Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (R.E.M.S.): New Frontiers for Ultrasound Use in the Assessment of Bone Status-A Current Picture

Evaluation of bone fragility in cognitively or physically impaired elderly care home patients using radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the standard for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment but is often inaccessible to cognitively or physically impaired care home patients. Radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry (REMS), a portable and radiation-free alternative, enables effective BMD evaluation in this vulnerable and underserved population. This cross-sectional study assessed BMD using REMS in 260 patients aged ≥ 70 years (39 males, 221 females; mean age 82.29 years) between April 2023 and July 2024. Osteoporosis diagnosis was based on T-scores <  - 2.5 SD or history of fragility fractures, with severe osteoporosis defined by WHO criteria and high fracture risk by lumbar T-scores <  - 3.3 SD. Care home patients had significantly lower BMD and T-scores than outpatients, with 56.3% diagnosed with severe osteoporosis and 71.8% exhibiting lumbar T-scores <  - 3.3 SD. Despite high fracture risks, only 12.7% of care home patients received treatment. These trends were consistent across all age groups, revealing a high prevalence and severity of osteoporosis in care home residents. REMS has unveiled a substantial treatment gap in this population, emphasizing the critical need for improved osteoporosis management and proactive interventions to reduce fracture risks among care home patients worldwide.

Utility of the Fragility Score (FS) Determined Through Radiofrequency Ecographic Multi-Spectrometry (REMS) in the Follow-Up of Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis (AxSpA)

Objectives: Bone mineral density (BMD) variation under vitamin D supplementation, determined using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), is the gold standard and the main tool used in most studies in this domain. However, the scientific literature is lacking with regard to the usefulness of REMS in BMD follow-up, especially the importance of the fragility score (FS). The main objective of this study was to determine whether FS follow-up is relevant in a group of patients with axial spondyloarthritis and whether REMS could have clinical applicability. Methods: Patients with a certain diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) were recruited from two medical healthcare centers and were scanned using Radiofrequency Echographic Multi-Spectrometry in order to obtain their fragility score (FS), an objective measurement of bone quality. The main group was randomized into a vitamin D supplementation branch and a non-supplementation branch and followed up every 6 months for 18 months in total. Comparisons between the branches were made using MiniTab v.20 statistical software. Results: Lower FS values were obtained in patients who initially had high scores, suggesting a positive impact of vitamin D on bone quality (p = 0.008). Muscle strength was evaluated through a visual analogue scale (VAS), with improvements being seen in the supplementation branch (p < 0.005). Furthermore, although some patients had experienced falls in previous years, during the study period, no new events were recorded in either group. Conclusions: The FS is a reliable tool for evaluating bone architecture and is useful in everyday practice for the management of patients taking vitamin D supplements.

Osteoporosis Evaluation by Radiofrequency Echographic Multispectrometry (REMS) in Primary Healthcare

Background/Objectives: Radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry (REMS) technology has emerged as a promising alternative for osteoporosis diagnosis. This non-ionising, portable and accessible method enables early detection of osteoporosis in primary healthcare settings. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of REMS in evaluating osteoporosis within primary healthcare. Methods: Bone mineral density was assessed in 86 participants trough 172 scans of the lumbar spine and femur, using REMS technology in two Portuguese primary healthcare units in Guarda. Results: In the lumbar spine evaluation, 51.2% of the participants had osteopenia and 31.4% osteoporosis; in the femur evaluation, 43.0% had osteopenia and 34.9% osteoporosis. The data indicated a significant prevalence of bone fragility. The bone mineral density estimated by radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry showed good agreement with the clinical diagnosis, suggesting that this technology is effective in the early detection of osteoporosis. Conclusions: Bone densitometry using REMS method, performed by a radiographer in primary healthcare settings, offers a viable and innovative alternative for the effective detection of osteoporosis and osteopenia.

Bone Health for Gynaecologists

Osteoporosis, the most common bone disorder, profoundly impacts women's health, especially during postmenopausal phases. Characterised by diminished bone mineral density (BMD), it increases the risk of fractures, affecting mobility, quality of life, and potentially mortality. The present review analyses the intricate interactions among physiological alterations, diseases, and medications that lead to bone mineral density reduction in women. It underscores the importance of gynaecologists in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of osteoporosis via early risk assessment, suitable hormone treatment, and lifestyle modifications. Essential considerations encompass the categorisation of osteoporosis into primary (age-related) and secondary (attributable to diseases or pharmacological treatments) types, with particular emphasis on predisposing conditions such as premature menopause, hormone deficits, and cancer therapies. The significance of diagnostic instruments such as DXA and novel methodologies like trabecular bone score and quantitative ultrasonography is emphasised for precise evaluation and surveillance. The review also addresses nutritional methods, physical exercise, and pharmaceutical interventions, including hormone replacement therapy (HRT), selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), and other anti-resorptive drugs, to preserve bone health. This review highlights the important role of gynaecologists in maintaining women's bone health, promoting a proactive strategy to avert osteoporosis-related complications and enhance long-term results.

Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry-A Novel Tool in the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis and Prediction of Fragility Fractures: A Systematic Review

Background/Objectives: Given the significant economic and social burden of osteoporosis, there is growing interest in developing an efficient alternative to the traditional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) is an innovative, non-ionizing imaging technique that recently emerged as a viable tool to diagnose osteoporosis and estimate the fragility fracture risk. Nevertheless, its clinical use is still limited due to its novelty and continuing uncertainty of long-term performance. Methods: In order to evaluate the accuracy of the REMS, a systematic review of the English-language literature was conducted. Three databases were searched for relevant publications from 1 January 2015 until 1 December 2024 using the keyword combinations "(radiofrequency echographic multi spectrometry OR REMS) AND (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry OR DXA)". The initial search yielded 602 candidate articles. After screening the titles and abstracts following the eligibility criteria, 17 publications remained for full-text evaluation. Results: The reviewed studies demonstrated strong diagnostic agreement between REMS and DXA. Additionally, REMS showed enhanced diagnostic capabilities in cases where lumbar bone mineral density measurements by DXA were impaired by artifacts such as vertebral fractures, deformities, osteoarthritis, or vascular calcifications. REMS exhibited excellent intra-operator repeatability and precision, comparable to or exceeding the reported performance of DXA. The fragility score (FS), a parameter reflecting bone quality and structural integrity, effectively discriminated between fractured and non-fractured patients. Moreover, REMS proved to be a radiation-free option for bone health monitoring in radiation-sensitive populations or patients requiring frequent imaging to assess fracture risk. Conclusions: This current study underscores the robustness of REMS as a reliable method for diagnosing and monitoring osteoporosis and evaluating bone fragility via the FS. It also identifies critical knowledge gaps and emphasizes the need for further prospective studies to validate and expand the clinical applications of REMS across diverse patient populations.

The Management of Bone Defects in Rett Syndrome

Rett syndrome (RS) is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder primarily caused by mutations in the X-linked methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MECP2) gene, responsible for encoding MECP2 which plays a pivotal role in regulating gene expression. The neurological and non-neurological manifestations of RS vary widely in severity depending on the specific mutation type. Bone complications, mostly scoliosis but also osteoporosis, hip displacement, and a high rate of fractures, are among the most prevalent non-neurological comorbidities observed in girls with RS. Low bone mineral density (BMD) is primarily due to a slow rate of bone formation due to dysfunctional osteoblast activity. The use of anticonvulsants, immobilization, low physical activity, poor nutrition, and inadequate vitamin D intake all significantly hamper skeletal maturation and the accumulation of bone mass in RS girls, making them more susceptible to fragility fractures. In RS patients, the upper and lower limbs are the most common sites for fractures which are due to both a reduced BMD and a diminished bone size. This review summarizes the knowledge on risk factors for fragility fracture in patients with RS and proposes a potential diagnostic and therapeutic pathway to enhance low BMD and mitigate the risk of fragility fractures. In particular, this review focused on the importance of clinical and instrumental evaluation of bone status as a basis for adequate planning of nutritional, pharmacological, and surgical interventions to be undertaken. Additionally, the management of bone defects in individuals with RS should be customized to meet each person's specific needs, abilities, and general health.

Cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in the United States

Radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry (REMS) is an innovative, non-ionizing diagnostic technique that has shown high accuracy and precision, making it a promising alternative to DXA for osteoporosis diagnosis in clinical settings. With economic considerations playing an increasingly crucial role in healthcare decisions, this study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and economic impact of improved osteoporosis diagnosis using REMS followed by treatment in the United States. A microsimulation-based Markov model was constructed to estimate the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained (in US$2022) for REMS followed by treatment vs no diagnosis and treatment in US women aged 50 yr and older with osteoporosis. Women were categorized as high risk (receiving alendronate monotherapy for 5 yr) or very high risk (receiving an 18-mo course of anabolic treatment, abaloparatide, followed by 5 yr of alendronate). The study evaluated 2 medication adherence scenarios: one assuming full adherence to treatment and the other reflecting real-world adherence. The results indicate that REMS followed by treatment is associated with improved health outcomes, including more QALYs and fewer fractures, and reduced fracture-related costs compared to no diagnosis and treatment. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of REMS was estimated at $33 891 and $49 198 per QALY gained, under the full adherence and real-world adherence scenarios, respectively. These values are below the US cost-effectiveness threshold of $100 000 per QALY. Moreover, a 5% increase in the diagnosis and treatment of women over 50 yr at high and very high risk of fractures using REMS is projected to save approximately 30 000 life yr, 43 500 QALYs, and prevent 100 000 fractures over a lifetime under real-world medication adherence. In conclusion, this study suggests that REMS is a cost-effective strategy for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in US women, offering substantial potential economic benefits and improved health outcomes.

