Healthcare Workers and Manual Patient Handling: A Pilot Study for Interdisciplinary Training

Human Posture: Concept Analysis With Roy's Model Using Walker and Avant's Approach

The significance of human posture extends beyond mere body stance to its profound impact on long-term physical well-being. Guided by the Roy adaptation model and Walker and Avant's approach, in this paper the author presents a concept analysis of posture, which resulted in a proposed explanatory theory of postural functional status. By identifying attributes of posture (alignment, adaptation, and awareness), its antecedents (body parts, force of gravity, and musculoskeletal system), and consequences, this concept analysis offers fresh ideas to promote and shape postural future in nursing, wellness, and public health, with an aim to sustain the quality-of-life for individuals of all ages.

Work restrictions among healthcare providers in a northern Italian public academic hospital: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Reduced work capacity in public hospitals has organizational repercussions, given the aging population, the shortage of healthcare workers, and the greater demand for healthcare services. In this study, we analysed the characteristics of staff assessed as "fit with restrictions" at a public academic hospital in northern Italy. We also aimed to identify individual and work-related variables that may be associated with the probability and timing of being "fit with restrictions".

METHODS

In this single-center observational study, sociodemographic data from staff employed in the Department of Healthcare Professions at our institution were analyzed using logistic regression to assess any associations between staff characteristics and the probability of being "fit with restrictions". Additionally, a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was fitted to investigate the potential association between staff characteristics and the timing of their first assessment as "fit with restrictions".

RESULTS

The study population was 2251 employees of which 18.4% (415/2251) were "fit with restrictions"; 56.1% (233/415) of nursing staff had at least one restriction, whereas 72.3% (300/415) of staff with restrictions had a permanent restriction. Sex was not associated with the probability of being "fit with restrictions" (odds ratio [OR] 0.75, 95%CI: 0.55 to 1.03). However, the probability was 22.9% lower (95%CI: 14.1% to 31.8%) for rehabilitation and technical healthcare staff compared to that of nurses and midwives. The Cox model showed an increase in the hazards of being "fit with restrictions" by a factor of 1.30 (95%CI: 1.02-1.68) for females.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of nursing staff face mobility and posture restrictions, with older hires and greater seniority associated with higher probabilities of restrictions. These findings underscore the importance of addressing aging and workplace conditions in the public healthcare sector, particularly considering differences across job profiles and sex.

Manual handling and back pain among health care professionals in neurological inpatient and outpatient settings: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

The number of patients with neurological disorders and severe disability is increasing globally. These patients often need help with positioning and the amount of support varies with their level of impairment. High rates of work-related musculoskeletal disorders are observed among healthcare professionals (HCP) with patient contact due to injuries during manual handling. There is insufficient research on manual handling by nurses and other HCP.

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of this study was to explore manual handling strategies by HCP in neurological inpatient and outpatient settings. A secondary aim was to explore pain during and post manual handling activities.

DESIGN

A convergent parallel mixed methods design.

METHODS

A quantitative survey was combined with qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews of HCP. The inclusion criteria were licensed allied HCP with at least seven years of experience with neurological patients in inpatient and/or outpatient settings and expertise in manual handling. Exclusion criteria included insufficient proficiency in German and pre-existing illness prior to start of professional education. The survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics and interviews were evaluated through inductive-reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Ten nurses, 10 occupational, 12 physiotherapists participated. Survey findings showed moderate time pressure, body strain, and low back and neck pain during patient transfers. HCPs spent an average of 7.3 (± 5.5) hours per week on personal endurance and strength training. They considered transfer aids moderately important and accessible, predominantly using the transfer board. Interdisciplinary collaboration in patient transfers was reported as crucial and usually available. We identified three themes from interviews: (1) individualised manual handling; (2) facilitating active patient participation during transfers; (3) maintaining personal physical fitness.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurological symptoms, patient fears, and goal setting necessitated personalised transfer strategies. Patient characteristics, lack of space and time complicated transfers, prompting HCPs to use perception-oriented techniques, leverage, gravity, and momentum.

The Risk Assessment of Patient Handling in Hospitals of Northeast of Iran

The study aim was to determine the risk of Manual patient handling (MPH) in Shahroud public hospitals, Iran. A cross-sectional study was performed in Imam Hossein (IHospital) and Bahar (BHospital) with 21 wards. MPH risk assessment was performed using MAPO (Movement and Assistance of Hospital Patient) index. The ratio of operator to disabled patient (NC/Op and PC/Op), lifting, minor aid, wheelchair, environmental, and training factor are evaluated to calculate MAPO index. Among studied wards 57%, 33.3%, and 9.5%, respectively, were in the high, moderate, and low risk exposure level. The maximum MAPO score were 16.7 in CCU of IHospital. Emergency ward of BHospital had the highest score of 9.8 and PC/OP ratio 17.5. The most risk factors were minor aid (90.5%), lifting factor (71.4%), and PC/OP (66.7%). Immediate ergonomic action is recommended.

Efficacy of Interventions in Reducing the Risks of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are prevalent among healthcare professionals, including nurses, therapists, doctors, and paramedics, due to the potential injuries incurred during patient transfer and handling. This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of existing interventions in reducing the risks of WMSDs in this population.

METHODS

Four databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and ScienceDirect were searched to identify randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials, as well as studies with pre-post design. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies using the Effective Public Health Practice Project criteria. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain quantitative results.

