Effectiveness of Dry Needling and Ischemic Trigger Point Compression in the Gluteus Medius in Patients with Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Short-Term Clinical Trial

Quantitative sensory testing and exercise-induced hypoalgesia protocols in low back pain: A scoping review

A significant driver of pain in individuals with low back pain (LBP) is alterations to endogenous pain modulation (EPM). EPM can be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST), however; there are inconsistencies in the way QST has been implemented across the low back pain literature. The objective of this scoping review was to summarize protocols used to assess EPM using QST (pain pressure threshold (PPT), temporal summation (TS), conditioned pain modulation (CPM)) or exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) in LBP. Databases Medline, Embase, CINAHL and AMED were searched on June 15, 2023, for articles that used QST or EIH protocols in LBP populations. Data was extracted on participants, study design, setting and details on QST and EIH protocols. Of the 221 studies included in the review, 196 used PPT, 62 used TS and 60 used CPM; only 5 studies investigated EIH. For all QST, there was high variability in the type of equipment, timing, trials, and testing location with many studies not reporting this information. There were 4 testing modalities used for TS, and 7 different test stimuli, and 3 different conditioning stimuli used across the studies for CPM. For CPM and EIH, PPT was the most common testing modality. There were 4 types of exercises used across the 5 EIH studies. This scoping review provides a summary of QST and EIH protocols in LBP that may be used as a guide for assessment in future studies. These results demonstrate a need for the development of standardized protocols and reporting guidelines. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents a summary of measures used to assess EPM in LBP. The results show the wide variability of protocols used in the literature. Future research should focus on creating standardized protocols, reporting guidelines and providing more guidance for researchers in selecting appropriate tests for their research questions.

Dry needling of the gluteus-medius muscle, combined with standard care, for chronic low back pain - a pilot randomized sham-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Individuals with low back pain (LBP) often exhibit weakness and the presence of trigger points in their Gluteus Medius (GMe) muscle.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effectiveness of adding dry needling (DN) for the GMe to standard care of active physical therapy in patients with chronic nonspecific LBP.

METHODS

A randomized, prospective, sham-controlled trial was conducted. Participants with chronic nonspecific LBP (N = 22, age range: 31-55 years) were randomly divided into intervention and control groups. Both groups received active physical therapy including exercises for 6 treatments. In addition, at each session, the intervention group received deep DN to their GMe muscle, and the control group received sham needling. Outcome measures included level of pain (using VAS scale), function (Oswestry disability index ODI), low back range of motion (ROM) (forward flexion and schober tests), and global rating of change. The research group was further divided into moderate and minimal disability according to the ODI.

RESULTS

The research group showed greater improvement in pain level compared with control (p = 0.01). The change in ODI was higher in the moderate LBP group compared with the control group (B = 5.25, p < 0.05). The change in forward flexion distance test was higher in the moderate disability LBP group compared with the control group (B = 6.31, p < 0.01). Simple mean analysis also revealed a significant difference between the moderate and minimal disability groups (B = 6.16, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating DN into physical therapy treatments for chronic nonspecific low back pain, can improve pain level and function.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NO

NCT04498572 (clinicaltrial.gov).

Inhibiting the JNK Signaling Pathway Attenuates Hypersensitivity and Anxiety-Like Behavior in a Rat Model of Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain

Low back pain (LBP) has become a leading cause of disability worldwide. Astrocyte activation in the spinal cord plays an important role in the maintenance of latent sensitization of dorsal horn neurons in LBP. However, the role of spinal c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) in astrocytes in modulating pain behavior of LBP model rats and its neurobiological mechanism have not been elucidated. Here, we investigate the role of the JNK signaling pathway on hypersensitivity and anxiety-like behavior caused by repetitive nerve growth factor (NGF) injections in male non-specific LBP model rats. LBP was produced by two injections (day 0, day 5) of NGF into multifidus muscle of the low backs of rats. We observed prolonged mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity in the low backs or hindpaws. Persistent anxiety-like behavior was observed, together with astrocyte, p-JNK, and neuronal activation and upregulated expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (CXCL1) proteins in the spinal L2 segment. Second, the JNK inhibitor SP600125 was intrathecally administrated in rats from day 10 to day 12. It attenuated mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity of the low back or hindpaws and anxiety-like behavior. Meanwhile, SP600125 decreased astrocyte and neuronal activation and the expression of MCP-1 and CXCL1 proteins. These results showed that hypersensitivity and anxiety-like behavior induced by NGF in LBP rats could be attenuated by the JNK inhibitor, together with downregulation of spinal astrocyte activation, neuron activation, and inflammatory cytokines. Our results indicate that intervening with the spinal JNK signaling pathway presents an effective therapeutic approach to alleviating LBP.

