Patient Experiences with the Transition to Telephone Counseling during the COVID-19 Pandemic

The Association Between COVID-fear with Psychological Distress and Substance Use: the Moderating Effect of Treatment Engagement

The purpose of this brief report was to examine the association between COVID-fear with psychiatric symptoms severity and substance use risk in an outpatient population with co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders and whether these associations were moderated by treatment engagement, especially after providers had shifted from an in-person care model to a telehealth format. A total of 136 patients receiving outpatient treatment for comorbid substance use and mental health disorders completed self-report questionnaires on their psychiatric symptoms, substance use, and treatment engagement (i.e., frequency, length, and helpfulness of phone and video sessions with a mental health counselor, psychiatrist, or primary care provider) in the past month between November 2020 and March 2021. Results showed that COVID-fear was significantly associated with psychiatric symptom severity, but not substance use risk. Additionally, perceived helpfulness of phone counseling sessions moderated the associations between COVID-fear and global psychiatric symptom severity, such that COVID-fear and global psychiatric symptom severity were positively associated when perceived helpfulness was low, and not associated if perceived helpfulness was high. The present results highlight the importance of directly addressing fears specific to a national emergency, as well as for providers to build strong rapport with their clients.

Overcoming barriers to traditional care delivery and pharmacy challenges: a qualitative study of buprenorphine, telehealth, and a digital therapeutic for opioid use disorder

BACKGROUND

The opioid epidemic contributes to increasing morbidity and mortality due to drug overdoses in the US, but barriers to traditional opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment prevent a vast majority of patients from accessing quality care and medications for opioid use disorder (MOUDs). Public Health Emergency (PHE) provisions during the COVID-19 pandemic relaxed in-person evaluation requirements for buprenorphine inductions, allowing for the expansion of telehealth care to OUD populations. This qualitative study explores patients' experiences with a novel digital therapeutic telehealth program with buprenorphine for OUD.

METHOD

Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with a sub-sample (n = 15) of participants from a larger feasibility and acceptability pilot. Interviews explored participants' opioid use, OUD treatment history, previous MOUD experience, barriers to previous treatment attempts, medication adherence, counseling experience, treatment satisfaction, and comparisons between current and previous treatments.

RESULTS

Barriers to care in previous OUD treatment episodes included logistical and program related inconveniences (program attendance requirements, commute distances, transportation, appointment wait times, and clinic patient volumes), financial strain, unreliable access to prescribers, residential program experiences, and the availability of detox-only based treatments. Participants with previous treatment experiences contrasted these barriers with the virtual delivery study setting and reported that the characteristics of telehealth OUD care facilitated improved engagement and retention by overcoming many of these barriers through: no transportation requirements, open and flexible appointment scheduling, appointment times confined to care team meetings only, absence of provider availability concerns, and the ability to receive buprenorphine maintenance care from home. The primary barrier noted for virtual care delivery was the fulfillment of buprenorphine prescriptions from local pharmacies.

CONCLUSION

A novel digital therapeutic telehealth program was reported to overcome almost all of the barriers encountered by participants during previous traditional OUD treatment episodes, contributing to a growing body of evidence supporting the permanency of current PHE expansions for OUD telehealth care. Findings also emphasize the importance of coming to workable policy solutions for buprenorphine supply threshold constraints on local pharmacies that unintentionally constrict access for telehealth and other OUD patients.

Patient and provider experiences with opioid use disorder care delivered via telehealth: A systematic mixed-studies review

INTRODUCTION

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and loosening of some opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment regulations in the U.S. and Canada, there has been a rapid rise in the use of telehealth for buprenorphine induction, maintenance, and counseling (tele-bupe). Previous reviews highlight that tele-bupe can expand access to OUD care and improve treatment retention, but none to date have synthesized patient and clinician experiences with and perceptions of this care.

OBJECTIVE

This review synthesized findings from quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies that examined patient and provider experiences with tele-bupe. We assessed the perceived effectiveness and acceptability of this treatment modality.

METHODS

Our systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. In July 2023, we searched six databases using keywords 'telehealth AND opioid use disorder' (and related terms) for papers published in English. Papers were eligible for inclusion if they reported findings about patient or provider experiences. Two reviewers screened studies for inclusion; 40 studies were included. We used a data-based convergent synthesis design to extract and synthesize findings, and the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool to appraise studies.

