Effects of Early Frequent Nephrology Care on Emergency Department Visits among Patients with End-stage Renal Disease

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Pregnancy-Related End-Stage Kidney Disease

Importance

The incidence of pregnancy-related acute kidney injury is increasing and is associated with significant maternal morbidity including progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Little is known about characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients who develop pregnancy-related ESKD.

Objectives

To examine the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with pregnancy-related ESKD and to investigate associations between pre-ESKD nephrology care and outcomes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a cohort study of 183 640 reproductive-aged women with incident ESKD between January 1, 2000, and November 20, 2020, from the US Renal Data System and maternal data from births captured in the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention publicly available natality data. Data were analyzed from December 2022 to June 2023.

Exposure

Pregnancy-related primary cause of ESKD, per International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes reported at ESKD onset by the primary nephrologist on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services form 2728.

Main Outcomes Measures

Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and competing risk models were constructed to examine time to (1) mortality, (2) access to kidney transplant (joining the waiting list or receiving a live donor transplant), and (3) receipt of transplant after joining the waitlist.

Results

A total of 341 patients with a pregnancy-related primary cause of ESKD were identified (mean [SD] age 30.2 [7.3]). Compared with the general US birthing population, Black patients were overrepresented among those with pregnancy-related ESKD (109 patients [31.9%] vs 585 268 patients [16.2%]). In adjusted analyses, patients with pregnancy-related ESKD had similar or lower hazards of mortality compared with those with glomerulonephritis or cystic kidney disease (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76-1.19), diabetes or hypertension (aHR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.39-0.61), or other or unknown primary causes of ESKD (aHR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.48-0.75). Despite this, patients with pregnancy-related ESKD had significantly lower access to kidney transplant compared with those with other causes of ESKD, including (1) glomerulonephritis or cystic kidney disease (adjusted subhazard ratio [aSHR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.43-0.66), (2) diabetes or hypertension (aSHR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98), and (3) other or unkown cause (aSHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.67-0.99). Those with pregnancy-related ESKD were less likely to have nephrology care or have a graft or arteriovenous fistula placed before ESKD onset (nephrology care: adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.40-0.56; graft or arteriovenous fistula placed: aRR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17-0.57).

Conclusion and Relevance

In this study, those with pregnancy-related ESKD had reduced access to transplant and nephrology care, which could exacerbate existing disparities in a disproportionately Black population. Increased access to care could improve quality of life and health outcomes among these young adults with high potential for long-term survival.

Adding creatinine to routine pregnancy tests: a decision tree for calculating the cost of identifying patients with CKD in pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Even in its early stages, chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. The current guidelines for pregnancy management suggest identifying risk factors for adverse outcomes but do not mention kidney diseases. Since CKD is often asymptomatic, pregnancy offers a valuable opportunity for diagnosis. The present analysis attempts to quantify the cost of adding serum creatinine to prenatal screening and monitoring tests.

METHODS

The decision tree we built takes several screening scenarios (before, during and after pregnancy) into consideration, following the hypothesis that while 1:750 pregnant women are affected by stage 4-5 CKD and 1:375 by stage 3B, only 50% of CKD cases are known. Prevalence of abortions/miscarriages was calculated at 30%; compliance with tests was hypothesized at 50% pre- and post-pregnancy and 90% during pregnancy (30% for miscarriages); the cost of serum creatinine (production cost) was set at 0.20 euros. A downloadable calculator, which makes it possible to adapt these figures to other settings, is available.

RESULTS

The cost per detected CKD case ranged from 111 euros (one test during pregnancy, diagnostic yield 64.8%) to 281.90 euros (one test per trimester, plus one post-pregnancy or miscarriage, diagnostic yield 87.7%). The best policy is identified as one test pre-, one during and one post-pregnancy (191.80 euros, diagnostic yield 89.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests the feasibility of early CKD diagnosis in pregnancy by adding serum creatinine to routinely performed prenatal tests and offers cost estimates for further discussion.