1
|
Dearfield CT, Ulfers M, Horn K, Bernat DH. Resident Support for the Federally Mandated Smoke-Free Rule in Public Housing: 2018-2022. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 21:102. [PMID: 38248565 PMCID: PMC10815862 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21010102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
This study examines support for the Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) mandatory smoke-free rule up to four years post-rule among smokers and non-smokers. A repeated cross-sectional design was used where District of Columbia public housing residents aged 18+ (n = 529) completed surveys during three time points: July 2018 (pre-rule), November 2018-March 2020 (post-rule), and September 2020-December 2022 (post-rule + COVID-19). Full support for the rule was indicated by agreeing that smoking should not be allowed in all indoor locations and within 25 feet of buildings. Descriptive statistics showed significant differences in support across time for smokers (5.3%, 30.7%, and 22.5%, respectively) and similar support across time for nonsmokers (48.2%, 52.2%, and 40.0%, respectively). In unstratified regression analysis, pre-rule support was lower than when the rule was in effect (aOR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.25, 0.90), and tobacco users were less likely to support the rule (aOR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.23, 0.50). Stratified logistic regression results showed that pre-rule support was lower among smokers compared to post-rule support (aOR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.03, 0.59); support among nonsmokers did not vary by time. Findings overall indicate low support for the smoke-free rule up to 4 years post-implementation. Engaging residents with the rule and promoting health and well-being may further enhance policy effectiveness and acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig T. Dearfield
- Department of Epidemiology, The Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA; (M.U.); (D.H.B.)
| | - Margaret Ulfers
- Department of Epidemiology, The Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA; (M.U.); (D.H.B.)
| | - Kimberly Horn
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Virginia Tech-Carilion Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA;
| | - Debra H. Bernat
- Department of Epidemiology, The Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA; (M.U.); (D.H.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hernandez D, Khan F, Albert D, Giovenco D, Branas C, Valeri L, Navas-Acien A. A randomized control trial to support smoke-free policy compliance in public housing. Trials 2023; 24:551. [PMID: 37608390 PMCID: PMC10463922 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07339-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoke-free housing policies in multiunit housing are increasingly widespread interventions to reduce smoking and secondhand smoke exposure. Little research has identified factors that impede compliance with smoke-free housing policies in low-income multiunit housing and test corresponding solutions. METHODS We are using an experimental design to test two compliance support interventions: (A) a "compliance through reduction (via relocation and reduction in personal smoking) and cessation" intervention targets households with smokers and involves support to shift smoking practices to areas beyond the apartment or building setting, reduce personal smoking, and deliver in-residence smoking cessation support services via trained peer educators and (B) a "compliance through resident endorsement" intervention involving voluntary adoption of smoke-free living environments through personal pledges, visible door markers, and/or via social media. We will compare randomly sampled participants in buildings that receive A or B or A plus B to the NYCHA standard approach. DISCUSSION This RCT addresses key gaps in knowledge and capitalizes on key scientific opportunities by (1) leveraging the federal mandate to ban smoking in a public housing system of more than sufficient size to conduct an adequately powered RCT; (2) expanding our understanding of smoke-free policy compliance beyond policy implementation by testing two novel treatments: (a) in-residence smoking cessation and (b) resident endorsement, while (3) addressing population and location-specific tobacco-related disparities. At the conclusion of the study, this RCT will have leveraged a monumental policy shift affecting nearly half a million NYC public housing residents, many of whom disproportionately experience chronic illness and are more likely to smoke and be exposed to secondhand smoke than other city residents. This first-ever RCT will test the effects of much-needed compliance strategies on resident smoking behavior and secondhand smoke exposure in multiunit housing. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials Registered, NCT05016505. Registered on August 23, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Hernandez
- Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA.
| | - Farzana Khan
- Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA
| | - David Albert
- Health Policy and Management, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA
| | - Daniel Giovenco
- Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA
| | - Charles Branas
- Epidemiology, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA
| | - Linda Valeri
- Biostatistics, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA
| | - Ana Navas-Acien
- Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dearfield CT, Choi K, Vivino A, Horn K, Ahluwalia JS, Crandell I, Bernat EM, Bernat DH. Are excluding e-cigarettes a loophole in the smokefree public housing rule? Prev Med Rep 2023; 31:102069. [PMID: 36483578 PMCID: PMC9722475 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) required all Public Housing Authorities to become smokefree in July 2018, following an 18-month implementation period that began February 2017. The HUD rule included all combustible tobacco products; e-cigarettes were not included. This purpose of this study is to characterize e-cigarette use overall and initiation after the implementation of the smokefree rule among tobacco users living in public housing. Data were collected from 396 adult (18+ years) current tobacco users at the time of rule implementation residing in the District of Columbia Housing Authority between July 2018 and November 2021. Measures include e-cigarette use, age of initiation, reasons for e-cigarette use, e-cigarette use susceptibility (among non-users), and sociodemographic characteristics. Descriptive and crosstab statistics were calculated to characterize e-cigarette use. Nearly-one-quarter of tobacco users reported lifetime use of e-cigarettes (24 %, n = 95) and 4.8 % (n = 19) indicated past 30-day e-cigarette use. Of the lifetime users, twenty-two (23.2 %) initiated their use after the smoke-free rule went into effect, with only two of those residents indicating they did so because of the rule. Of those who never used an e-cigarette, 23.5 % (n = 70) indicated being curious about e-cigarettes and 10.7 % (n = 40) said they may use e-cigarettes in the next year. Results indicate low use of e-cigarette products and low uptake due to the rule. Few tobacco users who never used e-cigarettes indicated intentions to use. Results suggest that omitting e-cigarettes from the HUD rule has not led to significant use of these products in this sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig T. Dearfield
- The George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Kelvin Choi
- Division of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Anthony Vivino
- The George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Kimberly Horn
- Virginia Tech-Carilion Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| | - Jasjit S. Ahluwalia
