1
|
Zilski N, Speiser D, Bartley J, Roehle R, Blohmer JU, Keilholz U, Goerling U. Quality of life after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a pathogenic BRCA variant. J Sex Med 2023; 21:33-39. [PMID: 37973412 DOI: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdad143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is recommended to women with a pathogenic BRCA variant, but as a main side effect, RRSO could lead to an early onset of menopause. AIM To evaluate the impact of RRSO and preoperative menopausal status on menopausal symptoms, sexual functioning, and quality of life (QOL). METHODS The study was conducted between November 2019 and April 2020. Women were included who tested positive for a pathogenic BRCA1/2 variant between 2015 and 2018. Depression levels, QOL, and global health status were measured and compared with those of women who opted against RRSO. Furthermore, women who underwent RRSO treatment were asked to report menopausal complaints that they experienced at 1 month postsurgery and any current complaints. OUTCOMES RRSO had no significant impact on QOL, but women who were premenopausal at the time of surgery reported more sexual complaints than postmenopausal women. RESULTS In total, 134 carriers of a BRCA mutation were included: 90 (67%) underwent RRSO and 44 (33%) did not. At the time of the survey, neither the control nor experimental group experienced significant changes in QOL (b = -0.18, P = .59). Women who underwent RRSO reported a significantly lower global health status (b = -0.66, P = .05). Women who were premenopausal at the time of surgery were bothered more by sexual symptoms (b = 0.91, P = .19) but experienced fewer vasomotor complaints (b = -1.09, P = .13) than women who were postmenopausal at the time of RRSO. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The decrease of sexual functioning after RRSO should be an integral part of preoperative counseling because it is important for BRCA carriers, especially for premenopausal women. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS Some strengths of the present study were the long follow-up, a high response rate, and the existence of a control group, whereas defining menopausal status by last menstrual bleeding and self-report of data (eg, breast cancer history) increased the risk of errors. CONCLUSION Our study indicated that women who underwent RRSO experienced no difference in QOL when compared with women without RRSO and that patients with premenopausal status seemed to be at higher risk to experience sexual complaints after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Zilski
- Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Dorothee Speiser
- Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Julia Bartley
- Department of Gynecology, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, 39108 Magdeburg, Germany
- TFP Fertility Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Roehle
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Clinical Study Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, 10178, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Department of Gynecology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrich Keilholz
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Ute Goerling
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wei X, Oxley S, Sideris M, Kalra A, Brentnall A, Sun L, Yang L, Legood R, Manchanda R. Quality of life after risk-reducing surgery for breast and ovarian cancer prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023; 229:388-409.e4. [PMID: 37059410 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.03.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the impact of risk-reducing surgery for breast cancer and ovarian cancer prevention on quality of life. We considered risk-reducing mastectomy, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, and risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy. DATA SOURCES We followed a prospective protocol (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD42022319782) and searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library from inception to February 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We followed a PICOS (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and study design) framework. The population included women at increased risk of breast cancer or ovarian cancer. We focused on studies reporting quality of life outcomes (health-related quality of life, sexual function, menopause symptoms, body image, cancer-related distress or worry, anxiety, or depression) after risk-reducing surgery, including risk-reducing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy or risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer. METHODS We used the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) for study appraisal. Qualitative synthesis and fixed-effects meta-analysis were performed. RESULTS A total of 34 studies were included (risk-reducing mastectomy: 16 studies; risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: 19 studies; risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy: 2 studies). Health-related quality of life was unchanged or improved in 13 of 15 studies after risk-reducing mastectomy (N=986) and 10 of 16 studies after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (N=1617), despite short-term deficits (N=96 after risk-reducing mastectomy and N=459 after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy). Sexual function (using the Sexual Activity Questionnaire) was affected in 13 of 16 studies (N=1400) after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in terms of decreased sexual pleasure (-1.21 [-1.53 to -0.89]; N=3070) and increased sexual discomfort (1.12 [0.93-1.31]; N=1400). Hormone replacement therapy after premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy was associated with an increase (1.16 [0.17-2.15]; N=291) in sexual pleasure and a decrease (-1.20 [-1.75 to -0.65]; N=157) in sexual discomfort. Sexual function was affected in 4 of 13 studies (N=147) after risk-reducing mastectomy, but stable in 9 of 13 studies (N=799). Body image was unaffected in 7 of 13 studies (N=605) after risk-reducing mastectomy, whereas 6 of 13 studies (N=391) reported worsening. Increased menopause symptoms were reported in 12 of 13 studies (N=1759) after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy with a reduction (-1.96 [-2.81 to -1.10]; N=1745) in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Endocrine Symptoms. Cancer-related distress was unchanged or decreased in 5 of 5 studies after risk-reducing mastectomy (N=365) and 8 of 10 studies after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (N=1223). Risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy (2 studies, N=413) led to better sexual function and menopause-specific quality of life. CONCLUSION Risk-reducing surgery may be associated with quality of life outcomes. Risk-reducing mastectomy and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy reduce cancer-related distress, and do not affect health-related quality of life. Women and clinicians should be aware of body image problems after risk-reducing mastectomy, and of sexual dysfunction and menopause symptoms after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy may be a promising alternative to mitigate quality of life-related risks of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xia Wei
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Samuel Oxley
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michail Sideris
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ashwin Kalra
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Brentnall
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Li Sun
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Li Yang
- School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Rosa Legood
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Long-Term Non-Cancer Risks in People with BRCA Mutations following Risk-Reducing Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy and the Role of Hormone Replacement Therapy: A Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030711. [PMID: 36765666 PMCID: PMC9913268 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO) is the gold standard preventative option for BRCA mutation carriers at high risk for ovarian and breast cancer. However, when performed at the recommended ages of 35-45 years, RRBSO induces immediate premature surgical menopause, along with the accompanying adverse psychosocial, cardiovascular, bone, and cognitive health consequences. While these health consequences have been thoroughly studied in the general population, little is known about the long-term health outcomes in the BRCA population. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) until the average age of natural menopause can help mitigate these health risks, yet the initiation of HRT is a complex decision among BRCA carriers due to concern of increasing the already high risk of breast cancer in these people. This review summarizes the current research on long-term non-cancer risks in BRCA carriers following RRBSO-induced premature surgical menopause, and highlights the existing evidence in support of HRT use in this population.
