1
|
Matovic Zaric V, Pantic I, Lugonja S, Glisic T, Konjikusic S, Lolic I, Baljosevic N, Zgradic S, El Mezeni J, Vojnovic M, Brankovic M, Milovanovic T. Survival of Patients with Alcohol-Related Liver Disease Cirrhosis-Usefulness of the New Liver Mortality Inpatients Prognostic Score. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:2508. [PMID: 39594174 PMCID: PMC11592997 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14222508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2024] [Revised: 11/03/2024] [Accepted: 11/04/2024] [Indexed: 11/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Alcohol can directly damage the liver, causing steatosis, steatohepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular cancer. The aim of this study was to examine 28-day survival in hospitalized patients with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) cirrhosis, as well as to develop and validate a new survival prediction model. Methods: A total of 145 patients with ALD cirrhosis were included; 107 were diagnosed with acute decompensation (AD) and 38 with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). The new liver mortality inpatients (LIV-IN) score was calculated using the following variables: hepatic encephalopathy (HE), hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), ascites, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), community-acquired infection (CAI), and fibrinogen. The diagnostic accuracy of the LIV-IN score was tested, along with the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELD-Na), albumin-bilirubin (ALBI), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), chronic liver failure consortium-C acute decompensation (CLIF-C AD), and chronic liver failure consortium-acute-on-chronic liver failure (CLIF-C ACLF). Results: Lethal outcome occurred in 46 (31.7%) patients. The mortality rate was higher in the ACLF group (n = 22, 57.9%) compared to the AD group (n = 24, 22.4%) (p < 0.01). The highest predictive power for short-term mortality was observed for the LIV-IN score (AUC 73.4%, p < 0.01). In patients with AD, the diagnostic accuracy of the CLIF-C AD score was better than for the LIV-IN score (AUC 0.699; p = 0.004, AUC 0.686; p = 0.007, respectively). In patients with ACLF, only the LIV-IN score had statistically significant discriminative power in predicting 28-day survival. Conclusions: The liver mortality inpatients prognostic score is a new, reliable prognostic model in predicting 28-day mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Matovic Zaric
- Emergency Center, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (I.L.); (N.B.)
| | - Ivana Pantic
- Clinic of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (I.P.); (T.G.); (S.Z.); (J.E.M.); (M.V.); (T.M.)
| | - Sofija Lugonja
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, General Hospital “Djordje Joanovic”, 23000 Zrenjanin, Serbia;
| | - Tijana Glisic
- Clinic of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (I.P.); (T.G.); (S.Z.); (J.E.M.); (M.V.); (T.M.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;
| | | | - Iva Lolic
- Emergency Center, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (I.L.); (N.B.)
| | - Nevena Baljosevic
- Emergency Center, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (I.L.); (N.B.)
| | - Sanja Zgradic
- Clinic of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (I.P.); (T.G.); (S.Z.); (J.E.M.); (M.V.); (T.M.)
| | - Jasna El Mezeni
- Clinic of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (I.P.); (T.G.); (S.Z.); (J.E.M.); (M.V.); (T.M.)
| | - Marko Vojnovic
- Clinic of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (I.P.); (T.G.); (S.Z.); (J.E.M.); (M.V.); (T.M.)
| | - Marija Brankovic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;
- University Hospital Medical Center Bežanijska Kosa, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Tamara Milovanovic
- Clinic of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (I.P.); (T.G.); (S.Z.); (J.E.M.); (M.V.); (T.M.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cabel T, Pascu CM, Ghenea CS, Dumbrava BF, Gunsahin D, Andrunache A, Negoita LM, Panaitescu A, Rinja EM, Pavel C, Plotogea OM, Stan-Ilie M, Sandru V, Mihaila M. Exceptional Liver Transplant Indications: Unveiling the Uncommon Landscape. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:226. [PMID: 38275473 PMCID: PMC10813978 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14020226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation represents the definitive intervention for various etiologies of liver failure and encompasses a spectrum of rare indications crucial to understanding the diverse landscape of end-stage liver disease, with significantly improved survival rates over the past three decades. Apart from commonly encountered liver transplant indications such as decompensated cirrhosis and liver cancer, several rare diseases can lead to transplantation. Recognition of these rare indications is essential, providing a lifeline to individuals facing complex liver disorders where conventional treatments fail. Collaborative efforts among healthcare experts lead not only to timely interventions but also to the continuous refinement of transplant protocols. This continued evolution in transplant medicine promises hope for those facing diverse and rare liver diseases, marking a paradigm shift in the landscape of liver disease management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teodor Cabel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania; (T.C.); (D.G.); (L.-M.N.); (E.M.R.)
| | - Cristina Madalina Pascu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania (M.M.)
