Sensor-Based Fall Risk Assessment: A Survey

Leveraging feature selection for enhanced fall risk prediction in elderly using gait analysis

There is no effective fall risk screening tool for the elderly that can be integrated into clinical practice. Developing a system that can be easily used in primary care services is a current need. Current studies focus on the use of multiple sensors or activities to achieve higher accuracy. However, multiple sensors and activities reduce the availability of these systems. This study aims to develop a system to perform fall prediction for the elderly by using signals recorded from a single sensor during a short-term activity. A total of 168 features in the time and frequency domains were created using acceleration signals obtained from 71 elderly people. The features were weighted based on the ReliefF algorithm, and the artificial neural networks model was developed using the most important features. The best classification result was obtained using the 17 most important features of those weighted for K = 20 nearest neighbors. The highest accuracy was 82.2% (82.9% Sensitivity, 81.6% Specificity). The partially high accuracy obtained in our study shows that falling can be detected early with a sensor and a simple activity by determining the right features and can be easily applied in the assessment of the elderly during routine follow-ups.

Snapshot of Fall Prevention in Patients Referred to a Neurorehabilitation Unit: A Feasibility Study on the Use of an Airbag Device

Active wearable devices such as protective smart belts have been proposed to reduce hip impact in the event of a fall. This study primarily evaluated the feasibility and acceptance of a specific protective belt among selected patients identified as being at risk of falling who were admitted to an ICS Maugeri Neurorehabilitation Unit from September 2022 to April 2023. According to previous institutional observations, the device was worn between the 6th and 21st days of recovery. Out of 435 admitted patients, 118 were considered eligible, but 101 declined to participate (about 50% refused to wear the belt without first trying it on; the other 50% found it too heavy or difficult to manage). Among the 17 patients who accepted (users), 9 used the belt correctly. The remaining eight patients refused to wear it after 24 h, due to discomfort. Out of 435 patients admitted, we observed at least one fall in 49 patients, of whom 5 were eligible patients; 1 was a user who had quickly refused to use the belt and fell with mild damage. Two non-eligible patients and one eligible non-user patient experienced falls resulting in hip fractures; only in the latter case could the use of the belt have limited the damage to the hip. Difficulties in recruiting patients and low acceptance of the proposed intervention present further challenges.

SFDA: Domain Adaptation With Source Subject Fusion Based on Multi-Source and Single-Target Fall Risk Assessment

In cross-subject fall risk classification based on plantar pressure, a challenge is that data from different subjects have significant individual information. Thus, the models with insufficient generalization ability can't perform well on new subjects, which limits their application in daily life. To solve this problem, domain adaptation methods are applied to reduce the gap between source and target domain. However, these methods focus on the distribution of the source and the target domain, but ignore the potential correlation among multiple source subjects, which deteriorates domain adaptation performance. In this paper, we proposed a novel method named domain adaptation with subject fusion (SFDA) for fall risk assessment, greatly improving the cross-subject assessment ability. Specifically, SFDA synchronously carries out source target adaptation and multiple source subject fusion by domain adversarial module to reduce source-target gap and distribution distance within source subjects of same class. Consequently, target samples can learn more task-specific features from source subjects to improve the generalization ability. Experiment results show that SFDA achieved mean accuracy of 79.17 % and 73.66 % based on two backbones in a cross-subject classification manner, outperforming the state-of-the-art methods on continuous plantar pressure dataset. This study proves the effectiveness of SFDA and provides a novel tool for implementing cross-subject and few-gait fall risk assessment.

A Novel Smart Shoe Instrumented with Sensors for Quantifying Foot Placement and Clearance during Stair Negotiation

Trips and slips are significant causal perturbations leading to falls on stairs, especially in older people. The risk of a trip caused by a toe or heel catch on the step edge increases when clearance is small and variable between steps. The risk of a slip increases if the proportion of the foot area in contact with the step is reduced and variable between steps. To assess fall risk, these measurements are typically taken in a gait lab using motion-capture optoelectronic systems. The aim of this work was to develop a novel smart shoe equipped with sensors to measure foot placement and foot clearance on stairs in real homes. To validate the smart shoe as a tool for estimating stair fall risk, twenty-five older adults' sensor-based measurements were compared against foot placement and clearance measurements taken in an experimental staircase in the lab using correlations and Bland-Altman agreement techniques. The results showed that there was a good agreement and a strong positive linear correlation for foot placement (r = 0.878, p < 0.000) and foot clearance (r = 0.967, p < 0.000) between sensor and motion analysis, offering promise for advancing the current prototype into a measurement tool for fall risk in real-life staircases.

