical health (OR, 2.45), and poor mental health (OR, 2.21). Adjusted analyses found that CNS tumor diagnosis (p = .001) and health variables (p = .025) contribute significantly to sexual dysfunction in CCSs.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one third of adult CCSs report clinically significant sexual dysfunction, which underscores a significant screening and treatment need. However, because available measures were developed for survivors of adult cancers, research to create a sexual health measure specifically for adult CCSs is necessary to better identify the sexual health concerns of this vulnerable population.

A Scoping Review of Oncosexology Policy and Practice Tools Focused on Adolescents and Young Adults

Background: Despite being considered a key component of quality-of-life, sexual health concerns in adolescents and young adults (AYA) patients with cancer (aged 15-39 years old) are often unmet due to barriers from both patients and health care professionals (HCPs). Investigation into policy and practice tools in this scope of practice is also limited. Aim: To review the literature on policy and practice tools in AYA oncosexology. Method: A scoping review was conducted using four databases: Medline, EMCARE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO, based on the Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review methodology. Retrieved articles were extracted into Covidence, followed by two screening rounds. Descriptive and basic content analyses were performed for evidence synthesis. Results: Seventy-four articles were included after screening rounds and citation searches. Overall, oncosexology policy and practice tools were categorized into screening tools (11 articles), guidelines (38 articles), training programs (15 articles), service delivery initiatives (5 articles), and the evaluation of their feasibility/challenges to implementation (5 articles). Among these, only ten articles were specifically about the AYA population. They helped identify and resolve sexual health concerns in AYA patients with cancer by providing strategies to overcome communication barriers, treatment options, and information resources for patients, and by advocating for more HCP education on this topic. Conclusion: The results warrant the need for more research, implementation and expansion of policy and practice tools for sexual health issues in AYA patients with cancer.

Provider perspectives and recommendations on standardized sexual function screening intervention in adolescent/young adult oncology patients

BACKGROUND

Sexual function (SF) concerns are common among adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors, are underrecognized and undertreated. This study sought AYA oncology provider input on the implementation of an SF screening tool to address this unmet need.

PROCEDURE

Semi-structured interviews were completed with oncology providers (n = 25) who care for AYAs at a single institution. Interviews sought to understand barriers to addressing SF, elicit perspectives on use of an established screening tool, and obtain recommendations for SF screening intervention development and implementation. Interviews were developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR); thematic analysis-guided interpretation.

RESULTS

AYA oncology providers were in favor of using an SF screening tool, but confirmed previously identified barriers and implementation considerations within multiple CFIR domains, including concerns about privacy, patient comfort, provider buy-in, provider knowledge, resource needs, and workflow/capacity constraints. They identified numerous strategies to address barriers through screening intervention design and implementation approaches. For example, provider buy-in could be optimized through education, availability of clinical resources, creation of a dedicated sexual healthcare team, provider engagement in intervention development, and leadership involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Development and implementation of an effective SF screening intervention is necessary to improve diagnosis and treatment of sexual dysfunction, with the ultimate goal of improving sexual health-related quality of life in AYA cancer survivors. AYA oncology providers identified numerous intervention and implementation design strategies for the development and implementation of an SF screening intervention, which must be integrated with patient recommendations.

Sexual Problems as Late Effects: Awareness and Information Needs Among 1870 Long-term Norwegian Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Survivors (The NOR-CAYACS Study)

Purpose: Treatment-related sexual problems are common, but understudied, among survivors of Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Survivors (CAYACS). We investigated awareness of, and information needs regarding, sexual problems as late effects in a nation-wide sample of long-term CAYACS. Methods: Five-year survivors were identified by the Cancer Registry of Norway, diagnosed between 1985 and 2009 with any childhood cancer (0-18 years of age, excluding central nervous system tumors), leukemia, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or malignant melanoma (19-39 years of age). Malignant melanoma survivors treated with local surgery only served as an unmatched reference group. Survivors were mailed a survey, including items on awareness and information needs. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were used for data analyses. Results: Of 5361 CAYACS invited, 2104 responded (39%), of which 1870 were eligible for inclusion. In all, 62% were aware of sexual problems as late effects (46% aware only, 16% experienced it) and 31% reported information needs. Of all groups, childhood cancer survivors reported the lowest level of awareness (43% aware, 7% experienced it) and the highest information needs (38%). In multivariable models, awareness was associated with higher education, shorter time since treatment, more intense treatments, and experiencing hormonal changes and reduced fertility. Information needs were associated with having experienced sexual problems, female gender, higher treatment intensity, chronic fatigue, and increased depressive symptoms. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of long-term CAYACS report being unaware of, and have information needs regarding sexual problems as late effects decades beyond treatment. Addressing such issues during follow-up care is important.