| | - Catalin Stefan Ghenea
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania; (T.C.); (D.G.); (L.-M.N.); (E.M.R.)
| | - Bogdan Florin Dumbrava
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Sf. Ioan” Emergency Hospital, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Deniz Gunsahin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania; (T.C.); (D.G.); (L.-M.N.); (E.M.R.)
| | - Andreea Andrunache
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania (M.M.)
| | - Livia-Marieta Negoita
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania; (T.C.); (D.G.); (L.-M.N.); (E.M.R.)
| | - Afrodita Panaitescu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania; (T.C.); (D.G.); (L.-M.N.); (E.M.R.)
| | - Ecaterina Mihaela Rinja
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania; (T.C.); (D.G.); (L.-M.N.); (E.M.R.)
| | - Christopher Pavel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania; (T.C.); (D.G.); (L.-M.N.); (E.M.R.)
- Department 5, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050447 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Oana-Mihaela Plotogea
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania; (T.C.); (D.G.); (L.-M.N.); (E.M.R.)
- Department 5, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050447 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Madalina Stan-Ilie
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania; (T.C.); (D.G.); (L.-M.N.); (E.M.R.)
- Department 5, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050447 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Vasile Sandru
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania; (T.C.); (D.G.); (L.-M.N.); (E.M.R.)
- Department 5, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050447 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mariana Mihaila
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania (M.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Inayat F, Ali H, Patel P, Dhillon R, Afzal A, Rehman AU, Afzal MS, Zulfiqar L, Nawaz G, Goraya MHN, Subramanium S, Agrawal S, Satapathy SK. Association between alcohol-associated cirrhosis and inpatient complications among COVID-19 patients: A propensity-matched analysis from the United States. World J Virol 2023; 12:221-232. [PMID: 37970569 PMCID: PMC10642379 DOI: 10.5501/wjv.v12.i4.221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alcohol-associated cirrhosis (AC) contributes to significant liver-related mortality in the United States. It is known to cause immune dysfunction and coagulation abnormalities. Patients with comorbid conditions like AC are at risk of worse clinical outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The specific association between AC and COVID-19 mortality remains inconclusive, given the lack of robust clinical evidence from prior studies. AIM To study the predictors of mortality and the outcomes of AC in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the United States. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database 2020. Patients were identified with primary COVID-19 hospitalizations based on an underlying diagnosis of AC. A matched comparison cohort of COVID-19 patients without AC was identified after 1:N propensity score matching based on baseline sociodemographic characteristics and Elixhauser comorbidities. Primary outcomes included median length of stay, median inpatient charges, and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included a prevalence of systemic complications. RESULTS A total of 1325 COVID-19 patients with AC were matched to 1135 patients without AC. There was no difference in median length of stay and hospital charges in COVID-19 patients with AC compared to non-AC (P > 0.05). There was an increased prevalence of septic shock (5.7% vs 4.1%), ventricular fibrillation/ventricular flutter (0.4% vs 0%), atrial fibrillation (13.2% vs 8.8%), atrial flutter (8.7% vs 4.4%), first-degree atrioventricular nodal block (0.8% vs 0%), upper extremity venous thromboembolism (1.5% vs 0%), and variceal bleeding (3.8% vs 0%) in the AC cohort compared to the non-AC cohort (P < 0.05). There was no difference in inpatient mortality in COVID-19 patients with non-AC compared to AC, with an odds ratio of 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.78-1.22, P = 0.85). Predictors of mortality included advanced age, cardiac arrhythmias, coagulopathy, protein-calorie malnutrition, fluid and electrolyte disorders, septic shock, and upper extremity venous thromboembolism. CONCLUSION AC does not increase mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. There is an increased association between inpatient complications among COVID-19 patients with AC compared to non-AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faisal Inayat
- Department of Internal Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore 54550, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Hassam Ali
- Department of Internal Medicine, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC 27834, United States
| | - Pratik Patel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mather Hospital and Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University, Port Jefferson, NY 11777, United States
| | - Rubaid Dhillon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| | - Arslan Afzal
- Department of Internal Medicine, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC 27834, United States
| | - Attiq Ur Rehman
- Department of Hepatology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD 21202, United States
| | - Muhammad Sohaib Afzal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University Health, Shreveport, LA 71103, United States
| | - Laraib Zulfiqar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Quaid-e-Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur 63100, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Gul Nawaz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore 54550, Punjab, Pakistan
| | | | - Subanandhini Subramanium
- Department of Internal Medicine, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC 27834, United States
