|
1
|
Čandrlić M, Tomas M, Matijević M, Kačarević ŽP, Bićanić M, Udiljak Ž, Butorac Prpić I, Miškulin I, Čandrlić S, Včev A. Regeneration of Buccal Wall Defects after Tooth Extraction with Biphasic Calcium Phosphate in Injectable Form vs. Bovine Xenograft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Dent J (Basel) 2023; 11:223. [PMID: 37754343 PMCID: PMC10528832 DOI: 10.3390/dj11090223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Bone healing after tooth extraction may be affected by defects of the alveolus buccal wall, such as fenestrations and dehiscences. Therefore, to minimize dimensional changes it is advisable to perform alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extractions. Different biomaterials are used for this purpose. The aim of this study was to investigate the qualitative and quantitative histological changes in human biopsies taken after 6 months of healing of extraction sockets with buccal wall defects. For this purpose, the defects of 36 patients (18 per group) were treated with injectable biphasic calcium phosphate (I-BCP) or bovine xenograft (BX) after extraction. After six months of healing, biopsies were taken and proceeded to the histology laboratory. No evidence of an inflammatory response of the tissue was observed in the biopsies of either group, and the newly formed bone (NB) was in close contact with the remaining biomaterial (BM). The histomorphometric results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the mean percentage of NB (p = 0.854), BM (p = 0.129), and soft tissue (p = 0.094). To conclude, both biomaterials exhibited osteoconductivity and biocompatibility and achieved satisfactory bone regeneration of buccal wall defects after tooth extraction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marija Čandrlić
- Department of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.Č.); (M.T.); (M.B.); (Ž.U.); (I.B.P.)
| | - Matej Tomas
- Department of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.Č.); (M.T.); (M.B.); (Ž.U.); (I.B.P.)
| | - Marko Matijević
- Community Healthcare Center of Osijek-Baranja County, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia;
| | - Željka Perić Kačarević
- Department of Anatomy, Histology, Embriology, Pathology Anatomy and Pathology Histology, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia;
- Botiss Biomaterials GmbH, 15806 Zossen, Germany
| | - Marijana Bićanić
- Department of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.Č.); (M.T.); (M.B.); (Ž.U.); (I.B.P.)
| | - Žarko Udiljak
- Department of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.Č.); (M.T.); (M.B.); (Ž.U.); (I.B.P.)
| | - Ivana Butorac Prpić
- Department of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.Č.); (M.T.); (M.B.); (Ž.U.); (I.B.P.)
| | - Ivan Miškulin
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia;
| | - Slavko Čandrlić
- Department of Interdisciplinary Areas, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Crkvena 21, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia;
| | - Aleksandar Včev
- Department of Pathophysiology, Physiology and Immunology, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Čandrlić M, Tomas M, Karl M, Malešić L, Včev A, Perić Kačarević Ž, Matijević M. Comparison of Injectable Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and a Bovine Xenograft in Socket Preservation: Qualitative and Quantitative Histologic Study in Humans. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23052539. [PMID: 35269686 PMCID: PMC8910217 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23052539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
This study is the first histologic evaluation of an injectable biphasic calcium phosphate (IBCP) in humans six months after socket preservation according to the principles of guided bone regeneration. After tooth extraction, the alveolar ridge of 21 patients was augmented with IBCP (maxresorb® inject) in the test group, while 20 patients in the control group received a bovine xenograft (BX) (cerabone®). Six months after augmentation, a reentry procedure was performed to collect biopsies of regenerated bone for qualitative and quantitative histologic analysis. A total of 20 biopsies were taken for analysis. Qualitative histologic analysis showed complete integration of the biomaterial and no inflammatory tissue reaction, indicating the biocompatibility of the bone grafts and the surrounding tissue in both groups. Histomorphometric analysis showed comparable results in terms of newly formed bone (IBCP: 26.47 ± 14.71%, BX: 30.47 ± 16.39%) and residual biomaterial (IBCP: 13.1 ± 14.07%, BX: 17.89 ± 11.81%), with no significant difference found across groups (p > 0.05, Mann—Whitney U test). Statistical significance between groups was found in the result of soft tissue percentage (IBCP: 60.43 ± 12.73%, BX: 51.64 ± 14.63%, p = 0.046, Mann—Whitney U test). To conclude, IBCP and BX showed good osteoconductivity and biocompatibility with comparable new bone formation six months after alveolar ridge preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marija Čandrlić
- Department of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.Č.); (M.T.); (M.K.)
