|
1
|
Jalloul W, Moscalu M, Moscalu R, Jalloul D, Grierosu IC, Gutu M, Haba D, Mocanu V, Gutu MM, Stefanescu C. Are MTV and TLG Accurate for Quantifying the Intensity of Brown Adipose Tissue Activation? Biomedicines 2024; 12:151. [PMID: 38255256 PMCID: PMC10813038 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12010151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 12/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Recent research has suggested that one novel mechanism of action for anti-obesity medications is to stimulate the activation of brown adipose tissue (BAT). 18FDG PET/CT remains the gold standard for defining and quantifying BAT. SUVmax is the most often used quantification tool in clinical practice. However, this parameter does not reflect the entire BAT volume. As a potential method for precisely evaluating BAT, we have utilised metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) to answer the question: Are MTV and TLG accurate in quantifying the intensity of BAT activation? After analysing the total number of oncological 18F-FDG PET/CT scans between 2021-2023, we selected patients with active BAT. Based on the BAT SUVmax, the patients were divided into BAT-moderate activation (MA) vs. BAT-high activation (HA). Furthermore, we statistically analysed the accuracy of TLG and MTV in assessing BAT activation intensity. The results showed that both parameters increased their predictive value regarding BAT activation, and presented a significantly high sensitivity and specificity for the correct classification of BAT activation intensity. To conclude, these parameters could be important indicators with increased accuracy for classifying BAT expression, and could bring additional information about the volume of BAT to complement the limitations of the SUVmax.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wael Jalloul
- Department of Biophysics and Medical Physics-Nuclear Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (W.J.); (D.J.); (I.C.G.); (C.S.)
| | - Mihaela Moscalu
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Interdisciplinarity, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
| | - Roxana Moscalu
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Cell Matrix Biology and Regenerative Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK;
| | - Despina Jalloul
- Department of Biophysics and Medical Physics-Nuclear Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (W.J.); (D.J.); (I.C.G.); (C.S.)
| | - Irena Cristina Grierosu
- Department of Biophysics and Medical Physics-Nuclear Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (W.J.); (D.J.); (I.C.G.); (C.S.)
| | - Mihaela Gutu
- County Hospital of Emergency “Saint John the New”, 720224 Suceava, Romania; (M.G.); (M.M.G.)
| | - Danisia Haba
- Department 1 Surgery, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Veronica Mocanu
- Department of Morpho-Functional Sciences (Pathophysiology), “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Mihai Marius Gutu
- County Hospital of Emergency “Saint John the New”, 720224 Suceava, Romania; (M.G.); (M.M.G.)
| | - Cipriana Stefanescu
- Department of Biophysics and Medical Physics-Nuclear Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (W.J.); (D.J.); (I.C.G.); (C.S.)
| |
Collapse
|