Osteoporosis in axial radiographic spondyloarthritis: diagnostic limitations of bone mineral density and the need for comprehensive fracture risk assessment

Axial radiographic spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory joint disease that leads to a considerable decline in the quality of life of patients by impairment of function and mobility, which, in turn, brings about a deterioration of both physical and mental health. Osteoporosis (OP) is a significant issue in the course of r-axSpA. Fractures resulting from OP complicate the treatment of the underlying disease and reduce the quality of life of patients. The aim of this paper is to discuss currently available diagnostic methods for OP and highlight why the gold standard for diagnosis - the assessment of bone mineral density via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry - is not sufficient for patients with r-axSpA.

Physical Performance of Geriatric Women and Its Impact on Fracture Risk and Bone Mineral Density Assessed with Radiofrequency Echographic Multispectrometry (REMS)

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the impact of physical performance of geriatric women on their fracture risk and bone mineral density (BMD) assessed with radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry (REMS).

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study to assess the physical performance, BMD and fracture risk in 182 geriatric women aged 60 years and older. BMD was measured using REMS scanning (developed by Echolight S. p. a., Lecce, Italy), and the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) was utilized to estimate fracture risk. Physical performance was assessed using hand grip strength (HGS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (5XSST) and Flamingo test.

RESULTS

The mean HGS of both hands differed significantly between the groups with normal BMD, osteopenia and osteoporosis measured at the lumbar spine and hip. The mean TUG time of the subjects with osteoporosis was significantly higher (13.77 s) than those with osteopenia (7.14 s) and normal BMD (6.05 s) of the hip (p = 0.024). The mean 5XSST time of the subjects with normal BMD (8.86 s) was lower than those with osteopenia (9.30 s) and osteoporosis (13.6 s) of the hip (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed strong associations between physical performance and fracture risk. Rehabilitation programs focused on strength and mobility may be essential for fracture prevention.

Effective strategies for pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis: teriparatide use in focus

INTRODUCTION

Pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis (PLO) is a rare condition characterized by fragility fractures occurring during late pregnancy or lactation, primarily affecting the spine and causing significant morbidity and back pain. PLO can lead to mobility impairment and work incapacity, with recovery taking up to several years. Due to the lack of clinical trials, treatment strategies remain poorly defined, historically focusing on calcium supplements, vitamin D, and weaning from breastfeeding. However, recent attention has turned to teriparatide (TPD) as an option due to its anabolic properties and potential suitability for women of childbearing age.

METHODS

This review evaluates TPD's use in PLO treatment, using published systematic reviews and case studies. Over 300 cases with PLO were identified through PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane searches until August 2023.

RESULTS

We identified 175 cases with PLO treated with TPD alone or followed by antiresorptive therapy. Most women (85.7%) were primiparas. The mean ± SD duration of TPD use was 15 ± 6 months. Among the study patients, 91.4% used TPD alone, while 8.6% (15/175) utilized sequential therapy. Approximately 93% of our cohort exhibited potential risk factors for PLO. Despite the increased risk of recurrent fractures in PLO, only 14.7% (20/175) of those treated with TPD sustained new fractures during a 9-month to 9 years' follow-up period. The mean ± SD percent increase in BMD at the LS was 21.14% ± 7.4%, and at the FN it was 12.1% ± 9.3%. The baseline Z-scores at the LS ranged from -3.3 (-3.7 to -2.7), while the baseline Z-scores at the FN ranged from -2.0 (-2.7 to -1.5).

CONCLUSION

This review emphasizes PLO severity, advocating for increased awareness and timely interventions. TPD emerges as a promising therapeutic option in certain cases.

