1
|
Impact of Modeling Abstractions When Estimating Leaf Mass per Area and Equivalent Water Thickness over Sparse Forests Using a Hybrid Method. REMOTE SENSING 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/rs13163235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Equivalent water thickness (EWT) and leaf mass per area (LMA) are important indicators of plant processes, such as photosynthetic and potential growth rates and health status, and are also important variables for fire risk assessment. Retrieving these traits through remote sensing is challenging and often requires calibration with in situ measurements to provide acceptable results. However, calibration data cannot be expected to be available at the operational level when estimating EWT and LMA over large regions. In this study, we assessed the ability of a hybrid retrieval method, consisting of training a random forest regressor (RFR) over the outputs of the discrete anisotropic radiative transfer (DART) model, to yield accurate EWT and LMA estimates depending on the scene modeling within DART and the spectral interval considered. We show that canopy abstractions mostly affect crown reflectance over the 0.75–1.3 μm range. It was observed that excluding these wavelengths when training the RFR resulted in the abstraction level having no effect on the subsequent LMA estimates (RMSE of 0.0019 g/cm2 for both the detailed and abstract models), and EWT estimates were not affected by the level of abstraction. Over AVIRIS-Next Generation images, we showed that the hybrid method trained with a simplified scene obtained accuracies (RMSE of 0.0029 and 0.0028 g/cm2 for LMA and EWT) consistent with what had been obtained from the test dataset of the calibration phase (RMSE of 0.0031 and 0.0032 g/cm2 for LMA and EWT), and the result yielded spatially coherent maps. The results demonstrate that, provided an appropriate spectral domain is used, the uncertainties inherent to the abstract modeling of tree crowns within an RTM do not significantly affect EWT and LMA accuracy estimates when tree crowns can be identified in the images.
Collapse
|
2
|
Porcar-Castell A, Malenovský Z, Magney T, Van Wittenberghe S, Fernández-Marín B, Maignan F, Zhang Y, Maseyk K, Atherton J, Albert LP, Robson TM, Zhao F, Garcia-Plazaola JI, Ensminger I, Rajewicz PA, Grebe S, Tikkanen M, Kellner JR, Ihalainen JA, Rascher U, Logan B. Chlorophyll a fluorescence illuminates a path connecting plant molecular biology to Earth-system science. NATURE PLANTS 2021; 7:998-1009. [PMID: 34373605 DOI: 10.1038/s41477-021-00980-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
For decades, the dynamic nature of chlorophyll a fluorescence (ChlaF) has provided insight into the biophysics and ecophysiology of the light reactions of photosynthesis from the subcellular to leaf scales. Recent advances in remote sensing methods enable detection of ChlaF induced by sunlight across a range of larger scales, from using instruments mounted on towers above plant canopies to Earth-orbiting satellites. This signal is referred to as solar-induced fluorescence (SIF) and its application promises to overcome spatial constraints on studies of photosynthesis, opening new research directions and opportunities in ecology, ecophysiology, biogeochemistry, agriculture and forestry. However, to unleash the full potential of SIF, intensive cross-disciplinary work is required to harmonize these new advances with the rich history of biophysical and ecophysiological studies of ChlaF, fostering the development of next-generation plant physiological and Earth-system models. Here, we introduce the scale-dependent link between SIF and photosynthesis, with an emphasis on seven remaining scientific challenges, and present a roadmap to facilitate future collaborative research towards new applications of SIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Porcar-Castell
- Optics of Photosynthesis Laboratory, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR)/Forest Sciences, Viikki Plant Science Center (ViPS), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Zbyněk Malenovský
- School of Geography, Planning, and Spatial Sciences, College of Sciences Engineering and Technology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Troy Magney
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Shari Van Wittenberghe
- Optics of Photosynthesis Laboratory, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR)/Forest Sciences, Viikki Plant Science Center (ViPS), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Laboratory of Earth Observation, University of Valencia, Paterna, Spain
| | - Beatriz Fernández-Marín
- Department of Botany, Ecology and Plant Physiology, University of La Laguna (ULL), Tenerife, Spain
| | - Fabienne Maignan
- Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Yongguang Zhang
- International Institute for Earth System Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Kadmiel Maseyk
- School of Environment, Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
| | - Jon Atherton
- Optics of Photosynthesis Laboratory, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR)/Forest Sciences, Viikki Plant Science Center (ViPS), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Loren P Albert
- Institute at Brown for Environment and Society, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Biology Department, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Thomas Matthew Robson
- Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, Viikki Plant Science Centre (ViPS), Faculty of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Feng Zhao
