Time-Use and Mental Health in Older Adults: A Scoping Review

Translation, validation, and reliability of the Modified Occupational Questionnaire into Bahasa Melayu among older persons in Malaysia

INTRODUCTION

A Modified Occupational Questionnaire (MOQ) is a self-report questionnaire that records the occupational engagement of an individual hourly, focusing on activity category, reason for doing the activity, value to self, and value to society. Understanding the patterns of occupational engagement and meaningful time use in older persons is crucial for predicting physical and psychological health and establishing occupation-based interventions to support healthy aging. However, the MOQ, originally developed in an English-speaking country and may potentially be less suitable for Malaysian older persons, who are predominantly Malay-speaking and have distinct cultural adaptations. This study aimed to translate the MOQ from English to Bahasa Melayu and evaluate its validity and reliability among older persons in Malaysia.

METHODS

The translation, validation, and reliability assessment process followed guidelines from the World Health Organization, with adaptations from Sousa and Rojjanasrirat's recommendations. The process encompassed five steps: forward translation, harmonisation of the forward translation, backward translation, pretesting and cognitive interviews, and psychometric testing to assess the validity and reliability.

RESULTS

The Malay version of the MOQ (MOQ-M) demonstrated excellent item-level face validity index (I-FVI) and average scale-level face validity index (S-FVI/Ave), both scoring a perfect 1.00. Additionally, it exhibited excellent item-level content validity index (I-CVI) and average scale-level content validity (S-CVI/Ave), with scores ranging from 0.90 to 1.00 and 0.99 to 1.00, respectively. Internal consistency, measured using Cronbach's alpha, surpassed the minimum threshold for good reliability, with all three average scales in MOQ-M scoring between 0.84 and 0.99. Weighted average Cohen's Kappa coefficient revealed substantial agreement in the test-retest reliability across the three scales.

CONCLUSION

The MOQ-M is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing meaningful time use among Malay-speaking older persons in Malaysia.

CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

There was no consumer and community involvement in this study.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

This study aimed to translate the Modified Occupational Questionnaire (MOQ) into Bahasa Melayu (MOQ-M). The MOQ is a tool used by occupational therapists to understand how unemployed people spend their time and the reasons they are doing it. The translation was necessary because the original version of the MOQ was developed in an English-speaking country and might not be suitable for the Malay-speaking population in Malaysia due to cultural differences. A careful process was followed to make sure the translation was accurate and reliable. The translated version, MOQ-M, was then tested with older persons, most of whom were unemployed, to learn about their daily activities and the reasons for doing them. Understanding their daily routines is important for predicting their health and well-being. The results showed that the MOQ-M worked well, providing useful and consistent information. This means that the tool is reliable and can be trusted to measure how older persons spend their time and what activities are important to them. With this information, programmes can be created to better support older persons, helping them live healthier and happier lives as they age. However, it is important to note that most of the study participants were Malay, so this may not fully represent the different cultural groups in Malaysia.

Contributions of a time use perspective in community mental health practice: a scoping review

Introduction

Time use is an important indicator of health and well-being. Exploration of time use can provide in-depth information about individuals' activity patterns including routines and structure, the experience of activities, personal priorities and challenges. People experiencing severe mental illness may be at particular risk for time use patterns associated with poor health and wellbeing.

Methods

This scoping review aimed to identify and map the evidence about how a time use perspective informs assessment and intervention in community mental health practice. Electronic databases and hand-searches were used to identify relevant studies involving people with severe mental illness, and focused on time use applications in practice. Twenty-nine studies were included in this review, data-extracted and synthesized with reference to the review question.

Results

Of the twenty-nine identified studies, seven described development and psychometric testing of time use assessments; twelve used time use tools to measure outcomes; and ten described or evaluated time use intervention approaches. The identified time use assessments typically involved retrospective diaries completed before or during structured interviews, and an Experience Sampling Method using smart technology to gather activity data in real time. Both psychosocial and occupational interventions used time use to measure outcomes relevant to activity engagement, social functioning, and personal recovery. The identified time use interventions originated in occupational therapy; included structured manuals and workbooks to enable reflection on daily time use; individual or group sessions to collaborate in identifying priorities, goal planning and supporting desired changes to activity patterns. These interventions were viewed favorably overall, with improved activity engagement, quality of life, and personal recovery reported.

Discussion

Time use assessments evaluate outcomes of importance to personal recovery and community inclusion. Time use interventions address activity patterns associated with poor health and wellbeing, using collaborative and supported activity engagement approaches, and contribute to emerging evidence on interventions that support personal recovery. Furthering peer involvement in developing and delivering these interventions will bring important insights to time use practice and research, while the social forces that marginalize or constrain activity participation for people with severe mental illness also need to be addressed to advance time use and other approaches that aim to support community inclusion.

"You Need to Set a Daily Schedule": Understanding Successful Aging via Three-Sided Viewpoints

This study aimed to identify the constructs related to successful aging in the context of engagement in social and productive activities. A qualitative design was used to explore three viewpoints on the aging period with 9 focus groups (3 each for adults 65 years or older, older adults' family members, and health professionals) and 18 interviews with older adults (older adults Mage = 71.7 years, Standard Deviation = 4.62). The transcripts were analyzed using constructivist grounded theory principles. Three categories were identified for successful aging: (a) engagement with life, including social participation, fixed/flexible schedule, time, and meaningful occupation; (b) self-management abilities, including producing daily schedules, independence, and initiation/striving toward goals; and (c) diversity among older adults, including their views on retirement, being active or not, and their dreams/values/goals. Considering the diverse nature of older adults, recognizing the importance of life engagement and self-management abilities emphasizes the necessity for an occupation-based, self-tailored approach to enable successful aging.