Genome-Wide Association Study of Metamizole-Induced Agranulocytosis in European Populations

Cytochrome P450 1A2 is the most important enzyme for hepatic metabolism of the metamizole metabolite 4-methylaminoantipyrine

Aims

Metamizole (dipyrone) is a prodrug not detectable in serum or urine after oral ingestion. The primary metabolite, 4‐methylaminoantipyrine (4‐MAA), can be N‐demethylated to 4‐aminoantipyrine (4‐AA) or oxidized to 4‐formylaminoantipyrine (4‐FAA) by cytochrome P450 (CYP)‐dependent reactions. We aimed to identify the CYPs involved in 4‐MAA metabolism and to quantify the effect of CYP inhibition on 4‐MAA metabolism.

Methods

We investigated the metabolism of 4‐MAA in vitro using CYP expressing supersomes and the pharmacokinetics of metamizole in the presence of CYP inhibitors in male subjects.

Results

The experiments in supersomes revealed CYP1A2 as the major CYP for 4‐MAA N‐demethylation and 4‐FAA formation with CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 contributing to N‐demethylation. In the clinical study, we investigated the influence of ciprofloxacin (CYP1A2 inhibitor), fluconazole (CYP2C19 inhibitor) and the combination ciprofloxacin/fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of metamizole in n = 12 male subjects in a randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind study. The geometric mean ratios for the area under the concentration–time curve of 4‐MAA after/before treatment were 1.17 (90% CI 1.09–1.25) for fluconazole, 1.51 (90% CI 1.42–1.60) for ciprofloxacin and 1.92 (90% CI 1.81–2.03) for ciprofloxacin/fluconazole. Fluconazole increased the half‐life of 4‐MAA from 3.22 hours by 0.47 hours (95% CI 0.13–0.81, P < .05), ciprofloxacin by 0.69 hours (95% CI 0.44–0.94, P < .001) and fluconazole/ciprofloxacin by 2.85 hours (95% CI 2.48–3.22, P < .001).

Conclusion

CYP1A2 is the major CYP for the conversion of 4‐MAA to 4‐AA and 4‐FAA. The increase in 4‐MAA exposure by the inhibition of CYP1A2 and by the combination CYP1A2/CYP2C19 may be relevant for dose‐dependent adverse reactions of 4‐MAA.

Role of Pharmacogenetics in Adverse Drug Reactions: An Update towards Personalized Medicine

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are an important and frequent cause of morbidity and mortality. ADR can be related to a variety of drugs, including anticonvulsants, anaesthetics, antibiotics, antiretroviral, anticancer, and antiarrhythmics, and can involve every organ or apparatus. The causes of ADRs are still poorly understood due to their clinical heterogeneity and complexity. In this scenario, genetic predisposition toward ADRs is an emerging issue, not only in anticancer chemotherapy, but also in many other fields of medicine, including hemolytic anemia due to glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, aplastic anemia, porphyria, malignant hyperthermia, epidermal tissue necrosis (Lyell's Syndrome and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome), epilepsy, thyroid diseases, diabetes, Long QT and Brugada Syndromes. The role of genetic mutations in the ADRs pathogenesis has been shown either for dose-dependent or for dose-independent reactions. In this review, we present an update of the genetic background of ADRs, with phenotypic manifestations involving blood, muscles, heart, thyroid, liver, and skin disorders. This review aims to illustrate the growing usefulness of genetics both to prevent ADRs and to optimize the safe therapeutic use of many common drugs. In this prospective, ADRs could become an untoward "stress test," leading to new diagnosis of genetic-determined diseases. Thus, the wider use of pharmacogenetic testing in the work-up of ADRs will lead to new clinical diagnosis of previously unsuspected diseases and to improved safety and efficacy of therapies. Improving the genotype-phenotype correlation through new lab techniques and implementation of artificial intelligence in the future may lead to personalized medicine, able to predict ADR and consequently to choose the appropriate compound and dosage for each patient.