Predictability of Fall Risk Assessments in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Scoping Review

Fall risk increases with age, and one-third of adults over 65 years old experience a fall annually. Due to the aging population, the number of falls and related medical costs will progressively increase. Correct prediction of who will fall in the future is necessary to timely intervene in order to prevent falls. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review is to determine the predictive value of fall risk assessments in community-dwelling older adults using prospective studies. A total of 37 studies were included that evaluated clinical assessments (questionnaires, physical assessments, or a combination), sensor-based clinical assessments, or sensor- based daily life assessments using prospective study designs. The posttest probability of falling or not falling was calculated. In general, fallers were better classified than non-fallers. Questionnaires had a lower predictive capability compared to the other assessment types. Contrary to conclusions drawn in reviews that include retrospective studies, the predictive value of physical tests evaluated in prospective studies varies largely, with only smaller-sampled studies showing good predictive capabilities. Sensor-based fall risk assessments are promising and improve with task complexity, although they have only been evaluated in relatively small samples. In conclusion, fall risk prediction using sensor data seems to outperform conventional tests, but the method's validity needs to be confirmed by large prospective studies.

Comparative Analysis of Fall Risk Assessment Features in Community-Elderly and Stroke Survivors: Insights from Sensor-Based Data

Fall-risk assessment studies generally focus on identifying characteristics that affect postural balance in a specific group of subjects. However, falls affect a multitude of individuals. Among the groups with the most recurrent fallers are the community-dwelling elderly and stroke survivors. Thus, this study focuses on identifying a set of features that can explain fall risk for these two groups of subjects. Sixty-five community dwelling elderly (forty-nine female, sixteen male) and thirty-five stroke-survivors (twenty-two male, thirteen male) participated in our study. With the use of an inertial sensor, some features are extracted from the acceleration data of a Timed Up and Go (TUG) test performed by both groups of individuals. A short-form berg balance scale (SFBBS) score and the TUG test score were used for labeling the data. With the use of a 100-fold cross-validation approach, Relief-F and Extra Trees Classifier algorithms were used to extract sets of the top 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 features. Random Forest classifiers were trained for each set of features. The best models were selected, and the repeated features for each group of subjects were analyzed and discussed. The results show that only the stand duration was an important feature for the prediction of fall risk across all clinical tests and both groups of individuals.

Preventing falls: the use of machine learning for the prediction of future falls in individuals without history of fall

Nowadays, it becomes of paramount societal importance to support many frail-prone groups in our society (elderly, patients with neurodegenerative diseases, etc.) to remain socially and physically active, maintain their quality of life, and avoid their loss of autonomy. Once older people enter the prefrail stage, they are already likely to experience falls whose consequences may accelerate the deterioration of their quality of life (injuries, fear of falling, reduction of physical activity). In that context, detecting frailty and high risk of fall at an early stage is the first line of defense against the detrimental consequences of fall. The second line of defense would be to develop original protocols to detect future fallers before any fall occur. This paper briefly summarizes the current advancements and perspectives that may arise from the combination of affordable and easy-to-use non-wearable systems (force platforms, 3D tracking motion systems), wearable systems (accelerometers, gyroscopes, inertial measurement units-IMUs) with appropriate machine learning analytics, as well as the efforts to address these challenges.

Wearable Sensor Systems for Fall Risk Assessment: A Review

Fall risk assessment and fall detection are crucial for the prevention of adverse and long-term health outcomes. Wearable sensor systems have been used to assess fall risk and detect falls while providing additional meaningful information regarding gait characteristics. Commonly used wearable systems for this purpose are inertial measurement units (IMUs), which acquire data from accelerometers and gyroscopes. IMUs can be placed at various locations on the body to acquire motion data that can be further analyzed and interpreted. Insole-based devices are wearable systems that were also developed for fall risk assessment and fall detection. Insole-based systems are placed beneath the sole of the foot and typically obtain plantar pressure distribution data. Fall-related parameters have been investigated using inertial sensor-based and insole-based devices include, but are not limited to, center of pressure trajectory, postural stability, plantar pressure distribution and gait characteristics such as cadence, step length, single/double support ratio and stance/swing phase duration. The acquired data from inertial and insole-based systems can undergo various analysis techniques to provide meaningful information regarding an individual's fall risk or fall status. By assessing the merits and limitations of existing systems, future wearable sensors can be improved to allow for more accurate and convenient fall risk assessment. This article reviews inertial sensor-based and insole-based wearable devices that were developed for applications related to falls. This review identifies key points including spatiotemporal parameters, biomechanical gait parameters, physical activities and data analysis methods pertaining to recently developed systems, current challenges, and future perspectives.