Symptom Burden of Patients with Advanced Pancreas Cancer (APC): A Provincial Cancer Institute Observational Study

Real Life Data and Outcome of FOLFIRINOX Use in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients in General Hospitals in the Netherlands

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic cancer is one of the five most common causes of cancer mortality in developed countries. In patients with metastatic disease, the most frequent treatment used is FOLFIRINOX, which is associated with moderate toxicity which could influence quality of life. The efficacy of FOLFIRINOX in a general population in the Netherlands has not been subject of research before, and therefore, this research has been set up in order to investigate what the real-life benefits of FOLFIRINOX are in a population with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) treated in three general hospitals in the Netherlands.

METHODS

The data used in this study was collected by patient records leading to a noninterventional retrospective cohort study. Eighty-six patients, over 18 years of age, diagnosed with mPC between the years 2015 and 2022 and treated with FOLFIRINOX at Maasstad Hospital in Rotterdam, Amphia Hospital in Breda, or Catharina Hospital in Eindhoven, were included in the study. Kaplan-Meier models were used in order to represent survival outcomes.

RESULTS

The results showed a median overall survival of 228 days (IQR 118-355). Only 14.0% (n = 12) completed the first-line treatment, and 51.2% (n = 44) of patients stopped treatment before or during cycle 6. Toxicity is highest, grade 3, after the first cycle but remains high for grade 1 and 2 during all treatment cycles.

CONCLUSION

Survival rates for patient with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX were worse in our study population than in comparative studies.

Assessing the long-term priorities of pancreaticoduodenectomy survivors

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the long-term quality of life (QOL) and priorities of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) survivors.

METHODS

Survivors were surveyed via internet-based support groups. The relative importance of longevity, experience, costs, and QOL were assessed.

RESULTS

The PD cohort (n = 247, 35%) was 60 ± 12 years, 71% female, and 93% white. With moderate agreement, patients ranked survival most important, followed by functional and emotional well-being; costs and experience were least important (W = 35.7%, p < 0.001). Well-being improved throughout survivorship (P-QOL: 39 ± 12 at ≤3 mo vs 43 ± 12 at >10 y, p = 0.170; M-QOL: 38 ± 13 at ≤3 mo vs 44 ± 16 at >10 y; p = 0.015) but remained below the general population (p < 0.001). PD patients with benign diagnoses ranked functional independence as most important (2.00 ± 1.13 vs 2.63 ± 1.19, p < 0.001, W = 41.1%); PD patients with malignant diagnoses regarded overall survival most important (2.10 ± 1.20 vs 1.82 ± 1.22, p < 0.16, W = 35.1%). The mean rank order of priorities remained concordant between short-term (<1 year) and long-term (>5 years) survivors.

CONCLUSION

PD survivors experience long-term mental and physical health impairments, underscoring the importance of functional and emotional support. Survivors place paramount importance on overall survival, functional independence, and emotional well-being. Cancer survivors prioritize longevity, while survivors of chronic benign conditions prioritize functional independence.

Frailty and Increased Levels of Symptom Burden Can Predict the Presence of Each Other in HNSCC Patients

Frailty is an important risk factor for adverse events (AEs), especially in elderly patients. Therefore, assessing frailty before therapy is recommended. In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients, frailty is prognostic for severe postoperative complications and declining quality of life (QoL) after HNSCC treatment. Thus, assessment of frailty may help to identify individuals at risk for AE caused by oncologic therapy. We investigated the relationship between frailty and symptom burden to better understand their interaction and impact on HNSCC patients. In this prospectively designed cross-sectional study, the presence of frailty and symptom burden was assessed by using the Geriatric 8 (G8) and Minimal Documentation System (MIDOS2) questionnaires. A total of 59 consecutively accrued patients with a first diagnosis of HNSCC before therapy were evaluated. Patients were considered frail at a total G8 score ≤ 14. The MIDOS2 symptom burden score was considered pathological with a total score ≥ 4 or any severe symptom (=3). Statistical correlations were analyzed using Spearman and Pearson correlation. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to analyze the potential of predicting frailty and MIDOS2. p-values < 0.05 were considered significant. A total of 41 patients (69.5%) were considered frail, and 27 patients (45.8%) had increased symptom burden. "Tiredness" was the most common (overall rate 57.8%) and "Pain" was the most often stated "severe" symptom (5 patients, 8.5%). G8 and MIDOS2 correlated significantly (ρ = -0.487, p < 0.001; r = -0.423, p < 0.001). Frailty can be predicted by MIDOS2 symptom score (AUC = 0.808, 95% CI 0.698-0.917, p < 0.001). Vice versa, the G8 score can predict pathological symptom burden according to MIDOS2 (AUC = 0.750, 95% CI 0.622-0.878, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The strong link between frailty and increased symptom burden assessed by G8 or MIDOS2 indicates a coherence of both risk factors in HNSCC patients. Considering at least one of both scores might improve the identification of individuals at risk and achieve higher QoL and reduced complication rates by decision making for appropriate therapy regimens.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a scoping review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify and evaluate the use of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in patients with gastrointestinal cancer, as well as provide references for analyzing treatment outcomes, gauging prognostic risk, and assessing clinical symptoms and function in gastrointestinal cancer patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, ProQuest, Embase, and CINAHL were systematically searched using keywords and controlled vocabulary through January 2023.

