1
|
Liu Y, Yang X, Liu Y, Dong P, Liang R, Hopkins DL, Holman BWB, Luo X, Zhu L, Yang Z, Zhang Y. Chinese consumer perception and purchasing behavior of beef - Mainly in North and East China. Meat Sci 2025; 220:109696. [PMID: 39486217 DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Revised: 10/22/2024] [Accepted: 10/23/2024] [Indexed: 11/04/2024]
Abstract
Beef is an important food for Chinese people and understanding the intrinsic and extrinsic factors that impact on their satisfaction and purchasing behavior is necessary for industry growth. This was confirmed using an online survey that included 26 questions and 3617 valid responses, mainly from people located in North and East China. It was found that 47.7 % of Chinese residents like to eat beef, and they perceive beef as healthy and of high nutritional value. Chilled beef, exclusive of hot-boned or frozen products, was preferred by the majority (58.2 %) of respondents. Shank was the most popular beef cut for Chinese consumers, reflecting that stewing was found to be the preferred method for cooking beef. There were demographic differences in consumption frequency, purchase location, and the most important sensory qualities of beef for Chinese consumers. Male consumers placed more importance on the marbling of beef compared to female consumers (P < 0.05). Meat color, marbling, and price were ranked as the top three factors considered when respondents were purchasing beef. Eating and cooking habits had the strongest effect on consumer willingness to purchase beef. These findings will help to support consumer orientated beef production and processing in North and East China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanxiaoxue Liu
- Lab of Beef Processing and Quality Control, College of Food Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China; National R&D Center for Beef Processing Technology, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Quality Safety Monitoring for Animal Products and Veterinary Drug Innovation, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China
| | - Xiaoyin Yang
- Lab of Beef Processing and Quality Control, College of Food Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China; National R&D Center for Beef Processing Technology, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Quality Safety Monitoring for Animal Products and Veterinary Drug Innovation, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China
| | - Yunge Liu
- Lab of Beef Processing and Quality Control, College of Food Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China; National R&D Center for Beef Processing Technology, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Quality Safety Monitoring for Animal Products and Veterinary Drug Innovation, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China
| | - Pengcheng Dong
- Lab of Beef Processing and Quality Control, College of Food Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China; National R&D Center for Beef Processing Technology, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Quality Safety Monitoring for Animal Products and Veterinary Drug Innovation, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China
| | - Rongrong Liang
- Lab of Beef Processing and Quality Control, College of Food Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China; National R&D Center for Beef Processing Technology, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Quality Safety Monitoring for Animal Products and Veterinary Drug Innovation, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China
| | - David L Hopkins
- Lab of Beef Processing and Quality Control, College of Food Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China; National R&D Center for Beef Processing Technology, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China; Canberra ACT, 2903, Australia
| | - Benjamin W B Holman
- Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, NSW Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales 2650, Australia; Yangxin Yiliyuan Halal Meat Co., Ltd., Binzhou 251800, PR China
| | - Xin Luo
- Lab of Beef Processing and Quality Control, College of Food Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China; National R&D Center for Beef Processing Technology, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Quality Safety Monitoring for Animal Products and Veterinary Drug Innovation, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China
| | - Lixian Zhu
- Lab of Beef Processing and Quality Control, College of Food Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China; National R&D Center for Beef Processing Technology, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Quality Safety Monitoring for Animal Products and Veterinary Drug Innovation, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China
| | - Zhengang Yang
- Yangxin Yiliyuan Halal Meat Co., Ltd., Binzhou 251800, PR China
| | - Yimin Zhang
- Lab of Beef Processing and Quality Control, College of Food Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China; National R&D Center for Beef Processing Technology, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Quality Safety Monitoring for Animal Products and Veterinary Drug Innovation, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ferreira GA, Barro AG, Terto DK, Bosso EB, Dos Santos ÉR, Ogawa NN, Bridi AM. Sensory quality of beef with different ultimate pH values - A Brazilian perspective. Meat Sci 2024; 209:109415. [PMID: 38103397 DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