RESULTS

Patients and providers hold generally positive views of tele-bupe and most support its continued use in some form, citing multiple benefits, including accessibility and convenience. Most studies also identified barriers to tele-bupe, including technological challenges. Patients and providers differed in how they thought telehealth affects the clinical relationship, with providers expressing more concern about rapport-building and patients stating that being in their own environments during visits facilitated comfort and openness. The findings also suggest that providers are conflicted about when and for whom tele-bupe is appropriate.

CONCLUSION

Overall, both patients and providers view tele-bupe favorably; however, providers are conflicted about the patients and situations for which it is appropriate, which may lead to inequities in who is offered this form of care.

Enhancing medication management in hemodialysis patients: Exploring the impact of patient-centered pharmacist care and motivational interviewing

BACKGROUND

Patients on hemodialysis (HD) often uses several medications, making them highly susceptible to medication-related problems (MRP) thereby leading to medication nonadherence. Therefore, an innovative pharmaceutical care strategy incorporating drug therapy optimization (DTO) and motivational interviewing (MI) can mitigate medication-related problems and optimize patient care.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of pharmacist led interventions in utilizing DTO and MI techniques in managing medication related problems among patients undergoing hemodialysis.

METHOD AND DESIGN

A12-months, cross sectional prospective study was conducted among 63 End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients on HD. DTO was conducted by the pharmacist to identify the MRP by reviewing complete medication list gathered from patient interview and medical records. All MRPs was classified using the PCNE classification version 9.00 and medication issues, that require patient involvement were categorized as patient-related, while those that necessitate physician intervention were classified as physician-related. The DTO was performed at the baseline, 6-month and at the final month of the study. Identified medication issues were communicated to the site nephrologist and was tracked during next follow up. Whereas MI was conducted physically at Month-3 and via telephone on month-6 and month-9 to address patient related medication issues.

RESULTS

Mean age of the study population was 48.5±14 years. While the mean number of prescribed medications was 8.1±2 with 57% of the patients taking more than 5 types of medication. After 12 months of pharmacist intervention using DTO and MI, a mean reduction in MRP was observed for both patient-related and physician-related MRPs across three time series. However, further analysis using repeated measure ANOVA revealed that the reduction in patient-related MRPs was statistically significant [F(1.491, 92.412) = 60.921, p < 0.05], while no statistically significant difference was detected in physician-related MRPs [F(2, 124) = 2.216, P = 0.113].

CONCLUSION

Pharmaceutical care service through DTO and MI can effectively reduce and prevent drug-related issues to optimize medication therapy among HD patients.

"We figured it out as we went along": Staff perspectives of COVID-19 response efforts at a large North American syringe services programme

Syringe services programmes face operational challenges to provide life-sustaining services to people who use substances and those who have substance use disorders. COVID-19 has disrupted operations at these programmes and is a threat to people with substance use disorder because of severe poverty, de-prioritisation of COVID-19 safety and high prevalence of comorbidities. This phenomenological qualitative study describes 16 in-depth interviews with staff of one of the largest syringe services programme in North America-Prevention Point Philadelphia, located in the Kensington neighbourhood of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Interviews were conducted from December 2020 to February 2021, audio-recorded, transcribed and coded to develop a thematic framework. Participants were mostly white (71.4%) and female (68.8%) with a median age of 31.5. Three main and four sub-themes related to the impact of COVID-19 on the syringe services programme were identified: (1) COVID-19 altered services provision (sub-theme: select service changes should be retained); (2) unclear or absent COVID-19 response guidance which compromised mitigation (sub-themes: COVID-19 messaging was difficult to translate to practice, learn-as-we-go); and (3) staff and clients experienced elevated mental anguish during the pandemic (sub-theme: already limited resources were further strained). COVID-19 presented complex challenges to an organisation normally strained in pre-pandemic times. A staff culture of resourcefulness and resiliency aided the syringe services programme to balance client needs and staff safety. However, staff experienced a serious psychological impact, largely attributable to being unable to find reprieve from the stressors of COVID-19 and the difficulties associated with navigating and acting-on contradictory public health messaging. Staff also shared a belief that the relaxing of some pre-pandemic barriers allowed staff to link clients more readily with services. Syringe services programmes should embrace the potential for lasting changes to health services delivery brought about by wide-scale changes in service provisions because of COVID-19.

