1
|
Kong L, Jin X. Dysregulation of deubiquitination in breast cancer. Gene 2024; 902:148175. [PMID: 38242375 DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2024.148175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is a highly frequent malignant tumor that poses a serious threat to women's health and has different molecular subtypes, histological subtypes, and biological features, which act by activating oncogenic factors and suppressing cancer inhibitors. The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is the main process contributing to protein degradation, and deubiquitinases (DUBs) are reverse enzymes that counteract this process. There is growing evidence that dysregulation of DUBs is involved in the occurrence of BC. Herein, we review recent research findings in BC-associated DUBs, describe their nature, classification, and functions, and discuss the potential mechanisms of DUB-related dysregulation in BC. Furthermore, we present the successful treatment of malignant cancer with DUB inhibitors, as well as analyzing the status of targeting aberrant DUBs in BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lili Kong
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Pathophysiology, Health Science Center, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiaofeng Jin
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Pathophysiology, Health Science Center, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Luo X, Wang Y, Zhang H, Chen G, Sheng J, Tian X, Xue R, Wang Y. Identification of a Prognostic Signature for Ovarian Cancer Based on Ubiquitin-Related Genes Suggesting a Potential Role for FBXO9. Biomolecules 2023; 13:1724. [PMID: 38136595 PMCID: PMC10742228 DOI: 10.3390/biom13121724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer (OV) is associated with high mortality and poses challenges in diagnosis and prognosis prediction. Ubiquitin-related genes (UbRGs) are involved in the initiation and progression of cancers, but have still not been utilized for diagnosis and prognosis of OV. METHODS K48-linked ubiquitination in ovarian tissues from our OV and control cohort was assessed using immunohistochemistry. UbRGs, including ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like regulators, were screened based on the TCGA-OV and GTEx database. Univariate Cox regression analysis identified survival-associated UbRGs. A risk model was established using the LASSO regression and multivariate Cox regression analysis. The relationship between UbRGs and immune cell infiltration, tumor mutational burden, drug sensitivity, and immune checkpoint was determined using the CIBERSORT, ESTIMATE, and Maftools algorithms, based on the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer and TCGA-OV databases. GEPIA2.0 was used to analyze the correlation between FBXO9/UBD and DNA damage repair-related genes. Finally, FBXO9 and UBD were accessed in tissues or cells using immunohistochemistry, qPCR, and Western blot. RESULTS We confirmed the crucial role for ubiquitination in OV as a significant decrease of K48-linked ubiquitination was observed in primary OV lesions. We identified a prognostic signature utilizing two specific UbRGs, FBXO9 and UBD. The risk score obtained from this signature accurately predicted the overall survival of TCGA-OV training dataset and GSE32062 validation dataset. Furthermore, this risk score also showed association with immunocyte infiltration and drug sensitivity, revealing potential mechanisms for ubiquitination mediated OV risk. In addition, FBXO9, but not UBD, was found to be downregulated in OV and positively correlated with DNA damage repair pathways, suggesting FBXO9 as a potential cancer suppressor, likely via facilitating DNA damage repair. CONCLUSIONS We identified and validated a signature of UbRGs that accurately predicts the prognosis, offers valuable guidance for optimizing chemotherapy and targeted therapies, and suggests a potential role for FBXO9 in OV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaomei Luo
- Department of Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China (G.C.)
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
| | - Yingjie Wang
- Department of Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China (G.C.)
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
- School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- Department of Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China (G.C.)
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
| | - Guangquan Chen
- Department of Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China (G.C.)
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
| | - Jindan Sheng
- Department of Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China (G.C.)
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
| | - Xiu Tian
- Department of Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China (G.C.)
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
| | - Renhao Xue
- Department of Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China (G.C.)
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
- School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
| | - Yu Wang
- Department of Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China (G.C.)
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
| |
Collapse
|