This study evaluated Brazilian consumer perceptions of beef with different pH values at 48 h post-mortem (pHu) through sensory analysis. A total of 138 consumers evaluated raw and grilled steaks. The steaks were divided according to their pHu (normal pH < 5.8, atypical darkness, firmness, and dryness [DFD] > 5.8 pH < 6, and typical DFD pH ≥ 6). There was no difference in the visual evaluation of raw steaks or purchase intention. Evaluation of the grilled steaks showed that consumers preferred typical DFD steaks in terms of tenderness, and there was a tendency for the same behavior in terms of juiciness. No differences were observed in other evaluated parameters. Cluster analysis identified three consumer segments for visual evaluation, indicating a preference for steaks with higher pHu in terms of freshness. Additionally, four segments were identified for evaluation, with some groups expressing a preference for higher pHu meat in terms of freshness appearance, tenderness liking, and overall liking. The developed regression models for overall liking and purchase intention exhibited favorable adjustment indices, with r2 values of 0.86 and 0.57, respectively, for raw steaks and 0.90 for grilled steaks for in overall liking. Regression models indicated a strong influence of color and freshness appearance, in addition to tenderness liking and juiciness liking, on the overall liking scores of consumers. These results indicate that Brazilian consumers do not dislike dark cutting and, despite differentiating their greater tenderness, do not show a preference between the different pHu values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guilherme Agostinis Ferreira
- Departament of Animal Science, Center of Agrarian Sciences, State University of Londrina (UEL), 86.057-970, Londrina, Brazil
| | - Amanda Gobeti Barro
- Departament of Animal Science, Center of Agrarian Sciences, State University of Londrina (UEL), 86.057-970, Londrina, Brazil
| | - Daniela Kaizer Terto
- Departament of Animal Science, Center of Agrarian Sciences, State University of Londrina (UEL), 86.057-970, Londrina, Brazil
| | - Eloá Bispo Bosso
- Departament of Animal Science, Center of Agrarian Sciences, State University of Londrina (UEL), 86.057-970, Londrina, Brazil
| | - Évelyn Rangel Dos Santos
- Departament of Animal Science, Center of Agrarian Sciences, State University of Londrina (UEL), 86.057-970, Londrina, Brazil
| | - Natália Nami Ogawa
- Departament of Animal Science, Center of Agrarian Sciences, State University of Londrina (UEL), 86.057-970, Londrina, Brazil
| | - Ana Maria Bridi
- Departament of Animal Science, Center of Agrarian Sciences, State University of Londrina (UEL), 86.057-970, Londrina, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Altmann BA, Trinks A, Mörlein D. Consumer preferences for the color of unprocessed animal foods. J Food Sci 2023; 88:909-925. [PMID: 36727664 DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.16485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Consumer choices for food products are often based on appearance; one important aspect being product color. We systematically review the literature on consumer preferences for the color of raw beef, pork, poultry, bee honey, cow milk, and chicken eggs to inform future food technology and marketing research; a total of 40 studies were identified. Consumer preferences for pork color vary widely globally and can depend on other demographic factors. A trend toward light and bright beef was observed in six out of eight studies. A pink color was preferred in chicken by consumers in Northern Ireland and Brazil; muscle color uniformity was also related to higher acceptance. Contrarily, a diverse selection of honey colors is preferred; dark golden, yellow, and amber products were liked by consumers across the globe. One study observed a preference for white (over yellowish) milk. Worldwide, white and brown eggshells are preferred nearly equally with considerable differences between continents and regions. Our review highlights the heterogeneity of color preferences for animal products, worldwide; research methods should focus on quantifying colors associated with preferences so that food producers can accurately market their diverse products in regions with corresponding color preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Trinks
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Mörlein
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Quality Multiverse of Beef and Pork Meat in a Single Score. Foods 2022; 11:foods11081154. [PMID: 35454739 PMCID: PMC9028403 DOI: 10.3390/foods11081154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The rationale behind this review is the potential of developing a single score tool for meat quality evaluation based on visual and sensorial assessments of fresh meat. Based on the known sensory wheel concept, the first step was to create quality wheels capturing most common intrinsic and extrinsic quality cues of pork and beef outlined in the latest scientific papers. This resulted in identifying meat color, sensory characteristics and fat content as the most important intrinsic quality cues of fresh beef and pork. Furthermore, the highest number of studies showed the importance of price, certification logos and brand for beef quality evaluation. According to recent articles, price, breed, animal welfare and a veterinary certificate are the most important extrinsic attributes for pork consumers. The second step was to develop a single-score tool named the “Meat quality index”. It has been developed in line with published approaches of different total quality index concepts used in the food sector, providing insights into its application in the meat sector. As a result, this review proposes a unique approach in using quality index application, through the consumer’s preferences aspect of fresh meat.
Collapse
|