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Legorreta Cancer Center, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Ian Crandell
- Virginia Tech-Center for Biostatistics and Health Data Sciences, Roanoke, VA, United States
| | | | - Debra H. Bernat
- The George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dearfield CT, Horn K, Crandell I, Bernat DH. Behavioural intentions in response to a potential menthol cigarette sales ban: a survey examining smokers in Washington, DC public housing. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e059821. [PMID: 35831050 PMCID: PMC9280868 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Local, national and international policies are being proposed to ban the sale of menthol-flavoured tobacco products. With more bans being implemented, it is increasingly important to understand reactions to these bans among smokers of low socioeconomic status. This study examined public housing residents' behavioural intentions if menthol-flavoured cigarettes were no longer sold. SETTING 15 District of Columbia Housing Authority properties between March 2019 and March 2021. PARTICIPANTS 221 District of Columbia Housing Authority residents ages 18-80 years who reported smoking menthol cigarettes (83.3% African-American/black). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES Cigarette quitting and switching intentions due to a hypothetical menthol-flavoured cigarette sales ban. RESULTS Nearly one-half (48.0%) of residents said they intended to quit cigarette use if menthol-flavoured products were no longer sold, while 27.2% were unsure if they would quit, and 24.9% reported they would not quit. Older residents (OR 0.94 per year, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.97), senior/disabled building versus family building residents (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.97), those who smoked within 30 min of waking (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.98) and daily smokers (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.84) had lower odds of reporting quit intentions associated with a menthol ban. Of those not intending to quit, 40.7% reported they would switch to non-menthol cigarettes, 20.4% to another non-menthol product, 13.0% to menthol e-cigarettes and 20.4% to another menthol product. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest banning the sale of menthol-flavoured products has the potential to impact cigarette smoking cessation. Nearly three-quarters of smokers in public housing indicated a possibility of quitting smoking because of a menthol cigarette ban. Bans that include all flavours in all tobacco products may be most effective for facilitating overall tobacco cessation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig T Dearfield
- Epidemiology, The George Washington University Milken Institute of Public Health, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Kimberly Horn
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Virginia Tech-Carilion Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| | - Ian Crandell
- Department of Statistics, Center for Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| | - Debra H Bernat
- Epidemiology, The George Washington University Milken Institute of Public Health, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sabado-Liwag M, Zamora M, El-Toukhy S. Current state of unhealthy living characteristics in Black/African American and Latino populations: Tobacco use. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2022; 71:27-36. [PMID: 35490867 PMCID: PMC10699915 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2022.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Over the past six decades, the United States has significantly improved tobacco-related health outcomes through mass efforts in policies, research, and behavioral and clinical interventions. Disparities persist, however, among communities of color who continue to suffer disproportionate rates of cardiovascular disease and other tobacco-related morbidity and mortality. In this review, we synthesize and discuss the tobacco use lifecycle across the lifespan, with special attention paid to socioecological determinants of tobacco-use behavior among Blacks and Latinos. This review summarizes the permeability of tobacco use and tobacco-related determinants across multiple levels of influence, from the individual to the societal, and highlights gaps in the tobacco control and prevention landscape. Given its continued evolution and impact on socially disadvantaged communities, we conclude with recommendations for improving current tobacco research and treatment and prevention efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Sabado-Liwag
- Department of Public Health, California State University, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
| | - Mayra Zamora
- Department of Public Health, California State University, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Sherine El-Toukhy
- Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Horn K, Dearfield CT, Beth Johnson S, Krost K, Rincon Gallardo Patino S, Gray T, Crandell I, Bernat DH. Smoking cessation intentions and attempts one year after the federally mandated smoke-free housing rule. Prev Med Rep 2021; 24:101600. [PMID: 34976657 PMCID: PMC8683937 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study examines public housing residents' smoking cessation intentions, expectancies, and attempts one year after implementation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development's mandatory smoke-free rule in public housing. The sample includes 233 cigarette smokers, ages 18-80, who reside in the District of Columbia Housing Authority. Data collection occurred between March and August 2019. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, and Wilcoxon two-sample test analyses assessed smoking cessation intentions, expectancies, and attempts across resident demographics and characteristics. Findings showed 17.2% of residents reported not thinking about quitting, 39.1% reported thinking about quitting, and 48.6% reported thinking about quitting specifically because of the rule. Residents ages 60-80 were more likely to consider quitting because of the rule, compared to residents ages 18-59. Of those thinking of quitting, 58.6% were sure they could quit if they tried. Those thinking of quitting due to the rule (62.0%) were more likely to have made at least one quit attempt in the past 3 months than those i not attributinging thinking of quitting to the rule. Res Residents trying to quit reported an average of 2.7 attempts in the last 3 months;; most perceived evidence-based cessation supports as not helpful. A A majority reported thinking about quitting and attempting to quit but continuing to smoke, indicating a significant gap between intent to quit and successfully quitting. Results suggest that the rule positively influenced smoking behaviors. However, additional interventions are needed to assist public housing residents with successfully quitting smoking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Horn
- Virginia Tech-Carilion Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Craig T. Dearfield
- The George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sallie Beth Johnson
- Radford University Carilion, Department of Public Health and Healthcare Leadership, Roanoke, VA, USA
- Virginia Tech Carilion, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA
| | - Kevin Krost
- Virginia Tech-Carilion Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | | | - Tiffany Gray
- Virginia Tech-Carilion Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Ian Crandell
- Virginia Tech-Center for Biostatistics and Health Data Sciences, Roanoke, VA, USA
| | - Debra H. Bernat
- The George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|