Reliability of 30-s Chair Stand Test with and without Cognitive Task in People with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus

Effects of low-frequency vibration training on walking ability and body composition among older adults: a randomized controlled trial

Background

As life expectancy rises, age-related decline in mobility and physical function poses challenges for older adults. While traditional exercise can help, limitations and injury risks persist. This study explores low-frequency vibration training as a potential alternative to improve walking ability and body composition in older adults.

Methods

A lottery was used to randomly assign 50 participants (mean age 80.08 years) to either a vibration group (n = 25, 10 males, 15 females) or a control group (n = 25, 11 males, 14 females). While the control group continued their regular daily schedule, the vibration group completed 8 weeks of low-frequency vibration training (frequency: 4-13 Hz; amplitude: two mm), three sessions per week, with each session lasting 20-30 minutes. The walk ability was assessed using the 30-second Chair Stand Test (30-s CST), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and six-meter (six m) walk speed, while body composition was measured via body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage, and waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR).

Results

Low-frequency vibration training significantly increased walking speed in the six m walk speed (F (1,36) = 4.50, p = 0.04, η p 2 = 0.11) and TUG (z =  - 2.72, p = 0.007), compared with the control group. Observed improvements on the 30-s CST were not statistically significant (F (1,36) = 0.05, p = 0.81, η p 2 = 0.002). In the WC, the effect of time (F (1,36) = 7.19, p = 0.01, η p 2 = 0.16) was significant. The main effect of the group for HC (F (1,36) = 0.06, p = 0.80, η p 2 = 0.002) and WHR (F (1,36) = 2.00, p = 0.16, η p 2 = 0.05) were not significant, but the interaction effects for HC (F (1,36) = 6.37, p = 0.01, η p 2 = 0.15) and WHR (F (1,36) = 9.08, p = 0.005, η p 2 = 0.20) were significant. However, the intervention showed no statistically significant effects on BMI and body fat percentage.

Conclusion

Low-frequency vibration training significantly enhanced walking speed and WHR in older adults. This low-intensity intervention is especially beneficial for those with exercise limitations or a high risk of injury. Although its effects on BMI and body fat percentage were limited, the study offers valuable insights for developing personalized vibration training programs.

LIVING - protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of three different levels of diabetes self-management programs

BACKGROUND

In Denmark, Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) care includes diabetes self-management programs (DSMPs) delivered by municipalities. Following a successful pilot study, a DSMP was expanded to include a digital platform and flexible educational materials. While exercise therapy is recognized as essential in T2D management, high-quality studies on DSMPs incorporating exercise are limited. This trial assesses the (cost)effectiveness of three interventions with escalating intensity, hypothesizing that higher intensity enhances diabetes management competence and reduces complication risk.

METHODS/DESIGN

A pragmatic randomized controlled trial will assess three different DSMP interventions in six Danish municipalities acting as trial sites. Each site will implement one of three versions of Lev Livet: a short version (SLL), a full version (FLL), or the full version with high intensity exercise (FLL + H). At each site, 48 participants will be randomly assigned (2:1) to intervention or control groups. Primary outcome is perceived competence in diabetes (questionnaire). Other outcomes measure physical activity level (accelerometer),HbA1c, disease progression, physical function, and self-reported metrics. The trial is approved by the Danish National Center for Ethics (case no 1-10-72-107-23) and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06091501).

DISCUSSION

The LIVING trial has the potential to establish whether the Lev Livet program is effective and cost effective and how it can be implemented in municipalities. By analyzing dose-response relationships, the trial may refine intervention frequency and intensity, improve diabetes management, and inform both national and international guidelines for accessible, effective diabetes care.