Collapse
|
4
|
Climacteric symptoms in postoperative patients among endometrial cancer, cervical cancer, and ovarian cancer: a cross-sectional study. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:6785-6793. [PMID: 35526200 PMCID: PMC9213383 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07117-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To date, no studies have assessed climacteric symptoms after hystero-adnexectomy for endometrial, cervical, or ovarian cancer. Thus, this study aimed to compare climacteric symptoms among patients who underwent surgery for these three cancer types. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we interviewed patients who were registered at a menopausal outpatient clinic between January 1999 and July 2016 after undergoing total hysterectomy, intrapelvic only or intrapelvic plus para-aortic lymph node dissection, and bilateral adnexectomy performed via laparotomy as a cancer treatment. Climacteric symptoms were assessed using a patient-reported questionnaire covering core domains with five symptoms only at the initial consultation. Each symptom was graded from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). We evaluated the frequency of symptom severity according to the time elapsed since surgery and the cancer type. Results The numbers of patients with endometrial, ovarian, and cervical cancer were 328, 90, and 107, respectively. Overall, climacteric symptoms were more severe in patients with cervical cancer than in those with endometrial or ovarian cancer; symptom severity decreased with increasing time since surgery. However, symptom severity did not decrease significantly over time in patients with cervical cancer even after > 5 years had elapsed since surgery. Conclusion The climacteric symptoms were less severe in patients with endometrial or ovarian cancer with longer time elapsed since surgery but not in those with cervical cancer. Patients with cervical cancer may require more prompt interventions, including symptomatic treatment and longer follow-up period, than those with endometrial or ovarian cancer. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-07117-z.
Collapse
|
5
|
Śniadecki M, Brzeziński M, Darecka K, Klasa-Mazurkiewicz D, Poniewierza P, Krzeszowiec M, Kmieć N, Wydra D. BARD1 and Breast Cancer: The Possibility of Creating Screening Tests and New Preventive and Therapeutic Pathways for Predisposed Women. Genes (Basel) 2020; 11:genes11111251. [PMID: 33114377 PMCID: PMC7693009 DOI: 10.3390/genes11111251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Current oncological developments are based on improved understanding of genetics, and especially the discovery of genes whose alterations affect cell functions with consequences for the whole body. Our work is focused on the one of these genes, BRCA1-associated RING domain protein 1 (BARD1), and its oncogenic role in breast cancer. Most importantly, the study points to new avenues in the treatment and prevention of the most frequent female cancer based on BARD1 research. The BARD1 and BRCA1 (BReast CAncer type 1) proteins have similar structures and functions, and they combine to form the new molecule BARD1-BRCA1 heterodimer. The BARD1-BRCA1 complex is involved in genetic stabilization at the cellular level. It allows to mark abnormal DNA fragments by attaching ubiquitin to them. In addition, it blocks (by ubiquitination of RNA polymerase II) the transcription of damaged DNA. Ubiquitination, as well as stabilizing chromatin, or regulating the number of centrosomes, confirms the protective cooperation of BARD1 and BRCA1 in the stabilization of the genome. The overexpression of the oncogenic isoforms BARD1β and BARD1δ permit cancer development. The introduction of routine tests, for instance, to identify the presence of the BARD1β isoform, would make it possible to detect patients at high risk of developing cancer. On the other hand, introducing BARD1δ isoform blocking therapy, which would reduce estrogen sensitivity, may be a new line of cancer therapy with potential to modulate responses to existing treatments. It is possible that the BARD 1 gene offers new hope for improving breast cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcin Śniadecki
- Department of Gynecology, Gynecologic Endocrinology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Prof. Marian Smoluchowski Str. No. 17, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland; (M.B.); (D.K.-M.); (M.K.); (D.W.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-501-337-941
| | - Michał Brzeziński
- Department of Gynecology, Gynecologic Endocrinology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Prof. Marian Smoluchowski Str. No. 17, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland; (M.B.); (D.K.-M.); (M.K.); (D.W.)
| | - Katarzyna Darecka
- St. Adalbert’s Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, St. Jean Paul 2nd No. 50 Avenue, 80-462 Gdańsk, Poland;
| | - Dagmara Klasa-Mazurkiewicz
- Department of Gynecology, Gynecologic Endocrinology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Prof. Marian Smoluchowski Str. No. 17, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland; (M.B.); (D.K.-M.); (M.K.); (D.W.)
| | - Patryk Poniewierza
- Warsaw College of Engineering and Health, The Battle of Warsaw 1920. Str. No. 18, 02-366 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Marta Krzeszowiec
- Department of Gynecology, Gynecologic Endocrinology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Prof. Marian Smoluchowski Str. No. 17, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland; (M.B.); (D.K.-M.); (M.K.); (D.W.)
| | - Natalia Kmieć
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Clinical Center in Gdańsk, Prof. Marian Smoluchowski Str. No. 17, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland;
| | - Dariusz Wydra
- Department of Gynecology, Gynecologic Endocrinology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Prof. Marian Smoluchowski Str. No. 17, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland; (M.B.); (D.K.-M.); (M.K.); (D.W.)
| |
Collapse
|