Differentiating gender-based reproductive concerns among adolescent and young adult cancer patients: A mixed methods study

INTRODUCTION

Few studies have examined the distinct reproductive concerns (RC) of men and women in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patient population. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore and differentiate the RC of AYAs.

METHODS

Participants completed the Reproductive Concerns After Cancer (RCAC) scale and participated in a semistructured interview. Interviews were deductively coded based on an analytic schema derived from the RCAC.

RESULTS

After identifying participants through the electronic health record, 27 younger AYAs, ages 12-25, enrolled in the study. Four inductive themes emerged and differed by gender. These include differential temporality, acceptance, and openness to alternatives, partner influence, and parental/guardian influence. AYA men reported fewer RC (M = 49.4, SD = 9.6) compared to AYA women (M = 56.8, SD = 8.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Oncofertility care providers are advised to account for short- and long-ranging concerns based on AYAs' gender. Future evaluations of patient-reported outcome measures specific to AYA RC are recommended.

Sexuality, fertility, family planning, family life, and partnership in young breast cancer patients: a longitudinal study

Objectives

Adolescent and young adult (AYA) breast cancer patients are often faced with sexuality-related problems. Since healthcare providers are often unfamiliar with problems specific to AYA cancer this topic is too little integrated into routine oncological care. The objective of this study was to analyze sexuality, fertility, family planning, family life, and partnership regarding satisfaction and supportive care needs in AYA breast cancer patients.

Methods

A total of 139 AYA breast cancer patients were examined twice, 1 year apart. The patients were asked to complete several questionnaires and to answer multiple questions about satisfaction with sexuality, fertility, family planning, family life, and corresponding supportive care needs in these domains.

Results

While the patients were largely satisfied with their family life and partnerships, they were less satisfied with their sexuality and family planning. Only small mean score changes were observed in these variables over the course of a year. Being a parent already and having the possibility of further completing family planning were strongly associated with higher satisfaction and lower supportive care needs in these domains. Satisfaction was generally negatively associated with supportive care needs. Older age was predictive of lower satisfaction with sexuality at follow-up.

Conclusion

AYA cancer patients deserve special consultations concerning the impact of cancer and treatment on their sexuality and fertility, and it is especially important that women who have yet to complete their family planning be actively offered information and support concerning sexuality and fertility protection before beginning treatment.

Oncofertility care: A qualitative study to understand personal perspectives and barriers in the multidisciplinary breast care team in Taiwan

Background:

Previous studies indicate significant gaps exist in current practices and perceptions of oncofertility care.

Objectives:

We aim to understand the clinical experience regarding oncofertility care among health providers in a multidisciplinary breast care team.

Methods:

A qualitative, descriptive study was conducted. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 16 health care providers who worked in a hospital in Taipei. Verbatim transcriptions were analyzed using constant analysis methods.

Results:

Health care providers’ experiences regarding fertility care for reproductive-age women with breast cancer were divided into two themes: personal perspectives and barriers. Personal perspectives consisted of six subthemes including empathizing with the patient’s suffering during the diagnosis and treatment, safety as a prerequisite, satisfying the women’s needs, respecting the women’s choice, questioning women’s ability to raise children, and returning to family life. There were also six subthemes under barriers. These subthemes were poor communication among the multidisciplinary team, lack of initial screening, insufficient support in the women’s families, treatment considerations, lack of evidence-based information regarding oncofertility, and non-follow-up protocol.

Conclusion:

Nurses should evaluate the fertility needs of women with cancer and identify potential gaps during oncofertility care. Education strategies and tactics should be improved in order to overcome difficulties arising from health care providers’ personal perspectives and barriers to the provision of optimal fertility care in women with cancer.