Inter-Session Reliability of Functional Performance and Muscle Power in Adults With Severe Obesity

Reliable and sensitive testing of physical function is crucial for assessing the effects of treatment or exercise intervention in various patient populations. The present study investigated the test-retest reliability and sensitivity (smallest detectable difference: SDD) of selected physical performance tests commonly used in clinical rehabilitation, including tests of habitual and maximal walking speed, walking endurance capacity, handgrip strength (HGS), and lower limb muscle power (Sit-to-Stand (STS), stair climb) in adults with severe obesity meeting the criteria for bariatric surgery. Thirty-two adults (BMI 43.8 ± 6.6 kg/m2) were enrolled in the study. Participants were assessed in three separate test sessions performed at the same time of day (±2 h) separated by 3 to 7 days. Habitual and maximal walking speed, walking endurance capacity, lower limb muscle power evaluated by stair climb and STS performance, and HGS demonstrated good-to-excellent inter-session reproducibility (ICC: 0.84-0.98, CV and SEM: 2.9%-11.3%) with individual sensitivity (SDD) ranging from 11.8% to 31.2%. Systematic learning effects from test session 1-2 were observed for the STS test and the 3- and 10-m habitual walk speed tests, manifested by increases of 6%-9%, 7%, and 3%, respectively (p < 0.05). Performing a familiarization session (test 1) fully prevented these learning effects (test 2 vs. 3). A majority of physical function tests showed improved reproducibility and sensitivity after the familiarization session. In conclusion, physical function can be assessed in a reliable manner in adults with severe obesity. Further, familiarization sessions prior to actual testing result in improved test-retest reliability and increased sensitivity.

Effects of a carbohydrate-reduced high-protein diet delivered with meal kits to Danish people with type 2 diabetes: protocol for a 12-month randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The cornerstone in the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is lifestyle modification including a healthy diet, typically one in which carbohydrate provides 45%-60% of total energy intake (E%). Nevertheless, systematic reviews and meta-analyses of trials with low carbohydrate diets (which are increased in protein and/or fat) for T2D have found improved glycaemic control in the first months relative to comparator diets with higher carbohydrate content. Studies lasting ≥1 year are inconclusive, which could be due to decreased long-term dietary adherence. We hypothesise that glucometabolic benefits can be achieved following 12 months of carbohydrate-restricted dieting, by maximising dietary adherence through delivery of meal kits, containing fresh, high-quality ingredients for breakfast, dinner and snacks, combined with nutrition education and counselling.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol describes a 12-month investigator-initiated randomised controlled, open-label, superiority trial with two parallel groups that will examine the effect of a carbohydrate-reduced high-protein (CRHP) diet compared with a conventional diabetes (CD) diet on glucometabolic control (change in glycated haemoglobin being the primary outcome) in 100 individuals with T2D and body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m2. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive either the CRHP or the CD diet (comprised 30/50 E% from carbohydrate, 30/17 E% from protein and 40/33 E% from fat, respectively) for 12 months delivered as meal kits, containing foods covering more than two-thirds of the participants' estimated daily energy requirements for weight maintenance. Adherence to the allocated diets will be reinforced by monthly sessions of nutrition education and counselling from registered clinical dietitians.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial has been approved by the National Committee on Health Research Ethics of the Capital Region of Denmark. The trial will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Results will be submitted for publication in international peer-reviewed scientific journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05330247.

PROTOCOL VERSION

The trial protocol was approved on 9 March 2022 (study number: H-21057605). The latest version of the protocol, described in this manuscript, was approved on 23 June 2023.

The reliability and validity of the 30-second chair stand test and modified four square step test in persons with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The 30-second Chair Stand Test (30s-CST) and Modified Four Square Step Test (mFSST) are used to determine the functional status of individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). No other studies have demonstrated the reliability and validity of the 30s-CST and mFSST.

PURPOSE

To identify the test-retest reliability, concurrent validity and the known-group validity of the 30s-CST and mFSST in persons with MS.

METHODS

A total of 64 persons with MS were enrolled. 30s-CST, mFSST, Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) and Five Times Sit to Stand (FTST) tests were performed. 30s-CST and mFSST were conducted again one-hour later.

RESULTS

The mean age of the persons with MS were 37.9±11.3 years. The test-retest reliability of the 30s-CST and mFSST were excellent (ICC30s-CST = 0.974, 95%CI: 0.95-0.98; ICCmFSST = 0.992, 95%CI: 0.98-0.99). The 30s-CST was strongly correlated with FTST and TUG (r1 = -0.871, p1 = 0.0001; r2 = -0.741,p2 = 0.0001). There was a strong relationship between mFSST with TUG and FTST (r1 = 0.781,p1 = 0.0001;r2 = 0.788,p2 = 0.0001). The SEM95 and MDC95 values of the 30s-CST and mFSST were 0.41/1.13 and 0.34/0.94, respectively. Besides, there were significant differences between the persons with or without fall history in 30s-CST (MD: 1.66, CI: 0.27 to 3.05, p = .019) and mFSST CST (MD:-2.70, CI: -4.73 to -0.67, p = .010) performances.