RESULTS

The scoping review collected 30 studies published from 2012 to 2022, including observational studies (n = 21), interventional studies (n = 4), and mixed studies (n = 5). Outcome indicators included mood, pain, fatigue, sleep, the ability to perform activities of daily living, social functioning, and other health problems.

CONCLUSION

Being a self-report questionnaire, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System offers a full assessment of patient's symptoms and quality of life, and accurately captures their actual thoughts, feelings, and experiences. Individuals with gastrointestinal cancer made frequent use of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System to provide an accurate measure of their health status.

Exploring the Relationship Between Health-Illness Transition Experiences and Distress Among Patients With Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVES

To explore the correlation between health-illness transition (HIT) experiences and distress among patients with pancreatic cancer.

SAMPLE & SETTING

55 patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer receiving chemotherapy at a tertiary cancer center in New York.

METHODS & VARIABLES

A prospective correlational study was performed to explore the frequency, extent, and management of HITs. HITs were evaluated using the Measurement of Transitions in Cancer Scale, and distress was measured with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer.

RESULTS

All patients experienced at least one HIT. The extent of HITs decreased over time. Patients reported that they managed HITs moderately well. There was a significant correlation between unmanaged HITs and distress. As distress increased, the extent of the physical and emotional HITs increased and management worsened.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

HITs are ubiquitous among patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Associated distress inhibits management. Nurses are well suited to assess for potential HITs and to support self-management of HITs.

Treatment with anticancer drugs for advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have a poor prognosis and high burden of cancer-related symptoms. It is necessary to assess the trade-off of clinical benefits and possible harms of treatments with anticancer drugs (TAD). This systematic review aims to compare the effectiveness of TAD versus supportive care or no treatment, considering all patient-important outcomes.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Epistemonikos. Two reviewers performed selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. We assessed certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

We included 14 randomised controlled trials. Chemotherapy may result in a slight increase in overall survival (MD: 2.97 months (95%CI 1.23, 4.70)) and fewer hospital days (MD: -6.7 (-8.3, -5.1)), however, the evidence is very uncertain about its effect on symptoms, quality of life, functional status, and adverse events. Targeted/biological therapy may result in little to no difference in overall survival and a slight increment in progression-free survival (HR: 0.83 (95%CI 0.63, 1.10)), but probably results in more adverse events (RR: 5.54 (95%CI 1.24, 23.97)). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of immunotherapy in overall survival and functional status.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence is very uncertain about whether the benefits of using treatment with anticancer drugs outweigh their risks for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. This uncertainty is further highlighted when considering immunotherapy or a second line of chemotherapy and thus, best supportive care would be an appropriate alternative. Future studies should assess their impact on all patient-important outcomes to inform patients in setting their goals of care.

Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: What Matters to Patients?

Pancreatic cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death, with a poor overall survival rate. Although certain risk factors have been identified, the origins of pancreatic cancer are still not fully understood. Surgical resection remains the primary curative treatment, but pancreatic surgery is still associated with high morbidity and mortality rates, and most patients will experience recurrence. The impact of pancreatic cancer on patients' quality of life is significant, with an important loss of healthy life in affected individuals. Traditional outcome parameters, such as length of hospital stay, do not fully capture what matters to patients during recovery. Patient-centered care is therefore central, and the patient's perspective should be considered in pre-operative discussions. Patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs) could play an important role in assessing patient perspectives, but standardized methodology for evaluating and reporting them is needed. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of patient perspectives and different patient-reported measures in pancreatic cancer surgery. Understanding the patient perspective is crucial for delivering patient-centered care and improving outcomes for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Characteristics of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer who access palliative care: An observational study

PURPOSE

Despite the benefits of palliative care (PC) in pancreatic cancer, little is known about patients who access PC. This observational study examines the characteristics of patients with pancreatic cancer at their first episode of PC.

