1
|
Pathak N, Zhang CX, Boukari Y, Burns R, Menezes D, Hugenholtz G, French RS, Gonzalez-Izquierdo A, Mathur R, Denaxas S, Hayward A, Sonnenberg P, Aldridge RW. Sexual and reproductive health and rights of migrant women attending primary care in England: A population-based cohort study of 1.2 million individuals of reproductive age (2009-2018). J Migr Health 2024; 9:100214. [PMID: 38327760 PMCID: PMC10847991 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2024.100214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Evidence on the sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) of migrants is lacking globally. We describe SRHR healthcare resource use and long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) prescriptions for migrant versus non-migrant women attending primary care in England (2009-2018). Methods This population-based observational cohort study, using Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD, included females living in England aged 15 to 49. Migration was defined using a validated codelist. Rates per 100 person years at risk (pyar) and adjusted rate ratios (RRs) were measured in migrants versus non-migrants for consultations related to all-causes, six exemplar SRHR outcomes, and LARC prescriptions. Proportions of migrants and non-migrants ever prescribed LARC were calculated. Findings There were 25,112,116 consultations across 1,246,353 eligible individuals. 98,214 (7.9 %) individuals were migrants. All-cause consultation rates were lower in migrants versus non-migrants (509 vs 583/100pyar;RR 0.9;95 %CI 0.9-0.9), as were consultations rates for emergency contraception (RR 0.7;95 %CI 0.7-0.7) and cervical screening (RR 0.96;95 %CI 0.95-0.97). Higher rates of consultations were found in migrants for abortion (RR 1.2;95 %CI 1.1-1.2) and management of fertility problems (RR 1.39;95 %CI 1.08-1.79). No significant difference was observed for chlamydia testing and domestic violence. Of 1,205,258 individuals eligible for contraception, the proportion of non-migrants ever prescribed LARC (12.2 %;135,047/1,107,894) was almost double that of migrants (6.91 %;6,728/97,364). Higher copper intrauterine devices prescription rates were found in migrants (RR 1.53;95 %CI 1.45-1.61), whilst hormonal LARC rates were lower for migrants: levonorgestrel intrauterine device (RR 0.63;95 %CI 0.60-0.66), subdermal implant (RR 0.72;95 %CI 0.69-0.75), and progesterone-only injection (RR 0.35;95 %CI 0.34-0.36). Interpretation Healthcare resource use differs between migrant and non-migrant women of reproductive age. Opportunities identified for tailored interventions include access to primary care, LARCs, emergency contraception and cervical screening. An inclusive approach to examining health needs is essential to actualise sexual and reproductive health as a human right.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neha Pathak
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, NW1 2DA, UK
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, WC1E 6JB, UK
- Guy's & St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Claire X. Zhang
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, NW1 2DA, UK
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Yamina Boukari
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Rachel Burns
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Dee Menezes
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Gregory Hugenholtz
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Rebecca S French
- Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Rohini Mathur
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Spiros Denaxas
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, NW1 2DA, UK
- BHF Data Science Center, Health Data Research UK, London, NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Andrew Hayward
- Inclusion Health, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
- Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Pam Sonnenberg
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, WC1E 6JB, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bozorgmehr K, McKee M, Azzopardi-Muscat N, Bartovic J, Campos-Matos I, Gerganova TI, Hannigan A, Janković J, Kállayová D, Kaplan J, Kayi I, Kondilis E, Lundberg L, Mata IDL, Medarević A, Suvada J, Wickramage K, Puthoopparambil SJ. Integration of migrant and refugee data in health information systems in Europe: advancing evidence, policy and practice. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2023; 34:100744. [PMID: 37927430 PMCID: PMC10625017 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Coverage of migrant and refugee data is incomplete and of insufficient quality in European health information systems. This is not because we lack the knowledge or technology. Rather, it is due to various political factors at local, national and European levels, which hinder the implementation of existing knowledge and guidelines. This reflects the low political priority given to the topic, and also complex governance challenges associated with migration and displacement. We review recent evidence, guidelines, and policies to propose four approaches that will advance science, policy, and practice. First, we call for strategies that ensure that data is collected, analyzed and disseminated systematically. Second, we propose methods to safeguard privacy while combining data from multiple sources. Third, we set out how to enable survey methods that take account of the groups' diversity. Fourth, we emphasize the need to engage migrants and refugees in decisions about their own health data. Based on these approaches, we propose a change management approach that narrows the gap between knowledge and action to create healthcare policies and practices that are truly inclusive of migrants and refugees. We thereby offer an agenda that will better serve public health needs, including those of migrants and refugees and advance equity in European health systems. Funding No specific funding received.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayvan Bozorgmehr
- Department of Population Medicine & Health Services Research, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
- Section Health Equity Studies & Migration, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Lancet Migration European Hub
| | - Martin McKee