- Faculty of Medicine Osijek, J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
| | - Matej Tomas
- Department of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.Č.); (M.T.); (M.K.)
| | - Matej Karl
- Department of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.Č.); (M.T.); (M.K.)
- Faculty of Medicine Osijek, J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
- Private Dental Practice Matej Karl, Prilaz Vilka Ivekovića 1, 31511 Belišće, Croatia
| | - Lucija Malešić
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia;
| | - Aleksandar Včev
- Department of Pathophysiology, Physiology and Immunology, Faculty of Dental medicine and Health Osijek, J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia;
| | - Željka Perić Kačarević
- Department of Anatomy, Histology, Embriology, Pathology Anatomy and Pathology Histology, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
- Correspondence: (Ž.P.K.); (M.M.)
| | - Marko Matijević
- Community Healthcare Center of Osijek-Baranja County, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
- Correspondence: (Ž.P.K.); (M.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Tomas M, Čandrlić M, Juzbašić M, Ivanišević Z, Matijević N, Včev A, Cvijanović Peloza O, Matijević M, Perić Kačarević Ž. Synthetic Injectable Biomaterials for Alveolar Bone Regeneration in Animal and Human Studies. Materials (Basel) 2021; 14:ma14112858. [PMID: 34073551 PMCID: PMC8197881 DOI: 10.3390/ma14112858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
After tooth extraction, the alveolar ridge undergoes dimensional changes. Different bone regeneration biomaterials are used to reduce bone loss. The aim of this article was to systematically review the literature on the effect of injectable synthetic biomaterials and their advantages and disadvantages for new bone formation in the maxilla and mandible in animals and humans. A literature search was conducted in November 2020 via MEDLINE PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase. Of the 501 records screened, abstract analysis was performed on 49 articles, resulting in 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Animal studies have shown heterogeneity in terms of animal models, follow-up time, composition of the injectable biomaterial, and different outcome variables such as bone–implant contact, newly formed bone, and peri-implant bone density. Heterogeneity has also been demonstrated by human studies. The following outcomes were observed: newly formed bone, connective tissue, residual injectable bone graft substitute, radiographic density, residual bone height, and different follow-up periods. Further studies, especially in humans, based on the histological and biomechanical properties of the injectable delivery form, are needed to draw more concrete conclusions that will contribute to a better understanding of the benefits of this type of biomaterials and their role in bone regeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matej Tomas
- Department of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.T.); (M.Č.); (M.J.); (Z.I.); (N.M.)
- Interdisciplinary University Study of Molecular Biosciences, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia
| | - Marija Čandrlić
- Department of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.T.); (M.Č.); (M.J.); (Z.I.); (N.M.)
- Faculty of Medicine Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia
| | - Martina Juzbašić
- Department of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.T.); (M.Č.); (M.J.); (Z.I.); (N.M.)
- Interdisciplinary University Study of Molecular Biosciences, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia
| | - Zrinka Ivanišević
- Department of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.T.); (M.Č.); (M.J.); (Z.I.); (N.M.)
| | - Nikola Matijević
- Department of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.T.); (M.Č.); (M.J.); (Z.I.); (N.M.)
- Interdisciplinary University Study of Molecular Biosciences, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia
| | - Aleksandar Včev
- Department of Pathophysiology, Physiology and Immunology, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia;
| | - Olga Cvijanović Peloza
- Department of Anatomy, Medical Faculty of the University of Rijeka, 51 000 Rijeka, Croatia;
| | - Marko Matijević
- Department of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.T.); (M.Č.); (M.J.); (Z.I.); (N.M.)
- Correspondence: (M.M.); (Ž.P.K.)
| | - Željka Perić Kačarević
- Department of Anatomy, Histology, Embriology, Pathology Anatomy and Pathology Histology, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia
- Correspondence: (M.M.); (Ž.P.K.)
| |
Collapse
|