| | - Saurabh Agrawal
- Department of Hepatology, Tampa General Medical Group and University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33606, United States
| | - Sanjaya K Satapathy
- Department of Hepatology, North Shore University Hospital and Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University, Manhasset, NY 11030, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Morales R, Bolarín JM, Muro M, Legaz I. Presence of KIR2DL2/S2, KIR2DL5, and KIR3DL1 Molecules in Liver Transplant Recipients with Alcoholic Cirrhosis Could Be Implicated in Death by Graft Failure. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13071217. [PMID: 37046435 PMCID: PMC10093628 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13071217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The second-most frequent diagnosis among patients receiving liver transplants (LTs) is alcoholic liver disease. The multifactorial pathophysiology of alcoholic liver disease depends on the innate immune system and the inflammatory cascade. According to recent studies on these receptors, killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) may be involved in sepsis, liver rejection, and virus relapse. We aimed to investigate the impact of preclinical issues like ascites and encephalopathy and KIR genetic traits on death from sepsis, multiorgan failure (MF), and graft failure (GF) in AC patients undergoing LTs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 164 consecutive and deceased Caucasian AC patients who underwent LTs. Pre-transplant complications, cause of death, and patient survival were analyzed. Genomic DNA was taken from peripheral blood, and PCR-SSO was used for genotyping KIR. Results: Compared to GF patients, there was a statistically significant increase in the frequency of KIR2DL2+ (75.8% vs. 51.2%; p = 0.047). Another increase in frequency was also observed in KIR2DS2+ in sepsis compared to the GF group (51.2% vs. 43.7%; p = 0.018). In patients who passed away from MF, a decrease in KIR2DL5+ was observed in AC patients with and without encephalopathy (p = 0.018). The frequency of KIR3DL1+ in the AC patients significantly increased the mortality from sepsis (p = 0.045), which was confirmed by multivariate logistic regression. The frequency of KIR3DL1+ in the AC patients significantly increased the mortality from sepsis (p = 0.012) and was confirmed by multivariate logistic regression. KIR2DS1+ and KIR2DS4+ showed increased mortality due to GF compared to patients without these genes (p = 0.011 and 0.012, respectively). However, this fact was confirmed only for KIR2DS1+ by multivariate logistic Cox regression. Conclusions: The presence of the KIR2DL2/S2+, KIR2DL5+, and KIR3DL1+ genes increases the frequency of death from multiple organ failure or graft failure. Our findings highlight the AC patient’s vulnerability to a LT during hospitalization. Following the transplant and outside of it, we adopt essential preventive measures to create a routine healthcare screening to enhance and modify treatments to increase survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Morales
- Department of Legal and Forensic Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute (IMIB), Regional Campus of International Excellence “Campus Mare Nostrum”, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
| | - José Miguel Bolarín
- Department of Legal and Forensic Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute (IMIB), Regional Campus of International Excellence “Campus Mare Nostrum”, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
| | - Manuel Muro
- Immunology Service, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca (HCUVA), 30120 Murcia, Spain
- Correspondence: (M.M.); (I.L.); Tel.: +34-968-369-599 (M.M.); +34-868-883-957 (I.L.); Fax: +34-968-349-678 (M.M.); +34-868-834-307 (I.L.)
| | - Isabel Legaz
- Department of Legal and Forensic Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute (IMIB), Regional Campus of International Excellence “Campus Mare Nostrum”, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
- Correspondence: (M.M.); (I.L.); Tel.: +34-968-369-599 (M.M.); +34-868-883-957 (I.L.); Fax: +34-968-349-678 (M.M.); +34-868-834-307 (I.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mazilescu LI, Bernheim I, Treckmann J, Radunz S. Donor, Recipient and Surgeon Sex and Sex-Concordance and their Impact on Liver Transplant Outcome. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13020281. [PMID: 36836516 PMCID: PMC9959865 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13020281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Patient sex is associated with differential outcome of many procedures although the exact mechanisms remain unknown. Especially in transplant surgery, surgeon-patient sex-concordance is rarely present for female patients and outcome may be negatively affected. (2) Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, recipient, donor, and surgeon sex were evaluated and short- and long-term outcome was analyzed with regards to sex and sex-concordance of patients, donors, and surgeons. (3) Results: We included 425 recipients in our study; 50.1% of organ donors, 32.7% of recipients, and 13.9% of surgeons were female. Recipient-donor sex concordance was present in 82.7% of female recipients and in 65.7% of male recipients (p = 0.0002). Recipient-surgeon sex concordance was present in 11.5% of female recipients and in 85.0% of male recipients (p < 0.0001). Five-year patient survival was comparable between female and male recipients (70.0% vs. 73.3%, p = 0.3978). Five-year patient survival of female recipients treated by female surgeons was improved without reaching significance (81.3% vs. 68.4%, p = 0.3621). (4) Conclusions: Female recipients and female surgeons are underrepresented in liver transplant surgery. Societal factors influencing outcome of female patients suffering from end-stage organ failure need to be further examined and acted upon to possibly improve the outcome of female liver transplant recipients.
Collapse
|