- School of Instrumentation Science and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | | | - Ingo Ensminger
- Department of Biology, Graduate Programs in Cell & Systems Biology and Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paulina A Rajewicz
- Optics of Photosynthesis Laboratory, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR)/Forest Sciences, Viikki Plant Science Center (ViPS), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Steffen Grebe
- Molecular Plant Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Mikko Tikkanen
- Molecular Plant Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - James R Kellner
- Institute at Brown for Environment and Society, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Janne A Ihalainen
- Nanoscience Center, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Uwe Rascher
- Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany
| | - Barry Logan
- Biology Department, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Joint Use of PROSAIL and DART for Fast LUT Building: Application to Gap Fraction and Leaf Biochemistry Estimations over Sparse Oak Stands. REMOTE SENSING 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/rs12182925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Gap Fraction, leaf pigment contents (content of chlorophylls a and b (Cab) and carotenoids content (Car)), Leaf Mass per Area (LMA), and Equivalent Water Thickness (EWT) are considered relevant indicators of forests’ health status, influencing many biological and physical processes. Various methods exist to estimate these variables, often relying on the extensive use of Radiation Transfer Models (RTMs). While 3D RTMs are more realistic to model open canopies, their complexity leads to important computation times that limit the number of simulations that can be considered; 1D RTMs, although less realistic, are also less computationally expensive. We investigated the possibility to approximate the outputs of a 3D RTM (DART) from a 1D RTM (PROSAIL) to generate in very short time numerous extensive Look-Up Tables (LUTs). The intrinsic error of the approximation model was evaluated through comparison with DART reference values. The model was then used to generate LUTs used to estimate Gap Fraction, Cab, Car, EWT, and LMA of Blue Oak-dominant stands in a woodland savanna from AVIRIS-C data. Performances of the approximation model for estimation purposes compared to DART were evaluated using Wilmott’s index of agreement (dr), and estimation accuracy was measured with coefficients of determination (R2) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). The low approximation error of the proposed model demonstrated that the model could be considered for canopy covers as low as 30%. Gap Fraction estimations presented similar performances with either DART or the approximation (dr 0.78 and 0.77, respectively), while Cab and Car showed improved performances (dr increasing from 0.65 to 0.77 and 0.34 to 0.65, respectively). No satisfying estimation methods were found for LMA and EWT using either models, probably due to the high sensitivity of the scene’s reflectance to Gap Fraction and soil modeling at such low LAI. Overall, estimations using the approximated reflectances presented either similar or improved accuracy. Our findings show that it is possible to approximate DART reflectances from PROSAIL using a minimal number of DART outputs for calibration purposes, drastically reducing computation times to generate reflectance databases: 300,000 entries could be generated in 1.5 h, compared to the 12,666 total CPU hours necessary to generate the 21,840 calibration entries with DART.
Collapse
|
4
|
Sensitivity Analysis of the DART Model for Forest Mensuration with Airborne Laser Scanning. REMOTE SENSING 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/rs12020247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) measurements are increasingly vital in forest management and national forest inventories. Despite the growing reliance on ALS data, comparatively little research has examined the sensitivity of ALS measurements to varying survey conditions over commercially important forests. This study investigated: (i) how accurately the Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer (DART) model was able to replicate small-footprint ALS measurements collected over Irish conifer plantations, and (ii) how survey characteristics influenced the precision of discrete-return metrics. A variance-based global sensitivity analysis demonstrated that discrete-return height distributions were accurately and consistently simulated across 100 forest inventory plots with few perturbations induced by varying acquisition parameters or ground topography. In contrast, discrete return density, canopy cover and the proportion of multiple returns were sensitive to fluctuations in sensor altitude, scanning angle, pulse repetition frequency and pulse duration. Our findings corroborate previous studies indicating that discrete-return heights are robust to varying acquisition parameters and may be reliable predictors for the indirect retrieval of forest inventory measurements. However, canopy cover and density metrics are only comparable for ALS data collected under similar acquisition conditions, precluding their universal use across different ALS surveys. Our study demonstrates that DART is a robust model for simulating discrete-return measurements over structurally complex forests; however, the replication of foliage morphology, density and orientation are important considerations for radiative transfer simulations using synthetic trees with explicitly defined crown architectures.