RESULTS

A total of 40 studies were included in the review. Among the interventions, motorized assistive devices showed the most significant relative reduction in WMSD risks (p < .0000; standardized mean difference [SMD] = -3.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [-4.53, -2.12]), followed by combined interventions of cognitive and exercise (p < .0001; SMD = -0.62, 95% CI = [-0.91, -0.33]), combined intervention of cognitive and assistive device intervention (p = .02; SMD = -0.77, 95% CI = [-1.42, -0.12]), nonmotorized assistive device (p = .02; SMD = -0.63, 95% CI = [-1.15, -0.12]), cognitive intervention (p < .0001; SMD = -0.62, 95% CI = [-0.91, -0.33]), and physical exercise (p = .06; SMD = -0.16, 95% CI = [-0.32, 0.00]) intervention.

CONCLUSION

The overall evidence indicates that interventions have a significant effect in reducing the risk of WMSDs among healthcare workers, with motorized assistive devices showing the most promising results. The findings from this review can provide valuable guidance for hospital administrators, policymakers, and other experts in implementing effective strategies to prevent WMSDs among healthcare professionals.

Manual patient handling in the healthcare setting: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Manual patient handling is the most frequently reported risk factor for work related musculoskeletal disorders in healthcare. Patient handling tasks are routinely performed manually without assistive devices and can create awkward postures and high loads for nurses and allied health professionals (AHPs). However, AHPs, notably physiotherapists, also utilize therapeutic handling to facilitate patient movement during rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVES

To comprehensively map the literature surrounding manual patient handling (without assistive devices) by healthcare practitioners.

METHODS

AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, and EMBASE databases were searched. Grey literature was sourced from Google Scholar, EThOS, Open Grey, Health and Safety Executive, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and Work Safe Australia. Literature published in English between 2002 and 2021 was included.

RESULTS

Forty-nine records were included: 36 primary research studies, 1 systematic review and 12 'other' including narrative and government reports. Primary research was predominantly observational cross-sectional (n = 21). The most common settings included laboratories (n = 13) and hospitals (n = 13). Seven research questions were identified, with patient handling practices (n = 13) the most common. Nurses formed the largest practitioner population (n = 13) and patients were often simulated (n = 12). Common outcomes included tasks performed (n = 13) and physical demands during patient handling (n = 13).

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

This comprehensive scoping review identified that most research was observational, investigating nurses in hospitals or laboratories. More research on manual patient handling by AHPs and investigation of the biomechanics involved in therapeutic handling is needed. Further qualitative research would allow for greater understanding of manual patient handling practices within healthcare. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.

Interventions to prevent and reduce work-related musculoskeletal injuries and pain among healthcare professionals. A comprehensive systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are among the main causes of injury and pain in healthcare professionals. Previous reviews provided a fragmented view of the interventions available for WMSDs. This review aims to provide a comprehensive description of interventions for preventing and reducing work-related musculoskeletal injuries and/or pain among healthcare professionals, and to assess the methodological quality of studies.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed, based on the Effective Public Health Practice Project process. A comprehensive search was conducted on six peer-reviewed databases and manually. The methodological quality of the studies included was rated as weak, moderate, or strong. The studies were organized based on the 2019 classification of the interventions by Oakman and colleagues.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven articles were included reporting individual (n = 4), task-specific (n = 4), work organization and job design (n = 2), work environment (n = 1), and multifactorial (n = 16) interventions. Overall quality rating was strong for 6 studies, moderate for 16, and weak for 5. Individual interventions such as neuromuscular and physical exercise were effective in reducing pain. Task-specific and work organization interventions could prevent certain injuries. Significant reduction of both injuries and pain resulted from multifactorial interventions, which were reported by the majority of strong (n = 5) and moderate (n = 10) quality articles.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides healthcare professionals with evidence-based information to plan interventions targeted towards reducing WMSDs. In particular, more efforts are needed to implement and extend effective multifactorial interventions. Moreover, studies about each professional healthcare target group are needed.

PRACTICAL APPLICATION

Our results can guide policy-makers, healthcare managers and professionals to choose the best strategies to prevent and reduce WMSDs and to shape continuous education programs. This study prompts clinicians to develop inter-professional collaborations and to practice physical activities in order to reduce WMSDs.

Assessing Risks Awareness in Operating Rooms among Post-Graduate Students: A Pilot Study

Background: In this study, we promote a global approach to occupational risk perception in order to improve occupational health and safety training programs. The study investigates the occupational risk perception of operating room healthcare workers using an Analytic Hierarchy Process approach. Methods: A pilot study was carried out through a cross-sectional survey in a university hospital in Southern Italy. An ad hoc questionnaire was administered to enrolled medical post-graduate students working in the operating room. Results: Fifty medical specialists from seven fields (anaesthetists, digestive system surgeons, general surgeons, maxillofacial surgeons, thoracic surgeons, urologists, and gynaecologists) were questioned about perceived occupational risk by themselves. Biological, ionizing radiation, and chemical risks were the most commonly perceived in order of priority (w = 0.300, 0.219, 0.210). Concerning the biological risk, gynaecologists unexpected perceived this risk as less critical (w = 0.2820) than anaesthesiologists (w = 0.3354), which have the lowest perception of the risk of ionizing radiation (w = 0.1657). Conclusions: Prioritization methods could improve risk perception in healthcare settings and help detect training needs and perform sustainable training programs.