CONCLUSION

The 30s-CST and mFSST are both valid and reliable in mildly-disabled individuals with MS.

Agreement between tele-assessment and face-to-face assessment of 30-s sit-to-stand test in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

The globalization of healthcare systems, and the aim to lower healthcare costs have all contributed to the growth of telehealth technology in recent years. However, before these systems are put into use, their efficacy should be verified. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study focusing on the evaluation of functional exercise capacity using the 30-s sit-to-stand (30-s STS) test as a tele-assessment method in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

AIMS

The purpose of the study is to investigate the level of agreement between tele-assessment and face-to-face assessment of 30-s STS test in patients with T2DM.

METHODS

Fifty participants performed two times 30-s STS tests separated by 1 h: a face-to-face and an Internet-connected video call examination (tele-assessment). Two physiotherapists conduct these evaluations; each was blinded to the other. The order of the evaluations was designated at random for each participant and physiotherapist.

RESULTS

There was a good level of agreement between tele-assessment and face-to-face assessment of the 30-s STS test (mean differences = 0.20 ± 0.88, limits of agreement = 1.93 to - 1.53). Excellent interrater reliability was found for scores of the 30-s STS test [ICC = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88; 0.96)]. In addition, all before and after test parameters show that there was a very good interrater reliability (ρ ≥ 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows a good level of agreement between tele-assessment and face-to-face assessment of the 30-s STS test. Our study's findings indicate that tele-assessment is a potential application to determine the level of physical capacity remotely in patients with T2DM.

Which field test should be used to compare the functional exercise capacities of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without diabetic peripheral neuropathy? Cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The 6-minute step test (6MST) has begun to be used as a simple and effective alternative for assessing functional exercise capacity. There is no study using 6MSTs to evaluate the exercise capacities of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) with and without diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cardiorespiratory responses of the 6-minute walk test (MWT) and the 6MST exercise tests and to analyze the usability of the 6MST in Type 2 DM patients with and without neuropathy.

METHODS

32 non-neuropathic Type 2 DM, 32 neuropathic Type 2 DM patients, and 30 healthy volunteers were included in this cross-sectional study. Functional exercise capacity was evaluated with the 6MWT and the 6MST. The 30-second sit-stand test (30s STS) was used to evaluate general lower extremity muscle strength and function.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the results of 6MWT (m), 6MST (number of steps), and 30s STS of the three groups (p<0.05). The 6MST results of patients with neuropathic Type 2 DM were significantly lower than those of non-neuropathic diabetics and those who were healthy (number of steps; 114.07±25.57 vs. 133.48±33.57 vs. 160.35±28.52, respectively) (p=0.001). The change in cardiorespiratory response in systolic blood pressure, heart rate, perceived dyspnea, and leg fatigue severity was significantly higher at 6MST than 6MWT in the three groups (p<0.05). 6MST was correlated with 6MWT (r=0.679, p=0.001), and 30s STS (r=0.589, p=0.001) in patients with Type 2 DM.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiorespiratory responses increased more in 6MST compared to 6MWT. In patients with Type 2DM, 6MWT and 6MST were moderately correlated with each other. 6MST is an effective and safe assessment method that may better reveal the differences in functional exercise capacity between neuropathic and non-neuropathic individuals in clinics.

Arterial stiffness expressed as brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and gait assessment independent of lower extremity strength: a cross-sectional study in the older men population

BACKGROUND

Older men are more vulnerable to fatal falls than women, and gait disturbances contribute to the risk of falls. Studies have assessed the association between arterial stiffness and gait dysfunction, but the results have been inconclusive. This study aimed to conduct a cross-sectional analysis to evaluate the association between brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) and gait assessment in older men.