Collapse
|
5
|
Monitoring LAI, Chlorophylls, and Carotenoids Content of a Woodland Savanna Using Hyperspectral Imagery and 3D Radiative Transfer Modeling. REMOTE SENSING 2019. [DOI: 10.3390/rs12010028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Leaf pigment contents, such as chlorophylls a and b content (C a b ) or carotenoid content (Car), and the leaf area index (LAI) are recognized indicators of plants’ and forests’ health status that can be estimated through hyperspectral imagery. Their measurement on a seasonal and yearly basis is critical to monitor plant response and adaptation to stress, such as droughts. While extensively done over dense canopies, estimation of these variables over tree-grass ecosystems with very low overstory LAI (mean site LAI < 1 m 2 /m 2 ), such as woodland savannas, is lacking. We investigated the use of look-up table (LUT)-based inversion of a radiative transfer model to retrieve LAI and leaf C a b and Car from AVIRIS images at an 18 m spatial resolution at multiple dates over a broadleaved woodland savanna during the California drought. We compared the performances of different cost functions in the inversion step. We demonstrated the spatial consistency of our LAI, C a b , and Car estimations using validation data from low and high canopy cover parts of the site, and their temporal consistency by qualitatively confronting their variations over two years with those that would be expected. We concluded that LUT-based inversions of medium-resolution hyperspectral images, achieved with a simple geometric representation of the canopy within a 3D radiative transfer model (RTM), are a valid means of monitoring woodland savannas and more generally sparse forests, although for maximum applicability, the inversion cost functions should be selected using validation data from multiple dates. Validation revealed that for monitoring use: The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) outperformed other indices for LAI estimations (root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.22 m 2 /m 2 , R 2 = 0.81); the band ratio ρ 0.750 μ m ρ 0.550 μ m retrieved C a b more accurately than other chlorophylls indices (RMSE = 5.21 μ g/cm 2 , R 2 = 0.73); RMSE over the 0.5–0.55 μ m interval showed encouraging results for Car estimations.
Collapse
|
6
|
Detection of Pine Shoot Beetle (PSB) Stress on Pine Forests at Individual Tree Level using UAV-Based Hyperspectral Imagery and Lidar. REMOTE SENSING 2019. [DOI: 10.3390/rs11212540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, the outbreak of the pine shoot beetle (PSB), Tomicus spp., has caused serious shoots damage and the death of millions of trees in Yunnan pine forests in southwestern China. It is urgent to develop a convincing approach to accurately assess the shoot damage ratio (SDR) for monitoring the PSB insects at an early stage. Unmanned airborne vehicles (UAV)-based sensors, including hyperspectral imaging (HI) and lidar, have very high spatial and spectral resolutions, which are very useful to detect forest health. However, very few studies have utilized HI and lidar data to estimate SDRs and compare the predictive power for mapping PSB damage at the individual tree level. Additionally, the data fusion of HI and lidar may improve the detection accuracy, but it has not been well studied. In this study, UAV-based HI and lidar data were fused to detect PSB. We systematically evaluated the potential of a hyperspectral approach (only-HI data), a lidar approach (only-lidar data), and a combined approach (HI plus lidar data) to characterize PSB damage of individual trees using the Random Forest (RF) algorithm, separately. The most innovative point is the proposed new method to extract the three dimensional (3D) shadow distribution of each tree crown based on a lidar point cloud and the 3D radiative transfer model RAPID. The results show that: (1) for the accuracy of estimating the SDR of individual trees, the lidar approach (R2 = 0.69, RMSE = 12.28%) performed better than hyperspectral approach (R2 = 0.67, RMSE = 15.87%), and in addition, it was useful to detect dead trees with an accuracy of 70%; (2) the combined approach has the highest accuracy (R2 = 0.83, RMSE = 9.93%) for mapping PSB damage degrees; and (3) when combining HI and lidar data to predict SDRs, two variables have the most contributions, which are the leaf chlorophyll content (Cab) derived from hyperspectral data and the return intensity of the top of shaded crown (Int_Shd_top) from lidar metrics. This study confirms the high possibility to accurately predict SDRs at individual tree level if combining HI and lidar data. The 3D radiative transfer model can determine the 3D crown shadows from lidar, which is a key information to combine HI and lidar. Therefore, our study provided a guidance to combine the advantages of hyperspectral and lidar data to accurately measure the health of individual trees, enabling us to prioritize areas for forest health promotion. This method may also be used for other 3D land surfaces, like urban areas.
