Current Update on PET/MRI in Gynecological Malignancies-A Review of the Literature

Primary staging with 2[18F]-FDG-PET/CT and -PET/MRI and radiotherapy response evaluation with MRI in uterine cervical cancer: an interim analysis of a prospective clinical trial

BACKGROUND

In uterine cervical cancer (UCC), tumour staging is performed according to the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) system, where imaging is incorporated, or the more generic Tumour Node Metastasis (TNM) classification. With the technical development in diagnostic imaging, continuous prospective evaluation of the different imaging methods contributing to stage determination is warranted. The aims of this interim study were to (1) evaluate the performance of radiological FIGO (rFIGO) and T staging (rT) with 2-fluorine-18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose (2[18F]-FDG)-positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) and with magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI), compared to clinical FIGO (cFIGO) and T (cT) staging based on clinical examination and conventional imaging, in treatment-naïve UCC, and to (2) identify possible MRI biomarkers for early treatment response after radiotherapy.

METHODS

Ten consecutive patients with newly diagnosed UCC from the prospective PRODIGYN (Prognostic and Diagnostic Added Value of Medical Imaging in Staging and Treatment Planning of Gynecological Cancer) study (ethical approval number 2022-04207-01; NCT05855941) were included. Study participants underwent 2[18F]FDG-PET/CT and -PET/MRI, and an additional MRI one week after radiotherapy. Agreement between rFIGO and cFIGO was analysed using Cohen's kappa. Differences in rFIGO between 2[18F]FDG-PET/CT and -PET/MRI were evaluated with Wilcoxon signed ranks test, and added value of rFIGO for metastasis assessment was demonstrated with descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

In 2/10 patients, a higher stage was obtained with rFIGO compared to cFIGO, where presence of metastases led to upstaging. In 3/10, rFIGO was lower than cFIGO, and in 5/10 rFIGO and cFIGO were similar. Degree of agreement between rFIGO and cFIGO was poor, (κ = 0.091, p < 0.005) with 2[18F]FDG-PET/CT and (κ = - 0.010, p > 0.05) with FDG/PET/MRI). There was no significant difference between 2[18F]FDG-PET/CT and -PET/MRI for rFIGO (p = 0.18), or rT stage assessment (p = 0.32). MRI-derived tumour volume and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were most affected on MRI one week after radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that there is an added value of rFIGO staging with 2[18F]FDG-PET/CT and -PET/MRI compared to clinical examination and conventional radiology, for metastasis assessment in treatment-naïve UCC. In early treatment response evaluation with MRI, ADC and tumour volume may be predictive parameters of interest in future prognostic analyses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials, NCT05855941. Registered 02 May 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05855941?term=NCT05855941&rank=1 .

Tata Memorial Centre Evidence Based Use of Nuclear medicine diagnostic and treatment modalities in cancer

ABSTRACT

PET/CT and radioisotope therapy are diagnostic and therapeutic arms of Nuclear Medicine, respectively. With the emergence of better technology, PET/CT has become an accessible modality. Diagnostic tracers exploring disease-specific targets has led the clinicians to look beyond FDG PET. Moreover, with the emergence of theranostic pairs of radiopharmaceuticals, radioisotope therapy is gradually making it's way into treatment algorithm of common cancers in India. We therefore would like to discuss in detail the updates in PET/CT imaging and radionuclide therapy and generate a consensus-driven evidence based document which would guide the practitioners of Oncology.

18F-FDG PET/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for the Management of Gynecological Malignancies: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

Positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18] fluoro- D-glucose integrated with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (18F-FDG PET/MRI) has emerged as a promising tool for managing various types of cancer. This review study was conducted to investigate the role of 18F- FDG PET/CT and FDG PET/MRI in the management of gynecological malignancies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched for relevant articles in the three databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All studies reporting data on the FDG PET/CT and FDG PET MRI in the management of gynecological cancer, performed anywhere in the world and published exclusively in the English language, were included in the present study.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the EndNote software (EndNote X8.1, Thomson Reuters) to list the studies and screen them on the basis of the inclusion criteria. Data, including first author, publication year, sample size, clinical application, imaging type, and main result, were extracted and tabulated in Excel. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of the modalities were extracted and summarized.

MAIN RESULTS

After screening 988 records, 166 studies published between 2004 and 2022 were included, covering various methodologies. Studies were divided into the following five categories: the role of FDG PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI in the management of: (a) endometrial cancer (n = 30); (b) ovarian cancer (n = 60); (c) cervical cancer (n = 50); (d) vulvar and vagina cancers (n = 12); and (e) gynecological cancers (n = 14).

CONCLUSIONS

FDG PET/CT and FDG PET/MRI have demonstrated potential as non-invasive imaging tools for enhancing the management of gynecological malignancies. Nevertheless, certain associated challenges warrant attention.