Imaging in osteogenesis imperfecta: Where we are and where we are going

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare phenotypically and genetically heterogeneous group of inherited skeletal dysplasias. The hallmark features of OI include bone fragility and susceptibility to fractures, bone deformity, and diminished growth, along with a plethora of associated secondary features (both skeletal and extraskeletal). The diagnosis of OI is currently made on clinical grounds and may be confirmed by genetic testing. However, imaging remains pivotal in the evaluation of this disease. The aim of this article is to review the current role played by the various radiologic techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of OI in the postnatal setting as well as to discuss recent advances and future perspectives in OI imaging. Conventional Radiography and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) are currently the two most used imaging modalities in OI. The cardinal radiographic features of OI include generalized osteopenia/osteoporosis, bone deformities, and fractures. DXA is currently the most available technique to assess Bone Mineral Density (BMD), specifically areal BMD (aBMD). However, DXA has important limitations and cannot fully characterize bone fragility in OI based on aBMD. Novel DXA-derived parameters, such as Trabecular Bone Score (TBS), may provide further insight into skeletal changes induced by OI, but evidence is still limited. Techniques like Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can be useful as problem-solvers or in specific settings, including the evaluation of cranio-cervical abnormalities. Recent evidence supports the use of High-Resolution peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (HR-pQCT) as a promising tool to improve the characterization of bone fragility in OI. However, HR-pQCT remains a primarily research technique at present. Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) is an alternative to DXA for the determination of BMD at central sites, with distinct advantages but considerably higher radiation exposure. Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) is a portable, inexpensive, and radiation-free modality that may complement DXA evaluation, providing information on bone quality. However, evidence of usefulness of QUS in OI is poor. Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) is an emerging non-ionizing imaging method that holds promise for the diagnosis of low BMD and for the prediction of fracture risk, but so far only one published study has investigated its role in OI. To conclude, several different radiologic techniques have proven to be effective in the diagnosis and monitoring of OI, each with their own specificities and peculiarities. Clinicians should be aware of the strategic role of the various modalities in the different phases of the patient care process. In this scenario, the development of international guidelines including recommendations on the role of imaging in the diagnosis and monitoring of OI, accompanied by continuous active research in the field, could significantly improve the standardization of patient care.

A Case Showing a New Diagnostic Aspect of the Application of Radiofrequency Echographic Multi-Spectrometry (REMS)

Radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry (REMS) is an ultrasound technique that has been recently introduced in the medical field to detect osteoporosis and fracture risk at axial sites. The use of sonography to visualize the region of interest (ROI) of the hip neck provides the opportunity to identify occult fractures. A 91-year-old woman with persistent right leg pain was referred to rheumatologist due to a known history of arthritis and osteoporosis. She was able to walk using a crutch, although experiencing an antalgic gait. The patient had recently fallen on her right side from standing height. During the visualization of the ROI of the right femoral neck using REMS, an abrupt break of the femoral cortex suspected to be a fracture was seen; therefore, the measurement of the femoral neck was performed on the left side. The T-score had value of -2.9 SD and the fragility score was 86.7. Due to unclear signs of a fracture after an X-ray of the hip, a computed tomography (CT) exam of the hip was performed, which revealed a femoral neck fracture. Occult fractures of the femoral neck are challenging to diagnose and require numerous radiologic exams. The use of ultrasound as a method to measure bone density allows the simultaneous diagnosis of osteoporosis and detection of fractures.

Radiofrequency Echographic Multispectrometry (REMS): A New Option in the Assessment Bone Status in Adults with Osteogenesis Imperfecta

This study aimed to estimate the utility of the Radiofrequency Echographic Multispectrometry (REMS) approach in the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) in subjects with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). In 41 subjects (40.5 ± 18.7 years) with OI and in 36 healthy controls, we measured BMD at the lumbar spine (LS-BMD), femoral neck (FN-BMD) and total hip (TH-BMD), employing a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry tool. Additionally, REMS scans were also performed at the lumbar and femoral sites. The presence and number of reported fractures were assessed in the study population. Patients characterized by a history of fragility fractures represented 84.5% of the study population. OI subjects showed significantly reduced BMD values both at the level of the lumbar spine and the femoral subregions (p < 0.01) compared to healthy controls when performed using both the DXA and the REMS method. Dividing OI patients on the basis of the Sillence classification, no differences were found between the LS-BMD values carried out using the DXA technique between the OI type I group and OI Type III and IV groups. On the contrary, the OI Type III and IV groups presented significantly lower values of both Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) and LS-BMD through REMS with respect to OI type I patients (p < 0.05). Based on the data of this study, it is possible to conclude that even the new REMS assessment, which does not use ionizing radiation, represents an excellent method for studying the bone status in subjects affected by OI.