Temperature Changes during Implant Osteotomy Preparations in Human Cadaver Tibiae Comparing MIS® Straight Drills with Densah® Burs

Comparison of Temperature Changes during Implant Osteotomy: Conventional, Single, and Osseodensification Drilling

Purpose: This study compared temperature changes during implant osteotomies using osseodensification drilling (OD), conventional drilling, (CD) and single drilling (SD) protocols on artificial bone blocks of varying densities. Methods: In this in vitro study, 240 osteotomies were performed (80 each for CD, SD, and OD protocols) across four bone densities (D1, D2, D3, and D4) and two drilling speeds (800 rpm and 1600 rpm). A drill length of 12 mm and diameter of 3.3 mm were used under irrigated conditions. Temperature changes were measured using an infrared thermal camera, noting the initial temperature (T0), the maximum temperature reached (T1), and the temperature change (ΔT) before and after each osteotomy, with comparisons drawn among the three protocols. Results: Significant differences in ΔT were observed between the CD and SD protocols across all bone densities and speeds. The CD protocol showed lower ΔT levels at 1600 rpm compared to 800 rpm, whereas the SD protocol showed significantly higher mean ΔT levels at 1600 rpm. For the OD protocol, there was no significant difference in ΔT between the two speeds for D1-D3 densities; however, a significant increase in ΔT was recorded at 1600 rpm for D4. Moreover, the CD protocol consistently yielded the lowest temperature increases in denser bones (D1-D2) at both speeds, while the OD protocol had lower ΔT in less dense bones (D4). Conclusions: The CD protocol consistently achieved lower temperature changes, particularly in denser bones, compared to the SD and OD protocols. The OD protocol, meanwhile, was more effective at reducing temperature increases in less-dense bones.

Temperature Changes (ΔT) in Correlation with Number of Implant Osteotomy Preparations in Human Cadaver Tibiae, Comparing Osseodensification (OD) Burs in Clockwise (CW) versus Counterclockwise (CCW) Mode

(1) Background: OD burs are used in two different modes: (i) CW and (ii) CCW. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the ΔT during the preparation of implant osteotomies in a four-way interaction. (2) Methods: Three hundred and sixty osteotomies were prepared at 12 mm depth in human cadaver tibiae. The ΔT values were calculated similarly to the method used in two previous studies carried out by our group. Four different variables were evaluated for their effect on ΔT. (3) Results: A four-way interaction was observed in the CCW mode, allowing for 1000 RPM to have the least effect in both modes. However, in the CCW mode the use of 3.0 and 4.0 burs after 23 osteotomies showed a statistically significant increase in ΔT, and significant chatter, compared to the CW mode. In the CCW mode, the ΔT was increased significantly as the diameter of the burs increased in 800 and 1200 RPM. (4) Conclusions: The synergistic effect of drills' diameter, CCW mode, 800 and 1200 RPM, and bur usage (over 23 times) had a significant effect on ΔT, which exceeded 47 °C. One thousand (1000) RPM had the least effect in both modes. The 3.0 and 4.0 burs in the CCW mode drastically increased the temperature and produced significant chatter.

Effect of Er:YAG Laser Exposure on the Amorphous Smear Layer in the Marginal Zone of the Osteotomy Site for Placement of Dental Screw Implants: A Histomorphological Study

The placement of dental screw implants typically involves the use of rotary techniques and drills to create a bone bed. This study explores the potential benefits of combining this method with an Er:YAG laser. Split osteotomies were performed on 10 jaws of euthanized domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica), with 12 mandibular implant osteotomies in each jaw, divided into 4 groups. In order to make a comprehensive assessment of the effect of Er:YAG lasers, histomorphological techniques were used to measure the reduction in amorphous layer thickness after Er:YAG laser treatment, both with and without the placement of dental screw implants from different manufacturers. Following bone decalcification and staining, the thickness of the amorphous layer was measured in four groups: Group A-osteotomy performed without Er:YAG laser treatment-had amorphous layer thicknesses ranging from 21.813 to 222.13 µm; Group B-osteotomy performed with Er:YAG laser treatment-had amorphous layer thicknesses ranging from 6.08 to 64.64 µm; Group C-an implant placed in the bone without laser treatment-had amorphous layer thicknesses of 5.90 to 54.52 µm; and Group D-an implant placed after bone treatment with Er:YAG laser-had amorphous layer thicknesses of 1.29 to 7.98 µm. The examination and photomicrodocumentation was performed using a LEICA DM1000 LED microscope (Germany) and LAS V 4.8 software (Leica Application Suite V4, Leica Microsystems, Germany). When comparing group A to group B and group C to D, statistically significant differences were indicated (p-value = 0.000, p < 0.05). The study demonstrates the synergistic effects and the possibility of integrating lasers into the conventional implantation protocol. By applying our own method of biomodification, the smear layer formed during rotary osteotomy can be reduced using Er:YAG lasers. This reduction leads to a narrower peri-implant space and improved bone-to-implant contact, facilitating accelerated osseointegration.

Effects of Osseodensification on Primary Stability of Cylindrical and Conical Implants-An Ex Vivo Study

Primary stability is an important factor for dental implant success. In the past years, a new method for bone site preparation was introduced, named osseodensification (OD). OD produces a condensation of the trabecular portion of the bone, increasing bone-to-implant contact and primary stability. This study aims to compare the effect of OD in cylindrical and conical implants to conventional instrumentation. A total of forty implants, divided into four groups, were placed in porcine tibia: cylindrical conventional (1a), cylindrical OD (1b), conical conventional (2a) and conical OD (2b). Each implant was measured for implant stability quotient (ISQ), insertion torque (IT) and removal torque (RT). Group 2b showed the higher values for each of the evaluated parameters; groups 1b and 2b showed better results than 1a and 2a, respectively. Regarding the IT and RT, group 1b achieved higher values than group 2a, but not for ISQ. The inter-group comparison showed significant difference between groups 1a vs 2a, 1a vs 2b and 1b vs 2b for ISQ and 1a vs 1b and 1a vs 2b for RT analysis. OD resulted in improved ISQ, IT and RT of both cylindrical and conical implants.