Purely Off-Clamp Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Stands the Test of Time: 15 Years Functional and Oncologic Outcomes from a Single Center Experience

Trifecta Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Using the New Hugo™ RAS System Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

(1) Background: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is still performed in many referred urological institutions, representing a valid alternative to robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). We aimed to compare trifecta outcomes of LPN and RAPN with the Hugo™ RAS System. (2) Methods: Between October 2022 and September 2023, eighty-nine patients underwent minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (group A, RAPN = 27; group B, Laparoscopic PN = 62) for localized renal tumors at our Institution. Continuous variables were presented as median and IQR and compared by means of the Mann-Whitney U test, while categorical variables were presented as frequencies (%) and compared by means of the χ2 test. (3) Results: Group A showed a higher rate of male patients (81.5% vs. 59.7%, p = 0.04) and a higher trend towards larger clinical tumor size (34 vs. 29 mm, p = 0.14). All the other baseline variables were comparable between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Regarding post-operative data, group A displayed a lower operative time (92 vs. 149.5 min, p = 0.005) and a shorter hospital stay (3 vs. 5, p = 0.002). A higher rate of malignant pathology was evidenced in group A (77.8% vs. 58.1%, p = 0.07) as well as a lower trend towards positive surgical margins (3.7% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.82), even if not statistically significant. (4) Conclusions: The rate of trifecta achievement was 92.6% and 82.3% for group A and B (p = 0.10), respectively. In terms of trifecta outcomes, RAPN using the Hugo™ RAS System showed comparable results to LPN performed by the same experienced surgeon.

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using the novel Hugo™ RAS system: Feasibility, setting and perioperative outcomes of the first off-clamp series

INTRODUCTION

Hugo Robot-Assisted Surgery (RAS) System has been conceived with enhanced modularity but its role for nephron-sparing surgery setting still remains poorly explored. We aimed to describe our experience in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) with a three-arms setting for the first off-clamp series using the new Hugo RAS System.

METHODS

Patients were placed on an extended flank position at the margin of the surgical bed with a slightly flexion (45°). The first 11 mm robotic trocar (camera port) was placed along the pararectal line 14 ± 2 cm far from the umbilicus. The pneumoperitoneum was then induced through the AirSeal system (SurgiQuest, Milford, Connecticut, USA©). Two more 8 mm operative robotic ports were placed under direct vision, either 8 ± 1 cm far from optic's port. Two 12 mm laparoscopic ports for bed-assistant were placed between robotic ports. Monopolar curved shears, fenestrated grasper, and large needle driver were used in a three-instruments configuration.

RESULTS

Off-clamp RAPN was successfully performed in seven patients with cT1 renal masses using a trans-peritoneal route. Median port placement and docking time was 6 min (IQR, 4-8 min). Hemostasis was achieved through renorraphy using a single transfix stitch with sliding clips technique. There was no need for additional ports placement. No intraoperative complications occurred, no clashing of robotic instruments or between the robotic arms was observed. No technical failures of the system occurred. Median console time was 83 min (IQR, 68-115 min). Median estimated blood loss were 200 ml (IQR, 50-400 ml). All patients were discharged between post-operative day 2 and 3, without the need of hospital readmission. No complications were recorded within the first 30 post-operative days.

CONCLUSIONS

We performed the first series of off-clamp RAPN using the novel HUGO RAS System. This novel robotic platform showed an easy-friendly docking system, providing excellent perioperative outcomes with a simple three-arms configuration.

Assessing the Trade-off Between the Safety and Effectiveness of Off-clamp Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Masses with a High RENAL Score: A Propensity Score-matched Comparison of Perioperative and Functional Outcomes in a Multicenter Analysis

BACKGROUND

Tumors with a high nephrometry score represent a challenging surgical scenario for which robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is a primary option in expert hands.