METHODS

First-time, specialist PC episodes captured through the Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC), in Victoria, Australia between 2014 and 2020, for pancreatic cancer, were identified. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined the impact of patient- and service-level characteristics on symptom burden (measured through patient-reported outcome measures and clinician-rated scores) at first PC episode.

RESULTS

Of 2890 eligible episodes, 45% began when the patient was deteriorating and 32% ended in death. High fatigue and appetite-related distress were most common. Generally, increasing age, higher performance status and more recent year of diagnosis predicted lower symptom burden. No significant differences were noted between symptom burden of regional/remote versus major city dwellers; however, only 11% of episodes recorded the patient as a regional/remote resident. A greater proportion of first episodes for non-English-speaking patients began when the patient was unstable, deteriorating or terminal, ended in death and were more likely to be associated with high family/carer problems. Community PC setting predicted high symptom burden, with the exception of pain.

CONCLUSION

A large proportion of first-time specialist PC episodes in pancreatic cancer begin at a deteriorating phase and end in death, suggesting late access to PC. Timely referrals to community-based specialist PC, access in regional/remote areas, as well as development of culturally diverse support systems require further investigation.

The impact of early palliative care on the quality of life of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: The IMPERATIVE case-crossover study

PURPOSE

Pancreatic cancer is a lethal disease. Many patients experience a heavy burden of cancer-associated symptoms and poor quality of life (QOL). Early palliative care alongside standard oncologic care results in improved QOL and survival in some cancer types. The benefit in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) is not fully quantified.

METHODS

In this prospective case-crossover study, patients ≥ 18 years old with APC were recruited from ambulatory clinics at a tertiary cancer center. Patients underwent a palliative care consultation within 2 weeks of registration, with follow up visits every 2 weeks for the first month, then every 4 weeks until week 16, then as needed. The primary outcome was change in QOL between baseline (BL) and week 16, measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep). Secondary outcomes included symptom control (ESAS-r), depression, and anxiety (HADS, PHQ-9) at week 16.

RESULTS

Of 40 patients, 25 (63%) were male, 28 (70%) had metastatic disease, 31 (78%) had ECOG performance status 0-1, 31 (78%) received chemotherapy. Median age was 70. Mean FACT-hep score at BL was 118.8, compared to 125.7 at week 16 (mean change 6.89, [95%CI (-1.69-15.6); p = 0.11]). On multivariable analysis, metastatic disease (mean change 15.3 [95%CI (5.3-25.2); p = 0.004]) and age < 70 (mean change 12.9 [95%CI (0.5-25.4); p = 0.04]) were associated with improved QOL. Patients with metastatic disease had significant improvement in symptom burden (mean change -7.4 [95%CI (-13.4 to -1.4); p = 0.02]). There was no difference in depression or anxiety from BL to week 16.

CONCLUSION

Palliative care should be integrated early in the journey for patients with APC, as it can improve QOL and symptom burden.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03837132.

Association of palliative care management and survival after chemotherapy discontinuation in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A retrospective single-centre observational study

BACKGROUND

Palliative care (PC) is integrated into standard oncology care. However, its clinical impact at the end of life remains unclear in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA). We aimed to describe the end-of-life care pathway and to assess whether PC referral influences survival after chemotherapy discontinuation (CD) among advanced PA patients.

METHODS

This retrospective single-centre observational study was conducted among deceased patients with advanced PA who had received chemotherapy between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021. Baseline characteristics, the timing of PC referral and events after CD were collected. The primary outcome was time from CD to death.

RESULTS

Among the 148 included patients, 53.4% (n = 79) received PC, mostly late after the CD (n = 133, 89.9%), 16.9% (n = 25) received chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life and 75.6% died at the hospital. None received PC in the 8 weeks following the diagnosis. PC referral significantly increased PC department admissions (p < 0.001) and decreased medical unit admissions (p < 0.001). The median survival after the CD was 35 days (IQR: 19-64.5). PC referral was associated with increased survival after CD (HR: 0.65 [0.47-0.90], p = 0.010, Cox) and after adjusting (HR: 0.65 [0.42-0.99], p = 0.045, Cox).

CONCLUSION

The study suggests that PC may be associated with longer survival after CD in advanced PA patients. However, PC is underused, and patients are referred late in their care pathway.