Impact of Lesion Delineation and Intensity Quantisation on the Stability of Texture Features from Lung Nodules on CT: A Reproducible Study

Enhancing the Clinical Utility of Radiomics: Addressing the Challenges of Repeatability and Reproducibility in CT and MRI

Radiomics, which integrates the comprehensive characterization of imaging phenotypes with machine learning algorithms, is increasingly recognized for its potential in the diagnosis and prognosis of oncological conditions. However, the repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features are critical challenges that hinder their widespread clinical adoption. This review aims to address the paucity of discussion regarding the factors that influence the reproducibility and repeatability of radiomic features and their subsequent impact on the application of radiomic models. We provide a synthesis of the literature on the repeatability and reproducibility of CT/MR-based radiomic features, examining sources of variation, the number of reproducible features, and the availability of individual feature repeatability indices. We differentiate sources of variation into random effects, which are challenging to control but can be quantified through simulation methods such as perturbation, and biases, which arise from scanner variability and inter-reader differences and can significantly affect the generalizability of radiomic model performance in diverse settings. Four suggestions for repeatability and reproducibility studies are suggested: (1) detailed reporting of variation sources, (2) transparent disclosure of calculation parameters, (3) careful selection of suitable reliability indices, and (4) comprehensive reporting of reliability metrics. This review underscores the importance of random effects in feature selection and harmonizing biases between development and clinical application settings to facilitate the successful translation of radiomic models from research to clinical practice.

Quantum-enhanced hybrid feature engineering in thoracic CT image analysis for state-of-the-art nodule classification: an advanced lung cancer assessment

The intricate nature of lung cancer treatment poses considerable challenges upon diagnosis. Early detection plays a pivotal role in mitigating its escalating global mortality rates. Consequently, there are pressing demands for robust and dependable early detection and diagnostic systems. However, the technological limitations and complexity of the disease make it challenging to implement an efficient lung cancer screening system. AI-based CT image analysis techniques are showing significant contributions to the development of computer-assisted detection (CAD) systems for lung cancer screening. Various existing research groups are working on implementing CT image analysis systems for assessing and classifying lung cancer. However, the complexity of different structures inside the CT image is high and comprehension of significant information inherited by them is more complex even after applying advanced feature extraction and feature selection techniques. Traditional and classical feature selection techniques may struggle to capture complex interdependencies between features. They may get stuck in local optima and sometimes require additional exploration strategies. Traditional techniques may also struggle with combinatorial optimization problems when applied to a prominent feature space. This paper proposed a methodology to overcome the existing challenges by applying feature extraction using Vision Transformer (FexViT) and Feature selection using the Quantum Computing based Quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QC-FSelQUBO) technique. This algorithm shows better performance when compared with other existing techniques. The proposed methodology showed better performance as compared to other existing techniques when evaluated by applying necessary output measures, such as accuracy, Area under roc (receiver operating characteristics) curve, precision, sensitivity, and specificity, obtained as 94.28%, 99.10%, 96.17%, 90.16% and 97.46%. The further advancement of CAD systems is essential to meet the demand for more reliable detection and diagnosis of cancer, which can be addressed by leading the proposed quantum computation and growing AI-based technology ahead.

Diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion with combinations of multiple tumor markers: A comparison study of five machine learning models

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the diagnostic value of combinations of tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 125, CA153, and CA19-9 in identifying malignant pleural effusion (MPE) from non-malignant pleural effusion (non-MPE) using machine learning, and compare the performance of popular machine learning methods.

METHODS

A total of 319 samples were collected from patients with pleural effusion in Beijing and Wuhan, China, from January 2018 to June 2020. Five machine learning methods including Logistic regression, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), Bayesian additive regression tree, random forest, and support vector machine were applied to evaluate the diagnostic performance. Sensitivity, specificity, Youden's index, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of different diagnostic models.