OBJECTIVE

To compare perioperative and functional outcomes of off-clamp and on-clamp RPN in patients with renal masses with a high RENAL score (≥9).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

For this retrospective analysis, an RPN data set including 1604 patients treated at three institutions between 2003 and 2021 was queried for cases with a RENAL score ≥9.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

We used 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to select a cohort in which imbalances between the off-clamp and on-clamp groups were minimized. We used χ2 and Student t tests to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the probability of having an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥45 ml/min during follow-up. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of a trifecta outcome (negative surgical margin status, no Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 complications, eGFR decline ≤30%) and of retaining eGFR ≥45 ml/min over time.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

From an overall cohort of 354 patients (142 on-clamp, 212 off-clamp), a homogeneous PSM cohort of 78 patients in each group was selected (p ≥ 0.17). In the PSM cohort, operative time was significantly shorter in the off-clamp group (p < 0.001). There were no differences between the groups in the rates of severe complications (p = 0.32) and positive surgical margins (p = 0.24). The rate of trifecta achievement was significantly higher in the off-clamp group (83.3% vs 67.9%; p = 0.03). Warm ischemia time >20 min was independently negatively associated with trifecta achievement (odds ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.74). Moreover, the off-clamp group had a significantly higher probability of retaining eGFR ≥45 ml/min over time (3 yr: 95.9% vs 81.6%; p = 0.03); every 1-min increase in warm ischemia time reduced this probability by 1.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a favorable trade-off between the benefits and risks of off-clamp RPN, with similar perioperative outcomes and a net benefit in terms of trifecta achievement and long-term renal function outcomes in comparison to on-clamp RPN.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The complexity of surgery for kidney tumors can be assessed using the RENAL score, which is a measure of the location and size of a kidney tumor. In a multicenter series of patients with tumors with a high RENAL score, we compared outcomes between strategies with (on-clamp) and without (off-clamp) clamping of kidney blood vessels during robot-assisted removal of part of the affected kidney. We found that off-clamp surgery results in better postoperative kidney function.

The Association of Ischemia Type and Duration with Acute Kidney Injury after Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a robust surrogate for chronic kidney disease. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of ischemia type and duration during RAPN with postoperative AKI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed all patients who underwent RAPN at our institution since 2011. The ischemia types were warm ischemia (WI), selective artery clamping (SAC), and zero ischemia (ZI). AKI was defined according to the Risk Injury Failure Loss End-Stage (RIFLE) criteria. We calculated ischemia time thresholds for WI and SAC using the Youden and Liu indices. Logistic regression and decision curve analyses were assessed to examine the association with AKI.

RESULTS

Overall, 154 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among all RAPNs, 90 (58.4%), 43 (28.0%), and 21 (13.6%) were performed with WI, SAC, and ZI, respectively. Thirty-three (21.4%) patients experienced postoperative AKI. We extrapolated ischemia time thresholds of 17 min for WI and 29 min for SAC associated with the occurrence of postoperative AKI. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that WIT ≤ 17 min (odds ratio [OR] 0.1, p < 0.001), SAC ≤ 29 min (OR 0.12, p = 0.002), and ZI (OR 0.1, p = 0.035) significantly reduced the risk of postoperative AKI.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm the commonly accepted 20 min threshold for WI time, suggest less than 30 min ischemia time when using SAC, and support a ZI approach if safely performable to reduce the risk of postoperative AKI. Selecting an appropriate ischemia type for patients undergoing RAPN can improve short- and long-term functional kidney outcomes.

Robot-Assisted Renal Surgery with the New Hugo Ras System: Trocar Placement and Docking Settings

The current literature relating to the novel HugoTM RAS System lacks consistent data concerning the bedside features of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). To describe the trocar placement and docking settings for RAPN with a three-arm configuration to streamline the procedure with HugoTM RAS, between October 2022 and April 2023, twenty-five consecutive off-clamp RAPNs for renal tumors with the HugoTM RAS System were performed. We conceived a trouble-free three-arm setting to ease and standardize RAPN trocar placement and docking settings with HugoTM RAS. Perioperative data were collected. Post-operative complications were reported according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The eGFR was calculated according to the CKD-EPI formula. Continuous variables were presented as the median and IQR, while frequencies were reported as categorical variables. Off-clamp RAPNs were successfully performed in all cases without the need for conversion or additional port placement. The median age and BMI were 69 years (IQR, 60-73) and 27.3 kg/m2 (IQR, 25.7-28.1), respectively. The median tumor size and R.E.N.A.L. score were 32.5 mm (IQR, 26-43.7) and 6 (IQR, 5-7), respectively. Two patients were affected by cT2 renal tumors. The median docking and console time were 5 (IQR, 5-6) and 90 min (IQR, 68-135.75 min), respectively, with slightly progressive improvements in the docking time achieved. No intraoperative complications occurred alongside clashes between instruments or with the bed assistant. In experienced hands, this simplified three-instrument configuration of the HugoTM RAS System for off-clamp RAPN resulted in feasible and safe practice, providing patient-tailored trocar placement and docking with non-inferior peri-perioperative outcomes to other robotic platforms.