Home-Based Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Therapy: The Impact in Chronic Leg Lymphedema in Patients Treated for Gynecologic Cancer

Therapist versus Machine-Immediate Effects of Manual versus Mechanical Lymphatic Drainage in Patients with Secondary Lymphedema

Background: Complex decongestive therapy (CDT) is the standard and basic therapy for lymphedema. The central component of CDT is manual lymphatic drainage (MLD). In addition to CDT, other measures such as intermittent pneumatic compression therapy (IPCT) (active compression machine therapy) are available. In this prospective research study, the objective and subjective effects of MLD and IPCT on lymphedema of the lower extremity were investigated and both therapies were directly compared. Furthermore, the patients' body mass index (BMI) and stage of lymphedema were tested for their effect on the respective therapy. Methods: Patients participating in the study received both therapies (MLD and IPCT) on the same lymphedema-affected limb at an interval of two days. The objective volumetric therapy effect was measured by the digital volume measurement of the affected limb. The subjective effects of the therapies were measured using two specially designed questionnaires. Results: A total of 40 patients were included in the study. There was no significant difference in the volume differences between the interventions, BMI categories, lymphedema, or treatment order regarding the immediate and two-day effect. Conclusions: No significant difference was found in the subjective or objective therapy efficacy of the two methods. Intermittent pneumatic compression therapy is considered a comparable therapeutic procedure when properly indicated.

Prophylactic complex physiotherapy in gynecologic cancer survivors: patient-reported outcomes based on a lymphedema questionnaire

OBJECTIVE

Lower extremity lymphedema secondary to cancer treatment impacts quality of life for gynecological cancer survivors. Complex decongestive physiotherapy is applied when lymphedema is diagnosed, but prophylactic physiotherapy is not yet a standard of care. The aim of this study is to evaluate prophylactic complex physiotherapy in patients with gynecological cancer and its effects on patient-reported symptoms based on the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire.

METHODS

The data of patients diagnosed with gynecological cancers who underwent lymphadenectomy from July 2021 to June 2022 was evaluated. All patients were referred to the physiotherapy unit before adjuvant treatment. Patients who accepted prophylactic physiotherapy were informed and massage and exercise training were implemented, whereas patients who declined were solely informed. Bilateral lower extremity circumferences were measured at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months at the levels of 10 cm, 30 cm, and 50 cm above the heels. A translated form of the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire was administered to all patients at the last visit.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were included in the study. Patients were diagnosed with endometrial (50%), ovarian (32%), cervical (16%), and vulvar (2%) cancer. Overall, 70% underwent systematic pelvic±para-aortic lymphadenectomy whereas sentinel lymph node mapping was performed in 30%. Lymphedema was seen in 5% (n=3) of the prophylactic physiotherapy positive group and in 60% (n=24) of the physiotherapy negative group. The median score was 3 (range 1-5) in the physiotherapy positive group and 16 (range 9-20) in the physiotherapy negative group. In patients diagnosed with lymphedema in the physiotherapy negative group, systematic lymphadenectomy was performed in 91.7% (n=22) and a higher number of lymph nodes was extracted (median 45.5; p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic complex physiotherapy is associated with lower rates of lymphedema and better patient-reported symptom scores according to the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire.

Conservative treatment versus lymphaticovenular anastomosis for early-stage lower extremity lymphedema

OBJECTIVE

Several options for the treatment of lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) can be broadly classified into conservative treatment, such as compression garments and decongestive lymphatic therapy, and surgical treatment, such as lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA). The purpose of our study was to clarify the superiority of these treatments by comparing the outcomes of LVA with those of conservative treatment for early-stage LEL.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study. The patients with LEL who presented to our department between January 2015 and December 2022 were identified and classified into two groups: conservative treatment and surgical treatment. The LEL indexes, calculated from the four lower extremity circumferences and the body mass index, were compared at the 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up between the two groups.

RESULTS

Of the 101 patients with LEL, 53 with 72 affected limbs (conservative treatment, 39 patients and 53 affected limbs; surgical treatment, 15 patients and 19 affected limbs) were included in the present analysis. The therapeutic effect for reducing edema, as determined by comparing the corrected LEL index at 12 months (103.7 ± 12.7 vs 91.9 ± 10.7; P = .005) and 24 months (103.1 ± 12.9 vs 83.8 ± 7.2; P < .001), was significantly higher in the surgical treatment group than that in the conservative treatment group. The conservative treatment group showed little change in the corrected LEL index at ≤24 months of follow-up (+3.1%; P = .299). In contrast, the surgical treatment group showed a significant reduction in edema at 24 months according to the corrected LEL index (-16.2%; P = .019).

CONCLUSIONS

In early-stage LEL, conservative treatment centered on compression therapy alone only maintained edema (ie, edema did not worsen or improve). In contrast, LVA with compression therapy reduced edema.