Imaging Review of Pelvic Ring Fractures and Its Complications in High-Energy Trauma

Evaluating the stability of external fixators following pelvic injury: A systematic review of biomechanical testing methods

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review aims to identify previously used techniques in biomechanics to assess pelvic instability following pelvic injury, focusing on external fixation constructs.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted to include biomechanical studies and to exclude clinical trials.

RESULTS

Of an initial 4666 studies found, 38 met the inclusion criteria. 84% of the included studies were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The studies analysed 106 postmortem specimens, 154 synthetic bones, and 103 computational models. Most specimens were male (97% synthetic, 70% postmortem specimens). Both the type of injury and the classification system employed varied across studies. About 82% of the injuries assessed were of type C. Two different fixators were tested for FFPII and type A injury, five for type B injury, and fifteen for type C injury. Large variability was observed for external fixation constructs concerning device type and configuration, pin size, and geometry. Biomechanical studies deployed various methods to assess injury displacement, deformation, stiffness, and motion. Thereby, loading protocols differed and inconsistent definitions of failure were determined. Measurement techniques applied in biomechanical test setups included strain gauges, force transducers, and motion tracking techniques.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

An ideal fixation method should be safe, stable, non-obstructive, and have low complication rates. Although biomechanical testing should ensure that the load applied during testing is representative of a physiological load, a high degree of variability was found in the current literature in both the loading and measurement equipment. The lack of a standardised test design for fixation constructs in pelvic injuries across the studies challenges comparisons between them. When interpreting the results of biomechanical studies, it seems crucial to consider the limitations in cross-study comparability, with implications on their applicability to the clinical setting.

Management of pelvic ring fractures in limited resources country: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

Pelvic ring fractures (PRFs) management needs adequate facilities and human resources. However, the prehospital ambulance management role in Indonesia is insufficient. Many hospitals have limited resources that necessitate patients to be referred to higher trauma centers. This study aims to describe the state of PRFs management at a level 1 trauma center in limited-resource country.

METHODS

We conducted retrospective studies of PRFs management from 2011 to 2021 at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital. We analyzed patient's management flow from injury, referral process, initial to definitive treatment, mortality, and Majeed functional score.

RESULTS

From 109 patients, 30.3% were non-referrals that came without ambulance, while 69.7% were referrals using an ambulance. All non-referral patients came without pelvic binder with 54.5% unstable hemodynamic, while 35.5% of the referrals came with unstable hemodynamic and 72.4% had pelvic binder. Median time for non-referrals reaching our hospital is 12.5 h. Unlike local referrals, 75% of regional and 85.7% of national referrals general improvement had to be improved before being referred. Polytrauma cases were 33.9% with 12 days mean interval to definitive treatment. Mortality rate in this study was 13.8%. During post-operative follow-up with a mean of 4 years, 83% of patients could be followed up and reported 93 median Majeed score.

CONCLUSION

The management of PRFs at level 1 trauma center in limited-resource country shows a mortality rate of 13.8% through various limitations such as unimplemented ambulance prehospital management, number of patients who were referred without pelvic binder applied, and the long waiting interval for definitive treatment.

TiRobot‑assisted versus conventional fluoroscopy-assisted percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for pelvic ring injuries: a meta‑analysis

BACKGROUND

The TiRobot is the only robot that has been reported in the literature for posterior pelvic injuries. We aim to compare TiRobot-assisted pelvic screw fixation with the conventional fluoroscopy-assisted percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis to identify studies involving TiRobot‑assisted versus conventional percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for pelvic ring injuries in electronic databases, including Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Library, Highwire, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and WanFang database, up to April 2022. The following keywords were used: "TiRobot," "robot," "robotic," "pelvic fracture," "screw fixation," "percutaneous," and "pelvic ring injury." Pooled effects of this meta-analysis were calculated using STATA SE version 15.0.

RESULTS

Compared with conventional fluoroscopy-assisted percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation, TiRobot will result in less radiation exposure time of screw implantation (P = 0.000), less frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy (P = 0.000), fewer guide wire attempts (P = 0.000), less intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.005), better screw accuracy (P = 0.011), better Majeed score (P = 0.031), and higher overall excellent and good rates of Majeed score (P = 0.018). However, there were no significant differences in terms of operative time (P = 0.055), fracture healing time (P = 0.365), and overall excellent and good rate of reduction accuracy (P = 0.426) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

TiRobot-assisted fixation has less intraoperative fluoroscopy and intraoperative blood loss, superior screw accuracy, and Majeed score compared with conventional percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation. TiRobot has no significant effect on operative time, fracture healing time, and reduction accuracy. Given the relevant possible biases in our meta-analysis, we required more adequately powered and better-designed RCT studies with long-term follow-up to reach a firmer conclusion.