Analytical Validation of GFRNMR: A Blood-Based Multiple Biomarker Assay for Accurate Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate

External Validation of a Novel Multimarker GFR Estimating Equation

Key Points

Using multiple markers may improve GFR estimation especially in settings where creatinine and cystatin C are known to be limited. Panel eGFR is a novel multimarker eGFR equation consisting of age, sex, cystatin C, and nuclear magnetic resonance–measured creatinine, valine, and myo-inositol. eGFR-Cr and eGFR-Cr-CysC may underestimate measured GFR, while panel eGFR was unbiased among younger Black male individuals.

Background

Using multiple markers may improve accuracy in GFR estimation. We sought to externally validate and compare the performance of a novel multimarker eGFR (panel eGFR) equation among Black and White persons using the Genetic Epidemiology Network of Arteriopathy cohort.

Methods

We included 224 sex, race/ethnicity, and measured GFR (mGFR) category–matched persons, with GFR measured using urinary clearance of iothalamate. We calculated panel eGFR using serum creatinine, valine, myo-inositol, cystatin C, age, and sex. We compared its reliability with current eGFR equations (2021 CKD Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine [eGFR-Cr] and creatinine with cystatin C [eGFR-Cr-CysC]) using median bias, precision, and accuracy metrics. We evaluated each equation's performance in age, sex, and race subgroups.

Results

In the overall cohort, 49% were Black individuals, and mean mGFR was 79 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Panel eGFR overestimated mGFR (bias: −2.4 ml/min per 1.73 m2; 95% confidence interval [CI], −4.4 to −0.7), eGFR-Cr-CysC underestimated mGFR (bias: 4.8 ml/min per 1.73 m2; 95% CI, 2.1 to 6.7), while eGFR-Cr was unbiased (bias: 2.0 ml/min per 1.73 m2; 95% CI, −1.1 to 4.6). All equations had comparable accuracy. Among Black male individuals younger than 65 years, both eGFR-Cr (bias: 17.0 ml/min per 1.73 m2; 95% CI, 8.6 to 23.5) and eGFR-Cr-CysC (bias: 14.5 ml/min per 1.73 m2; 95% CI, 6.0 to 19.7) underestimated mGFR, whereas panel eGFR was unbiased (bias: 1.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2; 95% CI, −3.4 to 10.0). Metrics of accuracy for all eGFRs were acceptable in all subgroups except for panel eGFR in Black female individuals younger than 65 years (P30: 73.3%).

Conclusions

Panel eGFR can be used to estimate mGFR and may have utility among Black male individuals younger than 65 years where current CKD Epidemiology Collaboration equations are biased.

Performance of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance-Based Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in a Real-World Setting

An accurate estimate of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is essential for proper clinical management, especially in patients with kidney dysfunction. This prospective observational study evaluated the real-world performance of the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based GFR_NMR equation, which combines creatinine, cystatin C, valine, and myo-inositol with age and sex. We compared GFR_NMR performance to that of the 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine and creatinine-cystatin C equations (CKD-EPI_2021Cr and CKD-EPI_2021CrCys), using 115 fresh routine samples of patients scheduled for urinary iothalamate clearance measurement (mGFR). Median bias to mGFR of the three eGFR equations was comparably low, ranging from 0.4 to 2.0 mL/min/1.73 m². GFR_NMR outperformed the 2021 CKD-EPI equations in terms of precision (interquartile range to mGFR of 10.5 vs. 17.9 mL/min/1.73 m² for GFR_NMR vs. CKD-EPI_2021CrCys; p = 0.01) and accuracy (P15, P20, and P30 of 66.1% vs. 48.7% [p = 0.007], 80.0% vs. 60.0% [p < 0.001] and 95.7% vs. 86.1% [p = 0.006], respectively, for GFR_NMR vs. CKD-EPI_2021CrCys). Clinical parameters such as etiology, comorbidities, or medications did not significantly alter the performance of the three eGFR equations. Altogether, this study confirmed the utility of GFR_NMR for accurate GFR estimation, and its potential value in routine clinical practice for improved medical care.

Impact of race-independent equations on estimating glomerular filtration rate for the assessment of kidney dysfunction in liver disease

BACKGROUND

Altered hemodynamics in liver disease often results in overestimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by creatinine-based GFR estimating (eGFR) equations. Recently, we have validated a novel eGFR equation based on serum myo-inositol, valine, and creatinine quantified by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in combination with cystatin C, age and sex (GFR_NMR). We hypothesized that GFR_NMR could improve chronic kidney disease (CKD) classification in the setting of liver disease.

