Prediction of Glioma Grade and IDH Status Using 18F-FET PET/CT Dynamic and Multiparametric Texture Analysis

Challenges and limitations in applying radiomics to PET imaging: Possible opportunities and avenues for research

Radiomics, the high-throughput extraction of quantitative imaging features from medical images, holds immense potential for advancing precision medicine in oncology and beyond. While radiomics applied to positron emission tomography (PET) imaging offers unique insights into tumor biology and treatment response, it is imperative to elucidate the challenges and constraints inherent in this domain to facilitate their translation into clinical practice. This review examines the challenges and limitations of applying radiomics to PET imaging, synthesizing findings from the last five years (2019-2023) and highlights the significance of addressing these challenges to realize the full clinical potential of radiomics in oncology and molecular imaging. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, using keywords relevant to radiomics issues in PET imaging. Only studies published in peer-reviewed journals were eligible for inclusion in this review. Although many studies have highlighted the potential of radiomics in predicting treatment response, assessing tumor heterogeneity, enabling risk stratification, and personalized therapy selection, various challenges regarding the practical implementation of the proposed models still need to be addressed. This review illustrates the challenges and limitations of radiomics in PET imaging across various cancer types, encompassing both phantom and clinical investigations. The analyzed studies highlight the importance of reproducible segmentation methods, standardized pre-processing and post-processing methodologies, and the need to create large multicenter studies registered in a centralized database to promote the continuous validation and clinical integration of radiomics into PET imaging.

The role of [18 F]FDOPA PET as an adjunct to conventional MRI in the diagnosis of aggressive glial lesions

BACKGROUND

Amino acid PET is recommended for the initial diagnosis of brain lesions, but its value for identifying aggressive lesions remains to be established. The current study therefore evaluates the added-value of dynamic [18 F]FDOPA PET as an adjunct to conventional MRI for determining the aggressiveness of presumed glial lesions at diagnosis.

METHODS

Consecutive patients, with a minimal 1 year-follow-up, underwent contrast-enhanced MRI (CE MRI) and dynamic [18 F]FDOPA PET to characterize their suspected glial lesion. Lesions were classified semi-automatically by their CE MRI (MRI-/+), and PET parameters (static tumor-to-background ratio, TBR; dynamic time-to-peak ratio, TTPratio). Diagnostic accuracies of MRI and PET parameters for the differentiation of tumor aggressiveness were evaluated by chi-square test or receiver operating characteristic analyses. Aggressive lesions were either defined as lesions with dismal molecular characteristics based on the WHO 2021 classification of brain tumors or with compatible clinico-radiological profiles. Time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 109 patients included, 46 had aggressive lesions (45 confirmed by histo-molecular analyses). CE MRI identified aggressive lesions with an accuracy of 73%. TBRmax (threshold of 3.2), and TTPratio (threshold of 5.4 min) respectively identified aggressive lesions with an accuracy of 83% and 76% and were independent of CE MRI and clinical factors in the multivariate analysis. Among the MRI-lesions, 11/56 (20%) were aggressive and respectively 55% and 50% of these aggressive lesions showed high TBRmax and short TTPratio in PET. High TBRmax and short TTPratio in PET were significantly associated to poorer survivals (p ≤ 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Dynamic [18 F]FDOPA PET provides a similar diagnostic accuracy as contrast enhancement in MRI to identify the aggressiveness of suspected glial lesions at diagnosis. Both methods, however, are complementary and [18 F]FDOPA PET may be a useful additional tool in equivocal cases.

Artificial intelligence in neuro-oncology: advances and challenges in brain tumor diagnosis, prognosis, and precision treatment

This review delves into the most recent advancements in applying artificial intelligence (AI) within neuro-oncology, specifically emphasizing work on gliomas, a class of brain tumors that represent a significant global health issue. AI has brought transformative innovations to brain tumor management, utilizing imaging, histopathological, and genomic tools for efficient detection, categorization, outcome prediction, and treatment planning. Assessing its influence across all facets of malignant brain tumor management- diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy- AI models outperform human evaluations in terms of accuracy and specificity. Their ability to discern molecular aspects from imaging may reduce reliance on invasive diagnostics and may accelerate the time to molecular diagnoses. The review covers AI techniques, from classical machine learning to deep learning, highlighting current applications and challenges. Promising directions for future research include multimodal data integration, generative AI, large medical language models, precise tumor delineation and characterization, and addressing racial and gender disparities. Adaptive personalized treatment strategies are also emphasized for optimizing clinical outcomes. Ethical, legal, and social implications are discussed, advocating for transparency and fairness in AI integration for neuro-oncology and providing a holistic understanding of its transformative impact on patient care.