1
|
Awais M, Rehman A, Bukhari SS. Advances in liquid biopsy and virtual biopsy for care of patients with glioma: a narrative review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2025; 25:529-550. [PMID: 40183671 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2025.2489629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2025] [Accepted: 04/02/2025] [Indexed: 04/05/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The World Health Organization's 2021 classification of central nervous system neoplasms incorporated molecular and genetic features for classifying gliomas. Classification of gliomas located in deep-seated structures became a clinical conundrum given the absence of crucial pathological and molecular data. Advances in noninvasive imaging modalities offered virtual biopsy as a novel solution to this problem by identifying surrogate radiomic signatures. Liquid biopsies of blood or cerebrospinal fluid provided another enormous opportunity for identifying genomic, metabolomic and proteomic signatures. AREAS COVERED We summarize and appraise the current state of evidence with regards to virtual biopsy and liquid biopsy in the care of patients with gliomas. PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar were searched on 7/30/2024 for relevant articles published after the year 2013 in the English language. EXPERT OPINION A large body of preclinical and preliminary clinical evidence suggests that virtual biopsy is possible with the combined use of multiple novel imaging modalities in conjunction with machine learning and radiomics. Likewise, liquid biopsy in conjunction with focused ultrasound may be a valuable tool to obtain proteomic and genomic data regarding glioma in a minimally invasive manner. These modalities will likely become an integral part of care for patients with glioma in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Awais
- Department of Radiology, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Abdul Rehman
- Department of Medicine, Tidal Health Peninsula Regional, Salisbury, MD, USA
| | - Syed Sarmad Bukhari
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shrestha B, Stern NB, Zhou A, Dunn A, Porter T. Current trends in the characterization and monitoring of vascular response to cancer therapy. Cancer Imaging 2024; 24:143. [PMID: 39438891 PMCID: PMC11515715 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-024-00767-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 08/26/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Tumor vascular physiology is an important determinant of disease progression as well as the therapeutic outcome of cancer treatment. Angiogenesis or the lack of it provides crucial information about the tumor's blood supply and therefore can be used as an index for cancer growth and progression. While standalone anti-angiogenic therapy demonstrated limited therapeutic benefits, its combination with chemotherapeutic agents improved the overall survival of cancer patients. This could be attributed to the effect of vascular normalization, a dynamic process that temporarily reverts abnormal vasculature to the normal phenotype maximizing the delivery and intratumor distribution of chemotherapeutic agents. Longitudinal monitoring of vascular changes following antiangiogenic therapy can indicate an optimal window for drug administration and estimate the potential outcome of treatment. This review primarily focuses on the status of various imaging modalities used for the longitudinal characterization of vascular changes before and after anti-angiogenic therapies and their clinical prospects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binita Shrestha
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
| | - Noah B Stern
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
| | - Annie Zhou
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
| | - Andrew Dunn
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
| | - Tyrone Porter
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Javid H, Oryani MA, Rezagholinejad N, Esparham A, Tajaldini M, Karimi‐Shahri M. RGD peptide in cancer targeting: Benefits, challenges, solutions, and possible integrin-RGD interactions. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6800. [PMID: 38349028 PMCID: PMC10832341 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
RGD peptide can be found in cell adhesion and signaling proteins, such as fibronectin, vitronectin, and fibrinogen. RGD peptides' principal function is to facilitate cell adhesion by interacting with integrin receptors on the cell surface. They have been intensively researched for use in biotechnology and medicine, including incorporation into biomaterials, conjugation to medicinal molecules or nanoparticles, and labeling with imaging agents. RGD peptides can be utilized to specifically target cancer cells and the tumor vasculature by engaging with these integrins, improving drug delivery efficiency and minimizing adverse effects on healthy tissues. RGD-functionalized drug carriers are a viable option for cancer therapy as this focused approach has demonstrated promise in the future. Writing a review on the RGD peptide can significantly influence how drugs are developed in the future by improving our understanding of the peptide, finding knowledge gaps, fostering innovation, and making drug design easier.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hossein Javid
- Department of Medical Laboratory SciencesVarastegan Institute for Medical SciencesMashhadIran
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of MedicineMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
- Surgical Oncology Research CenterMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
| | - Mahsa Akbari Oryani
- Department of Pathology, School of MedicineMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
| | | | - Ali Esparham
- Student Research Committee, Faculty of MedicineMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
| | - Mahboubeh Tajaldini
- Ischemic Disorder Research CenterGolestan University of Medical SciencesGorganIran
| | - Mehdi Karimi‐Shahri
- Department of Pathology, School of MedicineMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
- Department of Pathology, School of MedicineGonabad University of Medical SciencesGonabadIran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhao L, Wen X, Xu W, Pang Y, Sun L, Wu X, Xu P, Zhang J, Guo Z, Lin Q, Chen X, Chen H. Clinical Evaluation of 68Ga-FAPI-RGD for Imaging of Fibroblast Activation Protein and Integrin α vβ 3 in Various Cancer Types. J Nucl Med 2023:jnumed.122.265383. [PMID: 37142301 PMCID: PMC10394316 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiolabeled fibroblast activation protein (FAP) inhibitors (FAPIs) and Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptides have been extensively investigated for imaging of FAP- and integrin αvβ3-positive tumors. In this study, a FAPI-RGD heterodimer was radiolabeled with 68Ga and evaluated in patients with cancer. We hypothesized that the heterodimer, recognizing both FAP and integrin αvβ3, would be advantageous because of its dual-receptor-targeting property. Methods: The effective dose of 68Ga-FAPI-RGD was evaluated in 3 healthy volunteers. The clinical feasibility of 68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT was evaluated in 22 patients with various types of cancer, and the results were compared with those of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI-46. Results: 68Ga-FAPI-RGD was tolerated well, with no adverse events in any of the healthy volunteers or patients. The effective dose from 68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT was 1.01 × 10-2 mSv/MBq. In clinical investigations with different types of cancer, the radiotracer uptake and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) of primary and metastatic lesions in 68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT were significantly higher than those in 18F-FDG PET/CT (primary tumors: SUVmax, 18.0 vs. 9.1 [P < 0.001], and TBR, 15.2 vs. 5.5 [P < 0.001]; lymph node metastases: SUVmax, 12.1 vs. 6.1 [P < 0.001], and TBR, 13.3 vs. 4.1 [P < 0.001]), resulting in an improved lesion detection rate and tumor delineation, particularly for the diagnosis of lymph node (99% vs. 91%) and bone (100% vs. 80%) metastases. 68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT also yielded a higher radiotracer uptake and TBR than 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT did. Conclusion: 68Ga-FAPI-RGD exhibited improved tumor uptake and TBR compared with 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT. This study demonstrated the safety and clinical feasibility of 68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT for imaging of various types of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Zhao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Cancer Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
- Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, Surgery, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Clinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Xuejun Wen
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics and Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Weizhi Xu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Cancer Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Yizhen Pang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Cancer Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Long Sun
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Cancer Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Xiaoming Wu
- College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China; and
| | - Pengfei Xu
- Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, Surgery, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Clinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Nanomedicine Translational Research Program, NUS Center for Nanomedicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jingjing Zhang
- Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, Surgery, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Clinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Nanomedicine Translational Research Program, NUS Center for Nanomedicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Zhide Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics and Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Qin Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Xiaoyuan Chen
- Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, Surgery, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore;
- Clinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Nanomedicine Translational Research Program, NUS Center for Nanomedicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Haojun Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Cancer Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China;
| |
Collapse
|