Collapse
|
7
|
Pérez-Bueno ML, Pineda M, Barón M. Phenotyping Plant Responses to Biotic Stress by Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2019; 10:1135. [PMID: 31620158 PMCID: PMC6759674 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Photosynthesis is a pivotal process in plant physiology, and its regulation plays an important role in plant defense against biotic stress. Interactions with pathogens and pests often cause alterations in the metabolism of sugars and sink/source relationships. These changes can be part of the plant defense mechanisms to limit nutrient availability to the pathogens. In other cases, these alterations can be the result of pests manipulating the plant metabolism for their own benefit. The effects of biotic stress on plant physiology are typically heterogeneous, both spatially and temporarily. Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging is a powerful tool to mine the activity of photosynthesis at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scale, allowing the phenotyping of plants. This review will recapitulate the responses of the photosynthetic machinery to biotic stress factors, from pathogens (viruses, bacteria, and fungi) to pests (herbivory) analyzed by chlorophyll fluorescence imaging both at the lab and field scale. Moreover, chlorophyll fluorescence imagers and alternative techniques to indirectly evaluate photosynthetic traits used at field scale are also revised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Luisa Pérez-Bueno
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular and Cell Biology of Plants, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Granada, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Malenovský Z, Homolová L, Lukeš P, Buddenbaum H, Verrelst J, Alonso L, Schaepman ME, Lauret N, Gastellu-Etchegorry JP. Variability and Uncertainty Challenges in Scaling Imaging Spectroscopy Retrievals and Validations from Leaves Up to Vegetation Canopies. SURVEYS IN GEOPHYSICS 2019; 40:631-656. [PMID: 36081835 PMCID: PMC7613335 DOI: 10.1007/s10712-019-09534-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2017] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Imaging spectroscopy of vegetation requires methods for scaling and generalizing optical signals that are reflected, transmitted and emitted in the solar wavelength domain from single leaves and observed at the level of canopies by proximal sensing, airborne and satellite spectroradiometers. The upscaling embedded in imaging spectroscopy retrievals and validations of plant biochemical and structural traits is challenged by natural variability and measurement uncertainties. Sources of the leaf-to-canopy upscaling variability and uncertainties are reviewed with respect to: (1) implementation of retrieval algorithms and (2) their parameterization and validation of quantitative products through in situ field measurements. The challenges are outlined and discussed for empirical and physical leaf and canopy radiative transfer modelling components, considering both forward and inverse modes. Discussion on optical remote sensing validation schemes includes also description of a multiscale validation concept and its advantages. Impacts of intraspecific and interspecific variability on collected field and laboratory measurements of leaf biochemical traits and optical properties are demonstrated for selected plant species, and field measurement uncertainty sources are listed and discussed specifically for foliar pigments and canopy leaf area index. The review concludes with the main findings and suggestions as how to reduce uncertainties and include variability in scaling vegetation imaging spectroscopy signals and functional traits of single leaves up to observations of whole canopies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zbyněk Malenovský
- Surveying and Spatial Sciences Group, School of Technology, Environments and Design, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 76, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia
- Global Change Research Institute CAS, Remote Sensing Department, Bělidla 986/4a, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- USRA/GESTAR, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Biospheric Sciences Laboratory, 8800 Greenbelt Rd, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
| | - Lucie Homolová
- Global Change Research Institute CAS, Remote Sensing Department, Bělidla 986/4a, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Lukeš
- Global Change Research Institute CAS, Remote Sensing Department, Bělidla 986/4a, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Henning Buddenbaum
- Environmental Remote Sensing and Geoinformatics, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany
| | - Jochem Verrelst
- Image Processing Laboratory (IPL), Parc Científic, Universitat de València, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain
| | - Luis Alonso
- Image Processing Laboratory (IPL), Parc Científic, Universitat de València, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain
| | - Michael E. Schaepman
- Remote Sensing Laboratories, Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Lauret
- Centre d’Etudes Spatiales de la Biosphère - UPS, CNES, CNRS, IRD, Université de Toulouse, 31401 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
| | | |
Collapse
|