METHODS

Data from the 2014-2015 Korea Institute of Sport Science Fitness Standards project were used for the analysis. The inclusion criteria were men aged > 65 years with gait assessment [the 30-s chair stand test (30s-CST), the timed up and go (TUG) test, the figure-of-8 walk (F8W) test, the 2-min step test (2MST), and the 6-min walk test (6MWT)] and baPWV measurement data. Generalized linear regression analysis was conducted with multiple confounding factor adjustments, including lower extremity isometric strength.

RESULTS

A total of 291 participants were included in the analysis. The mean age was 71.38 ± 4.40 years. The mean values were as follows: (1) 30s-CST, 17.48 ± 5.00; (2) TUG test, 6.01 ± 1.10 s; (3) F8W test, 25.65 ± 4.71 s; (4) 2MST, 102.40 ± 18.83 per 2 min; and (5) 6MWT, 500.02 ± 85.65 m. After multivariable adjustment, baPWV was associated with the 6MWT (β = -0.037, 95% CI: -0.072--0.002), TUG test (β = 0, 95% CI: 0.000-0.001), and F8W test (β = 0.002, 95% CI: 0.000-0.004). baPWV was not associated with the 30s-CST and 2MST.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study showed a statistically significant association between gait assessments and arterial stiffness, independent of lower extremity strength. However, this association was modest. Future prospective studies are needed to elucidate the complex relationship between arterial stiffness and gait dysfunction.

Validity of the 30-Second Sit-to-Stand test as a measure of lower extremity function in persons with multiple sclerosis: Preliminary evidence

BACKGROUND

The 30-Second Sit-To-Stand (30SSTS) is a quick, inexpensive, safe, and widely used clinical measure of lower extremity function. To date, there is limited evidence regarding the use of 30SSTS in multiple sclerosis (MS). The purpose of this study was to examine the construct validity of the 30SSTS test in persons with MS compared with non-MS healthy controls.

METHODS

Twenty ambulatory persons with MS and twenty age- and sex-matched healthy controls completed the 30SSTS, Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), Timed Up and Go (TUG), Six-Minute Walk (6MW), and Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ). Persons with MS also completed the Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) and 12-item MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12).

RESULTS

Persons with MS had significantly worse performance on the TUG (mean difference [95% confidence interval] = 1.4 [0.5, 2.3] sec) and 6MW (-259.2 [-450.8, -67.6] ft), but not on the 30SSTS (-1.6 [-1.5, 4.6] reps) and T25FW (-0.59 [-0.1, 1.2] ft/sec) compared with controls. There were significant moderate-to-strong correlations between the 30SSTS with T25FW, TUG, and 6MW scores in persons with MS (r = 0.48, -0.65 and 0.61, respectively), whereas the 30SSTS was only significantly associated with 6MW scores (r = 0.43) in controls. The 30SSTS was negatively associated with MS-related walking disability assessed by the PDDS and MSWS-12 (r_s = -0.52 and -0.64, respectively), but was not significantly associated with the GLTEQ in MS and controls (r = 0.30 and 0.17, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study provides initial support for the construct validity of the 30SSTS as a measure of lower extremity function in persons with MS. Our findings warrant the inclusion of the 30SSTS as a feasible and valid measure of physical function in clinical research and practice involving persons with MS.

Effect of exercises according to the circadian rhythm in type 2 diabetes: Parallel-group, single-blind, crossover study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of structured exercise appropriate the circadian rhythm in terms of blood sample test (BST), functionality and quality of life (QoL) in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a parallel-group, single-blind, crossover study. Thirty individuals with type 2 diabetes aged 35-65 years were enrolled in the study and allocated into 2 groups as the Morning Chronotype (MC) Group (n = 15) and the Evening Chronotype (EC) Group (n = 15) using Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire which was used to determine the chronotypes. Participants were evaluated in terms of BST, functionality and QoL at the beginning of the study (T0), at 6 (T1), 12 (T2), and 18 (T3) weeks after the study started. A structured exercise program for 3 days a week over 6 weeks was applied in accordance with the chronotypes (T1-T2) and cross-controlled for the chronotypes (T2-T3). Significant differences were found in favor of the exercise given at the appropriate time for the chronotype in all parameters in both groups within groups (T0-T1-T2-T3) (p < 0.05). In the time∗group interactions, exercise in accordance with the appropriate chronotype in both groups provided the highest statistical improvement in all parameters (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that structured exercise performed at the appropriate time for chronotype improves HbA_1c, fasting blood glucose, HDL-LDL cholesterol, triglyceride, total cholesterol, functionality and quality of life in type 2 diabetes. This variation in blood values was observed to reflect the quantitative effects of exercise administered according to the circadian rhythm in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04427488). The protocol of the study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04427488).