Nothing really changed: Arizona patient experience of methadone and buprenorphine access during COVID

Objective

To understand patient experience of federal regulatory changes governing methadone and buprenorphine (MOUD) access in Arizona during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

This community-based participatory and action research study involved one-hour, audio-recorded field interviews conducted with 131 people who used methadone and/or buprenorphine to address opioid use disorder at some point during COVID (January 1, 2020- March 31, 2021) in Arizona. Transcribed data were analyzed using a priori codes focused on federally recommended flexibilities governing MOUD access. Data were quantitated to investigate associations with COVID risk and services access.

Results

Telehealth was reported by 71.0% of participants, but the majority were required to come to the clinic to attend video appointments with an offsite provider. Risk for severe COVID outcomes was reported by 40.5% of the sample. Thirty-eight percent of the sample and 39.7% of methadone patients were required to be at the clinic daily to get medication and 47.6% were at high risk for COVID severe outcomes. About half (54.2%) of methadone patients indicated that some form of multi-day take home dosing was offered at their clinic, and 45.8% were offered an extra day or two of multi-day doses; but no participants received the federally allowed 14- or 28-day methadone take-home doses for unstable and stable patients respectively. All participants expressed that daily clinic visits interrupted their work and home lives and desired more take-home dosing and home delivery options.

Conclusions

MOUD patients in Arizona were not offered many of the federally allowed flexibilities for access that were designed to reduce their need to be at the clinic. To understand the impact of these recommended treatment changes in Arizona, and other states where they were not well implemented, federal and state regulators must mandate these changes and support MOUD providers to implement them.

Barriers and poor telephone counseling experiences among patients receiving medication for opioid use disorders

OBJECTIVE

The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed the relaxation of regulations surrounding Medication for Opioid Use Disorders (MOUD) treatment, including a shift from in-person to telehealth counseling services adjunct to MOUD treatment. We examine how patient-level barriers impact their counseling experiences.

METHODS

We examine data from n = 264 participants who completed a cross-sectional survey regarding their experiences with telephone counseling adjunct to MOUD between July to November 2020. Variables examined include: convenience and satisfaction with telephone counseling, comfort and change in relationship with counselor, and how telephone counseling helped with anxiety, depression, anger, substance use, and recovery. Participants also listed the barriers they faced when using telephone counseling.

RESULTS

Thirty-one percent of the sample (n = 81) reported experiencing one or more barriers to telephone counseling. Satisfaction with counseling, perceived convenience, comfort, and beneficial effects of counseling on substance use were associated with increased odds of reporting no barriers (range of p.038 to <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Many participants reported barriers to telehealth counseling, and these barriers were in turn associated with poorer counseling experiences.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Many treatment providers plan to integrate telehealth service provision in their healthcare delivery model, but more research on patient-level barriers and its impact on treatment is needed.

The analysis of telephone consultation contents of patients with bipolar disorder received by a self-help group

Aim

Previous research shows that telephone consultation is useful in suicide prevention, substance use disorder, and other mental illnesses. However, no study has been conducted with a specific focus on telephone consultation for patients with bipolar disorder (BPD). Therefore, this study investigates the utilization of telephone consultation by patients with BPD and their families and analyzes the consultation contents to identify specific issues that they face.

Methods

We investigated a record book of telephone consultation conducted between 2013 and 2019 provided by the Japanese Alliance of Bipolar Disorder, which is a self-help group in Japan specializing in BPD. The main themes regarding consultation were extracted and labelled as diagnosis, symptoms, treatment, laws and social support, interpersonal relations, social life, other people with BPD, and others, with up to three items being labeled per consultation.

Results

A total of 3540 consultations were sought, and consulters who were patients accounted for 74% of the calls. The largest number of consultations were those related to symptoms (1522), followed by interpersonal relations (1003), social life (896), and treatment (797). There was a significant difference in the distribution of consultation contents between patients and their families (χ 2 = 44.595, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Most consultations by patients with BPD were about their psychiatric symptoms. Consultation contents differed between patients and families, with patients focusing more on their own social life and families focusing more on the treatment of BPD. These findings could help health-care professionals in formulating effective psychoeducation and psychotherapy programs.