Treating myofascial pain with dry needling: a systematic review for the best evidence-based practices in low back pain

BACKGROUND

 Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a common source of pain in primary care or pain clinics. There are many different ways to manage and treat MPS, such as physical exercise, trigger points massage, and dry needling.

OBJECTIVE

 The objective of this overview is to highlight and discuss the evidence-based treatment of myofascial pain by dry needling in patients with low back pain.

METHODS

 A systematic review was made based on meta-analysis (MA) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to dry needling treatment for myofascial pain in patients with lumbar pain, published from 2000 to 2023.

RESULTS

 A total of 509 records were identified at first. Seventy were published before 2000, so they were excluded. From the remaining 439 studies, ninety-two were RCTs or MA, of which 86 additional studies were excluded for the following reasons: not related to dry needling treatment (n = 79), not published in English (n = 4), duplicated (n = 1), project protocol (n = 1), and not related to myofascial pain (n = 1). So, this review was based on 4 RCTs and two MA. These studies compared dry needling efficacy to other treatments, such as acupuncture, sham dry needling, laser therapy, physical therapy, local anesthetic injection, ischemic compression, and neuroscience education. Despite outcomes and follow-up period varied between them, they showed that dry needling can decrease post-intervention pain intensity and pain disability.

CONCLUSION

 Dry needling is an effective procedure for the treatment of myofascial pain in patients with acute and chronic low back pain. Further high-quality studies are needed to clarify the long-term outcomes.

Effectiveness of Dry Needling and Ischaemic Trigger Point Compression of the Levator Scapulae in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain: A Short-Term Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic neck pain (CNP) may be associated with latent myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in the levator scapulae (LS), which can be treated with ischemic compression (IC) and dry needling (DN). Variables and elastography changes are evaluated to compare the short-term efficacy of two treatments with DN.

METHODS

A randomized clinical trial is conducted with 80 participants in two groups: the DN group (n = 40) and IC group (n = 40). The duration is 12 weeks, and mechanical heterogeneity index, pressure pain threshold (PPT), and pain intensity are measured at baseline, immediately after, 48 h after, and one week after treatment.

RESULTS

Statistically significant changes were immediately observed between the two groups: PPT decreased in the DN group (p = 0.05), while it increased in the IC group. At 48 h and one week after treatment, these values increased in the DN group and remained higher than in the IC group. The heterogeneity index improved in both groups but more significantly in the DN group than in the IC group.

CONCLUSIONS

In subjects with CNP who had latent plus hyperalgesic MTrPs in the LS muscle, DN outperformed IC in PPT, pain intensity, and mechanical heterogeneity index at 48 h and one week after initiating therapy.

Pressure Pain Threshold Protocols With Pressure Algometer in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The pressure pain threshold is commonly employed to assess pain in various conditions. Despite its widespread use, the measurement of pressure pain thresholds is not consistently described across studies. Therefore, this review aimed to systematically examine the evidence regarding the assessment of pressure pain thresholds in patients with low back pain, including the protocols and body sites employed.

METHODS

Six databases were systematically screened from their earliest records to May 2023 to identify studies utilizing pressure pain thresholds. Eligibility screening was conducted for the identified studies, and the included studies underwent appraisal using the appropriate tool corresponding to their study design.

RESULTS

Upon categorizing based on the type of pain, we included 5 studies involving acute low back pain and 43 studies with chronic pain. The meta-analysis was conducted to compare subjects with and without pain, revealing no significant difference for the paraspinal region (SMD = -4.19, 95%CI = -11.7 to 3.32, z = -1.09, p = .27), piriformis (SMD = -1.24, 95%CI = -4.25 to 1.76, z = -0.81, p = .42) and quadratus lumborum musculature (SMD = -0.37, 95%CI = -1.35 to 0.60, z = -0.75, p = .45).

CONCLUSION

The paraspinal and gluteal musculature are the most frequently evaluated. Concerning the protocols for assessment, no consensus was identified. However, studies that assessed chronic low back pain typically adhered to a similar approach regarding the number of measures and a constant increase in pressure.