RESULTS

For diagnostic models with a single tumor marker, the model using CEA, constructed by XGBoost, performed best (AUC = 0.895, sensitivity = 0.80), and the model with CA153, also by XGBoost, showed the largest specificity 0.98. Among all combinations of tumor markers, the combination of CEA and CA153 achieved the best performance (AUC = 0.921, sensitivity = 0.85) in identifying MPE under the diagnostic model constructed by XGBoost.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic models for MPE with a combination of multiple tumor markers outperformed the models with a single tumor marker, particularly in sensitivity. Using machine learning methods, especially XGBoost, could comprehensively improve the diagnostic accuracy of MPE.

Qualitative and Semiquantitative Parameters of 18F-FDG-PET/CT as Predictors of Malignancy in Patients with Solitary Pulmonary Nodule

This study aims to evaluate the reliability of qualitative and semiquantitative parameters of ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT, and eventually a correlation between them, in predicting the risk of malignancy in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) before the diagnosis of lung cancer. A total of 146 patients were retrospectively studied according to their pre-test probability of malignancy (all patients were intermediate risk), based on radiological features and risk factors, and qualitative and semiquantitative parameters, such as SUVmax, SUVmean, TLG, and MTV, which were obtained from the FDG PET-CT scan of such patients before diagnosis. It has been observed that visual analysis correlates well with the risk of malignancy in patients with SPN; indeed, only 20% of SPNs in which FDG uptake was low or absent were found to be malignant at the cytopathological examination, while 45.45% of SPNs in which FDG uptake was moderate and 90.24% in which FDG uptake was intense were found to be malignant. The same trend was observed evaluating semiquantitative parameters, since increasing values of SUVmax, SUVmean, TLG, and MTV were observed in patients whose cytopathological examination of SPN showed the presence of lung cancer. In particular, in patients whose SPN was neoplastic, we observed a median (MAD) SUVmax of 7.89 (±2.24), median (MAD) SUVmean of 3.76 (±2.59), median (MAD) TLG of 16.36 (±15.87), and a median (MAD) MTV of 3.39 (±2.86). In contrast, in patients whose SPN was non-neoplastic, the SUVmax was 2.24 (±1.73), SUVmean 1.67 (±1.15), TLG 1.63 (±2.33), and MTV 1.20 (±1.20). Optimal cut-offs were drawn for semiquantitative parameters considered predictors of malignancy. Nodule size correlated significantly with FDG uptake intensity and with SUVmax. Finally, age and nodule size proved significant predictors of malignancy. In conclusion, considering the pre-test probability of malignancy, qualitative and semiquantitative parameters can be considered reliable tools in patients with SPN, since cut-offs for SUVmax, SUVmean, TLG, and MTV showed good sensitivity and specificity in predicting malignancy.

Application of nnU-Net for Automatic Segmentation of Lung Lesions on CT Images and Its Implication for Radiomic Models

Radiomics investigates the predictive role of quantitative parameters calculated from radiological images. In oncology, tumour segmentation constitutes a crucial step of the radiomic workflow. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and prone to inter-observer variability. In this study, a state-of-the-art deep-learning network for automatic segmentation (nnU-Net) was applied to computed tomography images of lung tumour patients, and its impact on the performance of survival radiomic models was assessed. In total, 899 patients were included, from two proprietary and one public datasets. Different network architectures (2D, 3D) were trained and tested on different combinations of the datasets. Automatic segmentations were compared to reference manual segmentations performed by physicians using the DICE similarity coefficient. Subsequently, the accuracy of radiomic models for survival classification based on either manual or automatic segmentations were compared, considering both hand-crafted and deep-learning features. The best agreement between automatic and manual contours (DICE = 0.78 ± 0.12) was achieved averaging 2D and 3D predictions and applying customised post-processing. The accuracy of the survival classifier (ranging between 0.65 and 0.78) was not statistically different when using manual versus automatic contours, both with hand-crafted and deep features. These results support the promising role nnU-Net can play in automatic segmentation, accelerating the radiomic workflow without impairing the models' accuracy. Further investigations on different clinical endpoints and populations are encouraged to confirm and generalise these findings.