Association between 30-s Chair Stand-Up Test and Anthropometric Values, Vibration Perception Threshold, FHSQ, and 15-D in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Simple Summary

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a chronic global disease with a series of complications that lead to problems in the somatosensory system, the cardiovascular system, health-related quality of life, foot health, and even balance. These balance problems arise from deficits in lower limb strength, among other causes. The 30-s chair stand-up test is a test that evaluates leg strength and is an easy, quick, inexpensive, and predictive test of different parameters. How this test relates to health-related quality of life, vibration sensitivity threshold, and foot health has not been studied. This study tests the degree of the relationships of the 30-s chair stand-up test with the 15-dimensional (15-D) questionnaire, Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ), vibration sensitivity threshold, and body composition questionnaires.

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic, worldwide disease affecting more than 400 million people. This pathology involves several associated problems, such as diabetic neuropathy complications, obesity, and foot problems, both in terms of health and sensitivity. Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the relationships of the 30-s chair stand-up test with the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ), the vibration perception threshold (VPT), and the 15-dimensional (15-D) questionnaire in T2DM people. Methodology: Ninety participants with T2DM were assessed in terms of fat mass percentage, VPT, foot health, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and the 30-s chair stand-up test. Results: The 30-s chair stand-up test was found to exhibit a moderate relationship with “physical activity” (rho = 0.441; p ≤ 0.001) and “vigor” (rho = 0.443; p ≤ 0.001) from FHSQ. The 30-s chair stand-up test was also found to be weakly associated with foot pain (rho = 0.358; p = 0.001), 15-D total score (rho = 0.376; p ≤ 0.001), “sleeping” (rho = 0.371; p < 0.001), and “depression” (rho = 0.352; p = 0.001). Conclusions: The 30-s chair stand-up test is associated with “physical activity”, “vigor”, and “foot pain” from the FHSQ and the 15-D questionnaire total score and its dimensions “sleeping” and “depression” in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Therefore, following the results obtained, qualified clinicians can use the 30-s chair stand-up test as a good tool for monitoring and managing type 2 diabetes.

Effects of neuromuscular training compared to classic strength-resistance training in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

The aim of the present clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of neuromuscular versus classical strength-resistance training as part of a cardiac rehabilitation programme in patients following acute coronary syndrome. The study is designed as a double-blinded, randomised, and controlled clinical trial. Thirty participants suffering from acute coronary syndrome who meet our inclusion criteria will be recruited by a private tertiary hospital. The intervention group will follow 20 sessions of a cardiac rehabilitation programme divided into two parts: aerobic training and neuromuscular strength-resistance training. The control group will complete the same aerobic training as well as a classical strength-resistance training workout programme. The primary outcome of the study will be the mean difference in change from baseline in the Incremental Shuttle Walking Test. The secondary outcomes will be the cardiorespiratory fitness of the patients (assessed by means of the Chester Step Test), lower-limb performance (assessed with the 30-Second Chair Stand Test and Single-Leg Squat Test), lower-limb strength (hip flexor handheld dynamometry), sexual dysfunction assessment (Sex Health Inventory for Men) and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). This work will provide evidence for the effectiveness of a neuromuscular versus a classic strength-training programme in terms of cardiorespiratory fitness, lower-limb performance capacities and quality of life, in cardiac patients. The data obtained could lead to more effective and functional workouts which, in turn, may enhance the speed at which these patients can return to their everyday activities of life and improve the efficiency of their movement patterns and heart responses. Furthermore, patients may find neuromuscular workout routines more motivating and engaging, thus encouraging them to adopt healthier lifestyle patterns.