RESULTS

We conducted a retrospective multicenter study in 205 patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), comparing the performance of GFR_NMR to that of validated CKD-EPI eGFR equations, including eGFRcr (based on creatinine) and eGFRcr-cys (based on both creatinine and cystatin C), using measured GFR as reference standard. GFR_NMR outperformed all other equations with a low overall median bias (-1 vs. -6 to 4 ml/min/1.73 m² for the other equations; p < 0.05) and the lowest difference in bias between reduced and preserved liver function (-3 vs. -16 to -8 ml/min/1.73 m² for other equations). Concordant classification by CKD stage was highest for GFR_NMR (59% vs. 48% to 53%) and less biased in estimating CKD severity compared to the other equations. GFR_NMR P30 accuracy (83%) was higher than that of eGFRcr (75%; p = 0.019) and comparable to that of eGFRcr-cys (86%; p = 0.578).

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of myo-inositol and valine to creatinine and cystatin C in GFR_NMR further improved GFR estimation in CLD patients and accurately stratified liver disease patients into CKD stages.

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance-Based Metabolomics Approach Revealed the Intervention Effect of Using Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) by CKD Patients

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is the end point of a number of systemic chronic diseases. The prevalence of CKD is increasing worldwide and recent epidemiological studies are showing the high prevalence of renal failure in CKD patients using complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs). Clinicians believe that biochemical profiles of CKD patients using CAM (referred here to as CAM-CKD) may be different compared to those on standard clinical treatment and should be managed differently. The present study aims to explore the potential of the NMR-based metabolomics approach to reveal the serum metabolic disparity between CKD and CAM-CKD patients with respect to normal control (NC) subjects and if the differential metabolic patterns can provide rationale for the efficacy and safety of standard and/or alternative therapies. Serum samples were obtained from 30 CKD patients, 43 CAM-CKD patients, and 47 NC subjects. The quantitative serum metabolic profiles were measured using 1D ¹H CPMG NMR experiments performed at 800 MHz NMR spectrometer. The serum metabolic profiles were compared using various multivariate statistical analysis tools available on MetaboAnalyst (freely available web-based software) such as partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and random forest (a machine learning) classification method. The discriminatory metabolites were identified based on variable importance in projection (VIP) statistics and further evaluated for statistical significance (i.e., p < 0.05) using either Student t-test or ANOVA statistics. PLS-DA models were capable of clustering CKD and CAM-CKD with considerably high values of Q ² and R ². Compared to CAM-CKD patients, the sera of CKD patients were characterized by (a) elevated levels of urea, creatinine, citrate, glucose, glycerol, and phenylalanine and phenylalanine-to-tyrosine ratio (PTR) and (b) decreased levels of various amino acids (such leucine, isoleucine, valine, and alanine), high-density lipoproteins, lactate, and acetate. These changes suggested that CKD patients manifest severe oxidative stress, hyperglycemia (with dampened glycolysis), increased protein energy wasting, and reduced lipid/membrane metabolism. Statistically significant and strong positive correlation of PTR with serum creatinine levels suggested the role of oxidative stress in the progression of kidney disease. Significant differences in metabolic patterns between CKD and CAM-CKD patients were observed. With respect to NC subjects, the serum metabolic changes were more aberrant in CKD patients compared to CAM-CKD patients. The aberrant metabolic changes in CKD patients with manifestations of higher oxidative stress compared to CAM-CKD patients could explain clinical discrepancies between CKD and CAM-CKD patients and further advocate the use of different treatment strategies for CKD and CAM-CKD patients.

Serum myo-inositol and valine improve metabolomic-based estimated glomerular filtration rate among kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Close monitoring of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential for the management of patients post kidney transplantation. Measured GFR (mGFR), the gold standard, is not readily accessible in most centers. Furthermore, the performance of new estimated GFR (eGFR) equations based upon creatinine and/or cystatin C have not been validated in kidney transplant patients. Here we evaluate a recently published eGFR equation using cystatin C, creatinine, myo-inositol and valine as measured by nuclear magnetic resonance (eGFRNMR).

METHODS

Residual sera was obtained from a cohort of patients with clinically ordered iothalamate renal clearance mGFR (n = 602). Kidney transplant recipients accounted for 220 (37%) of participants.

RESULTS

Compared to mGFR, there was no significant bias for eGFRcr or eGFRNMR, while eGFRcr-cys significantly underestimated mGFR. P30 values were similar for all eGFR. P15 was significantly higher for eGFRNMR compared to eGFRcr, while the P15 for eGFRcr-cys only improved among patients without a kidney transplant. Agreement with mGFR CKD stages of <15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 ml/min/1.73 m2 was identical for eGFRcr and eGFRcr-cys (61.8%, both cases) while eGFRNMR was significantly higher (66.4%) among patients with a kidney transplant.

CONCLUSION

The 2021 CKD-EPI eGFRcr and eGFRcr-cys have similar bias, P15, and agreement while eGFRNMR more closely matched mGFR with the strongest improvement among kidney transplant recipients.