matRadiomics: A Novel and Complete Radiomics Framework, from Image Visualization to Predictive Model

Radiomics aims to support clinical decisions through its workflow, which is divided into: (i) target identification and segmentation, (ii) feature extraction, (iii) feature selection, and (iv) model fitting. Many radiomics tools were developed to fulfill the steps mentioned above. However, to date, users must switch different software to complete the radiomics workflow. To address this issue, we developed a new free and user-friendly radiomics framework, namely matRadiomics, which allows the user: (i) to import and inspect biomedical images, (ii) to identify and segment the target, (iii) to extract the features, (iv) to reduce and select them, and (v) to build a predictive model using machine learning algorithms. As a result, biomedical images can be visualized and segmented and, through the integration of Pyradiomics into matRadiomics, radiomic features can be extracted. These features can be selected using a hybrid descriptive–inferential method, and, consequently, used to train three different classifiers: linear discriminant analysis, k-nearest neighbors, and support vector machines. Model validation is performed using k-fold cross-Validation and k-fold stratified cross-validation. Finally, the performance metrics of each model are shown in the graphical interface of matRadiomics. In this study, we discuss the workflow, architecture, application, future development of matRadiomics, and demonstrate its working principles in a real case study with the aim of establishing a reference standard for the whole radiomics analysis, starting from the image visualization up to the predictive model implementation.

Form Factors as Potential Imaging Biomarkers to Differentiate Benign vs. Malignant Lung Lesions on CT Scans

Indeterminate lung nodules detected on CT scans are common findings in clinical practice. Their correct assessment is critical, as early diagnosis of malignancy is crucial to maximise the treatment outcome. In this work, we evaluated the role of form factors as imaging biomarkers to differentiate benign vs. malignant lung lesions on CT scans. We tested a total of three conventional imaging features, six form factors, and two shape features for significant differences between benign and malignant lung lesions on CT scans. The study population consisted of 192 lung nodules from two independent datasets, containing 109 (38 benign, 71 malignant) and 83 (42 benign, 41 malignant) lung lesions, respectively. The standard of reference was either histological evaluation or stability on radiological followup. The statistical significance was determined via the Mann-Whitney U nonparametric test, and the ability of the form factors to discriminate a benign vs. a malignant lesion was assessed through multivariate prediction models based on Support Vector Machines. The univariate analysis returned four form factors (Angelidakis compactness and flatness, Kong flatness, and maximum projection sphericity) that were significantly different between the benign and malignant group in both datasets. In particular, we found that the benign lesions were on average flatter than the malignant ones; conversely, the malignant ones were on average more compact (isotropic) than the benign ones. The multivariate prediction models showed that adding form factors to conventional imaging features improved the prediction accuracy by up to 14.5 pp. We conclude that form factors evaluated on lung nodules on CT scans can improve the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lesions.

CT Texture Analysis of Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors-Associations with Tumor Grading and Proliferation

Texture analysis derived from computed tomography (CT) might be able to provide clinically relevant imaging biomarkers and might be associated with histopathological features in tumors. The present study sought to elucidate the possible associations between texture features derived from CT images with proliferation index Ki-67 and grading in pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors. Overall, 38 patients (n = 22 females, 58%) with a mean age of 60.8 ± 15.2 years were included into this retrospective study. The texture analysis was performed using the free available Mazda software. All tumors were histopathologically confirmed. In discrimination analysis, "S(1,1)SumEntrp" was significantly different between typical and atypical carcinoids (mean 1.74 ± 0.11 versus 1.79 ± 0.14, p = 0.007). The correlation analysis revealed a moderate positive association between Ki-67 index with the first order parameter kurtosis (r = 0.66, p = 0.001). Several other texture features were associated with the Ki-67 index, the highest correlation coefficient showed "S(4,4)InvDfMom" (r = 0.59, p = 0.004). Several texture features derived from CT were associated with the proliferation index Ki-67 and might therefore be a valuable novel biomarker in pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors. "Sumentrp" might be a promising parameter to aid in the discrimination between typical and atypical carcinoids.