1
|
Shamaoma H, Chirwa PW, Zekeng JC, Ramoelo A, Hudak AT, Handavu F, Syampungani S. Utility of UAS-LIDAR for estimating forest structural attributes of the Miombo woodlands in Zambia. PLoS One 2025; 20:e0315664. [PMID: 40067864 PMCID: PMC11896069 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2024] [Accepted: 11/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/15/2025] Open
Abstract
The ability to collect precise three-dimensional (3D) forest structural information at a fraction of the cost of airborne light detection and ranging (lidar) makes uncrewed aerial systems-lidar (UAS-lidar) a remote sensing tool with high potential for estimating forest structural attributes for enhanced forest management. The estimation of forest structural data in area-based forest inventories relies on the relationship between field-based estimates of forest structural attributes (FSA) and lidar-derived metrics at plot level, which can be modeled using either parametric or non-parametric regression techniques. In this study, the performance of UAS-lidar metrics was assessed and applied to estimate four FSA (above ground biomass (AGB), basal area (BA), diameter at breast height (DBH), and volume (Vol)) using multiple linear regression (MLR), a parametric technique, at two wet Miombo woodland sites in the Copperbelt province of Zambia. FSA were estimated using site-specific MLR models at the Mwekera and Miengwe sites and compared with FSA estimates from generic MLR models that employed combined data from the two sites. The results revealed that the model fit of site-specific MLR models was marginally better (Adj-R2: AGB = 0.87-0.93; BA = 0.88-0.89; DBH = 0.86-0.96; and Vol = 0.87-0.98 than when using a generic combined data model (AGB = 0.80; BA = 0.81; DBH = 0.85; and Vol = 0.85). However, the rRMSE (2.01 - 20.89%) and rBias (0.01-1.03%) of site specific MLR models and combined data model rRMSE (3.40-16.71%) and rBias (0.55-1.16%) were within the same range, suggesting agreement between the site specific and combined data models. Furthermore, we assessed the applicability of a site-specific model to a different site without using local training data. The results obtained were inferior to both site-specific and combined data models (rRMSE: AGB = 36.29%-37.25%; BA = 52.98-54.52%; DBH = 55.57%-64.59%; and Vol = 26.10%-30.17%). The results obtained from this indicate potential for application in estimating FSA using UAS-lidar data in the Miombo woodlands and are a stepping stone towards sustainable local forest management and attaining international carbon reporting requirements. Further research into the performance of UAS-lidar data in the estimation of FSA under different Miombo vegetation characteristics, such as different age groups, hilly terrain, and dry Miombo, is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hastings Shamaoma
- Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Copperbelt University, Kitwe, Zambia
| | - Paxie W. Chirwa
- Forest Science Postgraduate Programme, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Jules C. Zekeng
- Department of Forest Engineering, Advanced Teachers Training School for Technical Education, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon
- Oliver R Tambo Africa Research Chair Initiative (ORTARChI), Chair of Environment and Development, Department of Environmental and Plant Sciences, Copperbelt University, Kitwe, Zambia
| | - Abel Ramoelo
- Centre for Environmental Studies (CFES), Department of Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorology after CFES, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Earth Observation Programme, South African National Space Agency (SANSA), Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Andrew T. Hudak
- USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Moscow, Idaho, United States of America
| | - F. Handavu
- Department of Geography, Environment and Climate Change, Mukuba University, Kitwe, Zambia
| | - Stephen Syampungani
- Forest Science Postgraduate Programme, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Oliver R Tambo Africa Research Chair Initiative (ORTARChI), Chair of Environment and Development, Department of Environmental and Plant Sciences, Copperbelt University, Kitwe, Zambia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Identification of Urban Green Space Types and Estimation of Above-Ground Biomass Using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Data. FORESTS 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/f13071077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
High-quality urban green space supports the healthy functioning of urban ecosystems. This study aimed to rapidly assess the distribution, and accurately estimate the above-ground biomass, of urban green space using remote sensing methods, thus providing a better understanding of the urban ecological environment in Xuzhou for more effective management. We performed urban green space classifications and compared the performance of Sentinel-2 MSI data and Sentinel-1 SAR data and combinations, for estimating above-ground biomass, using field data from Xuzhou, China. The results showed the following: (1) incorporating an object-oriented method and random forest algorithm to extract urban green space information was effective; (2) compared with stepwise regression models with single-source data, biomass estimation models based on multi-source data provide higher estimation accuracy (R2 = 0.77 for coniferous forest, R2 = 0.76 for shrub-grass vegetation, R2 = 0.75 for broadleaf forest); and (3) from 2016 to 2021, urban green space coverage in Xuzhou decreased, while the total above-ground biomass increased, with higher average above-ground biomass in broadleaf forests (133.71 tons/ha) compared to coniferous forests (92.13 tons/ha) and shrub-grass vegetation (21.65 tons/ha). Our study provides an example of automated classification and above-ground biomass mapping for urban green space using multi-source data and facilitates urban eco-management.
Collapse
|