Higher Prevalence of Dementia but No Change in Total Comfort While Dying among Nursing Home Residents with Dementia between 2010 and 2015: Results from Two Retrospective Epidemiological Studies

Comfort nursing theory on the postoperative rehabilitation quality and nursing satisfaction of patients with intracranial aneurysm

To explore the influence of comfort nursing theory on the postoperative rehabilitation quality of patients with intracranial aneurysms. From October 2017 to December 2022, 315 patients with intracranial aneurysms underwent interventional surgery in our hospital were included in this retrospective study and divided into the routine group (n = 105) and comfort nursing group (n = 210) based on different nursing methods. The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was used to assess patient rehabilitation outcomes. Patients' anxiety, pain, quality of life, and their satisfaction with treatment were compared. Compared with the patients receiving routine nursing, the time for comfortable nursing patients to resume normal diet, get out of bed and exercise, and the total hospital stay were significantly shortened. And the GOS score of patients receiving comfort nursing was significantly higher than that of patients receiving routine nursing. After nursing, self-rating anxiety scale and visual analog scale scores of comfortable nursing patients were significantly lower than those of routine nursing, and Karnofsky performance status scores were significantly higher than those of routine nursing. This showed that receiving comfortable nursing was beneficial to improve perioperative anxiety and depression in patients with intracranial aneurysm, and significantly improve the quality of life of patients. The total satisfaction of comfortable nursing patients was 95.24%, while that of routine nursing patients was 76.19%. Complications occurred in 30 patients receiving routine nursing, while only 15 patients received comfort nursing. The immune indexes such as CD3+, CD4+, and CD23+ of comfortable nursing patients were significantly higher than the routine nursing patients within 1 and 5 days after operation, while the immune indexes of CD8+ were lower than the routine nursing patients 5 days after operation. Comfortable nursing from the perspective of quality nursing can significantly improve the physiological indicators of patients with intracranial aneurysms, accelerate the progress of postoperative rehabilitation, improve the anxiety, pain and quality of life of patients, and improve the satisfaction of patients with nursing. Comfort nursing from the perspective of quality nursing can reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, which may be achieved by improving the patient's immune function.

Nursing-sensitive quality indicators for quality improvement in Norwegian nursing homes - a modified Delphi study

BACKGROUND

Use of nursing-sensitive quality indicators (QIs) is one way to monitor the quality of care in nursing homes (NHs). The aim of this study was to develop a consensus list of nursing-sensitive QIs for Norwegian NHs.

METHODS

A narrative literature review followed by a non-in-person, two-round, six-step modified Delphi survey was conducted. A five-member project group was established to draw up a list of nursing-sensitive QIs from a preliminary list of 24 QIs selected from Minimum Data Set (2.0) (MDS) and the international Resident Assessment Instrument for Long-Term Care Facilities (interRAI LTCF). We included scientific experts (researchers), clinical experts (healthcare professionals in NHs), and experts of experience (next-of-kin of NH residents). The experts rated nursing-sensitive QIs in two rounds on a seven-point Likert scale. Consensus was based on median value and level of dispersion. Analyses were conducted for four groups: 1) all experts, 2) scientific experts, 3) clinical experts, and 4) experts of experience.

RESULTS

The project group drew up a list of 20 nursing-sensitive QIs. Nineteen QIs were selected from MDS/interRAI LTCF and one ('systematic medication review') from the Norwegian quality assessment system IPLOS ('Statistics linked to individual needs of care'). In the first and second Delphi round, 44 experts (13 researchers, 17 healthcare professionals, 14 next-of-kin) and 28 experts (8 researchers, 10 healthcare professionals, 10 next-of-kin) participated, respectively. The final consensus list consisted of 16 nursing-sensitive QIs, which were ranked in this order by the 'all expert group': 1) systematic medication review, 2) pressure ulcers, 3) behavioral symptoms, 4) pain, 5) dehydration, 6) oral/dental health problems, 7) urinary tract infection, 8) fecal impaction, 9) depression, 10) use of aids that inhibit freedom of movement, 11) participation in activities of interest, 12) participation in social activities, 13) decline in activities of daily living, 14) weight loss, 15) falls, and 16) hearing loss without the use of hearing aids.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary experts were able to reach consensus on 16 nursing-sensitive QIs. The results from this study can be used to implement QIs in Norwegian NHs, which can improve the quality of care.

How Long-Term Care Quality Measures Address Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias in European Countries

OBJECTIVES

Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) are prevalent conditions in long-term care homes (LTCHs) with most LTCH residents living with ADRD in many countries. Despite the prevalence of ADRD in LTCHs, a recent examination of LTCH quality measurement programs in 4 countries revealed few LTCH quality measures addressed ADRD, most commonly as a risk adjuster. We sought to better understand how quality measurement programs address ADRD internationally.

DESIGN

International comparative analysis.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We examined LTCH quality measures in 4 European countries-Germany, Switzerland, Belgium, and the Netherlands.

METHODS

The specifications to calculate each measure were assessed to determine whether the measure was calculated without assessing for ADRD, included only residents with ADRD, excluded residents with ADRD, or was risk adjusted for the presence of ADRD among the LTCH residents.

RESULTS

A total of 143 measures were examined across 4 quality measurement programs. Thirty-seven percent of the measures explicitly address ADRD. The programs addressed ADRD in starkly different ways. In Germany, most (13 of 15) measures addressed ADRD, and did so as an exclusion or inclusion criterion, and in Switzerland all the measures addressed ADRD through risk adjustment. In Flanders, Belgium, all measures were calculated without assessing for ADRD. In the Netherlands, one-third of the measures explicitly addressed ADRD by restricting the measure to psychogeriatric units.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Although limited to examining measures from LTCH quality measurement programs in 4 European countries, this study adds evidence that ADRD tends not to be addressed by LTCH quality measures, but when ADRD is addressed, it tends to be through inclusion or exclusion criteria. LTCH regulators, policymakers, and providers can use this information to assess options for addressing ADRD in quality measurement programs. Future research is needed to assess how standard indicators of ADRD care quality differ across quality measurement programs.