- European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London, UK
- London School of Medicine & Tropical Hygiene, London, UK
| | | | | | - Ines Campos-Matos
- Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care, London, UK
| | | | - Ailish Hannigan
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Migrant’s Involvement in Health Research, School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | | | - Daniela Kállayová
- Lancet Migration European Hub
- Department of Public Health, Screening and Prevention, Ministry of Health, Slovak Republic
- Trnava University, Trnava, Slovak Republic
| | - Josiah Kaplan
- UNICEF Global Office of Research and Foresight, Florence, Italy
| | - Ilker Kayi
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Elias Kondilis
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Lene Lundberg
- Lancet Migration European Hub
- Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, Tromsø, Norway
| | | | - Aleksandar Medarević
- Institute of Public Health of Serbia 'Dr Milan Jovanovic Batut', Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Jozef Suvada
- St. Elizabeth University of Public Health and Social Work, Slovak Republic
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Diseases, Research Methods and Recommendations, and McMaster GRADE Centre, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Canada
| | - Kolitha Wickramage
- UN Migration Agency Global Data Institute, Migration Health Division, International Organization for Migration, Berlin, Germany
| | - Soorej Jose Puthoopparambil
- WHO Collaborating Centre on Migration and Health Data and Evidence, Global Health and Migration Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang CX, Boukari Y, Pathak N, Mathur R, Katikireddi SV, Patel P, Campos-Matos I, Lewer D, Nguyen V, Hugenholtz GC, Burns R, Mulick A, Henderson A, Aldridge RW. Migrants' primary care utilisation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: An interrupted time series analysis. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2022; 20:100455. [PMID: 35789753 PMCID: PMC9243519 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background How international migrants access and use primary care in England is poorly understood. We aimed to compare primary care consultation rates between international migrants and non-migrants in England before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2015-2020). Methods Using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD, we identified migrants using country-of-birth, visa-status or other codes indicating international migration. We linked CPRD to Office for National Statistics deprivation data and ran a controlled interrupted time series (ITS) using negative binomial regression to compare rates before and during the pandemic. Findings In 262,644 individuals, pre-pandemic consultation rates per person-year were 4.35 (4.34-4.36) for migrants and 4.60 (4.59-4.60) for non-migrants (RR:0.94 [0.92-0.96]). Between 29 March and 26 December 2020, rates reduced to 3.54 (3.52-3.57) for migrants and 4.2 (4.17-4.23) for non-migrants (RR:0.84 [0.8-0.88]). The first year of the pandemic was associated with a widening of the gap in consultation rates between migrants and non-migrants to 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.94) times the ratio before the pandemic. This widening in ratios was greater for children, individuals whose first language was not English, and individuals of White British, White non-British and Black/African/Caribbean/Black British ethnicities. It was also greater in the case of telephone consultations, particularly in London. Interpretation Migrants were less likely to use primary care than non-migrants before the pandemic and the first year of the pandemic exacerbated this difference. As GP practices retain remote and hybrid models of service delivery, they must improve services and ensure primary care is accessible and responsive to migrants' healthcare needs. Funding This study was funded by the Medical Research Council (MC_PC 19070 and MR/V028375/1) and a Wellcome Clinical Research Career Development Fellowship (206602).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire X. Zhang
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Rd, London NW1 2DA, United Kingdom
- Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care, 39 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0EU, United Kingdom
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, United Kingdom
| | - Yamina Boukari
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Rd, London NW1 2DA, United Kingdom
- Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care, 39 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0EU, United Kingdom
| | - Neha Pathak
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Rd, London NW1 2DA, United Kingdom
- Guy's & St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Rohini Mathur
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom
| | - Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi
- MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Berkeley Square, 99 Berkeley Street, Glasgow G3 7HR, United Kingdom
| | - Parth Patel
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Rd, London NW1 2DA, United Kingdom
| | - Ines Campos-Matos
- Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care, 39 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0EU, United Kingdom
- UK Health Security Agency, Wellington House, 133–155, Waterloo Road, London SE1 8UG, United Kingdom
| | - Dan Lewer
- Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom
| | - Vincent Nguyen
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Rd, London NW1 2DA, United Kingdom
- Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom
| | - Greg C.G. Hugenholtz
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Rd, London NW1 2DA, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Burns
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Rd, London NW1 2DA, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Mulick
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom
| | - Alasdair Henderson
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom
| | - Robert W. Aldridge
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Rd, London NW1 2DA, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|