Association of Hyperuricemia with Impaired Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Preserved Kidney Function: Analysis of the POL-AF Registry Cohort

Uric acid is a biomarker for heart failure, but not therapeutic target: result from a comprehensive meta-analysis

AIMS

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between serum uric acid (SUA) levels and the incidence rate and prognosis of heart failure (HF), as well as the impact of uric acid-lowering treatment on HF patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

PubMed and Embase were searched for original articles reporting on the association between SUA and HF incidence, adverse outcomes, and the effect of uric acid-lowering treatment in HF patients. Data were pooled using random effects or fixed effects models. Univariable meta-regression analysis assessed the influence of study characteristics on research outcomes. Statistical analyses were conducted using RevMan software and STATA software version 15.0. Eleven studies on HF incidence and 24 studies on adverse outcomes in HF patients were included. Higher SUA levels were associated with an increased risk of HF (RR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.53-2.16), all-cause mortality (RR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.25-1.66), cardiac death (RR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.32-1.84), and HF rehospitalization (RR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.37-3.13) in HF patients. Uric acid-lowering treatment was found to increase all-cause mortality in HF patients (RR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05-1.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Uric acid is an independent predictor of heart failure occurrence and adverse prognosis. Targeting uric acid lowering as a therapeutic intervention does not improve the prognosis of patients with heart failure. It may not be advisable to use traditional urate-lowering drugs in young patients with heart failure, and elderly patients should exercise caution when using them.

Worsening Renal Function and Adverse Outcomes in Patients with HFpEF with or without Atrial Fibrillation

Since worsening renal function (WRF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) often coexist in preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), we aimed to investigate the effect of WRF on the prognosis of HFpEF patients with and without AF. The study population of this study (n = 1763) was based on the subset of the Americas in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial (TOPCAT). We found that the cumulative probabilities of the primary composite outcome and cardiovascular death were significantly higher in AF patients post-WRF when compared to non-AF patients. In the time-dependent Cox proportional hazard model, WRF was significantly associated with higher risks of adverse outcomes (primary composite outcome: HR = 1.58 (95% CI, 1.19-2.11); all-cause death: HR = 1.50 (95% CI, 1.10-2.06); cardiovascular death: HR, 2.00 (95% CI, 1.34-3.00)) after adjustments for confounding factors at baseline in HFpEF patients with AF, whereas in HFpEF patients without AF, WRF was not significantly associated with any adverse outcome. p for interactions for the primary composite outcome, cardiovascular death, and AF were significant. In conclusion, these findings highlight that WRF was associated with a greater risk of the primary composite outcome, all-cause death, and cardiovascular death in HFpEF patients with AF.